Obama is furious that Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu has agreed to address Congress this March without first asking Obama "Pretty please can I address Congress?"

Our Congress can invite anyone they please to speak, they don't have to get Obama's or anyone else's permission to do that. What's pissed our Asshole in Chief off so bad is that he simply doesn't want Netanyahu telling our Congress and therefor the American people what's really going on in the Middle East and especially Iran. He wants Netanyahu to stay the hell home and shut the hell up, so now he's issued a threat to the man that "There will be a price to pay for this".

Can you believe that this man is actually our President and threatens our closest ally on the planet?

"The Obama administration reportedly is fuming over Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plans to address Congress in March regarding the Iranian threat, with one unnamed official telling an Israeli newspaper he will pay “a price” for the snub." http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/01/23/there-will-be-price-obama-team-reportedly-fuming-over-netanyahu-visit/

It's NOT a snub, no one had any obligation to confer with Obama on this, none at all, and when it comes to snubs by Obama of Netanyahu, our President's uncivil behavior toward that fine man has been despicable.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Netanyahu-Israeli-Obama-spat-in-face/2015/01/23/id/620461/?ns_mail_uid=35953315&ns_mail_job=1604994_01242015&s=al&dkt_nbr=tncjidk9


I have all kinds of respect for the office of our president. But none
what so ever for Obama. I am mad as hell. And I will stay that way until this
criminal is gone from this office.

It is clear to me and most, Obama is an inept, bumbling fool. The big problem is he just might get us all k**led.
He is also a t*****r to this country and the office in which he serves.

The damage he has caused our beloved United States will take a decade or more to repair. And still the full Congress will not act on behalf of the nation at large.

I would have thought by now, the Senate and the full House would have called for his resignation.
That should be the very first thing on the agenda. Not going to happen. We can only hope. But right at this point in time I don’t see the want to get this fool out of the office.
It does appear the legislators would rather deal with a known quantity than show some backbone.

Oh we so need term limits.

RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) :hunf: :hunf: :hunf: :hunf:

Canada's list spot on





The next time any politician claims that the rich need to pay more taxes, they should clarify just who is rich. A whole lot of middle class people might be surprised. If you have a job, you are considered rich. IN GOD WE TRUST


Just makes you want to shake your head in disbelief.

This is Canada's Top Ten List of America's Stupidity

(Of course we look like i***ts ....because we are.)


Number10)

Only in America ...could politicians talk about the

greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 per plate campaign fund-raising
event.


Number9)

Only in America ...could people claim that the

government still discriminates against b***k A******ns when they
have a black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20%
of the federal workforce is black while only 14% of the
population is black. 40+% of all federal entitlements goes to
b***k A******ns - 3X the rate that go to w****s, 5X the rate that
go to Hispanics!


Number8)

Only in America ...could they have had the two people

most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (the head of
the Treasury Department) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the
Ways and Means Committee). BOTH turn out to be tax c***ts who are
in favor of higher taxes.


Number 7)

Onlyin America ...can they have terrorists k**l

people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by
fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.


Number6)

Only in America...would they make people who want to

legally become American citizens wait for years in their home
countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege,
while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country
illegally just 'magically' become American citizens (probably
should be number one).


Number5)

Only in America ....could the people who believe in

balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution
be thought of as "extremist".


Number4)

Only in America ...could you need to present a

driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to v**e.


Number3)

Only in America ...could people demand the government

investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because
the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a
major U.S. Oil company ( Marathon Oil) is less than half of a
company making tennis shoes (Nike).


Number 2)

Only in America does the IRS collect more tax dollars

from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend
a trillion dollars more than it has per year - for total spending
of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have
nearly enough money.


And Number 1)

Only in America...could the rich people- who pay

86% of all income taxes - be accused of not paying their "fair
share" by people who don't pay any income taxes at all.

By Alex Griswold | January 21, 2015
“I believe in a smarter kind of American leadership,” President Barack Obama said at one point during last night’s 2015 State of the Union address. However, according to the most-widely used measure of readability, last night’s speech was only written at a ninth-grade reading level.

The Flesch-Kincaid readability scale tests how easy it is to read a passage by weighing the total words-per-sentence and syllable-per-words. A Daily Caller analysis found the State of the Union scored a 9.4 on the grade level scale, indicating that it is easily understood by 13- to 15-year-old students.

Obama is only the latest in a long trend of dumbed-down addresses. The sophistication of the State of the Union has been on a steady decades-long decline as more and more Americans tune in. John F. Kennedy regularly gave State of the Union addresses at an undergraduate level, while Obama’s first-term average was the lowest of the televised era.

But 2015′s rating actually represents a step forward for Obama, whose first-term Flesch-Kincaid average was at the eighth-grade level. President George W. Bush on average gave the highest ranked speeches of the past five presidents, while his father George H. W. Bush set the record in 1990 for giving the only State of the Union address ranked on a seventh-grade reading level.

One-worlders at it again with their annual 'pilgrimage' to Davos....all the usual suspects should be there....and checkout the hypocritical obscene 'carbon footprint' for these shysters to travel to Davos.....

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/01/20/world-economic-forum-davos-2014-preview/4353053/
Global elite descend on Davos to 'reshape world'
Kim Hjelmgaard, USA TODAY 11:08 p.m. EST January 20, 2014
The ski resort of Davos attracts the global political and business elite each year for the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum.
ZURICH Once a year Switzerland becomes much more than the sum of its chocolate, watches and banking sector.
For several days at the end of January, presidents, prime ministers, monarchs and corporate titans jostle with actors, rock stars and major influencers for top billing at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum. The confab takes place in the Alpine village of Davos, about 90 miles southeast of Zurich, and for a brief spell each year the pristine ski resort half-sheds its Graubünden roots and becomes a ground zero for the political and business elite.
"It's a fascinating event that occurs on any number of levels," says Boston-based Nariman Behravesh, a Davos veteran and chief global economist at IHS, a consultancy.
"The top-level political leadership give their speeches, but usually they don't tell you anything you don't already know. In the open forums there are a lot of talking heads, and you kind of know what they are going to say. However, the private meetings, often in the hallways and mostly off the record, are much more interesting, with lots of good discussion. There's also the partying. You have to be careful not to overdo it," he says.
This year's speech- and workshop-packed jamboree is taking place from Jan. 22-25.
Ostensibly, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Yahoo Chief Executive Officer Marissa Mayer, actors Matt Damon and Goldie Hawn, and any number of the approximately 2,500 heads of state, entrepreneurs, CEOs, young global leaders and assorted cultural and social visionaries making the pilgrimage to Davos will talk about one thing: "The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for Society, Politics and Business" WEF founder Klaus Schwab's characteristically abstruse theme for 2014. This follows on the heel's of 2013's "Resilient Dynamism" and "The Great T***sformation: Shaping New Models," the year before that. The WEF's ambitions for the gathering operating motto: "Committed to improving the state of the world" are nothing if not lofty.
"There's room for skepticism over what people will walk away with and then achieve but that doesn't mean they shouldn't try, " says IHS' Behravesh. "How the goals t***slate into actions is a different story. The WEF can't do a lot in terms of pressuring corporations or governments. So the worry is that these things tend to dissipate soon after the forum ends," he says, adding, "The goals are great. The themes are great. It's the follow-through that hasn't really been there."
For many, an expedition to Davos and it is for most without access to helicopter service a complicated journey up the mountain involving multiple planes, trains and automobiles is all about joining the high-powered and the pioneering to talk shop about the world's ills while trudging through the snow and ice in a good pair of boots and a warm jacket. The hope is that relevant action plans for change will stick around even after the last cheese fondue meal is consumed.
But in its heart of hearts this annual exclusive accumulation of sages, captains of industry and wealthy do-gooders is really about networking. "(It's about) chasing successful people who want to be seen with other successful people," the Lebanese-American writer and academic Nassim Taleb told Bloomberg Television a few years back. "That's the game," he said.
It's also a gamble, at least in the sense that the price of entry is extraordinarily high. The basic cost of a ticket to Davos is 27,000 Swiss francs, or about $30,000. However, in order to have the privilege of even paying that immodest fee the WEF requires membership of the organization. This will set you back another $55,000 or so. Of course that's assuming you travel light sans helicopter and $100,000 chalet, for example and alone. When the Yahoos and Googles of this world show up to big international pow-wows they don't often do it on their ownsome.
While no one believes four days in and around the slopes is enough time to fix everything, there should be plenty to talk about this year. Ahead of this week's Davos kickoff the WEF released its "Global Risks 2014" report detailing what it sees as the gravest threats facing our planet over the next 11 months or so. Many of our economies remain in danger. In some countries exceptionally high unemployment is sapping the prospects of our youth. Income polarization is increasing. Already-scarce water resources are becoming scarcer. C*****e c****e remains unresolved. State collapse and internal conflict and violence are proving stubbornly resilient.
"From conflict in the Middle East, the U.S. Federal Reserve's tapering program, and tension in the South China Sea, to the 75 million unemployed young people around the world, we face a situation where the number of potential flashpoints are many and are likely to grow," WEF boss Schwab wrote in these pages recently. Speaking in a pre-meeting press conference last week, the German economist said it was time to "push the reset button" on the world.
Still, there are moments of levity, in retrospect at least, that emerge from the event in the form of predictions gone awry.
"We know where we're heading ... this is a t***sitional period, but we have a clear political path," the then and now ousted Egyptian prime minister Hesham Kandil told CNBC during last year's meeting.
"Those Google guys," Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates said of Larry Page and Sergey Brin during 2003's annual meeting. "They want to be billionaires and rock stars and go to conferences, and all that. Let us see if they still want to run the business in two to three years."
-----