if per chance you really are a socialist, I don't think you would know the t***h if it jumped up and bit you in the ass. you've been brain washed into believing that everyone should be equal, money, property, everything shared. I work pay way to much in taxes to our extortionist government, to pay there bills and give the rest to a lot of people who don't want to work. very true , some of those people waiting in line deserve a helping hand. but there are to many just being leaches to everybody else.

Yeah, I actually take the time to read these things. I don't know why.

To save time I always skip over wh**ever gloom and doom, grandiose, government grant paid for, conclusion they are making and go right to the data, bias and uncertainty and what data they excluded .

They always bury that stuff way into the report or at the end.

You can guess why. They don't want anyone to really notice it.

What pisses me off most is my tax dollars are paying for these poor studies that are being used to generate even more taxes (the carbon credit , i.e. tax scheme).

Here ya go...its herehttp://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/13

read it. (global highlights)

annual averaged temp 0.69 C. breaking the previous records by 0.04 C.

Are you following?

Now scroll all the way down to the table in the SOTC report where it reports the uncertainties.

See the ocean and land temp anomaly. Its 0.69 +/- 0.09 C. The +/- 0.09 IS THE UNCERTAINTY.

The uncertainty in the anomaly temperature is more that twice the amount it beat the record temp by that they have their panties all in a bunch about.

Can you find that?

See here. https://bobtisdale.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/figure-1-rankings.png

Its underlined in red so you can find it. It's in the original report with no red underlining.

THATS WHAT I"M TALKING ABOUT.

1.) the graph was taken from the g****l w*****g studies. Its the same graph except it shows the last 18 years which 'wamristas" are loathe to do.

2.) Read the latest study saying 2014 is the warmest year.

For example the latest NOAA report claiming 2014 was the hottest year on record. The conclusion was that 2014 To quote "was 0.69 C above the 20th century average of 13.9 C easily breaking the records of 2005 and 2010 by 0.04 C"

Now read down in the small print tucked away at the back ....the bias for that number 0. 69 C temp is +/- 0.09 C.

The temperature rise is less than half the uncertainty of the measurement they are quoting as the 'average temperature". Holy s**t.

I was a science major in college. If I turned in a paper with that conclusion based on miniscule differences with a bias that large in the original reading I would have received a failing grade.

If I tried that in Industry I would not have a client left.

Do you even read this s**t that they try to pass off as studies?

Or are you like the rest of the lemmings and just believe any crap the UN or Lame Stream Media say?

Here is a graph for you of the last 18 years.

https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/556650687577489409

This one inspires confidence.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2915061/Nasa-climate-scientists-said-2014-warmest-year-record-38-sure-right.html

In late breaking news, Climate clowns take 1700 private jets to Davos to discuss 'g****l w*****g". Heh. If they stayed home, stopped manipulating the data and just shut up, there would be a lot less CO2.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/20/1700-private-jets-fly-to-davos-to-discuss-global-warming/

They are not facts. Whenever debate comes up you guys try the same tired old meme. Shut down the debate and uncomfortable questions by Shrieking "settled science", Experts agree, etc.

The CO2 driven models are drivel. They aren't right and cannot accurately predict temps. Almost Every prediction has been wrong. The model has serious flaws.

The manipulation of data is pretty extreme.

The whole concept of man changing the temps is very questionable. Why did we have alternating hot spells and ice ages eons before man started producing any appreciable carbon footprint?

Crickets.

Is the earth warming. Probably.

Did man cause it? Probably not.

Is Co2 the cause or even a major driver? No.

That kinda puts the carbon tax scheme right into the grave and the powers that be can't be having that.