permafrost wrote:
If you fear a 100 extra v**es for the dems by i******s, what do you intend to do about v**er suppression laws, gerrymandering, intimidation and v****g locations?
V**er ID? Give me a break. Almost all of the supposedly "disenfranchised" v**ers receive some sort of government benefits which require an ID suitable for v**er ID. To suggest that these people are receiving benefits sans ID is a poorly thought through lie, believed only by the most gullible among us.
As for gerrymandering, it is mostly used at a state level, and Democrats have used it far more than Republicans. You didn't have the slightest damn problem with the practice as long as YOUR candidates were the ones reaping the benefits.
V***r f***d does not typically occur at the polls, but at registration. F**e ID's are rampant among wetbacks and many places simply don't check as closely as they should.