One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: Iggy Rat
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 44 next>>
Apr 28, 2015 09:49:24   #
(Main)
Who runs government?
Glaucon wrote:
A fact is something that is factual, true, real. A factoid is something that is false, but you want it to be true so badly you believe it is true anyway. Who are Norm and Al. Your sexual fantasies about me are d********g. Do you have any sexual fantasies about females?


Like your incorrect definition of "factiod"?
Go to
Apr 28, 2015 09:48:30   #
(Main)
Who runs government?
Glaucon wrote:
Do you have a dictionary? You can't ever think unless you know what words mean.


." Over time and common usage, factoid has assumed other meanings, particularly being used to describe a brief or trivial item of news or information." Wikipedia
Go to
Apr 28, 2015 08:48:55   #
(Main)
Rand Pauls Drunken Son
I'm white. Why didn't I get the "White Privelege Card"? That's right: it doesn't exist. NO EXCUSES! If he's not in jail, maybe it's because he showed up in court and agreed to pay his fines instead of burning down neighboring businesses.
Go to
Apr 28, 2015 06:50:14   #
(Main)
Who runs government?
Glaucon wrote:
A fact is something that is factual, true, real. A factoid is something that is false, but you want it to be true so badly you believe it is true anyway. Who are Norm and Al. Your sexual fantasies about me are d********g. Do you have any sexual fantasies about females?


Incorrect. A factoid is true but insignificant.
Go to
Apr 28, 2015 06:48:00   #
(Main)
Who runs government?
David187 wrote:
I am not so sure It is our fault, the volatility of the V**e is in question. If the V**e is Manipulated We really are the Sheep. I think the selective reporting of the Media says something. I still cannot understand Obama being Re-elected. If there is something funny, then the Congress is in question as well. I cant prove it but I can suspect our lack of representation is due to the fact we have lost control.


Yup. I suspect you're correct, but there still aren't enough of us who have realized it to make much differenct. I'm afraid the best we can hope for is to rebuild something better, something closer to what our Founders envisioned, from the ashes.
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 09:33:07   #
(Main)
conservative conundrum
the waker wrote:
Your confusing conservatives and rhinos again.
Although you are right, there is nothing conservative about the likes of Warren Buffet or George Soros.
Hey maybe they'll give all they're money to the poor.
There is a difference between giving gifts from the treasury for v**es, and taking time and money out of your OWN pocket to give to the poor.
Many would be surprised in the comparison to Liberal vs Conservative volunteer work and donations to the truly needy, not just people w/ they're hands out.
Your confusing conservatives and rhinos again. br ... (show quote)



It's funny how so many people automatically label our founding fathers "wealthy s***e-owners" or "privileged" when a lot of them, according to the histories, "died penniless".
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 08:39:13   #
(Main)
conservative conundrum
archie bunker wrote:
I failed the test. I couldn't get past the part about the government controlling every aspect of my life, taking by force from producers to give to non producers, murdering unborn humans, embracing immoral behaviors, punishing success, and rewarding failure, etc....


Ahh. That's better! I was starting to feel like I was missing something. A little touch of reality; that's what I'm hiding from!
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 08:30:27   #
(Main)
conservative conundrum
Common Sense Rebel wrote:
Actually that means you have always been a closet conservative.
Those have always been OUR values.

Glad you have finally woke up.


:thumbup:
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 08:24:58   #
(Main)
conservative conundrum
Glaucon wrote:
I have not heard any wingers suggest that there is anything more important Than money. Archie, You are beginning to talk like a reasonable person and not at all like a right wing extremist. What has happened to change your perceptions? You need to share that with some of the still crazies on this site.


He's far from the only one. Many true conservatives don't even like money. It's the politicians/ameristocracy who claim to have conservative views that skew your perception of us.


We ain't Them.
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 08:22:38   #
(Main)
conservative conundrum
archie bunker wrote:
I guess it is all in the perception Paul. I am a very rich man. I just don't have a lot of money. There is a lot more to life than money!!


:thumbup:
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 08:20:10   #
(Main)
This story is some pretty messed up stuff....
lpnmajor wrote:
That's right. V**e, just don't v**e like the sheep do - or we'll get more of the same BS we've been seeing for years and years.


V**e, Hell! I was thinking Monkey Wrench Gang!
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 08:18:29   #
(Main)
BANKS Trickery & Deceit and you're the Victim for their guessing games !
lpnmajor wrote:
We have a debt driven monetary system. Cash avoids all the fees exacted on debt t***sactions, so is anathema to the banks. Using a card for t***sactions, allows the issuer to "loan" you money for that t***saction, thus allowing them to charge many fees. Here's the thing; the merchant pays the issuer, to make the t***saction - in order to get their money for the item you bought, then YOU pay the issuer again - to complete the same t***saction. They get paid both ways.

This is how money is made. You take $1 and sell it multiple times to multiple people and take a fee each time and each direction, until shortly, the $1 is worth less than nothing. Having a debt driven economy, allows banks to do business - with NO MONEY AT ALL. It's all numbers on paper ( or hard drive ), allowing them to sell money, far in excess of actual cash reserves.

Our banking system is one giant Ponzi scheme. Should a good number of people turn in their cards, thus denying the banks that cash for t***saction fees - the banks would collapse.
We have a debt driven monetary system. Cash avoids... (show quote)


Succinct. Almost elegantly stated. Somewhat frightening.
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 05:32:29   #
(Main)
Once Again-Another Justification for Affirmative Action
KHH1 wrote:
That is a common saying by the right...although w****s who do not even meet minimal requirements and get hired through discrimination and "good ole boy" networks as the lady stated in the article. She said she was hiring white no matter how qualified the black man was. Why don't you righties acknowledge that as a part of reality? The one time I saw AA candidate stamped on a application, I was told I was the highest qualified....26yrs old with an EE degree....3.5 years of design experience at a Naval R&D facility laboratory and 2 years Enger. student intern at utility co. (Houston Lighting and Power)..with 90% of my Masters completed. I have never been underqualified for anything I applied for and most b****s think the same way knowing you are going in with skin color against you......and AA requires that all candidates meet the qualifications to even apply. If any of you really think that the lowest scoring white is higher than the highest scoring black you have been living a r****t's fantasy..Fortunately, many prominent leading organizations have no problems hiring qualified b****s based on their resume and not their color.....personally, i do not want to work with r****ts or for a r****t organization...I have too much to offer..........
That is a common saying by the right...although w*... (show quote)


That's what was said. It should be based on ABILITY not "give the job to Whitey". Why do you have to disagree? Oh. That's right: Because you're a bigot. Admit it, at least.
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 05:27:08   #
(Main)
This story is some pretty messed up stuff....
lpnmajor wrote:
If they are that upset with America, to the point where they will commit a felony ( desecrating the f**g is a felony ), then they should probably leave. It would be like getting upset with your grocery store, for not having the freshest fruit - and burning the store down. It would certainly clue folks in to the fact that you were upset, but would do nothing to solve the problem - in fact - it would only make it worse.


I thought that was the basic idea behind America. The f**g of our nation is representative of the Freedom of the citizens to make it a great nation. Or not. If the laws or officials are in need of change, even great change, it can be accomodated. Don't tread on the f**g; Change what it represents.
Go to
Apr 24, 2015 08:45:10   #
(Main)
Fracturing the world
nwtk2007 wrote:
You're right about that. The Saudis drove down the price of oil to put them out of business. Capitalism at its finest. And when they no longer pump the dirty oil, the Saudis will drive it back up. I think we need to subsidize the frackers, keep them pumping, and start the final steps toward not needing ANY outside oil. Then, flood the market with our oil and take away some of the Saudis customers.


I agree that we don't need Saudi oil, but fracking has poisoned the land in Colorado where I grew up. I've seen it with my own eyes while running a Non-Destructive Testing crew in oil and natural gas fields around the country. You want to pay big oil to poison our land and make huge profits from it?
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 44 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.