One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Winter Solstice
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 59 next>>
Aug 4, 2015 10:45:33   #
I, too, hope Trump is really serious about helping the Country out. Not that I like him, he is pretty brash, but I believe his extensive experience in business could actually be a great thing for the President.

Forkbassman wrote:
The course we're on can change with real men like Gowdy, Cruz and Carson. I'm hoping Trump's heart is right and he truly wants to help our country get back on the right track.
Go to
Aug 3, 2015 13:44:03   #
If this is true and gets passed, who will cut the pay checks? Oh wait, I know, We all work for nothing and the Government gets all the profits and distributes it equally. But then, who is the Government but people and who leads the people? We watched Lenin and Stalin take up that leadership role and we found that there were left the very rich and everyone else. Utopia just plain doesn't work and neither does c*******m. Enough said.

teaman wrote:
DON'T YOU JUST LOVE HOW STUPIDITY REIGNS IN CALIFORNICATION. THE PERFECT UTOPIAN SOCIALIST PERVERTED HELL HOLE THAT IS LOOSING PEOPLE AND BUSINESS!

The California Legislature is debating a bill that has passed through committee that would phase out hierarchy within a company. The bill is considered a landmark bill by many to eliminate what has been referred to as “wholesale oppression” of employees of a company.

Speaker of the Assembly Toni G. Atkins (D-San Diego) sponsored the bill and hailed it as the next step in equal rights for all Americans. In the State Senate, President Pro Tem Kevin De León cheered the efforts of Speaker Atkins and stated he and his caucus were fully on board. De León (D-Los Angeles) said, “No longer will workers confront the hostile environment which comes every day when they have to face being stratified in their careers.”

AB-69 details the terms which can no longer as stated in the law be used to “create a hostile work environment.” As codified in the law, the terms “supervisor, manager, overseer, team leader, leader, producer, director, controller, chair, boss, captain, head person, head honcho, authority, chief, chairperson, chairman, partner, inspector or any other term that may create a perception of inequity that an employee may perceive as harmful to their employment individuality.” Speaker Atkins stated, “This legislation in coordination with our recent law regarding bullying in the workplace will successfully create a harmonious environment for our residents which will enhance their life experience.”

The ACLU has weighed in supporting the proposal. ACLU spokesperson Jeffrey Steinberg expressed not only that the new law would be welcomed, but they feel the law will withstand any legal challenges. Steinberg stated “Our society has wrought a fearful environment for have-nots who wish to improve their economic status. Being stratified with hostile terms like supervisor or manager have created a d**g on our culture that must be halted.”

The bill created a firestorm amongst the entertainment community. The California legislature usually bends to the will of an industry which they perceive as ideologically and financially supportive, but in this case they are at loggerheads. This was caused by the inclusion of the terms producer and director in the law. Both the PGA (Producers Guild of America) and the DGA (Directors Guild of America) stated that the terms are essential to the proper operation of the production of either a movie or a television show. The guilds stated there would be mayhem on their sets. Gary Lucchesi, Co-President of the PGA “stated the California legislature thinks it can buy us off by providing us $330 million of tax credits for our productions and stealing from us our historical rights to our designations. I earned my title of producer. All I ever wanna be is a producer. This bill will steal that from me and my fellow guild members.”

The bill provides guidelines as to proper language. Some of the suggestions are buddy, comrade, crony, compatriot, chum, confidante, friend, mate, colleague, or the ubiquitous guys.

Republican leadership in both the Assembly and the State Senate stated the bill was just another nail in the coffin for California as a friendly environment for employers. They stated unfortunately because of their minority status they were unable to put a halt to the progress of the law.

The bill offers many remedies to the employees offended by any t***sgressors. The first is the state establishes mandatory classes for all companies with 10 or more employees in how to properly address all staff members. Those classes would have to be taken by all employees and must be certified to be completed within 180 days of the signing of the bill. If a company continues any offensive language, the fine is $100 per day per employee.

A spokesperson for People for The American Way (PFAW) said they were delighted with the progress the bill is making through the legislature. Senator De León gave credit to PFAW for generating wording for the legislation. Their spokesperson expressed that elected officials “would want to be on the right side of history in making this law part of the foundation of our society.” Governor Brown’s office announced if passed he would sign the legislation into law.

This legislation would certainly put California on the cutting edge of the evolution of the work environment. Workers will for the first time in history be free of being accountable to the man. There will be no more oppression in the workplace.It has been suggested this be named the Willy Loman Freedom Act. He would be proud.
DON'T YOU JUST LOVE HOW STUPIDITY REIGNS IN CALIFO... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 3, 2015 13:32:30   #
I wish we all could take a more positive attitude about the 2016 e******n. I am very hopeful that the new President (Republican of course) will slowly turn the course of this unwieldy ship. Of course, nothing outstanding will happen immediately but by mid-terms there should be some valuable changes.

Floyd Brown wrote:
We will see in next November.

It is a sad state of affairs we are in but that is where we are at.

Now matter who is going to be our next President the course this country is on will continue the same path.

I say the people in the back rooms will tell you who you can choose from.

Hillary is the leading option as of today.

That she lied or may have lied is most likely a none issue to those in the back room.

Lying to you or I is not the issue here;. What ever she says to
those in the back room is the issue That applies to all candidates.
We will see in next November. br br It is a sad ... (show quote)
Go to
May 6, 2015 14:15:21   #
JMHO wrote:
I read your post and it was a stupid post, so I responded the same.


Think of it as you wish. I don't give a hoot what you think....
Go to
May 6, 2015 14:10:57   #
CDM wrote:
The Central Bank is not a federal entity.

And they, in concert with the government have done such an outstanding job over the past 100 years...gee, today I can get a whole 1.5% return on my savings while Wall Street gets $75 billion a month for free...

If you really wanted an answer to this simple minded question you would first want to understand why it (the Fed) exists which obviously you don't. It is clearly explained in finite historic detail in The Creature From Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin. It's available at any number of on line outlets.

There are dozens of papers ranging from the very complex to the rather simplistic, describing plans that would service our monitory and economic needs in a free market society...which we presently are not. I suggest you read some of this material and then come back and ask a question with some meat on the bone.
The Central Bank is not a federal entity. br br... (show quote)


Google "History of the Federal Reserve". You will find all sorts of the complete history of the unscrupulous bankers who have run these illegal "Federal Reserve" institutions since our founding (using assorted names of course but still the same bunch of families). You will also see why they are in the business, that they make money with no backing and Loan it to the US. They also control the "Good times" & "Bad Times" by controlling the availability of money in circulation and how they do it.
Have a good time reading thesee. They are very interesting and informative.
Go to
May 5, 2015 15:14:42   #
As a Nation we have let the FED (under different names of course) into the United States four times. Three wise Presidents have destroyed it. But big money keeps finding a way to get back into control of our nation. This time we call it the Federal Reserve but, rest assured, this is the same world wide bunch od rich bankers, like the Rothchilds. This serpent keeps coming back and ruining our economy.
Once again, it is past time to get them out of control of this Nation.
If you are really interested in what the Federal Reserve and what it has done, you can easily find very good and honest (as far as I can tell) reading simple bu Googling the Federal Reserve.

tdsrnest wrote:
Some of you accountants or economist can you please start a thread as to what benifit's of Abolishing the Federal Reserve will help this country. All you TP folks that love to insult go play in another sand Box.

I want to hear positives of keeping the Federal Reserve and negatives. It appears that some of the comments on OPP makes sense to abolish but would enjoy reading both sides. Can it be all negative but it appears that it should not be abolish, because of the Fed responsibility.

Very powerful agency, so what would replace the Fed.

So the responsibility of the Fed is.

Conduct the nations monetary policy
Supervise and regulate banks foreign and domestic
Maintain stability of Financial System
Provide certain financial services to the US government
Oversee Nations payment system

So if abolished how do we provide these services to this country.
Some of you accountants or economist can you pleas... (show quote)
Go to
May 5, 2015 15:02:48   #
Let's all pray that that is the case. 8 more years of Obama-like Governance will surely make this Nation a thing of the past. We need the We the People to come to our senses and get government back to where the Constitution says it is supposed to be. We Are NOT a Welfare State - - - yet.

bdamage wrote:
I think she's toast!
Go to
May 5, 2015 14:48:12   #
Listen wiseguy, I didn't say "string them up". If you had bothered to read my post, you would know that is not the case. YOU GET A LIFE.

JMHO wrote:
Yeah! Let's take them out and string them up...no trial...after all they have to be guilty or they wouldn't have brought charges against them. Never mind that the DA has a conflict of interest with her husband on the city counsel. Never mind that within 24 hours of reading a preliminary autopsy report and a preliminary police investigative report the DA filed her charges...preliminary reports now mind you, and charges filed in less than 24 hours! So, on this circumstantial evidence, let's take them out and string them up. The r**ting thugs will cheer and justice will be served.

BTW, please provide proof of your blasphemous and stupid statement "isn't it about time we saw something being done to curb what seems to be ever increasing excessive use of violence and power by the constabulary against the citizens they are sworn to protect." You never hear of the good things (in the liberal media anyway) police officers do, but when the 1% screws up, it is headline news for several days. AND, THERE IS NO PROOF THESE BALTIMORE SIX SCREWED UP!

Get a life!
Yeah! Let's take them out and string them up...no... (show quote)
Go to
May 5, 2015 14:04:41   #
What a pile of c---! Charges would not have been brought against these 6 cops without Probable Cause.
I'm not saying that they are all guilty, but I am saying there must be sufficient evidence to bring the charges. If these 6 "To Protect and to Serve" people really did commit the crimes against Freddie they need to be punished.
In any case, isn't it about time we saw something being done to curb what seems to be ever increasing excessive use of violence and power by the constabulary against the citizens they are sworn to protect?

Go to
May 5, 2015 13:46:46   #
The FED will absolutely love a "Cashless Society". They already control most of the money in the world. Cashlessness would give them absolute control over not only all our worth but virtually everything we do. If we as Americans had an ounce of scene we would immediately abolish both the FED and the idea of a cashless society.
(Sounds a lot like Orwell's 1984 to me, how about you?

Sicilianthing wrote:
FACTS and DATA just keep coming... for the Doubting Sheep Dressed as CLOWNS !


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX



We Can’t Rein In the Banks If We Can’t Pull Our Money Out of Them

Martin Armstrong summarizes the headway being made to ban cash, and argues that the goal of those pushing a cashless society is to prevent bank runs ... and increase their control:

The central banks are ... planning drastic restrictions on cash itself.

They see moving to electronic money will first eliminate the underground economy, but secondly, they believe it will even prevent a banking crisis.

This idea of eliminating cash was first floated as the normal trial balloon to see how the people take it.

It was first launched by Kenneth Rogoff of Harvard University and Willem Buiter, the chief economist at Citigroup.

Their claims have been widely hailed and their papers are now the foundation for the new age of Economic Totalitarianism that confronts us.

Rogoff and Buiter have laid the ground work for the end of much of our freedom and will one day will be considered the new Marx with hindsight.

They sit in their lofty offices but do not have real world practical experience beyond theory.

Considerations of their arguments have shown how governments can seize all economic power are destroy cash in the process eliminating all rights.

Physical paper money provides the check against negative interest rates for if they become too great, people will simply withdraw their funds and hoard cash.

Furthermore, paper currency allows for bank runs. Eliminate paper currency and what you end up with is the elimination of the ability to demand to withdraw funds from a bank.

***

In many nations, specific measures have already been taken demonstrating that the Rogoff-Buiter world of Economic Totalitarianism is indeed upon us. This is the death of Capitalism.

Of course the socialists h**e Capitalism and see other people’s money should be theirs. What they cannot see is that Capitalism is freedom from government totalitarianism. The freedom to pursue the field you desire without filling the state needs that supersede your own.

There have been test runs of this Rogoff-Buiter Economic Totalitarianism to see if the idea works. I reported on June 21, 2014 that Britain was doing a test run.

A shopping street in Manchester banned cash as part of an experiment to see if Brits would accept a cashless society.

London buses ended accepting cash payments from July 2014. Meanwhile, Currency Exchange dealers began offering debt cards instead of cash that they market as being safer to travel with.

The Chorlton, South Manchester experiment was touted to test customers and business reaction to the idea for physical currency will disappear inside 20 years.

France passed another Draconian new law that from the police parissummer of 2015 it will now impose cash requirements dramatically trying to eliminate cash by force.

French citizens and tourists will then only be allowed a limited amount of physical money.

They have financial police searching people on trains just passing through France to see if they are t***sporting cash, which they will now seize.

Meanwhile, the new French Elite are moving in this very same direction. Piketty wants to just take everyone’s money who has more than he does.

Nobody stands on the side of freedom or on restraining the corruption within government. The problem always turns against the people for we are the cause of the fiscal mismanagement of government that never has enough for themselves.

In Greece a drastic reduction in cash is also being discussed in light of the economic crisis. Now any bill over €70 should be payable only by check or credit card – it will be illegal to pay in cash. The German Baader Bank founded in Munich expects formally to abolish the cash to enforce negative interest rates on accounts that is really taxation on wh**ever money you still have left after taxes.

***

Complete abolition of cash threatens our very freedom and rights of citizens in so many areas.

***

Paper currency is indeed the check against negative interest rates. We need only look to Switzerland to prove that theory. Any attempt to impose say a 5% negative interest rates (tax) would lead to an unimaginably massive flight into cash.

This was already demonstrated recently by the example of Swiss pension funds, which withdrew their money from the bank in a big way and now store it in vaults in cash in order to escape the financial repression. People will act in their own self-interest and negative interest rates are likely to reduce the sales of government bonds and set off a bank run as long as paper money exists.

Obviously, government and bankers are not stupid. The only way to prevent such a global bank run would be the total prohibition of paper money. This is unlikely, both in Switzerland and in the United States because the economies are dominated there by a certain “liberalism” to some extent but also because their currencies also circulate outside their domestic economies.

The fact that but the question of the cash ban in the context of a global conference with the participation of the major central banks of the US and the ECB will be discussed, demonstrates by itself that the problem is not a regional problem.

Nevertheless, there is a growing assumption that the negative interest rate world (tax on cash) is likely to increase dramatically in Europe in particular since it is socialism that is collapsing.

Government in Brussels is unlikely to yield power and their line of thinking cannot lead to any solution. The negative interest rate concept is making its way into the United States at J.P. Morgan where they will charge a fee on excess cash on deposit starting May 1st, 2015. Asset holdings of cash with a tax or a fee in the amount of the negative interest rate seems to be underway even in Switzerland.

***

The movement toward electronic money is moving at high speed and this says a lot about the state of the financial system. The track record of the major financial institutions is nearly perfect – they are always caught on the wrong side when a crisis breaks, which requires their bailouts. The fact that we have already seen test runs with theory-balloons flying, the major financial institutions are in no shape to withstand another economic decline.

For depositors, this means they really need to grasp what is going on here for unless they are vigilant, there is a serious risk of losing everything.

We must understand that these measures will be implemented overnight in the middle of a banking crisis after 2015.75. The balloons have taken off and the discussions are underway.

The trend in taxation and reduction of cash seems to be unstoppable. Government is not prepared to reform for that would require a new way of thinking and a loss of power.

That is not a consideration. They only see one direction and that is to take us into the new promised-land of economic totalitarianism.

People can’t pull cash out of their bank accounts – for political reasons, because they’ve lost confidence in the bank, or because “bail-ins” are enacted – if cash is banned.

The Financial Times argued last year that central banks would be the real winners from a cashless society:

Central bankers, after all, have had an explicit interest in introducing e-money from the moment the global financial crisis began…
***

The introduction of a cashless society empowers central banks greatly. A cashless society, after all, not only makes things like negative interest rates possible, it t***sfers absolute control of the money supply to the central bank, mostly by turning it into a universal banker that competes directly with private banks for public deposits. All digital deposits become base money.


The Government Can Manipulate Digital Accounts More Easily than Cash

Moreover, an official White House panel on spying has implied that the government is manipulating the amount in people’s financial accounts.

If all money becomes digital, it would be much easier for the government to manipulate our accounts.

Indeed, numerous high-level NSA whistleblowers say that NSA spying is about crushing dissent and blackmailing opponents … not stopping terrorism.

This may sound over-the-top … but remember, the government sometimes labels its critics as “terrorists“. If the government claims the power to indefinitely detain – or even assassinate – American citizens at the whim of the executive, don’t you think that government people would be willing to shut down, or withdraw a stiff “penalty” from a dissenter’s bank account?

If society becomes cashless, dissenters can’t hide cash. All of their financial holdings would be vulnerable to an attack by the government.

This would be the ultimate form of control. Because – without access to money – people couldn’t resist, couldn’t hide and couldn’t escape.
FACTS and DATA just keep coming... for the Doubtin... (show quote)
Go to
May 5, 2015 13:36:26   #
So why do we pick this particular incident to criticize the FBI over? They have been most ineffective in stopping lots and lots of similar attacks. Seems that they are good at surveillance but horrible inept at using that surveillance to accomplish anything.

CharlesRabb wrote:
ISIS says it was behind the attack outside a contest in Texas featuring cartoons of Islam’s prophet Mohammed. It is the first time the group claimed to have carried out an attack inside the United States.

Meanwhile, the FBI is under increased scrutiny for failing to prevent Sunday’s attack after it had closely monitored one of the suspects in the shooting.

Federal agents had been monitoring 30-year-old Elton Simpson for possible terrorist ties for more than a decade.

Simpson and his roommate were shot dead after opening fire on a security guard outside the event.

In the past, FBI agents recorded Simpson talking about fighting “non-believers” for Allah and about plans to travel to Africa to link up with Islamist brothers in Somalia.

Five years ago, he was arrested for attempting to join an al Qaeda-affiliated group there.

Years spent investigating Simpson for terrorism ties resulted in three years of probation, placement on the no-fly list, and $600 in fines and court fees.

His attorney says he became increasingly agitated.

“I mean, I know that some of the statements that he made were, ‘If you die on the battlefield’ than you get, you know, wh**ever, the wives and things like that, but I think you hear that out of a lot of people. I mean, that’s a belief of the Muslim faith,” Kristina Sitton, Simpson’s attorney, said in 2011.

Simpson recently posted messages on Twitter about his dismay with his country.

Just minutes before Sunday’s shooting, he tweeted that he and a brother had pledged loyalty to ISIS.

“May Allah accept us as mujahideen [jihadists],” he wrote.

Though the FBI was aware of his social media rants, he was not under 24-hour surveillance.
ISIS says it was behind the attack outside a conte... (show quote)
Go to
May 5, 2015 13:25:13   #
If you didn't watch Mike Huckabee's announcement you need to find it and listen to it.
I was pretty undecided just who I preferred the Republican candidate for President. Now I am behind Mike 100%.

I can't find a link to the entire announcement so I didn't post it here.
Go to
May 5, 2015 13:14:52   #
Hillary, like many politicians, speaks "Double Speak" fluently.
Our liberals may understand it because they hear exactly what the want to hear from her regardless of the WORDS she uses.

bdamage wrote:
She might've gotten away with this kind of crap in 2014, but she will be completely slaughtered in a debate if she tries to pull this against ANYONE!

When asked about her accomplishments as Secretary of State:

“My accomplishments as Secretary of State? Well, I'm glad you asked! My proudest accomplishment in which I take the most p***e, mostly because of the opposition it faced early on, you know… the remnants of prior situations and mindsets that were too narrowly focused in a manner whereby they may have overlooked the bigger picture and we didn’t do that and I’m proud of that. Very proud. I would say that’s a major accomplishment.”
- Hillary Clinton 11 March 2014

Could someone please tell me what the heck she said?

And she wants to be President?
She might've gotten away with this kind of crap in... (show quote)
Go to
Apr 12, 2015 14:34:36   #
Email doesn't work like it should. Write a letter on a piece of paper, stuff it in an envelope, affix a stamp and mail it to all those in Congress that you elected. That might carry some weight with that bunch.

wiley102 wrote:
I don't think anyone should be surprised that obama lied about the deal with Iran. I don't believe anything that lying son of a b***h says.
In addition to posting here, email your Senators and demand that they impeach that lying son of a b***h.
Go to
Apr 12, 2015 14:23:55   #
I couldn't agree more. The Fed has had three lives in the United States and all of them are/were unconstitutional. Their only aim is/was for these bankers to make more money. If Lincoln could create Greenbacks, so could this current Congress.

MrEd wrote:
All these things you have listed are supposed to be carried out by our lazy assed Congress. Read the Constitution and you will see that the FED is unconstitutional and should never have been given any authority over our money supply.

The Constitution clearly states that our government is supposed to do all these things. Our money is to be printed by our government, not some bank. Our money is supposed to be backed by something of value, like gold or silver and we don't pay interest on our own money, printed by the government and backed by the same. The FED is simply ripping us off BIG time.
All these things you have listed are supposed to b... (show quote)
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 59 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.