Interesting. Do you live in America? Inflation is below average. Stocks are up and growing. I'm not paying any taxes I was not paying when trump was president. B***k A******ns still trying to survive s******c r****m boosted by trump, and Republican trump breaks every law on the books. MAGAS are the folks living in a fools paradise.

Oh yes. The current economic facts prove we are better off now than under Trump. Check your facts. Not the false information from a right wing pundit. Learn to separate t***h from falsehood.

And give the nation back to Hitler? No thanks. I'll be v****g against Trump the proven criminal, not for Biden. I cannot understand the thinking that allows a decent person to v**e for a proven criminal. I certainly cannot.

Based on t***h and facts, your post contains several false statements. Typical prevarication from right wing pundits. Mix in a few minor t***hs to create a believable falsehood. Left and right both guilty.

Your meme needs trump, not Cortez. He is the one copying Hitler, step by step. Ever seen the side by side comparison of comments and actions?

Gee. I know that is what your right wing pundits are telling you, but that certainly did not appear to be the case in his State of the Union address to Congress. And if this is Obama's third term, he is certainly doing doing better now than trump was in his last year.

Based on your imoges, your problem is obvious.

Still listening to and believing your pundits, right? You ask a question, I answer, and you blow up like a punctured balloon. You asked about my thoughts on disagreement with an attorney. I answered and gave you evidence why I would not hesitate to take on an attorney. And you ignore it. And the 14th amendment is simple window dressing for the real reasons behind the end of Roe v. Wade. And if you believe religion is not behind the a******n bans, you are not as omniscient as you think you are. To your other question, the Christian nationalists are attempting to push religion into government via the Republican party. In any case, I will no longer respond to you. You are unable to control your temper, you believe liars, and you consistently attack me personally instead of debating political issues.

That's about the most absurd text I have seen today. A moderate is named a Democrat by you because they do not believe in v****g for criminals, liars, r****ts, and rapists? If you would select a decent human being as your candidate, I'd probably v**e for him or her. Instead, you put up one of the most d********g pieces of garbage in America as your candidate. I disagree with your economic policies because history shows they frequently result in revolution and c*******m. I am definitely better off today than under Trump, as well as your last disaster, Bush. It appears to me that most of your post is based on nothing but your imagination. And we had over 11 million i******s here back in the 60s and it did not do significant damage. Yes, I prefer to send most of them home, but your fellow Republicans refused to pass the legislation that would have improved the situation. And fuel prices are rising as a direct result of Russia and Saudi Arabia helping trump get elected. Saudi wants Trump in office to stop the aid to Isreal and Putin because he wants Trump to stop aid to Ukraine. The Saudis and Russia reduced their production of oil for the exact purpose of driving up the price of gasoline and blaming it on Biden. Do you have any idea how many of the claims in your post are totally bogus falsehoods from right wing pundits who are paid by the wealthy to lie to you about Biden and trump so you will support trump? Personally, I cannot respect anyone who can lower their standards to v**e for a proven criminal, rapist, liar, and fraud.

He cleaned up the GOP economic disaster Bush left us. He treated everyone fairly. He was a decent human being. Unlike trump. He was not guilty of fraud on multiple cases and not a rapist or r****t. I'd v**e Obama over trump any day. I don't v**e for lying thieves and scumbags.

Are you telling me the SCOTUS was not basing their opinion on the constitution? Where might I find verifiable evidence?

Yep. Been going on thart way for several thousand years.

Yep. That is fact.

And I agree that freedom is essential. And I suspect that our major departure in viewpoints involves economics. But, freedoms should not be used to hurt others or their freedoms. And it is a fact that uncontrolled capitalism has frequently led to revolt and initiating a c*******tic form of government. Examples include Russia, Cuba, China, Viet Nam. Cambodia, and others going back into feudal days. Therefore, for capitalism to flourish in an environment of freedom and e******y for all citizens, controls are necessary to maintain an acceptable level of e******y and an acceptable standard of living. The consequences of failure to do that have proven to be horrible in many cases. Over the last 55 years, it is my opinion that insufficient controls on American capitalism have been in place to maintain a stable economic situation. The standard of living for workers has been gradually falling since about 1968. In that period, the already wealthy have increased their share of all the wealth in America to approximately 50 percent from the 35 percent in the 1960s. The working class, of course, lost that same percentage, resulting in a significant reduction in their standard of living. Fact is that today, nearly 40 percent of American workers are paid a wage defined as below federally cited poverty. I suspect what is going on in America today is the civil unrest due to the continuing loss in quality of life in the working class. I have cited, in articles in this forum, the reasons this is happening and the laws congress has passed at the behest of the wealthy and corporate interests that are directly responsible for the losses to the working class. I predict that if this doesn't change in the not very distant future, civil unrest will lead to civil war. Fortunately for me, I will be in my grave before that happens. At least I hope that is the case. A republican said it best. See the memes.

Go read your constitution. Try the part about Congress shall make no law respecting religion. Roe v. Wade was based on that constitutional statement. And it has been violated by trump's appointed judges. Yes, the SCOTUS reversed a constitutionally based federal precedent that protected a******ns nationwide. Now, every religious narcissist is out there trying to turn America into a theocracy. Furthermore, a lawyer is, exactly, a professional liar. He or she has to be that in order to protect their clients. And I have more than passing familiarity with our justice system, including expert witness services in both federal and state courts. Additionally, in 1979 or 1980, I recommended that the District Engineer of the Detroit District Corps of Engineers deny a permit to a developer who wanted to fill a beautiful wetland next to Lake St Clair adjacent to Detroit for construction of a condominium. I was the Detroit District Chief of the Environmental Branch at the time. The permit was denied, and the developer sued the Corps of Engineers and me. I worked with the US Attorneys through lower courts, ultimately to the SCOTUS. In 1982, the SCOTUS found that I was correct in my interpretation of the Clean Water Act and Amendments of 1975 and that it was correct to deny the permit. This established the precedent that the Corps of Engineers had the authority to require permits for "all the waters of the United States. " Not just navigable waters as was the case prior to the Clean Water Act. So, yes, when I believe I am right, I will not hesitate to take on a lawyer. Call that what you will. I call it doing the right thing and following the law.