Of course, the l*****t media always omits anything that doesn't jive with their narrative.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, almost every major study on defensive gun use has found that Americans use their firearms defensively between 500,000 and 3 million times each year. There’s good reason to believe that most defensive gun uses are never reported to law enforcement, much less picked up by local or national media outlets.
https://datavisualizations.heritage.org/firearms/defensive-gun-uses-in-the-us/



"Well regulated"
The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.
https://constitution.org/1-Constitution/cons/wellregu.htm


And, as a side note, here are the thoughts of the Founding Fathers:

“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined…” – George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790

“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful s***ery.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787

“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

“The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” – Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776

I have read on OPP that Soros was somehow involved with cooperating with N**i Germany to turn over Jews to the Germans during the n**i era. I have done a little research on Soros and found out that he was born in 1930. I don't think the n**is would deal with a ten year old to a sixteen year old kid to somehow turn over Jews. There are several far right wing sources that make this claim. The main source is a woman named Judy Brighten that happens to have serious mental health issues.
George Soros is a self made billionaire, that his given millions and millions of dollars to different charities. As I understand it, he is also a major contributor to the Democratic Party. Is donating big bucks to a political party somehow some kind of sin? I think not. I believe that making a financial sacrifice to support the party you believe in is a sign of a fine American, as is philanthropy.
Soros is a hero, not a n**i collaborator. The fact that he is Jewish makes him a target for the same people that marched in Virginia saying, Jews will not replace us!

I just wonder if there is a single conservative out there who gives a crap that Donald J Trump willfully and knowingly pisses all over the rule of law every chance he gets. And he does it because he knows his base doesn't care, Republicans in the house and senate don't care, the DoJ doesn't care. The only ones who care are Democrats and the few Republicans who have retained their ability to think so know just what that POS is really doing.

The thing is though, his base says they love this country yet they are the first to applaud Donald as he willfully destroys everything right in front of their faces!