One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: 1alpha7
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 51 next>>
May 9, 2022 09:00:12   #
Gatsby wrote:
They have No Teleprompters. img src="https://stat... (show quote)


Add to the fact that Ukraine has an open case against Joe & H****r B***n... maybe that's why he had a lack of concern about the known Planned Russian Assault on Ukraine in the beginning.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/jul/28/v***l-image/opening-case-file-does-not-mean-joe-biden-criminal/
Go to
Apr 23, 2022 17:40:16   #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
I get less that 10 miles round trip and back to the liquor store for me on my electric vehicle (I weigh 300 Lb) and have hills both ways.


Go to
Apr 23, 2022 17:29:24   #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Gravitas Plus: The dark side of Electric Vehicles
Interesting 9-minute video...with a beautiful lady narrator.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFHvq-8np1o


Each EV motor lasts from 15-20 yrs and EVs have more than 1 motor... hope you have good credit.
If the Grid goes out, so does your trip! Most EVs can't travel 300 miles (the average is around 250+ miles)!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gUAy2gSNWQ
Go to
Feb 4, 2022 13:17:23   #
Milosia2 wrote:
You apparently think this makes him not guilty ?
9 Million documents with nothing in them that could implicate trump for anything, including misdemeanors.
Is it partisan to seek Justice for criminals.?
Partisan.
This apparently means it’s only a crime when the democrats do it.


Statement: Being investigated by a partisan Democrat hack is not a sign of guilt.
Democrats call most everything that Republicans do a CRIME and hit the court only to lose their
false battle.

Your Statement: This apparently means it’s only a crime when the democrats do it.
That's a very partisan & false statement. The Democrats v**e to implement laws to destroy the Bill of Rights.
Only the Lawless democrats believe that they and their backed B*M (Marxist Faction) can comment crimes
and not see punishment for wrong doing.
Go to
Jan 22, 2022 14:51:32   #
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
Biden is upset that the Senate rejected his "V**ers Right" bill. So, does that mean they'll try to use the "v***r f***d organization" again in 2022 & 2024?


More than likely!

It would be funny if the truckloads of illegal b****ts accidentally fell out of their trailers to the extent that the b****ts became exposed as they landed all over the roads that they were being delivered on.
Go to
Jan 22, 2022 09:48:43   #
Ri-chard wrote:
Save this for posterity > Joe Biden says he's built the most extensive "v***r f***d" org in history
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGRnhBmHYN0


Sometimes Biden lets the T***H slip from his lips. Looks like he & his renegades are at it again for the 2020 mid-term e******ns, then the 2024 P**********l E******ns.

He wants his paid i*****l i*******ts to v**e the destructive Democrats into office through his & the Senate's illegal v****g bills... the paid-to-v**e bill.
Go to
Jan 19, 2022 05:42:23   #


“Never underestimate Joe’s ability to F*** things up.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyKH2kkaLaY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTUaVQT6-So
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBmDMp3d8H8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZimzD6Vf9g
Go to
Jan 13, 2022 16:28:25   #
Go to
Jan 13, 2022 10:13:02   #
proud republican wrote:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/1/11/us-to-give-additional-308m-in-humanitarian-aid-to-afghanistan


Someone has to pay for the 2000 suicide bombers, so why not the Biden WH. Maybe Biden feels that $Billions of Highly Sophisticated Military Equipment just wasn't enough & now he needs to feed the terrorists to keep them in Afghanistan!
Makes you wonder what the new wall in front of the WH & Bidens Delaware beach house is actually for?
Go to
Jan 2, 2022 15:14:03   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Considering far more pressing circumstances threatening our nation and the world, somebody explain why I should give a tinker's damn about the fate of one female pervert.

Maxwell could spill the beans on a hundred high-profile perverts and it wouldn't change the course we are on by one freaking degree.

In the current political environment, there isn't a prosecutor alive or a court in existence that would go after Bill Clinton or Prince Andrew or any others in Epstein's merry band of p*******es. I mean, what the hell, we got a p*******e sitting in the WH.
Considering far more pressing circumstances threat... (show quote)


Go to
Jan 2, 2022 14:01:17   #
Big dog wrote:
Too bad, she couldn’t shred these elite perverts. I’m willing to bet she’s got enough information to bring down so many people that there would be WARS!!!!


Plus a Suicide Mission that stays hidden!
Go to
Jan 2, 2022 12:27:36   #
Big dog wrote:
I’m gonna guess she gets her sentence reduced!!


Most Probable...
Go to
Jan 2, 2022 10:54:38   #
EN Submarine Qualified wrote:
Why isn't she the subject of further investigation into Epstein's crimes? Oh I see. The fix is in. I suspect if she was arrested her fate would be similar to Epstein.

Maxwell is the daughter of British media mogul Robert Maxwell, who owned and operated a number of British tabloids and was at one point estimated to have been worth nearly $1.9 billion. She was educated at the prestigious Marlborough boarding school in the U.K., and went on to study at Oxford.Jul 9, 2019.


I agree!


Go to
Dec 31, 2021 13:26:13   #
lindajoy wrote:
And which of these Referenced was which???

Both had the seedy mix of those came to start trouble~~ so where's the difference?? The r****rs attacked police and damaged, burned city halls and Capital buildings all over the nation… please tell me the difference…Not BS but the distinguishing difference..


The difference is 'the DCCP k**led an unarmed woman in the Capitol' and it had to be called an 'i**********n' to protect him!
Go to
Dec 27, 2021 12:48:23   #
permafrost wrote:
Got a link?

Just to clear it up, Capital security is not part of the speaker of the house job..

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/republicans-shaky-no-evidence-attempt-to-cast-blame-on-pelosi-for-j***6/

FACTCHECK POSTS › FEATURED POSTS
Republicans’ Shaky, No Evidence Attempt to Cast Blame on Pelosi for J*** 6

In a statement provided to FactCheck.org, Jane L. Campbell, president and CEO of the U.S. Capitol Historical Society, said: “The Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the U.S. Capitol, the C*****l P****e Board does, and the Speaker does not oversee the Board. The Board consists of three v****g members: the Senate Sergeant at Arms, the House Sergeant at Arms, and the Architect of the Capitol; together with one non-v****g member, the Chief of the C*****l P****e.”

To put names to those titles, on J*** 6, the C*****l P****e chief was Steven Sund; the House sergeant at arms was Paul Irving; the Senate sergeant at arms was Michael Stenger; and the architect of the Capitol was Brett Blanton. Sund, Irving and Stenger all resigned in the wake of the r**t.
Got a link? br br Just to clear it up, Capital ... (show quote)


Correct... Congress & The House have oversite to ensure that USCP meets safety & security measures/requirements for all workers & visitors in the US Capitol... period...

The United States C*****l P****e (USCP) is overseen by the C*****l P****e Board and has Congressional oversight by appropriations and authorizing committees from the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. This oversight affords the Department the support and opportunity to continually ensure that the USCP meets the safety and security needs of the Congress, the staff, and the many visitors who come to the United States Capitol each day.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 51 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.