One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Boy from the Bronx
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 28 next>>
May 16, 2021 10:36:27   #
drlarrygino wrote:
Your whole post reeks with anti-white bigotry and r****m. Try writing for the New York Crimes, I mean Times, they need a few more l*****t sheepie.


What are you talking about? My post was NOT r****t! It was NOT full of "anti-white bigotry and r****m"! There wasn't even one single word of prejudice against any race, religion, or skin color in my entire post. Did you actually READ IT? If you did, you would know that my comments were anything BUT R****T!

All I said was that it's wrong for you to assume that Peter S was "Anti-American" or a "Marxist" just because his opinions don't match your rigid ultra-right-wing world view, or because he doesn't like Donald Trump. (a lot of people don't like Trump, even some REPUBLICANS!) Was that r****t? NO!

I also said that it's wrong for you to imply that only white people believe in the idea of putting "America First," that non-w***e A******ns believe in it too. Was that r****t? NO!

Finally, I further pointed out that those who say "America First" don't always mean it, like the America First Committee of the 1930s and early '40s, which opposed President Roosevelt's policy of sending aid to countries threatened by the Axis Powers (N**i Germany, F*****t Italy, and Militaristic Japan), arguing that the United States should attend to its own affairs first instead of worrying about what was going on in foreign lands. It eventually turned out that some of the committee members were themselves believers in F*****m, which means that they must have been a bunch of r****ts, since they obviously shared Hitler's racial views. In other words, I was just giving you a little American history to prove a point.

I don't see how you can interpret anything in my comments as being r****t towards white people. I'M WHITE! Does that mean I'm prejudiced against MYSELF? Give me a break, for crying out loud!

If anyone's a r****t, IT'S YOU! You must be if you think only w***e A******ns believe in America First.

As for me being a "l*****t sheeple," you obviously don't mind being a RIGHTIST SHEEPLE!
Go to
May 15, 2021 21:55:39   #
drlarrygino wrote:
He h**es American Nationalism and W****s putting America 1st. That means he wants us at least 2nd and subservient to other countries which he thinks should be #1. Most of his previous posts also mimic a Marxist agenda. Now get off your soap box,call Slo Joe and tell him to quit promoting Marxism and a One world government. Better yet, tell him to quit destroying our oil independence and making
a gallon of gasoline go up to$5.00.


Come on, now, you're being ridiculous! Name one comment by Peter S. where he said he h**es "American Nationalism," or people who believe in putting America first, or where he said that he wants this country to be "2nd and subservient to other countries which he thinks should be # 1," or where he mimicked "a Marxist agenda." Or are you just assuming that he believes these things simply because you don't like his politics, especially the fact that he disapproves of Donald Trump, who, as I've pointed out many times before, has been mimicking a F*****T AGENDA?

Another thing: why do you assume that only W***E A******NS believe in "America First"? You don't think there are any NON-W***E A******NS who feel the same way? For you to think that only white people are capable of doing what's best for their country is downright R****T!

Even so, not everyone who says "America First" actually means it. Back in the 1930s and early '40s, there was an organization called the America First Committee, which, among other things, was opposed to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's policy of sending arms, ammunition, and other forms of aid to countries that were being menaced by the spread of Italian F*****m, German N**ism, and Japanese militarism. The members of the committee argued that what was happening in Europe and Asia was none of our business, that the people of those areas of the world should fight their own battles, that they meant nothing to us, and that true "100% Americanism" meant attending to the affairs of the United States of America only.

On the face of it, this might have sounded like a noble and logical idea to a lot of Americans, but it ignored the possibility that what was happening in other countries might effect the interests, or even the security, of this country, or that foreign aggressors (Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, etc) might try to attack us if they were allowed to invade and take over other nations. In other words, the America First Committee's idea of "America First" would have endangered the U.S.A. instead of protecting it.

Also, some of the committee members turned out to be sympathetic towards the Axis Powers, which means that they really believed in putting THEM FIRST, and not America, and that they were basically American F*****TS!
Go to
May 12, 2021 23:42:37   #
drlarrygino wrote:
Your support for Marxism and anti-Americanism Trumps anything that any pro-White Nationalist agenda would support. America last won't cut it. Take your NWO and shove it up your a--


Where did "Peter S" say that he supports "Marxism and anti-Americanism"? When did he talk about "America last," or the NWO (New World Order)?

You're making the age-old right-wing mistake of assuming that anyone who differs with the opinions of the Conservative establishment is a Marxist, a C*******t, a Socialist, a Leninist, a Maoist, etc. That was Senator Joseph McCarthy's stock in trade, l believe, not to mention that of Adolf Hitler, J. Edgar Hoover, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, the South American death squards and dictators, the CIA, the Ku Klux Klan, Glen Beck, the late Morton Downey, Jr, and the recently late Rush Limbaugh.
Go to
May 12, 2021 23:28:27   #
proud republican wrote:
How are we Republicans / Conservatives asking for f*****m??? How did President T erg ump destroyed Democracy?? Give me an example ......And why I came to America is not any of anyone's business....


Trump didn't destroy Democracy, but he certainly TRIED TO DO IT, by behaving in an authoritarian manner, by spreading hatred against his critics and detractors, by refusing to tolerate anyone in his own administration who dared to oppose him, or disagree with him, or just plain contradict him. Furthermore, he had contempt for the United States Constitution, as evident by his suggestion that he could be elected to a third term as President, even though the 22nd Amendment (ratified in 1951) limits the President to only two four-year terms. (ironically, the 22nd Amendment was the idea of the REPUBLICANS, who didn't like the idea of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a DEMOCRAT, being elected President four times!)

Not only that, but Trump even once said that he'd like to be PRESIDENT-FOR-LIFE, even though a) nothing in the Constitution allows it, and b) ruling over a country for life is tantamount to being a DICTATOR! That's the way it was with Ferdinand Marcos of the Philippines, and Idi Amin of Uganda. (in fact, Amin insisted that he be referred to as "Field Marshal President-For-Life Dr. Idi Amin Dada"; talk about a mouthful!)

Trump further showed his disregard for the Constitution by a) promoting the outrageous idea that to be against him was the same as being against the United States of America itself, b) vilifying the media, accusing it of spreading "f**e news" (read: news reports that criticized him or his policies), calling it "evil" and "the enemy of the people," and planning to use the libel laws to intimidate Anti-Trump newspapers into silence, c) trying to concentrate all the powers of the Government in his hands alone, which would upset the balance of power and the checks and balances that have kept the Government from becoming a full-fledged totalitarian state, d) advocating for extralegal methods of dealing with accused criminals and political/racial r****rs (like the ones responsible for last summer's destruction and unrest), including summary executions without giving the suspects a chance for a fair trial, which would violate the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, and e) generally trying to give the impression that he was always right, and that those who said otherwise were either "losers" or "t*****rs"!

That is exactly the same attitude of all tyrants, despots, and dictators! If Trump were reelected last November, he would have been in a position to further undermine the Constitution, and thus destroy our heritage of freedom.
Go to
Mar 2, 2021 23:41:44   #
dtucker300 wrote:
Happy Sunday!


It's "THEIR businesses," not "they're businesses." "They're" is a shortened form of "they are," so you wouldn't say "they are businesses are being burned to the ground," right?

I find your cartoon showing Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Barack Obama being led on a leash by Chinese Premier Xi to be extremely distasteful. Why don't you show a similar cartoon with Donald Trump, Mike Pence, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ted Cruz, "Moscow Mitch" McConnell, etc, being led on a leash by Vladimir Putin?
Go to
Mar 2, 2021 23:32:13   #
steve66613 wrote:
The felony you’re referring to is:______.

There are REAL felonies, committed by the Rat Faced Piss Monkey (and its family) occupying the White House, are not being pursued whatsoever!


What exactly are these "felonies" that Joe Biden and his family have committed?
Go to
Mar 2, 2021 23:28:58   #
Jlw wrote:
Who would want to have demented china joe as their commander


Demented, HA! Trump and his crazy Q***n crowd are ten times more demented than Joe Biden.

As for "China Joe," how come people like you have never called Trump "Russia Donnie"?
Go to
Mar 2, 2021 23:24:50   #
thebigp wrote:
Home /Military/Report Raises Questions about National Guard Deployments to Washington DC – Are They Legal?
The National Guard via Wikimedia Commons
February 27, 2021--Paul Crespo --AAN

Homeland Security – In a recently published report by the Center for American Defense Studies (CADS) in Washington, DC, which I help lead, Major General Donald McGregor, USAF, Ret., former lead advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, asks critical questions about how and why the National Guard was deployed in such massive numbers to Washington, DC. It also questions the legality of the deployments and the subsequent unprecedented political ‘screenings’ of Guard personnel tasked with Capitol defense.
Ostensibly requested to provide security after the outrageous attack by a mostly unarmed mob of a few hundred on the U.S. Capitol on J****** 6, the massive military effort eventually topped 26,000 troops. McGregor questions whether there was a proper threat assessment completed after J****** 6 to justify this response. He also notes that the J****** 6 r**t is also being used to justify other inappropriate actions, such as the added ‘screening’ of Guardsmen, and the possible purge of troops in the regular military accused of undefined ‘extremism.’
Per his report:
That day’s tragic events are far-reaching and go well beyond the event itself. The malevolent behavior of a few laid the foundation for a disproportionate military response in support of the 59th P**********l Inaugural. Worse, it led to the unwarranted and ill-defined “screening” of our National Guard. And now a confusing ideological purge of military members accused of possible ‘extremism.’
Regarding the legality of the deployment, McGregor notes: “It remains unknown how the request unfolded and whether it was solely the Pentagon’s doing or went through more appropriate channels such as a civilian federal agency, the District of Columbia Mayor, local law enforcement—or did it come directly from the President?” The report adds that “one state’s National Guard Adjutant General (AG) questioned the legality of the request for Guard support to civil disturbance operations in DC and possible lack of p**********l authorization. The Adjutant General for Arizona denied National Guard support due to legal concerns, noting in a letter that it appeared the President’s involvement with this request was in question, which is legally problematic.”
The AG stated in his letter:
My legal team raised the above concerns, regarding the Posse Comitatus Act and related DoD regulatory prohibitions on the use of the Title 32 USC 502(f)(2)(A) status to perform direct support to law enforcement and civil disturbance operations in the District of Columbia.” Further, the AG questioned, “The press release [11 January 2021 White House press release] does not mention P**********l approval for the use of DoD resources in support of civilian law enforcement and civil disturbance operations.
This is a serious unanswered question. Did President Trump actually authorize this massive military effort? Was it legal?
Another critical question is – What was the threat? And was the threat properly assessed and defined? More specifically, as Maj. Gen. McGregor asks, “Was the National Special Security Event (NSSE) security planning process required for the Inauguration ignored or politicized?” He explains: NSSE Security planning always begins with one thing – A threat assessment. This is fundamental to the planning process as it drives the security resources and commensurate response to secure the event. Put simply, what is the threat, how bad is it, and what do we do about it? DHS did release a “first of its kind” Homeland Threat Assessment October 6, 2020, before the e******n—an important document that can be used to build a baseline threat appraisal.
But the specifics of the event such as location, logistics, geographics, lines of communication, and local jurisdictions require a separate and more detailed review, not to mention a serious update after the J****** 6 r**t. Since this threat assessment is supposed to drive the allocation of every security resource, threat level, and the need for additional background checks, was one completed?
From the publicly available reports, it appears that only a limited overall threat assessment was performed beyond the above noted October 2020 DHS Assessment. And it is very possible that it was not updated to incorporate the events of J****** 6.
Maj. General McGregor adds that based “on indicators such as a lack of logistical resources to support the increase in numbers, possible misuse, and violation of policies and/or statutory military activation laws, improper assigned missions and roles, hasty and unwarranted additional screening, and questionable outside pressure, make it appear that the level of NG response had little to do with the actual threats and more to do with politics.”
These are just a few of the serious concerns, and unanswered questions regarding the still ongoing – and potentially illegal – deployment of National Guard troops to our nation’s capital. Maj. Gen. McGregor asks many more, especially about the legality and justification for the politicized ‘screening’ of National Guard troops sent to DC.
The most important question though, is – where are the answers?
Home /Military/Report Raises Questions about Natio... (show quote)


How do you explain the fact that the "mostly unarmed mob" responsible for the Washington, DC, r**t on J****** 6th were able to murder a police officer? They must have had some kind of weapon to use in order to beat the cop to death. Or are you trying to play down the r**t so people will forget that Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans practically incited it?
Go to
Mar 2, 2021 23:01:24   #
Milosia2 wrote:
We should be looking at who and what is causing it. And then dealing out the consequences fitting the crime.
To me it’s more than obvious.

It’s all a****a and the demonrats fault.


Baloney! The Republicans are as much to blame as the Democrats, if not more.
Go to
Feb 24, 2021 00:58:18   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

I don’t like NON assimilating illegal scumbags invaders and enemy combatants who lie n wait on my land !

Learn the facts !


Not all of them are "enemy combatants who lie in wait on my land." Most of them don't bother or threaten others. You're just assuming these things because they're different from you.
Go to
Feb 24, 2021 00:36:53   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

Prove it and define it.


You want proof? Check out a recent YouTube video of a woman who visited the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC. Among other things, she came upon a sign listing the "Fourteen Characteristics Of F*****m." She said that Donald Trump's beliefs, actions, mentality, and attitude matched every one of those Fourteen Characteristics! If you don't believe me, go and visit that museum yourself, so you can read those Fourteen Characteristics, and then compare them to how Trump ran his administration.
Go to
Feb 23, 2021 23:47:51   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

Victor please, go sell it to the illegal scumbag Mexicans, Hispanic invaders and the Muslim Trash who don’t belong here !

I’m not a buyer for your stupid commentary.


So, you don't like Mexicans, Hispanics, or Muslims. What are you, a r****t?
Go to
Feb 23, 2021 23:45:24   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

I’m not a fan of either hands, unlike YOU I know the t***h.

I have all the evidence
All the archives
All the data
The proof
The corroborating material of all the above...

Maybe this can begin your journey into the t***h...

The Following Information is considered Dangerous:

The first misconception that most people have is that the Federal Reserve Bank is a branch of the US governmment. IT IS NOT. THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS A PRIVATE COMPANY. Most people believe it is as American as the Constitution. The Constitution actually forbids it's existence. Article 1, Section 8, states that Congress shall have the power to create money and regulate the value thereofff, not a bunch of international bankers! Today the FED controls and profits by printingg worthless paper, called money, through the Treasury, regulating its value, and the biggest outrage of all, collecting interest on it! (the so-called national debt, via the federal income tax)

The FED creates money from nothing, and loans it back to us through banks, and charges interest on our currency. The FED also buys Government debt with money printed on a printing press and charges US taxpayers interest. Many Congressmen and Presidents say this is fraud. Who actually owns the Federal Reserve Central Banks? The ownership of the 12 Central banks, a very well-kept secret, has been revealed: 1. Rothschild Bank of London 2. Warburg Bank of Hamburg 3..Rothschild Bank of Berlin 4. Lehman Brothers of NY 5. Lazard Brothers of Paris 6. Kuhn Loeb Bank of NY 7. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy 8.. Goldman Sachs of NY 9. Warburg Bank of Amsterdam 10.Chase Manhattan Bank of NY

These bankers are connected to London Banking Houses which ultimately control the FED. When England lost the Revolutionary War with America where our forefathers were fighting thheir own government, they planned to control us by controlling our banking system, the printing of our money, and our debt. How did it happen? After previous attempts to push the Federal Reserve Act through Congress, a group of bankers funded and staffed Woodrow Wilson's campaign for President. He had comitted to sign this act. In 1913, a Senator, Nelson Aldrich, maternal grandfather to the Rockefellers, pushed the Act through Congress just before Xmas, when much of Congress was on vacation..........
>>> br br I’m not a fan of either hands,... (show quote)


If there are 12 Central Banks controlled by the Federal Reserve Bank, why did you list only 10 of them?

I noticed that the names of the owners of those banks are mostly Jewish. Is this your subtle way of making people believe that the banks are part of a "Jewish plot"? Are you using your dislike of the Central Banks as an excuse for bigotry and Anti-Semitism?
Go to
Feb 23, 2021 23:37:31   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

Does this help you get it ?


That editorial cartoon suggests that "they" planned to "blame Trump" for the C****av***s. Well, basically, Trump is to blame. When he first heard about it, he dismissed it as a "h**x" by the Democrats. But when he found out it wasn't a h**x, he bungled the job of keeping the v***s from spreading, and he wouldn't listen to Dr. F***i's advice.

That diagram listing all those people you say are part of a conspiracy against us involving the v***s shows what appears to be the devil lurking in the background. Well, it doesn't prove anything. Anybody can claim that this or that person, or thing, or idea, is "the work of the devil." They said the same thing about evolution, rock and roll music, swing music, the saxophone, bobbed hair, sex education, alcoholic drinks (forgetting that Jesus drank wine), and so on and so on. White Southerners said it about the Civil Rights movement, often referring to Martin Luther King as "Martin Lucifer Coon."

As for the diagram accusing "they" of lying about tobacco, opioid drugs, GMOs, sugar, and other substances, it may be true, but you show no proof of it.
Go to
Feb 23, 2021 23:12:48   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

YOU FAILED !

All the Presidents were Scumbags, Losers and Rats... they all betrayed the oaths and turned on us...

They ALL Sold us out

They ALL c*********d themselves at some point for the Deep State !

What is Wrong with YOU ?

I’ll give maybe Kennedy the only one who tried to get us out of the New World Order and then maybe Reagan and they even Shot him to try to get Pappy Poppy Heroin Bush in there...

You people make me sick to my stomach !

You know nothing about the scumbags you actually v**ed for and still think they’re l********e P*******ts.

This is how ignorant you are about the Facts.
>>> br br YOU FAILED ! br br All the P... (show quote)


You are totally off the beam!

You expect people to believe that every single President we've ever had has "sold us out," "betrayed the oaths and turned on us," and "c*********d themselves at some point for the Deep State"? Where do you get your information from?

Alright, I'll admit it. Some of them did ignore the oath they took to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States," like Nixon, Trump, and to some extent, Reagan, but certainly not ALL OF THEM! That's going way beyond the laws of averages.

You also think that "they" (by which I assume you mean the "Deep State") had Ronald Reagan shot just so they could replace him with his Vice-President, George H.W. Bush? (The father of future President George W. Bush) Then how do you explain John Hinckley's confession that he tried to k**l Reagan just to gain the attention of actress Jodie Foster, whom he was obsessed with?
Besides, Reagan survived the assassination attempt. If Bush's people wanted to get rid of Reagan and failed, wouldn't they have tried to murder him again? If they failed again, wouldn't they've tried again and again until they finally succeeded? I personally think they would have.

What you're saying is just an i***tic and illogical theory. It's just as insane as "Pizzagate" and Q***n.

I'll admit that conspiracies and intrigue do exist in our Government (as well as the governments of other countries), and I personally believe that more than one person had a hand in the assassination of JFK, but I don't think this theory has any t***h to it, especially since you have presented no evidence to prove it.

By the way, why did you refer to George H.W. Bush as "Pappy Poppy Heroin Bush"?
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 28 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.