Why, if true, after all these years, including his elevation to judgeship, is all this just now being exposed? It doesn't make any sense to me. It all sounds politically based and is typical tactic for the desperate democrats.
If he broke no law, it's strictly an individual moral judgement period. Who and when were the age parameters set by? This smells highly political to me. Typical for the current democratic tactics.
Happy to be here and share.