One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: G1ReconBravo
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
Sep 11, 2017 01:52:14   #
G1ReconBravo wrote:
https://youtu.be/Msw0odRETPE


Not my words
Go to
Sep 11, 2017 01:51:05   #
https://youtu.be/Msw0odRETPE
Go to
Sep 10, 2017 23:15:51   #
16th and 5th anniversaries. And if there is an attack on our soil you can bet it takes place at an official gun free zone.
Go to
Sep 10, 2017 23:01:23   #
karpenter wrote:
Have You Ever Seen Anyone That Can Pack More
Lies
Nonsense
False Narratives

Into A Single Post ??


I suffered through it. And no. Its like a mashup of The View, Rachael Maddow, Joy Reid, Keith Olerman and Morning Joe's transcripts rewritten by someone without the benefit of having a strong understanding of the English language. If this is supposed to make me see things their way, it has failed miserably.
Go to
Sep 9, 2017 05:46:30   #
Fellow Muslim countries don't take them. The Palestinias are nothing but pawns used by both sides to advance agendas. But then we all are on some level. Albert Pike knew his s**t. I figured out who "the nihilists" are.
Go to
Sep 9, 2017 00:04:40   #
straightUp wrote:
I'm glad you wrote this in the end, because I think we do have a common enemy. But I'm not so sure YOU can see it. Let me just say that the entity I am calling our common enemy is neither left, nor right and the whole left/right circus is just that... A circus.

I hope we get a chance to talk about that sometime.


I appreciate your taking the time to respond. There seems to be more going on up there than I originally gave credit to. How refreshing. You sound less like an automocucktoid and more human.
Just a reminder, and defense of my comprehension sk**ls. YOU started the entire post, or response to Emily as
"Read? Emily, are you asking a Trump supporter to "read"? LOL.
Followed by your thoughts on the alt-right. Forgive if I misunderstood these to be correlated in your mind as opposed to being separate ideas. I don't know if you have seen my original acknowledgment and support of Emily's assessment of the AG. Page 4. And read my first post: America 2017: Twilight Zone. Get into my head a little, I couldn't agree more about a circus :)
I'm going to check out some OC by you. Try and get into your head a little.
Go to
Sep 8, 2017 23:20:45   #
S. Maturin wrote:
All the 'heat' seems to be coming from one side-- the side that shows up with masked faces, helmets, and pepper spray, clubs, fire, the normal brownshirt stuff.


Roger that. I've seen those tactics first hand. I don't think we've seen the worst yet. This stuff is right out of CIA's playbok on destabilizing government through civil conflict. It can go hot. There is certainly enough hardware out there. This all depends if good people from both sides can help unify their masses in common cause, or in this case a common enemy. The people who have the platforms and audience to do it aren't.
Go to
Sep 8, 2017 23:06:14   #
boofhead wrote:
I don't know why you oppose the official view as to why the Towers fell. Why would "they" lie to us? What gain? Show me the money!

After all, the towers were under threat of condemnation because they used asbestos as a fire r****dant on the steel used to build them and they were old and there was a need to replace them using the new building codes so they would be seen as less of a danger in these modern times, without releasing all that dangerous asbestos (run screaming for your life) into the atmosphere or to remove all that asbestos safely. Imagine the costs to do either one of those things.

Instead of that, the buildings came down into their own footprint for free (not including the human and financial losses to all of us not part of the system) and the release of asbestos and every other contaminant was allowed with no penalty, and the renter got billions of dollars in insurance in exchange.

Obviously no gain.
I don't know why you oppose the official view as t... (show quote)


TWICE!!
Go to
Sep 8, 2017 22:29:38   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
None of the photos and videos of the destruction of the WTC show any evidence of controlled demolitions. To think they do is nothing more than a conspiracy theory that has overwhelmed gullible dysfunctional fools. In your case, you've spent your entire adult life in the world of photos. The real world is never captured in such two dimensional imagery. Moreover, you are driven by personal prejudices and ideological agendas.

Why change building codes? Seriously? Due to many outdated construction standards incorporated in the WTC, the changes made were radical after 9/11.

1. Prevent progressive collapse by development and nationwide adoption of standards and code provisions, and develop a standard methodology – supported by analytical design tools and practical design.

2. Develop national standards for (1) conducting wind tunnel testing of prototype structures and (2) estimating wind loads and their effects on tall buildings for use in design.

3. Develop criteria to enhance tall building performance by limiting sway under lateral load design conditions (e.g., winds
and earthquakes).

4. Evaluate the technical basis for determining appropriate construction classification and fire rating requirements (especially for tall buildings), and explicitly consider factors including:
• timely access by emergency responders
• the extent to which redundancy in active fire systems should be credited for occupant life safety
• the need for redundancy in fire protection systems that are critical to structural integrity
• the ability of the structure and local floor systems to withstand a maximum credible fire scenario without collapse
• the effect of spaces containing unusually large fuel concentrations
• the extent to which fire control systems should be credited as part of the prevention of fire spread.

5. Establish a capability for studying and testing components, assemblies, and systems under realistic fire and load
conditions, and improve the technical basis for the century-old standard for fire resistance testing.

6. Require a performance objective where uncontrolled building fires result in burnout without partial or global collapse.


7. Adopt and use the “structural frame” approach to fire resistance ratings.

8. Develop criteria, test methods, and standards (1) for the in-service performance of sprayed fire-resistive materials and (2) ensure that these materials, as installed, conform to conditions in tests used to establish their fire resistance rating.

9. Develop performance-based standards and code provisions, to enable the design and retrofit of structures to resist real
building fire conditions, and methods necessary to evaluate the fire performance of the structure as a whole system.

10. Develop and evaluate new fire-resistive coating materials and technologies with significantly enhanced performance and
durability.

11. Evaluate the performance and suitability of advanced structural steel, reinforced and pre-stressed concrete, and other
high-performance material systems for use in building fires.


12. Enhance the performance and possibly the redundancy of active fire protection systems to accommodate greater risks
associated with increasing building height, including higher threat profile.

13. Develop fire alarm and communications systems to provide continuous, reliable, and accurate information on the status of
life safety conditions.

14. Adapt control panels at fire/emergency command stations to accept and interpret a larger quantity of more reliable
information from the active fire protection systems

15. Develop (1) real-time off-site secure t***smission of valuable information from fire alarm and other monitored building
systems for use by emergency responders and (2) preserve information either off-site or in a black box for purposes of
subsequent investigations and analysis.

16. Improve building occupants’ preparedness for evacuation in case of building emergencies.

17. Design tall buildings to accommodate timely full building evacuation of occupants when required. Stairwell capacity and stair discharge door width should be adequate to accommodate counterflow due to emergency access by responders.

18. Maximize remoteness of egress components (i.e., stairs, elevators, exits) without negatively impacting the average
travel distance. Maintain the functional integrity and survivability of egress components in a manner that becomes intuitive to building occupants.

19. Take steps to ensure that accurate emergency information is communicated in a timely manner through better coordination of information among different emergency responder groups.

20. Evaluate current and next generation evacuation technologies, including protected/hardened elevators, exterior escape devices, and stairwell descent devices.

21. Install fire-protected and structurally hardened elevators to improve emergency response activities in tall buildings.

22. Install emergency communications systems effective in buildings with challenging radio frequency propagation environments and able to track emergency responders.

23. Establish procedures for gathering critical information to enhance the situational awareness of emergency responders.

24. Establish and implement codes and protocols which ensure effective and uninterrupted operation of the command and control system for large-scale building emergencies.

25. Certify as-designed and as-built safety systems by a qualified third party, independent of the building owner(s).

26. Enforce available provisions in building codes to ensure that egress and sprinkler requirements are met by existing
buildings.
27. Require building owners to retain documents, including supporting calculations and test data, related to building design, construction, maintenance and modifications over the entire life of the building.

28. Clarify the role of the “Design Professional in Responsible Charge” to ensure all appropriate design professionals (e.g., the
fire protection engineer) are part of the design team in buildings that employ innovative or unusual structural and fire safety systems.

29. Develop continuing education curricula for training fire protection engineers and architects in structural engineering
principles and design, and in modern fire protection principles and technologies.

30. Develop academic and professional short-course training materials in the use of computational fire dynamics and
thermo-structural analysis tools.


These code changes will produce buildings that have significantly improved resistance to extreme loads. Although some of the changes will increase costs of tall buildings, the overall increase is expected to be relatively small.
None of the photos and videos of the destruction o... (show quote)


Sounds like a few companies are going to have a lot to gain. Investment tips?
Go to
Sep 8, 2017 14:50:05   #
straightUp wrote:
LOL... I like you. You put thought into your post.

I have a remote meeting with a team in India in the morning... (actually really late for them, but really early for me...) Anyway, I gotta crash soon. I did scan through your post... read the last paragraph. Yes, we probably do have a common enemy. I never get a chance to really discuss that because so few people can get past the partisan crap. Oh, and I'm not Republican nor have I ever been Democrat. But I do need to set you straight on some bulls**t. ;)
LOL... I like you. You put thought into your post.... (show quote)


I am always happy to talk. I don't h**e people. I h**e certain ideologies. And I put more thought into breathing than most libs put into their ideology. They put more emotion into flipping a light switch than I do writing a love letter. I'm really trying to prevent this conflict of ideology from going hot. It shows all the signs.
Go to
Sep 7, 2017 22:50:09   #
straightUp wrote:
Well, like I said... In these 8 months there's been plenty of non-economic policy and behavior from which to draw some basic conclusions.

For instance, no other president elect in history had to settle a lawsuit for before being sworn in, much less two class-actions suites and a civil law suit for a total of $25 million. And these were for fraud! (No fucking s**t.) For the first time (as far as I know) the American people actually elected a known fraudster. That's like hiring a known p*******e to babysit your kids.

He is also the first president in history not to have ANY political or military experience. This by itself doesn't mean anything... In fact, he *could* have bucked the system if he was a natural leader, but he's not. He's just a spoiled brat who's always had the money to be the boss and that s**t doesn't fly in the public sector, especially if you don't even have any experience in anything related to the presidency. (Except maybe riding in limousines).

So, far we're only seconds into his term and already... things are weird.

I'm going to FF, otherwise I'll be here all day...

8 months in, he has set some notable precedents... For one, his popularity is the lowest of any president since 1953 when they started looking at president’s average net approval rating during his first month vs. 175 days in, according to the FiveThirtyEight aggregate. Don't worry about the technical details, the point it he is exceedingly unpopular and a lot of that is because of a series of setbacks (many of his own making) that have led to a steady flow of negative news coverage.

He's the first president I know of that lies so much it's becoming normal.
He's the first president I know of that's constantly insulting people and often lying about them.
He is the first president I know of with a reputation for making statements that conflict with his own state department.
He is the first American president to refuse to visit the UK because the people there don't like him.
He is the first American president that caused sovereign governments like the Republic of Ireland to consider banning his presence.
He is the first U.S. president to actually encourage North Korea to step up their nuclear program. Which proves they don't take Trump seriously.
He is the ONLY president since China became a major trading partner to be stupid enough to actually threaten China with a cut-off on trade. China didn't even bother to respond because they know we can't do that without totally fucking ourselves. I guess they can't take Trump seriously either.

It's not just the precedents he sets... Even more importantly, Trump has burned too many bridges and now it's doubtful he can advance any agenda at all. No president has ever been a one-man band. Presidents have to be good at building coalitions, Trump has probably already screwed that up and that's probably why he doesn't even HAVE an agenda. His actions have all been driven by undoing wh**ever Obama did. So thing's like DACA. But unlike Trump, Obama also pushed things through legislation, so things like the ACA, which Trump FAILED to repeal.

So, I'd say there's enough there to warrant my humorous little dialog.

:)
Well, like I said... In these 8 months there's bee... (show quote)



Oh come on man! You're making me gag. This reads like a transcript straight from AM Joy or Democracy! or any of the bulls**t MSM. If I believed a word of any of the manufactured "facts" they/you offer I would probably be zombiecucked and should hope that someone who knows and loves me would put me out of my misery. Burn the body. Its a terrible disease.
And I'd say there's enough there to warrant a lot of hourmorous dialogue from a lot of people and I would hope to see some.
Go to
Sep 7, 2017 00:03:15   #
straightUp wrote:
Read? Emily, are you asking a Trump supporter to "read"? LOL.

I think we all know the deal here Emily. The people on the alt-right are r****ts, so you can't challenge them with rational arguments even if they could read beyond the 3rd grade level, because they will only shut it out. They HAVE to remain fixed on these patriotic "cupcakes" like how Sessions is trying to "protect" people. LOL.

They wouldn't be playing these charades if they could be honest and just say they like Sessions and Trump because they h**e minorities and that it's all emotional. To be honest, I'd have a lot more respect for them if they could at least be honest about their bigotry. The problem is (and this is funny) many of them were brought up (to some extent) as Christians and the Christian ideology is very clear on treating others as you would treat yourself. So on some level they know their bigotry is wrong but their will is so weak that they can't abide by their own Christian principals. So, they're conflicted and what do they do about it? They lie. They pretend that what they really want is e******y and freedom and justice and all the symbols they see being revered in American culture. "Yeah, that's the ticket!"

But anyone can see through the actions and declarations of that "pasty little rat-man" (excellent description btw) that he is doing everything possible to create a police state and that's just what the Trump supporters are asking for... A police state that favors white people. Like an apartheid system. That is what they don't have the guts to tell you.
Read? Emily, are you asking a Trump supporter to &... (show quote)


Stand back and enjoy as I dissect this fools brain

I'll just break it down into its awful segments.

1. "The people on the alt-right are r****ts."
This is probably the most accurate statement you made, but falls very short due to your over-generalization of all Trump supporters being nothing but the 4chan/pol s**tposters and Reddit basement dwellers known as the alt-right. I would say 95%Trump supporters I meet in the street have no clue what the fuck that term means or where it comes from. And yet they are all too aware of their negative association with it.

2. "so you can't challenge them with rational arguments even if they could read beyond the 3rd grade level."
You are just doubling down on your overgeneralization. Want to challenge me on reading ability and comprehension sk**ls? Try your luck at an honest to goodness debate? Trust me you dont.

3. "They HAVE to remain fixed on these patriotic "cupcakes" like how Sessions is trying to "protect" people"
Now you are speaking my language but in a different tongue that nobody on the right will give an ear to. Why not just speak to the fact he was/is a poor choice for AG. I have said many times his style of law enforcement should bring to mind the jackbooted tactics of the Chicago police ala 1968. But understand that most who support/ed him did and still do with an expectation that his awareness of child trafficking and exploitation on an industrial scale, and obvious crimes commited by HRC and CF not to mention countless others, would dominate the priorities of the AG for the next 4 years. He has done the bare minimum. And he will be gone soon.

4. "They wouldn't be playing these charades if they could be honest and just say they like Sessions and Trump because they h**e minorities and that it's all emotional".
I for one have never met ANYONE on the right who feels that way. I don't know where this kind of bulls**t info comes from. But I must point out that most people on the right (99+%) would base their descision on a candidate on a coin toss before they let emotions be a factor in their pick. Emotional v****g is 100% Cuck. My own mother understands and taught me this and has stated many times that she would be more than willing and happy to give up her right to v**e if it meant keeping stupid emotionally vunerable women from ruining this country at the polls, which is WAAAY more extreme than my own beliefs. But then my mother is a TRUE conservative with ideology based on facts, and understanding the destructive power of the self absorbed emo v**e. Her power comes from accepting her natural g****r role in life and sacrificing anything and everything in order to better raise self sufficient humans who take personal responsibily for their own lives, instead of running around with her tits out and a pussy hat on screaming about percieved ine******y. Now that's true feminism at work!

5. "I'd have a lot more respect for them if they could at least be honest about their bigotry"
No you wouldn't. And shouldn't.

6. "The problem is (and this is funny) many of them were brought up (to some extent) as Christians"
Christianity is not the problem. And there is no extent. You are. Or are not. The teaching of false doctrine is the problem. And it is a problem for sure. For we all sin and no sin is better or worse than another. And as christian sinners, we have no place to judge.

7. "Christian ideology is very clear on treating others as you would treat yourself." Wrong. Love all as you would your brother. No room or place for self absorption.

8. "on some level they know their bigotry is wrong but their will is so weak that they can't abide by their own Christian principals."
Maybe. But who are you to make such claims? Again the over generalization and self rightous holier-than-thou tone takes away any impact you might have had. Those whose hearts and minds you might have had any influence on or helped see things your way are gone and see you as worthless

9. "They pretend that what they really want is e******y and freedom and justice and all the symbols they see being revered in American culture. "Yeah, that's the ticket!".
Again I can't speak for every right leaning American, but there is no pretending that Freedom and Liberty are by far without a doubt the two most important American virtues that are demanded to be respected in minds of the average American and Trump supporter. We love Freedom. And Liberty. Any reverence to or love for "symbols" is cuckf*ggotry. Liberty is whats at the center of the Tootsie Pop.

10. I love how you saved the best (WORST) for last. "he is doing everything possible to create a police state and that's just what the Trump supporters are asking for... A police state that favors white people"

This last one is so stupid, so retarted, I mean medical diagnosis level r****ded, and based on who knows what the fuck kind of vcr manual t***slated propaganda, coming from what
HAS TO BE some suburban white kid or a foreigner. Nobody FROM the hood would say some dumb s**t like that.
If you knew s**t about s**t you would know that:

A. The police state doesn't need to be created. Its well established and its been around for at least 30 years. Modified and upgraded exponentially in the last 8 years by that lover of humanity ex prez. But single worst thing ever done was by Nixon and his declaration of the War on Drugs.
Trump has nothing to do with it. Might even legalize the bud if given a fucking chance.

B. Where the fuck is the rock you are just now crawling out from under? It has always favored white people. Even black cops favor white people under most circumstances. This is nothing new, or even r****t. Just the reality of the dangers of daily life in the hood...

I mean no personal ill will towards you. You probably mean well and recognize there is a serious problem in this world. I do to. We have the same enemy and you either cant see it yet, or refuse to even look around. Take a good hard look at your beliefs. Who are you? Who are your parents? Who is your creator? Your ideas, are they truly your own? What has shaped them? Where do they come from? These are real questions everybody should ask. I bet you want to be something more in this world than just a pawn used to complete somebody elses political objectives. Break free. Dont be a Rep or a Dem. Be you. The real you. Stop being cucked, and called out, and ultimately turned out. Peace.
Go to
Sep 6, 2017 19:15:12   #
straightUp wrote:
Trump is already making every president in history look good. I'm sure his presidency will go down in history as comic relief.

"2020-2024 president xxx, before that we had Obama from 2008 to 2016."
"What about 2016 to 2020?"
"Oh, that... well we took a break from having a real president and experimented with a clown for a while."


You obviously are not an American history archivist or very astute reader and observer of American history or current events if: 8 months into a P**********l term that goes mostly unreported on*, And would barely be enough time for ANY government action to be seen and felt by citizens at street level, is enough to influence your highly regarded and respected opinion of 44 men with a combined total of 236 years in an office with more archived information and documentation available for public research including popularity polling and op-eds than you could digest in a lifetime. So maybe you work part time at McDonalds or Starbucks? Or you are a powerful sorcerer?
Please sir, I'm just a poor man of very limited means becoming aged in my years I know, but I too wish to have such wonderous powers of insight and historical reference that you seem to possess. And would gladly indenture myself to you for the remainder of my years if you could find the place in your heart and time to maybe EXPLAIN YOUR EITHER ABSOLUTELY FUCKING RIDICULOUS OR MIRACULOUSLY PROFOUND OBSERVATION. I'm sure I can't be the only one wondering...
Go to
Sep 6, 2017 16:55:28   #
karpenter wrote:
Can't Break-Up The Family
That's The Prog Logic For Bringing In Every Family Member That Ever Drew A Breath Of Air
Then It's Still Logic For Sending Them All Back

They Came In Together, They All Leave Together

Obama Says Going To A Nation They Don't Know
And A Language They Don't Speak Is 'Cruel'
Yet That Is Exactly What Their Parents Did

So We Have People That Have Been Waiting Their Turn 10yrs Or More To Come Here Legally
And These I******s Butted Themselves In To The Front Of The Line
Forceably Taking These Other People's Places At Work And Schools
With-Out Applying For Citizenship, Overloading And Putting Hospitals Out Of Business
They Can Go Home Now, Wait Their Proper Turn
And Let These Others Have Their Proper And Legal Chance For Their Better Tommorrow

Why Do You Progs H**E Immigrants That Want To Come Here Legally
And Want To Become Legal And Proper Citizens ??
Can't Break-Up The Family br That's The Prog Logic... (show quote)


From the ideologues who care nothing of family values. Who in fact oppose it, and actively legislate to destroy its foundations.
Go to
Sep 6, 2017 14:24:10   #
Glad I wasn't drinking coffee while reading that. Damn fine hilarity! I came to this random little place hoping to get away from mindless emotional reactions and pre-scripted talking point arguments from both sides on the political spectrum. Twitter is like watching monkeys at the zoo throwing feces at one another. This place and its active users have more of a tight family feel. Even when some members of the family are cuckbots and need publicly shamed and made fun of for it. Seems to be less vile hatred spewing here which solves nothing and everyone knows only leads to the darkside of the force.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.