One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: ProudTiger
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
Feb 3, 2021 15:35:49   #
(Main)
Is it possible for someone to be dumber than AOC???
JFlorio wrote:
I thought at the end you would say this is satire. Introduction of this Bill should disqualify her as a state representative. Hell it should disqualify her from the human race.


And this I***T sits in the Texas Legislature?? She must have gotten her brains in a C*****r Jacks box! YGTBSME!
Go to
Feb 3, 2021 15:25:01   #
(Main)
Biden officials asked for reporters’ questions in advance
JFlorio wrote:
If you have to ask that you are too dumb to realize what a danger having a complacent press is. Damn you’re dumb.


Dumb is an Understatement. STUPID is more appropriate!
Go to
Nov 8, 2017 14:22:59   #
(Main)
HATING W****S: NOT A SOLUTION FOR B****S
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
B****s should be thankful they were bought from the Muslim s***e traders and brought to America. Those left in Africa, are still living in misery. Many of them are k**led by Boko Haram, their children raped by Muslims. Many of them are still sold as s***es to the Arab countries. And when they get old, the Muslims just get rid of them.

Muslims until now own s***es. The s***es came from African countries, and other 3rd world countries. It was reported that when they arrive to the Muslim homes, they are beaten, with no pay. The Muslim s***e owners confiscate their passports so the s***es could not escape or leave. This is still happening.

S***ery started from Mohammad's people when they ens***ed the Christians in Jerusalem. They raped them, k**led them. Those left were required to pay the highest tax. And when the Christians could not afford, they were k**led. That is your religion of peace.
=============== br B****s should be thankful they ... (show quote)




Go to
Nov 8, 2017 14:14:43   #
(Main)
T*********rs in the Military – Who Decides: Congress, the President, or Federal Judges?
E wrote:
A wussie l*****t Federal Judge, probably appointed by a president who was known to frequent homosexual circles in his youth and early Chicago days, will declare that t*********rs, going both ways, will be allowed in all capacities of the military, until the Supreme Court tells him to shove it up his appropriate aperture.

But, as the Constitution states, this is a matter for Congress and the President to handle and direct our military matters. Proud Tiger, you are right in your last statement. The United States Military is not there for social experimentation. The military is a weapon for the Generals and Admirals to direct in time of war and the smooth integrated pr********n thereof. It must act as a machine with finely tuned parts. As it is, personalities can and have caused friction and inefficiencies and danger without deliberately installing areas of friction because some one or group thinks they have a right to be in the military. This is not a right. It is not in the bill of rights. It is the right of the Commander and Chief to pick the best men he can find to run the military as best as possible. It is for them to pick the best teams to accomplish the Commander and Chief's directives.

Look who tried to allow t*********rs and homosexuals and women in the military in every capacity. A man who never served himself and would do better organizing a group grope in a bathhouse. And the the one who installed 'Don't ask don't tell' also never served and used deferments and never saw a woman he didn't want to abuse and use while serving in political office and before, whether they wanted to or not, whether they were cute or not. Just so they weren't his wife. And so many who want them in the military are the same ones who are all to happy to point out that the current President got deferments from the draft, while conveniently forgeting that the last president and B. Clinton also didn't serve. And they want to introduce this dynamic into the barracks, showers, battlefield, ships etc. You are just introducing the various elements those two presidents failed at all to often.

In the early days of Israel they had everyone serve. They found that there were more casualties in mixed units on the battlefield because the enemy would rather fight to the death then surrender to a woman. While it is always nice to rescue a fellow soldier in battle, sometimes it is just to dangerous and good sense prevents this. But put a woman out there and men will risk their lives beyond reason to rescue them, even if it endangered the whole unit. These are dynamics that are real and exist and you can't train away. Also, the women might be able to eventually pass the physical requirements of some situations. It is a waste of training time that would be better spent on men more likely to pass those tests and be able to maintain that level over time. It is simple facts. And those men will blend better on the field of battle. Throw in one homosexual man and they might leave him on the field of battle rather then save him. Why risk your life for someone you wouldn't want to share a fox hole with.

This also introduces the dynamic of sexual harassment and false accusations. Again, something that keeps the dynamics of the group from flowing in a fluid manner for the betterment of all, the unit, and the mission. It has already happened.

And what about sex occurring because it is available between willing people who find themselves alone. Does this weaken the unit? Yes. Like two people at an outpost together. It doesn't even have to get to full out sex. Just little flirtations and goofing off can cause the lose of a mission or outpost or lives.

Do women have a position in the military that is useful? Here comes the h**e. Secretaries, limited supply units no where near combat, Nurses. Oh yes. Nurses. Nothing helps get a man over his injuries like a compassionate female nurse. It just works. They are also useful in working with female prisoners. Homosexuals? Can't think of any benefit. T*********rs. No way. Even more d******e then homosexuals.

To sum it up, always go for the all hetrosexual fighting force for better efficiency and better chances for victory. The whole purpose. Let those others find a useful place in the civilian world.
A wussie l*****t Federal Judge, probably appointed... (show quote)



Absolutely outstanding comments "E" in every respect. It seems that you must have been there and done that as I did for about 30 years. You comments are very accurately "on target" not to mention, civil and well thought out. I know you join with me and thousands of other military professionals in hoping and praying that America gets her military on a straight path again with the objective of winning wars and not social experimentation. If we don't, we will find our selves living in a "third world" country very soon. I strongly believe that Donald Trump is the very last chance of turning our country around and restoring it to the way we have known it all our lives up until LBJ in the '60s and the damage other Liberals have done that followed him.

Thanks for your comments my friend -- I would liked to have served America with you. MAGA and God bless our great country.

--Jack B

Go to
Nov 7, 2017 20:27:45   #
(Main)
T*********rs in the Military – Who Decides: Congress, the President, or Federal Judges?
maryla wrote:
I agree! Plus, I understand the t*********r will need drug assistance the rest of life and it seems they would be weaker and less ready. I th/ink Trump's ruling should be upheld


T*********rs, homosexuals and women (God love them and they do have a vital non-combatant role) have been a significant degradation on all military combat ready units -- Most if not all require special support as you mentioned. If the US continues this Social Experiment within our military and more; we can expect to be a third world nation in less than 20 years. God help us!

--JB
Go to
Nov 7, 2017 20:18:58   #
(Main)
HATING W****S: NOT A SOLUTION FOR B****S
HATING W****S: NOT A SOLUTION FOR B****S

An Excellent Post by Mychal Massie – A Black man.

Indeed, B****s seem to be their very own worst enemy in multiple areas of our society. IMHO B****s must find a resolve to their h**e within the Black Community itself. However, there is a major problem there -- Exceptional Leadership with meaningful horizons to become a productive factor in American Society is severely lacking within the Black Community.

Read Massie’s exceptional post at the link below – it makes sense for all Americans:

http://www.wnd.com/2017/11/hating-w****s-not-a-solution-for-b****s/

--JB
Go to
Nov 7, 2017 20:09:28   #
(Main)
T*********rs in the Military – Who Decides: Congress, the President, or Federal Judges?
Ref: https://constitution.com/t*********rs-military-decides-congress-president-federal-judges/

A very interesting post relative to the inclusion or denial of t*********rs in the US Military. Please read for yourself the post contained in the reference link above.

As a former Commanding Officer of multiple units within the US Navy, I can tell you first-hand how disruptive male homosexuals are when mixed into a unit of heterosexual men. I can only imagine that t*********rs would have the same or worse effects on the readiness of military combat units. Women in the military are a related but separate issue but I think they have the same or a worse deleterious effect on the readiness of combat units as do homosexuals and t*********rs. Thank God I retired before women or t*********rs became members of combatant units. Back then it was "Don't ask don't tell" for male homosexuals -- that worked pretty well. Women and t*********rs in the US Military were still below the horizon of reality. When a homosexual was identified for any reason on my ship he was promptly off the ship in a matter of days -- permanently.

The US Military is not a medium for social experimentation regardless what Barack Obama and the Progressive Liberals think. Let’s MAGA! God Bless America!

--JB
Go to
Oct 11, 2017 15:10:07   #
(Main)
Update On The USS John S. McCain Collision Off The Coast Of Singapore -- CO and XO Removed
E wrote:
I agree with Saltwind and ProudTiger here. I find it hard to understand how a fast moving quick maneuvering ship like a destroyer could get in a collusion with those slower vessels. Incompetence somewhere worthy of dismissal or court martial.

Interesting observation: The commanding officer, Cmdr. Alfredo J. Sanchez, and executive officer, CDR Jessie L. Sanchez, Where they related?

To often we have tokens advanced in our armed forces over more worthy people, especially by that last POS POTUS. These were for diversity or some other BS. The best man for the job is and always will be the best person for the job and damn that BS diversity. Our armed forces are not a social experiment.
I agree with Saltwind and ProudTiger here. I find ... (show quote)


Interesting question you asked E about the CO and XO having the same last name -- Sanchez. At the risk of making humor in the midst of a very serious matter, The retired Navy officer who sent me this article said he wondered if the Sanchez's were man and wife?! I hope the Navy has not gotten that far in the PC muck yet. If you go to the link you will find their photos -- both males with the same last names.

Best regards,

--JB
Go to
Oct 11, 2017 14:10:49   #
(Main)
Update On The USS John S. McCain Collision Off The Coast Of Singapore -- CO and XO Removed
saltwind 78 wrote:
Proud, I was in a collision at sea many, many years ago. Somebody left a hatch open and the water shorted out steering. We were high-lining personnel from the Warrington to the USS Roberts. They retired the Captain. I was super impressed with the officer that had the con. He knew exactly what to do. I believe that the navy was a little fast on the draw. It is obvious to me that the navy always retires a Captain that commands a ship when something like this happens, since he is responsible for his command!
Proud, I was in a collision at sea many, many year... (show quote)


Roger your comments Saltwind and thanks for your contribution to America. Yes the Captain (and others) should be relieved in all such cases. I suggest that the Navy you reference was much stronger and much more combat ready than than the Navy we have today. The Navy I retired from some 28 years ago was much stronger than today -- we had one hell of a lot more ships. I would not fit in with today's Navy -- they would probably have me in the brig after about six weeks back on active duty. It seems that today we are more interested in ensuring all hands have a full ration of self esteem, taking care of pregnant women as well as taking care of t*********rs and homosexuals than we are in strong combat readiness and semanship. It seems that standards have been significantly reduced and I wonder when the US military will start handing out participation trophies. I would not put up with the "crap" in today's Navy for a minute. At the risk of repeating my self.... We have BIG problems and a large share of our poor combat readiness can be directly attributed to Barack Hussein Obama, weak Secretaries of Armed Services, as well as weak Admirals and Generals full of administrative experience and BS.

--JB
Go to
Oct 11, 2017 13:09:35   #
(Main)
Update On The USS John S. McCain Collision Off The Coast Of Singapore -- CO and XO Removed
Here is the latest information on the recent USS McCain collision as well as a reference link. As a former CO of a US Navy ship, I am still interested in learning the rank, g****r and experience level of the Officer of the Deck at the time of collision on the McCain and the Fitzgerald as well. Please post if any reader has that information. Please note -- it is spelled out in the following article that the repairs to the McCain are estimated to be some $223 million and take up to a year to complete. I would bet the cost will be higher. Needless to say we have big time problems in our Navy and the rest of the US Armed Services as well. I hope we can exempt the USMC from the last statement as I believe when the USMC goes down the tubes.... America is not far behind.

God Bless America!

--JB

USS John S. McCain CO, XO Removed as Part of Fatal Collision Investigation

https://news.usni.org/2017/10/10/uss-john-s-mccain-co-xo-removed-part-fatal-collision-investigation

Sam LaGrone – USNI – 10 Oct 17

The commander and executive officer of the guided-missile destroyer that was struck by a merchant oil tanker off the coast of Singapore on Aug. 21 were removed from their positions, a U.S. 7th Fleet spokesman told USNI News on late Tuesday.

USS John S. McCain (DDG-56) commander Cmdr. Alfredo J. Sanchez and executive officer Cmdr. Jessie L. Sanchez were removed from their positions by U.S. 7th Fleet commander Vice Adm. Phil Sawyer, “due to loss of confidence.”


The removals are a result of an ongoing investigation into the collision that cost the lives of 10 sailors and resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars of damage to the ship.

“While the investigation is ongoing, it is evident the collision was preventable, the commanding officer exercised poor judgment, and the executive officer exercised poor leadership of the ship’s training program,” read a statement provided to USNI News.

“Cmdr. A. Sanchez was reassigned to Commander, Naval Forces Japan (CNFJ) and Cmdr. J. Sanchez was reassigned to Ship Repair Facility (SRF) Yokosuka. Cmdr. Ed Angelinas, former commanding officer of USS McCampbell (DDG-85), assumed duties as acting commanding officer. Lt. Cmdr. Ray Ball, chief engineer of USS Antietam (CG-54), will assume duties as acting executive officer.”

The two officers are the seventh and eighth to lose their positions as a result of ongoing accountability actions following the collisions of McCain and USS Fitzgerald (DDG-62) that resulted in the total death of 17 sailors.


Former U.S. 7th Fleet commander Vice Adm. Joseph Aucoin was removed weeks short of his planned retirement shortly after the McCain collision. The command triad of Fitzgerald –commanding officer Cmdr. Bryce Benson, executive officer Cmdr. Sean Babbitt and command master chief CMC Brice Baldwin – were removed from their positions two months after that destroyer’s fatal collision.


Last month, Rear Adm. Charles Williams, commander of Combined Task Force 70, and Capt. Jeffery Bennett, commodore of Destroyer Squadron 15 were removed from their commands as a result of ongoing accountability actions into the two collisions.

News of the removals comes as McCain began its t***sit to the U.S. Naval Base in Yokosuka, Japan to begin planned repairs. According to a Navy cost estimate of the repairs obtained by USNI News, fixing McCain will cost about $223 million and take about a year.


In addition to the investigations into the individual collisions of McCain and Fitzgerald, U.S. Fleet Forces commander Adm. Phil Davidson is leading a Navy-wide investigation. Secretary of the Navy Richard V. Spencer is also leading a separate investigation into the incidents.

The following is the complete statement from U.S. 7th Fleet.

YOKOSUKA, Japan — The commanding officer, Cmdr. Alfredo J. Sanchez, and executive officer, CDR Jessie L. Sanchez, of the guided-missile destroyer USS John S. McCain (DDG 56) were relieved of their duties by Vice Adm. Phil Sawyer, Commander, Seventh Fleet, on Oct. 11. Both were relieved due to a loss of confidence.


John S. McCain was involved in a collision with the merchant vessel Alnic MC Aug. 21 that claimed the lives of 10 Sailors, injured five more, and damaged both ships.


While the investigation is ongoing, it is evident the collision was preventable, the commanding officer exercised poor judgment, and the executive officer exercised poor leadership of the ship’s training program.

Cmdr. A. Sanchez was reassigned to Commander, Naval Forces Japan (CNFJ) and Cmdr. J. Sanchez was reassigned to Ship Repair Facility (SRF) Yokosuka.


Cmdr. Ed Angelinas, former commanding officer of USS McCampbell (DDG-85), assumed duties as acting commanding officer. Lt. Cmdr. Ray Ball, chief engineer of USS Antietam (CG-54), will assume duties as acting executive officer.
Go to
Oct 5, 2017 22:32:12   #
(Main)
Proof that NFL Negro players are only protesting because they are R****T hypocrites.
EN Submarine Qualified wrote:
I responded to this thread but don't what happened to my words. Not a biggie but I do want to say even before the info on the Raiders came, I had already made a decision.
I recall after getting out of the Navy in 1961 I watched the first TV program of my life. Bart Starr and the Packers. Followed them through the first Super Bowl and until last Monday night football when the 'things' for lack of another word were kneeling and absorbing splinters from the bench,the TV went off!!! It will stay off. I have been a Packer fan for 56 years. Guess you felt you didn't need me. Guess what? The feeling is mutual.
I responded to this thread but don't what happened... (show quote)


Over paid "meat heads" -- here is another good reference to their stupidity.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/21476/who-needs-rules-nfl-player-arrested-every-7-days-joseph-curl

--JB
Go to
Oct 5, 2017 22:05:03   #
(Main)
Proof that NFL Negro players are only protesting because they are R****T hypocrites.
ProudTiger wrote:
A bunch of over paid juveniles who play a "Game". The people who died defending the f**g of America were not playing a "Game" --What a bunch of C-R-A-P. Wake up NFL players and get on America's team (and I don't mean the Cowboys)!

--JB


And a bit more.... See this informative link telling it like it is:


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/4/nfl-protests-hurt-the-fans-and-the-funding/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWVRVelpqbGxZMlE0WldVNCIsInQiOiJSSnZJc281R2FXMVBqUzh2RkhaQmF3dnFlWXpLYWo3MG41QStcLzFUam4zYXUrajdWeHh0SlwvU2dSOVRcL2NyRXVNKzBhQnphVytPMXk5cmVYZVNQQ3Z6aTlXMmU5N3JFSWg3VFpPa0lFN051RStCQ282N210UmJYaTEyRVpMa2FYWSJ9
Go to
Oct 5, 2017 21:55:44   #
(Main)
Proof that NFL Negro players are only protesting because they are R****T hypocrites.
Nuclearian wrote:
Over the past month we’ve seen protests within the NFL take a startling r****t turn. Some players are no longer happy just to quietly protest the anthem, as we’re now seeing black players rendering black power salutes after they sack white players, an act that Seahawks player Michael Bennett started last month. But now things have taken a startling turn for the worst, and a white quarterback has just suffered a season-ending injury that appears to be due to a d********g act of r****m on the football field.

We learned last week about the disturbing thing that began happening on the Oakland Raiders football team. As we previously reported, the Oakland Raiders is the only NFL lineup made up almost entirely of black players, except for their white quarterback, Derek Carr. Carr decided to stand proud and tall for the national anthem before the Raiders-Redskins game two weeks ago, but his entire offensive line – that protects him on the field from being hit – decided to sit out for the national anthem.

Before the game, one of the black players allegedly told another player, “If he [Carr] wants to stand alone for the National Anthem, he can stand alone on the field.”

Armstrong & Getty noted on their sports radio program that the star quarterback was not sacked a single time last season as his offensive line was always there to shield him from getting hit. But curiously, in the game immediately following the anthem protest by the black players, the white quarterback would suddenly find himself without any sort of protection by the players who were supposed to quite literally, have his back. He would go on to be sacked four times by the Redskins, back to back to back on the second offensive series of the Raiders.

While we had all hoped that this team was not actually punishing their white quarterback for standing for the national anthem, what just happened during the Oakland Raiders’ game against the Denver Broncos over the weekend has many fans shaking their head in disbelief. The very same white quarterback Derek Carr, whose black teammates in the week prior said Carr could “stand alone on the field,” now has a fractured spine after suffering a nearly career-ending injury on the football field.

The Ringer reports that the game came to an abrupt halt after Carr took a brutal hit that rendered him motionless and unable to move on the field. Medical personnel scrambled to attend to him, where fans anxiously held their breath as Carr was whisked away to a blue medical tent.

“Carr was scrambling in the backfield trying to avoid a sack from multiple Broncos defenders when, falling toward the ground, it appeared he took a knee in the back from Broncos defensive end Adam Gotsis,” The Ringer reported. “Carr stayed down on the field before heading to the blue medical tent on the sideline, and eventually the locker room.”

Would the black offensive line throw the entire game in order to teach Carr a lesson for standing for the anthem? Sports commentators Armstrong & Getty believe that’s exactly what happened. Here’s a transcript from their sports broadcast that took place after the Raiders-Redskins game, and it’s extremely unsettling. via The Federalist Papers:

“If this story is true, you’ve got an animosity between a white quarterback and a black offensive line that you can’t fix very easily,” they said. “Now this is getting into paranoia … and the fan base and the whole country.”

They wondered if this was a one-time “throwing” of the game.

“So is this a one-time punishment? Have they gotten together and talked to each other? Or are the black guys in the team not going to block for the white guys?

“At least for one game, it seems to be a message that was sent,” the other host said. “Maybe it was brief, maybe it was ‘alright, we’re going to let him get hit a couple times, see if he gets the message,’ but we don’t know.”

There were a handful of dropped passes by some of the black players that were “really weird,” they went on to say.

“That happens in the NFL all the time … but then the other stuff came up,” they said.

The hosts then said their “inside source” who is “extremely reliable” claims the game was in fact thrown which could go on to be a disastrous scandal for the NFL.

“They have a huge danger warning buzzer going off right now because if this happens on the Raiders, it could happen on any team as different decisions are made … as times are divided.”

When a reporter asked a team official about this, the hosts said they would be “blackballed.”

Later in the broadcast, TV Host Bill O’Reilly pointed out that it’s illegal to throw a game,and the players could go to prison for what they’ve done.

It’s entirely possible that Carr’s injuries were completely coincidental. But in light of what was said the week prior, where one of his black teammates allegedly said that Carr could “stand alone on the field,” Carr’s sudden back injury cannot go unquestioned.


http://freedomdaily.com/white-qb-tackled-black-teammates-not-kneeling-just-made-shocking-admission-else/
Over the past month we’ve seen protests within the... (show quote)


A bunch of over paid juveniles who play a "Game". The people who died defending the f**g of America were not playing a "Game" --What a bunch of C-R-A-P. Wake up NFL players and get on America's team (and I don't mean the Cowboys)!

--JB
Go to
Sep 28, 2017 21:31:43   #
(Main)
The "Deep State" in America -- The best characterization I have ever seen!
son of witless wrote:
Now that there is a good Halloween costume. Kind of a green wolfman. I wonder, do green hairy l***s m****r ?


Probably yes..... How about this one also for Halloween.....

--JB


Go to
Sep 28, 2017 21:02:45   #
(Main)
The "Deep State" in America -- The best characterization I have ever seen!
This cartoon needs to be nominated for the Academy Awards. They say that a picture is worth a thousand words... This one is worth at least 10,000 words and MORE! It is worth studying for a while as it depicts the current American problem in spades! God Bless America..... And Ben Garrison for his contribution.

--JB


Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.