One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: oldgeezer83
Nov 21, 2016 13:31:13   #
I thought it was about time to jog the memory of those I sent this message to almost 2 years ago.
As the 2008 e******n campaign is under way, the American people need to know whats been
happening to the Democrat Party. So far the things exposed in this review are on schedule.
George Soros is the biggest enemy the USA has. And we had better be careful about electing
anyone who is connected to him.
It is a pretty long read, but the information is very important to the very survival of this country,
and its ways of life, and the principles upon which it was founded.
I would be interested in knowing how deeply Barack Obama is connected to Soros, Also, Soros has endorsed Obama in the Democratic Primary, and Hillary Clinton has connections with Soros as well.
Looks like he has gained connections with all front runners in the primary. I think it is important for every American v**er to familiarize themselves with George Soros and The Shadow Party. So far in this 08 e******n it looks like things are going as they bplanned.



>
> Here to tell us about The Shadow Party is co-author Richard Poe, our
> esteemed colleague at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, where he serves
as
> director of research. Mr. Poe has written a number of bestselling books.
> His last two releases were Hillary's Secret War and The Seven Myths of Gun
> Control.
>
> FP: Richard Poe, welcome to Frontpage Interview.
>
> Poe: Thank you, Jamie.
>
> FP: So what exactly is the Shadow Party?
>
> Poe: The Shadow Party is the real power driving the Democrat machine. It
is
> a network of radicals dedicated to t***sforming our constitutional
republic
> into a socialist hive.
>
> The leader of these radicals is multibillionaire George Soros. He has
> essentially privatized the Democratic Party, bringing it under his
personal
> control. The Shadow Party is the instrument through which he exerts that
> control.
>
> FP: How does it work?
>
> Poe: It works by siphoning off hundreds of millions of dollars in
campaign
> contributions that would have gone to the Democratic Party in normal
times,
> and putting those contributions at the personal disposal of Mr. Soros. He
> then uses that money to buy influence and loyalty where he sees fit.
>
> In 2003, Soros set up a network of privately-owned groups which acts as a
> shadow or mirror image of the Party. It performs all the functions we
would
> normally expect the real Democratic Party to perform, such as shaping the
> Party platform, fielding candidates, running campaigns, and so forth.
> However, it performs these functions under the private supervision of Mr.
> Soros and his associates.
>
> The Shadow Party derives its power from its ability to raise huge sums of
> money. By controlling the Democrat pursestrings, the Shadow Party can
make
> or break any Democrat candidate by deciding whether or not to fund him.
>
> During the 2004 e******n cycle, the Shadow Party raised more than $300
> million for Democrat candidates, prompting one of its operatives, MoveOn
PAC
> director Eli Pariser, to declare, "Now it's our party. We bought it, we
own
> it."
>
> FP: Everyone knows that Soros has poured money into MoveOn. Can you name
> some other Shadow Party groups?
>
> Poe: The Shadow Party is always changing. New groups form and old ones
> dissolve. For instance, America Coming Together -- which raised $135
million
> for Democrat get-out-the-v**e drives in 2004 - has been mothballed, at
least
> for now. The most active Shadow Party groups today are probably the
Center
> for American Progress, America V**es, Democracy Alliance, the New Democrat
> Network, the New Politics Institute, ACORN and, of course, MoveOn.org.
>
> FP: How does Soros use his influence over the Party?
>
> Poe: He uses it to push the Party leftward. He is systematically purging
> the Party of moderates and packing it with radicals. For instance, the
> Shadow Party ousted Senator Joseph Lieberman in favor of Ned Lamont,
because
> Lieberman refused to support a "cut-and-run" policy in Iraq.
>
> FP: Isn't that just politics as usual, though - wealthy fat cats funding
> their favorite candidates?
>
> Poe: Funding ordinary candidates, be they Democrats or Republicans, would
> be politics as usual. Funding radical candidates who seek America's
> destruction is not. Money is a tool. It can be used for good or evil.
The
> Shadow Party is using it for evil.
>
> FP: Does the Shadow Party really seek to destroy America?
>
> Judge for yourself. In his new book The Age of Fallibility, Soros writes,
> "The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States."
> He announced in 2003 that it is necessary to "puncture the bubble of
> American supremacy." Soros is working systematically to achieve that
goal.
>
> On the economic front, he is shorting the dollar in global currency
markets,
> trying to force a devaluation. At the same time, Soros is orchestrating a
> nationwide movement to encourage mass immigration into the United States,
> and to mandate the provision of free social services to illegal
immigrants.
> These measures alone have the potential to bankrupt the nation. However,
if
> they fail, Soros has another program that will certainly finish the job.
A
> long-time Soros operative named Jeffrey Sachs has been placed in charge of
> the United Nations Millennium Project - a global war on poverty designed
to
> t***sfer wealth from rich countries to poor ones. Sachs is currently
> demanding that American taxpayers turn over $140 billion per year to his
> global welfare bureaucracy.
>
> On the political front, Soros has poured massive funding into such groups
as
> the ACLU, which uses lawsuits to hamstring the War on Terror. Soros also
> funds Amnesty International, whose US executive director has called for
the
> arrest of President Bush as a war criminal. Another Soros-funded group,
The
> Center for Constitutional Rights, has drawn up detailed articles of
> impeachment against the President.
>
> FP: Why don't more Americans know that Soros is pushing these destructive
> policies?
>
> Poe: The Shadow Party operates through deception. It uses the Democratic
> Party as camouf**ge. By posing as ordinary Democrats, Shadow Party
> candidates trick mainstream v**ers into supporting them. Their true
agenda
> remains concealed. As Soros writes in The Age of Fallibility, "[T]he
> Democratic Party does not stand for the policies that I advocate; indeed,
if
> it did, it could not be elected."
>
> The fact is, Soros aspires to establish a neo-socialist order in America.
> In the Atlantic Monthly of February 1997, he wrote, "The main enemy of the
> open society, I believe, is no longer the c*******t but the capitalist
> threat."
>
> FP: Tell me about Soros' efforts to rewrite the U.S. Constitution.
>
> Poe: Mr. Soros advocates deep structural change in our system of
government.
> In April 2005, Yale Law School hosted an event called, "The Constitution
in
> 2020", whose stated goal was to formulate "a progressive vision of what
the
> Constitution ought to be." Of the event's five institutional sponsors,
one
> was Soros' f**gship foundation The Open Society Institute, and two others
> were Soros-funded Shadow Party groups; the Center for American Progress
and
> the American Constitution Society. We nicknamed that event the Shadow
> Constitutional Convention.
>
> FP: What parts of our Constitution does Soros want to change?
>
> Poe: He appears to have a special animus against the Bill of Rights. Take
> freedom of worship, for instance. Soros seems to favor some sort of
> religious apartheid, with fundamentalist Christians banished to a
> socio-political Bantustan. For example, in a New Yorker interview of
> October 18, 2004, he said of President Bush, "The separation of church and
> state, the bedrock of our democracy, is clearly undermined by having a
> born-again President."
>
> Then there's the Second Amendment. Soros has provided massive funding to
> anti-gun groups and anti-gun litigators. The unprecedented assault on gun
> rights during the 1990s was largely bankrolled by Soros.
>
> FP: You and David Horowitz have also accused Soros of promoting political
> censorship in America.
>
> Poe: Most Americans do not realize that the McCain-Feingold Act of 2002
was
> a Trojan Horse. Its stated purpose was to reform campaign finance law.
Its
> actual effect is to regulate political speech. McCain-Feingold Act was a
> Shadow Party initiative. Soros and a group of leftwing foundations spent
> over $140 million to get it passed.
>
> Here's how it works. McCain-Feingold authorizes federal e******n
officials
> to decide who may or may not run political advertisements during e******n
> season, and what sorts of ads they may run. In September 2004, a federal
> judge expanded McCain-Feingold's reach by ordering the FEC to begin
> censoring the Internet. Blogger outrage forced the FEC to back down, but
> McCain-Feingold remains on the books. Sooner or later, it will be
enforced,
> to the full extent its creators envisioned. We can thank Mr. Soros for
> these developments.
>
> FP: Of course, we can also thank Republican Senator John McCain, who
> co-sponsored the bill.
>
> Poe: Yes, but McCain has a long history of collusion with the Shadow
Party.
>
> During the 2000 p**********l campaign, Soros sponsored two so-called
"Shadow
> Conventions," held at the same time and in the same cities as the
Republican
> and Democratic Conventions, in Philadelphia and Los Angeles respectively.
> Their purpose was to promote campaign finance reform. John McCain gave the
> keynote speech at the Philadelphia "Soros Convention" (as columnist Robert
> Novak dubbed it), while Russ Feingold did so at the LA event.
>
> McCain's service to the Shadow Party brought him financial benefits. In
> 2001, McCain founded the Reform Institute for Campaign and E******n
Issues.
> The Institute's major funders were mostly leftwing foundations. Prominent
> among them was George Soros' Open Society Institute.
>
> FP: It seems ironic that Soros spent ten years lobbying for campaign
finance
> reform, only to emerge as one of the biggest influence buyers in
Washington.
>
> Poe: As I said, the McCain-Feingold Act was a Trojan Horse. It made the
> Shadow Party possible. Among other things, it forced the Democratic Party
> into a financial crisis, enabling Soros to swoop in and buy up the Party
at
> a bargain-basement price.
>
> Democrats have traditionally relied on large, soft-money donations from
> unions, while Republicans relied more on small, "hard-money" donations
from
> mom-and-pop donors. When McCain-Feingold outlawed soft-money donations to
> the parties, Republicans were not unduly hampered, but Democrats flew into
a
> panic. They faced the real possibility of bankruptcy.
>
> Enter George Soros. After forcing the Democrats into a fiscal crisis, he
> then offered to rescue them. He set up a network of non-profit,
> "issue-advocacy" groups - the Shadow Party - and invited all the big
> Democrat donors to contribute to his network. Thus they could still
> contribute to the Democrat cause, but without giving directly to the
Party.
> The Party became dependent on Soros to raise campaign contributions which
> the law now forbade the Party itself to raise.
>
> FP: You and David Horowitz charge that Hillary Clinton has a secret
alliance
> with Soros.
>
> Poe: That's right. They have to keep their alliance secret because any
> political coordination between them would violate federal e******n law.
> Soros's Shadow Party is barred by law from coordinating its activities
with
> official Democratic Party candidates, such as Hillary.
>
> It's a poorly-kept secret, however. At the annual Take Back America!
> conference on June 3, 2004, Hillary gave Soros a glowing introduction,
> saying, "We need people like George Soros, who is fearless, and willing to
> step up when it counts." More importantly, her right hand man, Harold
> Ickes - who served the Clinton White House as deputy chief of staff - now
> serves Soros as de facto CEO of the Shadow Party. Ickes plays a
significant
> role in running Hillary's political machine and Soros' Shadow Party
> simultaneously. This is illegal, but no controlling authority seems
willing
> to intervene.
>
> The institutional manifestation of the Hillary-Soros axis is a group
called
> the Center for American Progress, whose president John Podesta formerly
> served as chief of staff to the Clinton White House. Hillary has no
> official connection to the Center. However, her dominance of the
> organization seems to be something of an open secret among l*****ts. One
> insider told a UPI reporter that the Center is "the official Hillary
Clinton
> think tank." Robert Dreyfuss of The Nation wrote of the Center, "It's not
> completely wrong to see it as a shadow government, a kind of Clinton White
> House-in-exile - or a White House staff in readiness for President Hillary
> Clinton." The Center for American Progress received its start-up funding
> from Soros and was, in fact, Soros' brainchild.
>
> FP: You and Mr. Horowitz have said that the Shadow Party purged Joseph
> Lieberman, in retaliation for his pro-war stance. How do you square that
> with the fact that Hillary supported Lieberman?
>
> Poe: Hillary supported Lieberman only with lip service. She was just
> hedging her bets. What mattered was her announcement that she would
support
> whomever won, be it Lieberman or Lamont. Please note that, within 24
hours
> of Lamont's victory over Lieberman, HILLPAC became the first Democrat
> political action committee to pledge money to Lamont's campaign. With
> friends like that, Lieberman doesn't need enemies.
>
> FP: Some conservatives welcome Soros' intervention. They say that the
> farther left he pushes the Democrats, the fewer people will v**e Democrat.
>
> Poe: It would certainly be nice if we could just sit back and wait for
the
> Shadow Party to fizzle out of its own accord. Given what is at stake,
> however, I think a more energetic approach is in order.
Go to
Nov 19, 2016 22:05:42   #
My Tribute pages, there are 3 of them. http://webspace.webring.com/people/ws/sweettater33/mytribute.html If your interested???
Go to
Nov 18, 2016 23:19:36   #
Solarkin, A P-38 was called "Lightning", it was a fighter plane in WWII.
Go to
Nov 18, 2016 23:17:10   #
I'm a conservative too. Been fighting the liberal progressives ever since I got this computer 13 years ago. Its my only way to fight for my country anymore too old to do anything else.
Go to
Nov 18, 2016 15:57:32   #
I am 83 years old. Was a builder of homes.apartment Projects, subdivision developer, for 50 years, retired in 2013. I served with the 7th Infantry Division in the Korean War Sep 1950=Oct 1951. Was all over that pennsula for 13 months from The Invasion of Inchon to Hysanjin on the Yaloi river on the border with Chinese Manchuria. After the war served as First Sergeant of the 71st Air Commando Squadron. We were flying C-119 "Flying Boxcars". They were converted to gunships and the squadron desognated 71st Special Operations Squadron and was sent to Vietnam for a year. I have put a URL to my air force page which tells a lot of my stories if you are interested click on the URL or copy and paste it in your address bar.

http://airforce.togetherweserved.com/usaf/servlet/tws.webapp.WebApp?cmd=ShadowBoxReflectionProfile&type=Person&ID=130114

This is me as 17 year old in Korea


71st Shoulder Patch


C-119 Flying Boxcar

Go to
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.