The "real" man that is now president:
"I did try and fuck her. She was married. I moved on her like a b***h, but I couldn't get there. [Again!] And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she's now got the big phony tits and everything. She's totally changed her look. I've gotta use some tic tacs, just in case I start kissing her. You know, I am automatically attracted to beautiful--I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything...Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything." The President of the United States of America

The "real" man that is now president on Ivanka:
"Yeah, she’s really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren’t happily married and, ya know, her father . . . ”
Comments on The View: "You know, if Ivanka wasn't my daughter perhaps I would be dating her."
And again here when asked if his daughter should pose for Playbook Magazine: “It would be really disappointing — not really — but it would depend on what’s inside the magazine. I don’t think Ivanka would do that, although she does have a very nice figure. I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.”
Earlier in 2003 on The Howard Stern Show, Donald Trump was also bragging about his daughter’s hot body: “You know who’s one of the great beauties of the world, according to everybody? And I helped create her. Ivanka. My daughter, Ivanka. She’s 6 feet tall, she’s got the best body. She made a lot money as a model—a tremendous amount.”

The "real" man that is now president on daughter, Tiffany:
On "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous, when asked about his infant daughter, Tiffany: "Well, I think that she's got a lot of Marla, she's a really beautiful baby, and she's, uh, she's got Marla's legs. We don't know whether or not she's got this part yet," Trump said in the old clip, using two-cupped hands in front of his chest, "but time will tell."

Please read more about this misogynist in sexual assault and harassment suits and how he treated women on "The Apprentice." Or look at how he went after Alicia Machado, the Miss Universe from Venezuela or Megyn Kelly or Rosie O'Donnell or Arianna Huffington or Hillary Clinton or Gail Collins or Brande Roderick or Bette Midler or Sarah Jessica Parker or Elizabeth Beck. Then take his obsession with Kristen Stewart on Twitter.

Are you sensing a pattern here and beginning to see why women should be concerned? He has committed to defunding Planned Parenthood. Agree or not with Roe v. Wade, this threatens women's health care with the fact that one in five women in the country use one of Planned Parenthood’s services, and you have a significant chunk of the female population that might will be left without proper resources to receive treatment for preventable diseases. It is not all about the 3% of A******ns, not funded by Federal Money, performed by a private Planned Parenthood affiliate.

The NY Times just came out with a story on how Nixon interfered with the Paris Peace Talks in 68 as he was afraid that if Johnson managed to bring about peace it would throw the e******n to the democrats. And while I don't find that surprising given his actions in 72 I would like to remind everyone that 22,000 more Americans died in Vietnam after 1968. The question I have is whether his actions were treasonous and what is so important about power that men would be willing to commit it in order to have some--though be it all so temporary?

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/us/politics/nixon-tried-to-spoil-johnsons-vietnam-peace-talks-in-68-notes-show.html?_r=0

Richard M. Nixon told an aide that they should find a way to secretly “monkey wrench” peace talks in Vietnam in the waning days of the 1968 campaign for fear that progress toward ending the war would hurt his chances for the presidency, according to newly discovered notes.

In a telephone conversation with H. R. Haldeman, who would go on to become White House chief of staff, Nixon gave instructions that a friendly intermediary should keep “working on” South Vietnamese leaders to persuade them not to agree to a deal before the e******n, according to the notes, taken by Mr. Haldeman.

The Nixon campaign’s clandestine effort to thwart President Lyndon B. Johnson’s peace initiative that fall has long been a source of controversy and scholarship. Ample evidence has emerged documenting the involvement of Nixon’s campaign. But Mr. Haldeman’s notes appear to confirm longstanding suspicions that Nixon himself was directly involved, despite his later denials....

Infringe: actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.): "making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright" synonyms: contravene, violate, t***sgress, break, breach

verb (used with object), infringed, infringing.
1.
to commit a breach or infraction of; violate or t***sgress:
to infringe a copyright; to infringe a rule.
verb (used without object), infringed, infringing.
2.
to encroach or trespass (usually followed by on or upon):
Don't infringe on his privacy.

t***sitive verb
1 :  to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another <infringe a patent>

We looked at the 1st Amendment, the foundational principle of our Republic, and saw where it had to be limited--abridged--for the true spirit of that right to shine. Same is true of the 2nd Amendment. Not to infringe but to clarify its use. Infringe does not t***slate to unrestricted. Quite the opposite. "Well regulated" is not a term to ignore. If ignored is the only way that makes all other arguments of restricted or unrestricted individual ownership possible. A Fable. Or just a sincere delusion. Just blind!

"To keep and bear arms" by any individual, though not a given by the 2nd Amendment, is not infringed upon by gun-control measures presently on the books. A person still gets to keep their guns. Registering your guns and awaiting a background check does not infringe on the right to keep and bear arms by the individual citizen, which is not a right. Reasonable controls do not infringe on the imaginary individual right to keep and bear arms. Such controls merely speak to the spirit of what is just and fair and for the common good. An unrestricted 2nd Amendment violates the Constitution and is a menace to its citizens.