Capt-jack wrote:
Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi are planning to impeach President Trump AGAIN.
My response: I told you so.
House Democrats just argued in court to allow them access to secret grand jury materials used for the Russia “collusion” h**x, because they may impeach President Trump again. They weren’t mincing words.
They are going to steal the Republic from the people and try to steal our v**es in the upcoming e******n. They know that Sleepy Joe can’t put a sentence together, much less win this Fall, so they are preparing.
They are going to impeach the President for something he didn’t do AGAIN
They are going to waste millions of dollars in taxpayer money AGAIN
They are going to attempt to remove a lawfully elected President AGAIN
Now this can only happen if we keep v****g for the Democrats. If Nancy P ends up holding the gavel after the November e******n well then this will be your failure for two more years.
Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi are planning to impea... (
show quote)
Only if the Democrats take the US Senate.
JW wrote:
A democracy is the opposite of a republic. Democracy makes a republic impossible. To put it as simply as I can, a republic is rule by law; a democracy is rule by majority. In a republic, law is the final arbiter. In a democracy, law exists only so long as the majority v**es for it. Republics are stable; democracies are unstable.
In our country, the Constitution guarantees rule by the majority, but with respect for the rights of the minority. A modern democracy as you suggest doesn't make sense. It is we the people who elect our representatives in state houses, town halls and Congress. We also elect the head of the executive branch. State judges, and local judges are often elected by the v**ers as well. With all that e******n' going on, I would call this nation a democracy and a republic, by your definition.
Capt-jack wrote:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) this week signaled that Democrats are going to push for more expanded mail-in v****g by referring to it now as “v****g at home.” Democracy
“We’re now calling it v****g at home because that’s really what it’s all about—enabling people to v**e at home,” Pelosi told MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell.
Pelosi said the $3.6 billion in the House’s HEROES Act is “necessary to conduct an e******n” where all v**ers would receive absentee b****ts.
The House Speaker also reportedly said this week $3.6 billion is just “a small price to pay for our democracy and the good health of people going to the polls” and argued that if Republicans “don’t support the resources, then they have stood in the way of v****g, which is in keeping with their v**er suppression in general.”
She reportedly added that v****g is “under assault both from a systematic national, nationwide campaign of v**er suppression and from the c****av***s.”
“People should not have to choose between v****g and preserving their good health and that of their families,” Pelosi reportedly added
The House Speaker has also said that more funds are needed for same-day registration services and to provide more and safer opportunities for v**ers to also “v**e well in advance of E******n Day.”
If this is put into effect a few million extra b****ts will be printed and end up in pockets of less then ethical
people and all the names with a D after them will put into the count, trunk loads of b****ts will show up days after the count and be added in. Kiss freedom good-by. Nancy P will have her gavel gold plated.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) this week signal... (
show quote)
Let's pay attention to the news. Yesterday, Trump threatened to close down Twitter for correcting the President on matters of facts. Since when do Presidents have the right to suspend the Constitution's First Amendment? I believe that Trump will have to take that unconstitutional stance down. We still have both freedom of the press, and freedom of speech.We should always thank G-d for giving us the most brilliant founding fathers, and the great men that came after them, that locked our freedoms down tight.
Rose42 wrote:
Putting Trump aside - Eisenhower's warning was prophetic.
The Public Health Service is what gave the Tuskegee Airmen syphilis without telling them so they could observe what happens without treatment. The CDC started out as a branch of the Public Health Service. You tell me....has the nature of man changed so that they would no longer do such things? Why should anyone put blind trust in the CDC?
Eisenhower was worried about a defense industry- military complex. When you have a question of how to solve a serious problem like this p******c which has now taken over a hundred thousand American lives, you go to the best scientific minds in the field. Thats Dr. F***i and the science guys at the CDC, and other scientific institutions.
I can assure you that General Eisenhower had the best medical doctors in the country. One of the things I find the hardest to understand is how did common science based solutions become a political statement?
2bltap wrote:
Just asking for honest opinions not hyperbole based on the C***d19 BS. Actually it is very apparent to me. Its because they really do not have positive ideas to bring this great country from the brink of destruction they themselves helped move a long.
Mike
https://youtu.be/mw8uUlrAqVcDemocrats are pushing mail in for the next e******n because many of their v**ers are minority Democrats whose right to v**e is being politicized and minimized. The state and federal governments should be all about defeating this p******c as quickly as it can while protecting people from the p******c.
The question is, why is the President of the United States issuing untrue and even dangerous advise concerning defeating this plague? Why are his tweets becoming crazier and more bazare every day? The question that we all should be concerned about Trump's unfitness to be President?
moldyoldy wrote:
Imagine that.
From , raw story.com
He knows he is lying.
I wish I could say that this unconstitutional move of the President came as a surprise. This President doesn't give a damn such things as federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, or just plain, doing the right thing. All that matters is repeating long debunked conspiracy, going to war against social media for fact checking the President , and frankly deciding to do the wrong thing, at the wrong time, for the worst reason. Trump's reasons for his actions are either that he believes he is king, or that he is completely above the law.
Before he became Vice President, he was known as big tobacco's boy in the Senate. He once said that tobacco doesn't k**l. I can see how a man of such character, and honor would be attractive to Trump.
Fodaoson wrote:
Socialism is an economic system. It is the economic system of c*******m. C*******m is a political system that enforces socialism. Socialism is difficult to have in a democracy. Limited capitalism works best in democracy
Fodaoson, Not exactly, c*******m is a type of socialism. Socialism is a wide ideology with many variations. C*******m is the most extreme example. It seeks to o*******w free enterprise through violent revolution. It maintains that the world must become c*******t to guarantee the worldwide revolution. It believes that all forms of religion is a way of supporting the status quo. C*******ts believe that until there is world revolution, a " dictatorship of the proletariat " must be instituted to further protect the workers revolution. After the revolution, this dictatorship will wither away and world wide c*******m will become truly international as national borders disappear.
On the right wing of socialism is the democratic form. This type of socialism believes in handing power over to the winners of an e******n. Unlike c*******m, it doesn't necessarily believe in all the means of production and distribution to be nationalized.
It is interesting to note that c*******t Marxism and democratic socialism are often at odds with each other, and consider other forms of socialism from themselves to be treasonous to the working class.
son of witless wrote:
Imagine if Barak the Obama would have been able to procure the same quality of First Lady as President Trump. He might have been a great President too. Naaaay, but he wouldn't have been as horrible as he was.
son, Obama had a perfect wife for First Lady. Unlike the current First Lady she took an active part in bettering the society, while the current First Lady hides as much as possible and has little to say. I wouldn't be surprised if the First Lady files for divorce after being humiliated by Donald for his affair with Stormy.
ACP45 wrote:
"In Washington, anyone testing positive for C****-** is included in the C***D death count. This includes 5 deaths due to gunshot wounds, which were counted as C***D deaths.
In Colorado, a man died of alcohol poisoning, seven times the legal limit, yet he was classified as a C***D death simply because he tested positive for the W***n v***s.
Is any of this about the v***s? Or is it about money, power, and the November e******n? Is this about safety or an excuse for legalized e******n f***d via mail-in b****ts? Is this a way to keep ObamaGate and Biden-Ukraine corruption out of the news? All with the DNC media parroting the anti-Trump narrative they have been fed.
Exaggerated death counts are fear porn, keeping people scared. What a good excuse to prevent Trump rallies and to keep Sleepy Joe Biden locked away in his basement away from scrutiny. Except of course when he is telling b****s, “You ain’t black” if they wander off the Democrat plantation."
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/05/cooking_the_books_on_c***d19_deaths.html"In Washington, anyone testing positive for C... (
show quote)
If anything the number of cases and deaths from c****-** is understated. In the early days of the p******c, many cases were not even counted because no tests were available.
Capt-jack wrote:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) this week signaled that Democrats are going to push for more expanded mail-in v****g by referring to it now as “v****g at home.” Democracy
“We’re now calling it v****g at home because that’s really what it’s all about—enabling people to v**e at home,” Pelosi told MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell.
Pelosi said the $3.6 billion in the House’s HEROES Act is “necessary to conduct an e******n” where all v**ers would receive absentee b****ts.
The House Speaker also reportedly said this week $3.6 billion is just “a small price to pay for our democracy and the good health of people going to the polls” and argued that if Republicans “don’t support the resources, then they have stood in the way of v****g, which is in keeping with their v**er suppression in general.”
She reportedly added that v****g is “under assault both from a systematic national, nationwide campaign of v**er suppression and from the c****av***s.”
“People should not have to choose between v****g and preserving their good health and that of their families,” Pelosi reportedly added
The House Speaker has also said that more funds are needed for same-day registration services and to provide more and safer opportunities for v**ers to also “v**e well in advance of E******n Day.”
If this is put into effect a few million extra b****ts will be printed and end up in pockets of less then ethical
people and all the names with a D after them will put into the count, trunk loads of b****ts will show up days after the count and be added in. Kiss freedom good-by. Nancy P will have her gavel gold plated.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) this week signal... (
show quote)
I doubt if Jesus would send Trump anyplace but hell. He has lots of experience with hell, after doing everything passible to create hell right here in America!
EN Submarine Qualified wrote:
A bit excessive. Remembering the conditions existing at the time of revolution,it was very important to ensure the government would never be able to direct you to belong to a given religion.
Nothing more.
Actually that was one of the reasons for breaking with England. People wanted to be able to select their religion, even none.
The so called 'separation of church and state is modern BS to justify ripping down cemetery and memorial crosses, etc.
Until comparatively recently, having a religion was not only OK but expected. As matter of fact,a person without professing a religion was frowned down on and castigated.
Also your comment aboutYouTube is just 'shooting the messenger'. The real gist was the speaker's words, not who happened to have it on their website.
A bit excessive. Remembering the conditions exist... (
show quote)
At the time of the American Revolution, the Stuart monarchs had established the Church of England, and the Protestant Church in Scotland suffered through several civil wars, America wanted to be free of religion dominated society. You could be a religious person or a complete non believer. It should not be a matter of church involving itself with politics.
rumitoid wrote:
The hardest and most demanding job on the planet, an incomprehensible responsibility, something you cannot imagine until sitting in that chair. Trump criticized Obama for playing golf, something I agreed with at the time; but he wasn't in that position to actually judge. They all need to justly release the incredible pressure of the job; we want them to relax. If I could afford the green fees, I would pay for a round.
Your right. Just because he was so critical of Obama's playing golf, doesn't seem right that he has played golf much, more than Obama ever did. He just called for the re opening of all places of worship. Not only did he show his hypocrisy, by playing golf and not attending church, but he put even more people of danger of catching and t***sferring this deadly v***s to many others. It's almost as though he was thinking that he is in danger of damaging his reputation as a medical expert. After all , he has been touting a medication that under massive testing, has not only shown that prevent this v***s, but people that take it have a higher death rate than others. That was thinking that an injestion of bleach or disinfectant might work.
PeterS wrote:
Well past time. These are the same people freaked out over the morals of Bill Clinton but have absolutely no problem with the morals of Donald Trump. Just goes to show that for today's evangelical Christians moral values are relative to who is president at the time.
Peter, That kind off says it all. I've asked a couple of Evangelist friends of mine how they could so fully support Donald Trump, Trump may be a lot of things, but he is a serial adulterer, a sex abuser, a con man, (Trump University), a pathological liar, a person that doesn't support the rule of law, a complete incompetent in charge of a nation's security during a deadly p******c, a lack of any empathy for workers that face infection, or being fired. The outrageous behavior shows he to say the least, unhinged. I know that the Lord forgives sinners, but Donald Trump?
bahmer, I'm sorry, but I make it a point not to read postings from youtube. I take Thomas' Jefferson's and Voltairs as well. Jefferson believed in a complete separation of church and state. The state should have no power to involve itself in church business. It doesn't pay any taxes for that protection. The church should never have anything to do with the state. That means supporting and/or endorsing a candidate for office. The founding fathers did not even believe in a religious test for political candidates. Voltair advanced the freedom of religion during the Enlightenment.