Well, we're waitingggggggggggg~~~
Nice to see you, come and play, we loveeeeee music, if you can't tell...
Of course you can, what am I saying~~~

Here's another two that just got it~~Their energy when signing together just seepssssss right in~~
Alison has a voice like none other and is truly a Lady~~Pant is Plant, not much changes about him...Excellent he is tho......
Hope you enjoy~~
http://youtu.be/Lgzs6pT26KI

And its about dam time they did. The so called Sharia law must not have any standing anywhere in this country. End of story

We have one country, one people, one constitution, one law. Our country is held together by our constitutional laws. The
United States of America shall accommodate no other law of any land, country, nation, peoples, or religious background or philosophy.

It is the opinion of millions of American citizens, a house divided upon it self will fall. So if any Muslim wants to bring there law, and practice it here, they should go back to where the came from and practice it there.

Muslims have said the feel insulted by new laws passed in Texas banning the use of sharia law.

Heads up to all Muslims in this country. This is America, we don't give a flying fig if you feel insulted. You are insulting the United States people, by trying to bring sharia here. You want to live here in our country? You obey our laws. You adopt our way of life. You were not asked to come here.


RETW

I hope I live long enough to see this Muslim F**e walk away & never see or hear from him again! We have been forced to endear almost 8 years of the hideous so called "leadership" of a F**e american, muslim, homosexual, pot smoking want-a-be-golfer, impostor & it has been the hardest thing I've had to put up with in all my 77 years on this planet. It has even been harder to put with than the assassinations of the Kennedy's & Dr. Martin Luther King...which many from OUR so called government were responsible. We have seen our White House lit up like a q***r christmas tree & muslim czars appointed in the government & paid high salaries...for what??? The World is laughing at us for the poor leadership we have & congress cowtails to his every whim because they are afraid of being called r****ts if they go against his bidding....It's absolutely d********g & very hard to bare any more...and the constant intimidation of marshal law, gun confiscation, sharia law, the witch hillary clinton as a president & the constant threats of the rhino's replacing Donald Trump as a legitimate contender for President of the USA...it's all so gut wrenching for me & many of We the People who want a leader who is honestly risking his life to run for this position & the I***TS in the so called republican Elite are trying their damnedest to prevent from happening...I want Donald Trump to run & I want him to WIN by a landslide & show the world that there is HOPE in America again & we can take our place in the leadership of the world & combat & defeat ISIS & create some peace & betterment for the World AGAIN!!!.......GOD BLESS AMERICA

“On Friday, Barack Obama called Newt Gingrich's plan to deport sharia-adhering Muslims in America "repugnant and an affront to everything that we stand for as Americans."” -http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/15/obama-gingrichs-call-to-ban-sharia-adherents-is-repugnant-video/#ixzz4EZIIZM1L

Okay, how many of you liberals really believe, and agree with Obama, that the following parts of Sharia law are compatible with “everything that we stand for as Americans”?

According to Sharia law:

• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (Muhammad's words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to eat must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be "Halal".
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on (see Sharia law in USA, UK, Europe & Saudi Arabia, Hitler & Islam).
http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/sharia-law.html

Obama continued to say:
“And we will win this fight by staying true to our values, values of pluralism and rule of law and diversity and freedoms, like the freedom of religion, freedom of speech and assembly, the very freedoms that the people of nice were celebrating last night on Bastille day.”

Oh really? How is this Pluralism?: “Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death” or “Criticizing or denying Allah, the god of Islam is punishable by death”

This is why you liberals can’t see what he’s doing: “Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.”

That is what Obama has been doing, advancing Islam by lying to you, and you blind followers of the blind are lapping it up!

And how is this even the rhetoric that is being pushed down our throats about “Moderate Muslims”!? You see, in defending Sharia law, Obama has stepped way beyond his lies about only supporting moderate Muslims! By supporting and defending and attempting to justify Sharia law as being “true to our values” as Americans, he has shown his true colors!

You can’t have “pluralism” (such as is true to American values) when one group is attempting to establish laws that make the other group illegal and punishable by death. That is the opposite of pluralism Mr. Barak I’ve-got-this-Taqqiya-thing-down-to-a-science Obama!

This is typical one-sided liberal hypocritical insanity! What about Christian’s right to freedom of religion to verbally denounce homosexuality as against God’s law? Gasp, outrage, why we’d rather allow Sharia law in our country than allow that kind of h**e speech! Hypocrites!

Here’s what Jesus Christ said:


Matthew 5:43-48
43 "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor, and h**e your enemy.'
44 But I tell you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who h**e you, and pray for those who mistreat you and persecute you,
45 that you may be children of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the just and the unjust.
46 For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Don't even the tax collectors do the same?
47 If you only greet your friends, what more do you do than others? Don't even the tax collectors do the same?
48 Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.

How does Sharia law in any way compare with such as the high moral standards of Jesus Christ?

eagle~~
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. See U.S. Const. amend. I. Freedom of expression consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. See U.S. Const. amend. XIV.

Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the "separation of church and state." Some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus t***sportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of "blue laws" is not prohibited. The free exercise clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person's practice of their religion.

The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place.

In other words protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference...

As Floyd Brown wrote:
This Nation was founded by people many who came here to avoid religious prosecution.

The general idea of the Founding was to allow people to worship as they wished.

There was to be no official State Religion.

pretty clear summation right there....

Nor was it established and written as it is to keep religion out of the government and politics.....It merely cites the right of freedom of religion, not to be attacked, limited or forced ...The government holds no authority over the right of or that which is chosen by a person......Freedom of Religion means just that, especially when you consider why they left their homeland and the persecution that forced them to leave...Think of their mindset, a strong mindset given what they endured in the name of "one chosen religion" being forced upon them....

I offen refer to the Federalist Papers and find great in~ depth understanding of what our fore-fathers intended or at least considered when draft the Constitution and Bill of Rights...

Perhaps some of you will enjoy reading this while others will have no desire~~~Just food for thought~~
http://virginiahumanities.org/2012/03/james-madison-religious-freedom/

<snip> Plenty more to the article ~

Now Madison was always the practical man; he had a solution: Members of Congress, just like their constituents, should pay their ministers; there should be no free ride for politicians. “[L]et them like their Constituents, … [discharge their religious duties] at their own expence. How small a contribution from each member of Congs wd suffice for the purpose?… How noble in its exemplary sacrifice to the genius of the Constitution; and the divine right of conscience?” James Madison was concerned not only with religious freedom, but setting a precedent for politicians’ use of the public purse.[3]

There are many other examples, but space does not permit.

Importantly, Madison was not opposed to religion. If you read Madison, it is clear that the former student of theology was personally, deeply religious. But he did not see his religion as in any way inconsistent with his commitment to religious liberty and a strict separation of church and state.

Some homework is necessary: Read Madison’s Memorial & Remonstrance – it is easily located on the web. What you will find is that he is still speaking to us about religious freedom, and from deep conviction. We should listen.

Thank you James Madison.

PS~~Madison’s Memorial & Remonstrance is excellent reading material....