One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: lolligagger
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
Jan 15, 2017 04:29:18   #
Something like a poll, just answer, 'I support Trump because....

Trump has no support. No one likes or wants him. He is a childish moron and that is clear to everyone in his character and his tweets. Trump has excited and given permission to all the worst elements in our society. Even they do not like this goon for his many incestuous comments about his daughter and love of Russia. Sick, sick man. He is not supported as a person but as a symbol of White Nationalism, though too goofy to be anything more.

I initially came here just to meet people and maybe make a friend. I wanted to avoid politics or maybe just skirt the issues. But Trump is such an overwhelming piece of crap, I changed. Sanity and Reason both demand to speak out against Trump. Since I have started paying attention to Politics, the nightmare of Trump has significantly grown. It is has now matured to the point of such utter absurdity that he is the President-elect as to lose all hope for the world. The man is a beast, plain and simple.
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 01:44:47   #
kenjay wrote:
And patently false.


kenjay, you need to give evidence that it is "patently false" about Trump's nepotism. Tell me the sun rises in the West and I will ask for proof. At which point you will call me a snowflake loser cry baby as evidence to your claim. Brilliant!
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 01:40:08   #
kenjay wrote:
You need to shut up until you prove you are not a cry baby snowflake loser.


You are truly hilarious and are clueless to that fact. I asked you for something substantive and said you would probably fail to do so, just return with more insults. And here you are! If I am a snowflake (?) loser cry baby it is up to you to show how and why? Making yourself look foolish again by a lack of argument and evidence is a bad strategy for making a point. The insults just make you look absurd. Make me look absurd. Give a counter-argument that is factually verifiable and reasonable. Show you have a brain in there. Be mature and accountable for what you say. Or, hey, just stick your tongue out and be done. Just as effective as empty insults.
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 01:27:55   #
kenjay wrote:
Cool now off your self asshole and really be free.


Please t***slate.
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 01:27:06   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
You liberals never stop screaming, do you? Even when you have a trifecta in the federal government, you scream. Nothing ever satisfies your insatiable hunger for something to b***h about? Utopia is an impossible dream, dude.

Now, about this nepotism thing. I seem to recall that JFK appointed his brother, Bobby, as AG and the senate confirmed the appointment. And his other brother, the insane Teddy, was a senator.

First lady Hillary launched Hillarycare, and this was not just a first lady's benefit project, this was an attempt to legislate, a no-no for an un-elected wife of a president.

Both Vice President Al Gore and his father were senators from Tennessee. And not only was George W. Bush's father president, but his great-grandfather was a U.S. senator.

Family connections are all over the capital. Colin Powell's son was appointed chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. The wife of Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Elaine Chao, was appointed secretary of Labor. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist's daughter, Janet, was appointed inspector-general of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Michigan congressman John Dingell, a Democrat, now occupies the seat once held by his father. So do Charles Gonzalez, D-Texas, Jim Duncan, R-Tenn., and Harold Ford, D-Tenn.

The father of the Democratic leader in the House, Nancy Pelosi, was a congressman.

Sen. Frank Murkowski, R-Alaska, gave up his Senate seat to become his state's governor. He said he examined the qualifications of 24 Alaskan officials to decide who should fill his Senate seat. And then, after long deliberation, he picked his daughter, Lisa Murkowski. She was a state senator.

Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., has a son-in-law who is lobbyist. Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., has a son who lobbies for telecommunications companies and shipbuilders.

Governor Moonbeam is currently serving his fourth full term, after his father already served two terms from 1959 to 1967

Andrew Cuomo became governor after his father, Mario Cuomo.

Oh yeah, examples of nepotism in high places go way way back.

The only reason liberals object to member's of Trump's family working with him is because liberals have a pathological need to scream about something, and they get especially strident when they get their dicks smashed into the dirt.
You liberals never stop screaming, do you? Even wh... (show quote)


Read the law as it pertains to nepotism. Is the appointment of his family to the t***sition team nepotism or not? Simple question. If it is, are you okay with that fact? If not, will you act or speak out against it. Are you trying to suggest that because nepotism may have happened before, there is a precedent or excuse for Trump to practice it now? Effectively, two wrongs (or 3 or 4 or more) make it right? What blocks you guys from questioning Trump? It is like a recent Trump supporter said that the illegal, unconstitutional, and heinous internment camps for Japanese Americans during WWII was precedent to do the same to Muslims. I am truly flummoxed at how you all seem so blind to the character and actions of this man and ready to make the most ridiculous arguments in support of him.
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 01:15:10   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
There were four options, only two were viable. Yes, we v**ed at a registered and properly managed polling place. And, guess what, the man we v**ed for won.


You did not know definitively that only two were viable to be president. Likely, but not absolutely.
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 01:12:36   #
JW wrote:
Nepotism is neither unethical nor illegal...


Yes it is; there are laws against it for the presidency. Do a little research before you comment.
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 01:10:52   #
And...?
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 00:10:04   #
peter11937 wrote:
You are not quoting Trump, but what a "source" said he said. Fact is that Truman twice authorized the deployment of nuclear weapons in August 1945 k*****g thousands in Japan. During the Cuban Missile Crisis the Silos were open, subs on station and B-52's in the air before the USSR backed down. Jack Kennedy was president. Both Truman and Kennedy were Democrats.
Since then , we have never even been close, but the idea that the USA would NEVER use them is false. The spoken policy is we would not use them FIRST again.
And there is nothing in what Trump has said that contradicts that. Now ISIS will use and Iran will use them , once in their possession, without hesitation. If you do not know why, you need to study the muslim idea of the end times. So , assuming ISIS or Iran has used a nuke, tactical nuke or a dirty bomb, and there is a suitable target, should we in advance, agree to forego a nuclear response? Of course not. Are there viable alternatives to use against the likes of ISIS and Iran that are effective and spectacular in effect? The Maximum Over-pressure Area Bomb ( MOAB) springs to mind. But no leader should ever say we will never use a nuclear response. They must know we will, if forced, respond in kind.
You are not quoting Trump, but what a "source... (show quote)


No, I am directly quoting Trump and can provide video if you need it; it is not second-hand. Your scenario demands attention but it is nowhere near what Trump has said about the use of nuclear weapons.
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 00:05:39   #
JFlorio wrote:
He got lucky. He got to run against the most flawed candidate in history.


Exactly!
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 00:04:28   #
AuntiE wrote:
Absolutely.


Do you understand what he wrote, that you are agreeing with absolutely? It contradicts all you said about the Press bias. It is total nonsense, yet if you agree with him, case closed against liberal bias.
Go to
Nov 21, 2016 00:01:33   #
JFlorio wrote:
Must be the presses fault Hillary used a private server to conduct government business on.


The Press reported it. What in the world are you talking about? That makes no sense whatsoever.
Go to
Nov 20, 2016 23:57:34   #
kenjay wrote:
Funny that you should mention fear. Fear is what causes liberals mental illnesses. You are a perfect example of liberal dementia you are a walking talking disaster.


Thank you for the diagnosis. Most kind.
Go to
Nov 20, 2016 23:56:00   #
kenjay wrote:
That means you are the most stupid person ever. There was two viable choices and you are glad one lost because the other one is a disaster. I am betting you v**ed for Hillary which makes you a liar. But take heart lying is the democrats stock in trade it is actually all they are good at. How long did it take you
to get this stupid and did you do it alone or with the help of your parents and teachers?


There were at least four viable options, as I recall: have any of you guys v**ed this e******n? Did you v**e in a registered polling place?

Why insult? What is its purpose? Do you know how foolish looking it makes you? Rational and decent people discuss respectfully the issue at hand. Disagreement should not mean animosity or ad hominem. You should try just making a reasonable argument for a change.
Go to
Nov 20, 2016 23:47:07   #
badbob85037 wrote:
The Congress you say did nothing but hinder Obama I see more as his enablers. Libya was our ally on the War of Terror. Our Congress had honored Qaddafi as a man of peace who had fostered peace deals all over Africa. Libya's prisons were over flowing with Al Qaeda terrorist.Libya was the richest nation in Africa and the freest in the Muslim world. Qaddafi had made a promise to his people there would be no homeless. A promise he made good on. The people of Libya paid 14 cents a gallon for gas.Qaddafi had trained and armed his citizens and they were holding their own against these terrorist. But what good are small arms against Obama's illegal war of over 6,000 sorties of bunker busters and cluster bombs?

Obama told America he had to save these citizens of Libya to start his unlawful war to begin with. He then murdered 130,000 of the ones he told us he had to save. The end results of his genocide was Libya's prisons emptied to make room for Black and Christian Libyans. The richest nation in Africa bombed into tribal lawlessness and victory f**gs of Al Qaeda flying across the wasteland. Then to give America another slap in the face he sent all Libya's military hardware to an enemy with the blood of thousands of young Americans on it's hands. Malaysian court among other things convicted Obama of genocide and after reviewing the evidence against him the World Court at the Hague agreed with that court's findings. What did Congress do to Obama for him destroying Libya? Zip, zero, null, nothing when he should have been impeached and then jailed or executed. Obama's "Affordable" Care Act the Republicans always talked a good line on how they were going to do this or that to end this unconstitutional law that has most Americans paying twice as much for half the coverage with a deductible that could never be reached. Yet again they did nothing.

I left the Republican party for the way they have enabled Obama to trash our Constitution as no other has done before. Maybe you Hillary supporting yahoos should try reading the Constitution for once in your life or at the least be able to tell the difference between it and the C*******t Manifesto.
The Congress you say did nothing but hinder Obama ... (show quote)


How did Obama do that? He does not make laws. His first two years with a democratic Congress and it was disgraceful. But after that the disgrace was on Republicans, who would filibuster a standard maintenance bill for toilet paper and light bulbs. Almost every executive action Obama had to take was because Congress was being derelict in their duties.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.