I made a general statement directed to all. Remember, the subject here is the alleged smoking gun.

Yes, that is the case.

If you use Firefox or Internet Explorer you don't have to add the http://

Great excuse though for avoiding some unpleasnt information

I submitted this two day's ago:

"However else this December 2009 Executive Order can be described, the directive was a serious grant of authority within the IRS to the powerful anti-Tea Party union."

This is an outright lie. Read the EO yourself. It promotes free communications among the affected parties. It does not grant any authority whatsoever of the union over the IRS.

Smoking gun? NOT!"

No one has even attempted a rebuttal. All the response I've received is so much verbal flatulence; aka ad hominem attacks

If my memory serves me correctly, the topic of discussion is supposed to be the alleged smoking gun.

Irrelevant

Yes, I believe the Holy Bible is the Word of God, infallible in meeting our spiritual needs. It is not, however, a science book or a rule book. It is obvious to all, except Creationists, that the Genesis creation account is allegorical.

It’s hypocrisy, not hypocracy, and hypocrites, not hypocrits. Haven’t you noticed the squiggly red underlines?

“Going somewhere on someone else’s dime” is what the one per centers have been doing, and they certainly aren’t progressive. See the graph here: www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/10/income-ine******y-america

No it’s not like saying America is a democracy. America is a Republic; with a representative Democracy form of government.

Regards

I don’t “admit” to being progressive; rather I am pleased to be progressive, rather than regressive. I don’t want to “take our country back”.: I want to take our country forward.

Regarding GOP and Creationists: I was merely stating my two different interests.

I don’t dislike Christians. I am a Christian myself. My objection to Creationists is their literal reading of the Genesis creation account is an impediment that is driving people away from church in droves..

No it’s not obvious that I think “all of you” are Creationists. Virtually all Creationists are ultra-conservative, but not all GOP adherents are Creationists, thank God.

Regards

First, I have no interest in knowing what “leaner” means. From the tone here, I presume it’s derogatory.

If you had read the supporting materials for the article, as I did, you would have found the reference to EO 13522, conveniently presented as a clickable button.

This time I’ll provide you the address: www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=86986

I’m an independent progressive. I do not get my opinions pre-formulated by any one. My interest is in debunking far right GOP and Creationist propaganda where ever I find it.

Regards

The article says:

"However else this December 2009 Executive Order can be described, the directive was a serious grant of authority within the IRS to the powerful anti-Tea Party union."

This is an outright lie. Read the EO yourself. It promotes free communications among the affected parties. It does not grant any authority whatsoever of the union over the IRS.

Smoking gun? NOT!