It is so odd that instead of edifying Christians, you choose to tear them down. You are an impostor and easy to spot. We will pray for you nevertheless. that is just the kind of people we are. It is not always easy to pray for a wolf in sheep's clothing, but I will for a minute, and then I will shake the dust off my sandals. God have mercy on your unrepentant soul. If you are a false prophet, it would be better for you that a millstone be tied around your neck and you be cast into the sea. I will probably be there.

What is behind everything and directing both parties is the Council of Foreign Relations which is dedicated to the destruction of individualism and the thorough indoctrination of collectivism.

There are three areas (most likely more) where both the Republican Party and Democratic Party agree:
1. Foreign Policy: Hasn't any one noticed that regardless of the party of the President that they all are engaged in the development of a one-world system? In the establishment of "Collectivism" over "individualism"? Those running both parties are the same people and really don't care whether it is Democratic or Republican. All the side issues are directed by them to confuse and deceive the "stupid" public.
2. Dominance of the banking system: It matters not who is president for they all are in favor of a dominant banking system reigning supreme, being protected at all costs, and whenever necessary being bailed out.
3. Role in the Middle East: It matters very little who is President just as long as he/she understands very clearly the rhetoric of maintaining, in one form or another, the justifications of the financial necessities for war and its continuous escalating juggernaut.

So while we Americans are arguing over the myriads of differing details manufactured (false f**gs) for us to haggle over, the highly elite members of the Council of Foreign Relations are all "laughing to the bank" of collectivism where the individual is being led, but not always so slowly, into giving up one individual right after another to the state.

The rhetoric on both sides is ever so emotionally cunning, so "intellectually" sound, and so "politically correct"! All birds have two wings: a left and a right one. No bird can ever fly with only one wing. Both wings belong to the same bird. In this case, both the left and right political wings belong to the same bird of collectivism as dictated by the Council of foreign Relations. They don't care which wing for the moment becomes dominant as long as it continues their overall philosophy of collectivism or a one-world -government.

Was it not John F. Kennedy that stated: "Ask not what your country can do for you [socialism]; but ask what you [individualism] can do for your country."?

Do not look at the rhetoric of any politician, regardless of party or lack thereof, but solely on his/her political v****g record. According to their v****g record most Democrats and most Republicans v**e the same relative to foreign policy, dominance of the banking system, and continued escalation of war in the Middle East.