Is Iran's "National Bank" the Rothschild Cabal's thumb on the Iranian people the way the Fed is on us?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvbvOYs9xIM

I'm beginning to think that attack on Saudi Arabia and Trump's response are 4d chess theater.

"You're crazy!" You might say to me.

I'm thinking that both targets...the "processing facility" and the Iranian National Bank...are ultimately Rothschild Cabal assets. We abandoned gold for the petrodollar and that era is done.

The world has a deep state and many nations have their toadies in high places...and even leaders who don't want to play ball find out they aren't really in control.

We're in an undeclared war folks and we have been since T***p w*n.

That more people are aware that man-kind is contributing to globule warming is a good sign.
The bad part is so much damage has been done that we nay not be able to reverse things from happening & it is getting worse.

We are learning how to capture more of the energy from the sun.
Man-kind is very inventive & is doing many things to adapt.
Getting the changes needed run in to the old ways of doing things.
Many activities of leisure involve using more energy than a walk in nature. (Or a park)

Many things are being produced that we could do with out as much.
We need not travel as much to have the feeling of being a part of being there.
With computers & T.V.s we can enjoy the sites & sounds of far away place's in our homes.
Much of the world is as near as pushing a key or turning a knob.

Much of the pleasure of going some where is in telling others of what you did on your trip.

There is the wish to do once what some are able to do at will with ease.
Travel & consume the pleasers in real time & space. At an over all a cost to your self & the envirment.

Do you ever look at the contrails planes crisscrossing the sky leave?
That is costly & polluting big time.

Spending a few extra minutes conversing with people you meet day to day is less costly & a bond is made. A bound that will surpass any contacts you have on a costly trip. All with less wear & tear on our environment.

For most it is to stop & think about the effort you go through to earn the cost of that trip.
Time spent in the old rat race that you need to take the trip to help you cope with the rat race.

As always to each their own.

Gavin Menzies tells us it was the Chinese Tributary system that fuelled the Renaissance and t***sferred power from the East to the West, but that is not antiquity as your link states, personally I believe Menzie's claims because if that "didn't happen", - (China gave the West the printing press etc. at the Renaissance of the 15 th. Century making Gutenburd's innovation anachronistic ), - the outcome of (p) Abrahams Religion and Western Religion in general would not be relevant to Universal Destiny.

Also what makes this analogy even more credible is the fact that the Chinese State who perfected the Tributory System and sent all their knowledge to the Renaissance meeting in Venice, so as to put the West in an indebted position, became defunct within decades of doing the deed.

Debt is the basis of the Tributory System couldn't agree more, $ bills are iou's.

It was after the second World War that the USD became the Global Reserve Currency before that the British Pound Sterling was top dog.

Ans. Gavin Menzies, a former British Royal Navy officer, argues in the bestseller 1421: The Year China Discovered America, that squadrons from Zheng He's fleets, between 1421 and 1423, did indeed get to the Americas first--as well as to Greenland, Antarctica, Australia and New Zealand. Unfortunately for supporters of this theory, he offers no proof, only a great deal of circumstantial evidence marred by questionable scholarship.

Menzies has no "smoking gun" that proves his theory-- because the xenophobic Confucian officials who advised the later Ming emperors destroyed all records of these sea voyages. So he relies upon three types of evidence. First, Menzies claims that Chinese maps from as early as 1428, allegedly showing parts of North and South America and some Atlantic islands, were used by European explorers (including Columbus) when they started their own voyages decades later. Second, he adduces allegedly tangible evidence of pre-Columbian contact between Asia and the Americas, such as: flora and fauna (maize, sweet potatoes, Asiatic chickens, coconuts) that must have been t***sported by humans; "DNA evidence" that links American Indians to the Chinese; wrecks of Chinese ships and medieval Chinese anchors found in California. Third, Menzies relies upon, and constantly reminds the reader of, his own naval expertise which gives him a mystical understanding that landlubbers lack; for example, "if I was able to state with confidence the course a Chinese fleet had taken, it was because...my own knowledge of the winds, currents, and sea conditions they faced told me the route as surely as if there had been a written record of it" (p. 83).

Authors that aim to rewrite 500 years of accepted history should rely less on subjective claims and more on hard evidence. And this is where Menzies ultimately fails to persuade. First, he does not read Chinese and thus cites no primary sources--a problem even if one accepts that the records were all destroyed.

I mentioned Kim Iversen because in her episode when she made known to me the $203 billion currency injection the episode is titled "Are We Headed For A Big Economic Crash" she is supporting Trump, she claims Trump didn't bully anyone and the Fed is afraid of Sanders and Warren wanting to regulate, I just laughed.

Actually the Central Bank doesn't have to make known cash injections that are mandatory with on going economic expansion QE 3 ended in the US on October 2014 with the US Quantitative Easing being tapered down to $10 billion a month from $85 billion a month, so even your appraisal of $128 billion is massively significant in terms of Easing.

You have no idea about the Federal system but just your opinion, not facts. Your credibility along with Siverson is lost since you deviated from yours and her original claim of the recent t***sfer of $208 billion which was false, and now you trying to turn around your theory of QE in 2014, which has no relevance to the activities and recent t***sfer of $128 billion. Your lies are enough me to lose my interest talking with you, cause I feel I am talking to lunatics trying to wonder around theories that you think could justify your claims. Siverson knows nothing about economy except she is a progressive blogger. Why should I even waste my time with this non-sense.

The other thing is that after 2009 when Obama began QE 1. when Britain and Japan were doing it too EU was a bit slow to start March 2015, the question is, why didn't the fiat system collapse then ?.

Ans. The 2009 QE by Obama had nothing to do with world economic activities. The 2008 recession was due to the huge Subprime lending crisis created by the democrats, to enforcing banks to lend mortgage to non-qualified and could not qualify for the normal lender's requirement. A subprime loan is a type of loan offered at a rate above prime to individuals who do not qualify for prime-rate loans.

Japan's fiat system at present is the most stable currency. Japan as the 3rd largest world economy is doing fine with the US. Basically most activities done by president Trump is the imposition of tariffs against China in order to reduce China's dominance in trade against the US. This dominance existed for more than 20 years, that has never been corrected. Now president Trump is the only president who has suppressed China's advantage over the US with the tariffs impost.

This has nothing to do with Japans currency. Japan and the US have very close relations in commerce. Japanese automakers have cumulatively invested about $51 billion in manufacturing in the United States over the span of decades, JAMA data shows.
From 2011 to 2018, direct employment in the U.S. at Japanese automakers grew by nearly 29%.
In 2018, JAMA manufacturers built 3.7 million vehicles and 4.4 million engines.[/b]

It was because China and Australia were not that badly affected by 2008 so we are best able to advise about the future.
Chinese and Australian "financial credibility" saved the day, Australian banks were forced to quit all criminal practices by the Labour Government earlier on, and China wasn't involved in selling garbage as securities.

Ans. The 2008 financial crisis had nothing to do with foreign economic activities. The crisis was due to liberals forced imposition of SUB-PRIME loans to the minorities particularly b****s and Hispanics who failed to pay millions of mortgages because they were not qualified to own mortgages to begin with. Thus in 2007 millions foreclosed due to non-payment. The $865 billion stimulus provided to Obama in 2009 paid some of the black mortgage balances so they could keep their homes. But millions more were foreclosed thus the financial crisis. Thousands of banks closed. The biggest bank victim was the Lehman Brothers.
https://www.thestreet.com/personal-finance/mortgages/subprime-mortgage-crisis-14704400


But next time a big crash comes China, India, Pakistan,Turkey and Russia will pull the plug probably Germany too and just say let's kiss our bad debts good by and start again, dump the IMF and World Bank.

We don't know what Britain would do but Japan is now becoming isolated from the Asian markets and looking for help from Russia so if the economic crash does come Trump could be alone, the USD is isolated at the moment as the only currency performing well but alone all the same.

Probably the Eurasian economies will tie up with China and Russia who are ruthlessly mercantile, profit means very little to them everything is long term and chiseled in stone, probably, we are now back in the barbaric age, and the worst place to be is on the losing side.

Ans. All your statements are speculative assumptions, theories and not facts. The US economy at present is doing well compared to the rest of the world economy. That because of the ingenuity of president Trump in recapturing the trade deficits with China which we've lost trillions of dollars over the 20 year period.

I personally think the Tributory System is not the answer, its no longer a part of economic development because if you accept payment in iou's in exchange for goods and services the only reason that contract will be on-going is if the indebted person, namely the US, will be fulfilling some absolute need in the near future for a substantial group of other people, and thereby maintaining the value of the iou. ($), that is an impossible commitment to keep in the long-term.

I think everything will be recalibrated on the basis of barter.

Ans. You were the previous one accusing the US of the Tributary System, now you are retracting it. Barter system? Are going back to antiquity? Your imagination is far beyond reality.

Trump openly admits - Saudi Arabia - "King, !! I said, !! you wouldn't be king for 2 weeks without the US, better purchase some of these weapons or else" , end quote, that's like giving a 10 year old a chess set with instructions written in Tibeten, its not really the Tributory System its the Mafia system.

Ans. You could not justify and prove your statements what president Trump and and Saudi had agreed upon. But coming out from your own imagination.

Be informed that the US is in a Free Market economy and has the right to sell products to allied countries who wanted to buy. I think you are not worth of my time. Thank you, and Bye!!

The injection of such an enormous amount preceded the •25% interest rate cut by days that shows either there was a pent-up demand or speculators were waiting to take advantage of inside information, that Trump telegraphed out.

Ans. The cut in interest rate of .25%, due to the rough week in the overnight funding market, where interest rates temporarily spiked to as high as 10% for some t***sactions Monday and Tuesday.

There was no pent-up demand The economy was rolling along just fine and dandy.

Kim Iversen says there was $53 billion on Monday $ 75 billion on Tuesday and $75 billion new money issued on Thursday by the Fed to be made immediately available to all local banks.

There was no bonds sold to cover that $203 billion, and there won't be any, that money is not being used to purchase collateral to be held on the Central Banks balance sheet, as far as I know it's just being borrowed by local blank customers at interest rates well below the market value.

I think this is happening because the banks are lending a******lly and can't balance their books any other way except by $203 billion being issued to keep interest rates low.

If the USD was any other currency this decision would be inflationary, but because the USD represents 62% of international foreign exchange reserves it will go unnoticed, although the other 38% of reserve currencies held by all Nations become less secure because of the the $203 billion injection by the Fed.

Ans. Kim Iversen is nobody but a progressive You Tube commentator, who lied about the release $53 billion, $75 billion, and another $ 75 billion which total to $203 billion. The correct amount was $53 billion and $75 billion total of $128 billion, and not $203 billion. The purpose of that was to add liquidity to the banks due to high demands of credit. In addition, bonds matured that the banks had to repurchase thus reducing bank's liquid assets.

The US isn't exporting anything to maintain this extra-specia international position the USD is just one part of a system in which the USA, Europe, Britain and Japan take turns in being the strong safe haven currency to absorb hot money flows that have to go somewhere other than into gold, precious metals, Russia or China.

At the moment Europe has started Quantitative Easing so their currencies will get an artificial stimulus while the fiat currency system remains credible because investors who are desperate for a secure yield go to the US.

But because the US doesn't ever have a surplus of Trade, not ever, there is no tangible reason fot the strength of the USD outside of international political arrangements.

The European currencies will have to regain value without artificial stimulus to maintain those political arrangements, the war in Yemen that Trump is maintaining in spite of Congress is one problem I agree.

So the USD will have to decline in value for the €,£ and ¥ to recover and they then can take a turn accommodating the hot money flows while the USD recovers with artificial stimulus, this is the present fiat system.

But if the yield in US bonds dries up concurrently with European, British and Japanese bond yields the fiat system could collapse.

The World can't have only one single strong currency, because even if the US did achieve a surplus in the Balance of Trade Account there would be no way for Nations to get $'s and put them into their foreign reserve holdings.

Ans. US dollar dominance did not start at president Trump.
The United States became the lender of choice for many countries that were willing to buy dollar-denominated U.S. bonds. In 1919, Britain was finally forced to abandon the gold standard, which decimated the bank accounts of international merchants who traded in pounds. By then, the dollar had replaced the pound as the world’s leading reserve.

That financial situation that Trump is trying to achieve is known as a Tributary Demand System, if other Nations accepted this from Trump they would become vassal states and be broken up immediately.

Ans. To summarize you have concluded that president Trump has achieved a Tributary System that will make other nations subordinate to the United States.
You are wrong. The success of president Trump's economic development in the US has no bearing with the ambition of Tributary System. This Tributary System has existed since 1898, and even begun from the time of the US independence from Great Britain. Here is the history how this begun.

https://academic.oup.com/cjip/article/6/1/1/457227

Warming & cooling of the planet for the most part is not under control of man-kind.
But we are doing things that contribute to influencing our atmosphere.
To the extent that we can do to lesson the impact man-kind has on the weather we should do.

Now the warming in our artic regions is releasing methane as the permafrost melts.
Melting ice is causing the tides & storms to cause much greater damage in costal areas.

We cannot control it but we can do things to lessen the damage.

=================
For heaven sake there you go again in a different fishing expedition so that there is something to blame on president Trump. What ever happening in Europe has not much to do with the US. China is the most affected business partner but lesser with the European nations. Germany triggers mostly the Europe's economy.

Local private banks are required to have reserves, but that does not mean that continued activities in bank are controlled. Changes on this are due to following factors. Increase in the demands of credit affects the rates higher.
Reserves in the bank could lower when more bonds are sold, the balance sheet assets liquid assets are reduced.

The .25% rate cut did not trigger inflation. What recently affects world inflation is the rising cost of fuel affecting the t***sport of all commodities of commerce, and the manufacturing products. Iran's bombing of oil in Saudi Arabia is part of that world shortage. although US is not much affected due to our own oil reserves.

Inflation is also affected by high demands of commodities when people have money to buy. Despite of our good economic demands, inflation did not much affect our economy. US inflation is stable.

The dollar at present is rated very high compared to the other countries currencies. China has devalued theirs to offset the tariffs impost on their exports to the US. Not a good idea, a violation of trade agreement.

Europe's economy has been affected by Germany's recession. Germany is the biggest economic power that affects mostly of Europe. Here are the reasons for that.

One of the main reasons why German industry is struggling so much is the country’s famous export dependency. Germany’s balance of trade, the difference between exports and imports, has seen some seasonally adjusted decline since the beginning of 2018 and only recently experienced what seems to be some kind of small recovery.
This, along with the continued weak performance of European export markets, makes it difficult for the German industry to export.
Moreover, domestic consumer spending in Germany has seen rather slow growth in the second half 2018 and just recently picked up a bit again.
1.German GDP growth has been slowing.
2.Industrial output 2009-19 has been negative
3. Manufacturing production 2018-19 has been slowing.
One of the main reasons why German industry is struggling so much is the country’s famous export dependency. Germany’s balance of trade, the difference between exports and imports, has seen some seasonally adjusted decline since the beginning of 2018 and only recently.

Overall president Trump has corrected the prior abuses of China and other countries thus prior years trade deficits with the US have been minimized. Prior years, US have lost average of $500 billions per year without even noticed by the prior presidents either due to ignorance of the economy or did not know how to balance the imports versus exports. Thus China got so rich within the 20 year period.

Now, US is able to control much of China's biggest trade imbalance that had been eroding our economy and balance of trade over the years. Despite of the world's slowing down, US has the best economy. Very low unemployment rate, no inflation, and balance of our trade with China with tariffs is working effectively. Mexico, and Canada with US is undergoing new trade agreement, removing NAFTA, and replaced with the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA.
Thanks to president Trump.

=================
I think the rise of interest rate is due to supply and demand. There are factors currently that affected this.

At present there is scarcity of bank reserves. That is the asset that provides bank liquidity. The reason why the US Treasury injected $75 billion. Bank reserves have been declining, and is expected to decline further. The Treasury’s cash balance increases as and currency in circulation grows.

In other words, the cash reserves in the banking system is out of balance with the volume of securities in the dealers’ balance sheet. Other reasons. Corporate tax payment is due, and the bond market sell off. Investors sold securities back to dealers. That will decline cash reserves further in the banking system.

Interest rates affect the law of supply and demand. An increase for the demand of money or credit will raise the interest rates. Conversely a decrease in demand of money will reduce the interest rates.

The .25% cut of interest rate could be attributed to current economy inflation that is low and economic stability is in place.