Richard Rowland wrote:
It may appear that I'm blaming the president for what I consider is a false hyped economy, I'm not. I feel that if he were left alone, he could, in fact, do wonders for the nation beyond what some feel he has already accomplished. However, I feel he's being played, along with the rest of us.
There's a reason he's being allowed to do the things he's doing. It's the same ole story of the hidden agenda, beneath, what on the surface, seems a reasonable course. Plus, even if he were free to do as he wished, eight years isn't enough time to set things straight. Too much has been deliberately lost, by allowing the nation's manufacturing base to pull up and leave.
As for new businesses being started, a lemonade stand is a business. Most of these businesses being started are marginal at best. Still, every once in a while, we hear of some gigantic conglomeration wanting to locate to this or that state, and the jobs that will be created. Every state in the union goes into a frenzy, to see who can give the most away, to have it locate in their state.
By the time the dust has settled, one wonders what has been gained, plus there's no guarantee the company will stay put for any length of time. Na, it's still just feel good economics, the reality is, the American worker still has to compete with foreign labor.
Plus, the conversation has yet to discuss how the Federal Reserve fits into the scheme of things. The fed can dray up the money supply or burst open the dam. And there's the rub, the president has no control over it. If President Donald Trump knows anything, he knows the Federal Reserve, and he also knows it can be lethal to tangle with those who own it.
There's the attempt to confuse the issue of JFK's assassination with organized crime, which, by the way, the FED certainly is, and Fidel Castro's response to the Bay of Pigs, failed invasion. My money is on those who control the FED, wh**ever reason for JFK's assassination, we have yet to learn. There have also been other leaders who objected to a national bank being established in their countries who meet an untimely end. Prior to JFK, they almost got America's President, Andrew Jackson.
It may appear that I'm blaming the president for w... (
show quote)
Andrew Jackson had few redeeming qualities. His opposition to a central bank was one of them. You will note that the Federal Reserve, with it's ties to what is now the IMF, came into being largely during the Administration of Woodrow Wilson, arguably one of our worst presidents. Wilson's chief adviser was Edward House, an admitted C*******t who was also the chief founder and architect of the Council on Foreign Relations.
The machinations of the bankers were already in place with the passage of the 16th Amendment, sold to a thoroughly conned American e*****rate as simply a tax on rich Northeastern industrialists. Ironic that these same industrialists were provided with tax shelters to largely protect their money from taxation.