Your "analogy" is like comparing apples and oranges. Breaking at an intersection is a law that if not obeyed could k**l the driver of the car and/or other drivers/pedestrians. What does that have to do with the break-down of an economy and unemployment??

If the first lockdown worked, people would not be getting sick and C-19 would have been contained and would not be a p******c any more. Why would we need another lockdown?

If the first lockdown did not work, people are still getting sick and C-19 did not become contained. Why would a second lockdown work?

Lockdowns don’t work. Anybody who believes they do is a delusional fool. What they do is kick the can down the road while taking a away people’s liberty and running the economy against the wall. The toll they have taken on human life and human rights has been incalculable. Increases in child abuse, suicide, and even heart attacks, are a result of mandatory stay-at-home orders issued by politicians who now rule by decree without any legislative or democratic due process. Small businesses have permanently closed by the thousands. Those poor owners are still responsible for the mortgages, rental contracts and taxes on their store properties - with no income! How do they DO that? As a result of lockdowns, tens of thousands of jobs have been lost....not temporarily lost - lost for good.

Lockdowns are not working now, and have never worked before - why should there be another one?

The CDC is deceiving us. There is a difference between testing positive for C***d and becoming infected with it.
Epidemiologists and medical researchers all over the world are becoming alarmed over the flaws in the current tests. The test is so sensitive it detects v***l artifacts unrelated to C***d that reside in the human body long after an infection, such as the flu or even the common cold. Statistically there should be a certain number of tests returning a false positive, but from what the pros are saying the number of false positives they are getting is extraordinary.