The Trump tax cuts increased tax revenue all the way thru 2022. Look it up.

Tax cuts for everyone, especially corporate tax cuts!!

And the warming will continue at the exact pace it is occurring now.

Both look like horses. The bar tender asks, "Why the long faces?"

Permy is WAY over his head on this topic. It is true science and requires true objective thinking.

That's because they don't care about being right, they just want their ilk to follow all their tripe and they will. they refuse to think objectively.

And without chewing!!

You aren't coming close to addressing the CO2 issue. Sorry but I don't think it is in your realm of understanding, no offense. The percentages of radio isotope carbon 13 in very specific for CO2 from burning f****l f**ls and from other natural sources. Simply put, the CO2 from natural sources is on the rise dramatically and the CO2 from burning f****l f**ls is decreasing. If man burning f****l f**ls is producing the cO2, then the CO2 from burning f****l f**ls should be on the rise.

Anyway, . . . .

There are several questions which have to be resolved for all of this to be believed and therefore we shoudl scrap our economies to "save the planet," no matter how many claim to agree with it or not. 100% of doctors once thought that high cholesterol caused heart disease but we now know it is a result of heart disease, not the cause, although some doctors STILL use the old thinking and prescribe statins to lower cholesterol that is very close to the normal range anyway.

Those questions are:

Why is the CO2 levels in the ice cores not rising prior to the warming periods and only after warming began, sometimes as long as 1000 years of lag behind warming???

How much effect can a green house gas have on temp if it is only 0.24% of the entire atmosphere??? Certainly physics say a jar of CO2 will heat up more than a jar of atmosphere. But that jar is 100% CO2, not 0.24% of it.

Why doesn't the isotopic signature of CO2 in the atmosphere match with that of f****l f**ls and why isn't that isotopic signature not increasing to be an even better match of the isotopic signature of f****l f**ls when, in fact, the isotopic signature of atmospheric CO2 is becoming even less of a match to the isotopic signature of f****l f**ls. If man released CO2 is the cause of warming, why isn't the isotopic signature of Co2 becoming even more of a match to that of CO2 from f****l f**l burning??

And I'll add another, why are some scientists now claiming that they NEVER claimed rising CO2 levels was the cause of warming, but now say the rising CO2 levels are just reinforcing the warming?

But what about all those thousands of scientists and countries who believe that man burning f****l f**ls is the cause of g****l w*****g?? What about them??? Well, I don't know. But millions believe all sorts of things that are totally bogus and unbelievable, much of which is backed up by the "experts' in those areas. Everything from religious beliefs to old wives tales to superstitious nonsense. The world cannot base its scientific understanding on the "beliefs" of any group what so ever. BTW, we also know that the 97% consensus about g****l w*****g has been debunked. I saw the survey they used to draw that conclusion. It asked if there was even a 5% chance that warming was caused by man, or a 10% chance or a 20 percent chance and on up to a 100% chance. Even those "scientists" who chose the 5% chance were placed in the 97% groups who claimed that man is causing the warming.

So, we are NOT as confident that man is causing g****l w*****g as we are that smoking causes lung cancer. Not at all. That is simply NOT true.


Based upon these unanswered questions, there is every reason to think that the warming is part of a natural phenomenon of earth warming and cooling. And, the fact is that permafrost is melting and ice is melting from warming beneath it. Greenland melting is a testament to that fact. And look at how much permafrost there is to melt. Consider the sheer size of the Siberian wilderness and its permafrost covering. The gas emitted as permafrost melts is methane which is 25 times more powerful of a green house gas than CO2. And don't forget about plain old water vapor. It is hundreds of times more powerful of a green house gas and as warming occurs, it is also increasing on a world wide scale.

Please do.

IOW, it is over your head.

You should forward that to Rachel Madcow at MSNBC.