The U.S. Faces a Far Worse Impact Than Garble From Joe Biden's Mental Decay
By: Andrew Malcolm

Much of the growing concern about President Joe Biden’s overall decline has focused on his obvious speech and physical challenges.

They are, indeed, concerning, scary, and, yes, clearly worsening. We see his garbled mind and words in the Oval Office cocoon and virtually every time he ventures outside.

The other day, for instance, the president of the United States told a Pennsylvania campaign audience, "My mom didn't live in Scranton since she was 1954." And he continued on.

Such signs of a muddled mind, combined with his worsening physical abilities, continue. Yet no one does anything about this smoldering national security threat except handlers change his shoes, steer him to shorter airplane stairs, and provide very simple, detailed crib notes that he still screws up.

For no apparent reason, in speeches, this president will yell or whisper, then salute an invisible someone in a field. In a blackly humorous way, Biden's blithe glide through garbles and nonsequiturs can seem entertaining. Forgotten now are times when some might even like a president.

Less noticed, however, and far more dangerous for our country’s future is the larger message of national weakness that this glassy-eyed, 81-year-old, serial liar projects repeatedly to a world replete with adversaries. They are eager and ready to take advantage of the once unchallenged superpower that now has a daft commander in chief for at least nine more months, absent some intervention.

The threats are not all visible yet. More seem certain to emerge as the window of perceived American weakness and opportunity narrows to the e******n and potential change of administrations in January.

The threats are mounting, and we see almost daily evidence in news reports from abroad as the United States and other closely allied countries come under attack in large part because our perpetually dazed commander in chief projects inviting weakness.

The assaults on Israel by Hamas in October, and now Iran, were followed not by Biden’s outright, ongoing, and unequivocal support.

They were followed instead by public kibitzing, leaked criticisms, and warnings from this White House about the tactics and intentions of the only functioning Mideast democracy and our closest ally there.

When the United States was attacked on 9/11, every single NATO ally provided public, military, and logistical support through troops, materiel, and advisory personnel at great cost in treasure and blood. Allies who were not attacked on 9/11 suffered fully one-third of the Afghan war dead.

Not one ally warned the U.S. publicly: “Don’t overreact now.” “Be careful.” “How could your FBI miss so many Saudis on tourist visas taking jumbo-jet flying lessons?” “Why didn’t you see this coming?”

To be sure, Secy. of State Antony Blinken did recently tweet:

The United States condemns Iran’s attack on Israel. As the President said, our commitment to Israel’s security against threats from Iran is ironclad.

But then Friday, Blinken, a former John Kerry aide, stressed that the U.S. is not involved in any Israeli offensive operations.

Why say such a thing? How ironclad does that sound?

That statement was clearly aimed at U.S. Muslims and Hamas supporters – I mean, v**ers – who’ve been street-demonstrating widely against Israel, blocking major thoroughfares and bridges.

Blinken could have ignored that question and instead addressed the world’s largest exporter of terrorism by saying something like: “You better think about U.S. power before you go attacking our allies."

Why not make the Persian troublemakers ponder what the United States might or might not do?

But that’s clearly more assertive than desired by Joe Biden, who has given Iran billions in sanctions relief recently.

To be fair, instead of attacking Biden for his Iran policies last week, Donald Trump also could have acted like a leader and said something on the order of: “Iran should never mistake anything in American politics for lack of support for the great nation of Israel.”

For some reason, both Biden and Barack Obama have consistently demonstrated an inexplicable desire to appease Iran.

I would say it is because both of them are anti-semites, plus second rate beta males. If they were ever in a real war zone they’d be curled in a fetal position crying for their mommies!

President Joe Biden’s campaign stops in Pennsylvania this week were marked by a series of inaccurate and misleading remarks across various topics, as CNN explains.

Biden's tour spanned three days, during which he engaged with citizens and discussed policy achievements and future plans. These speeches included comments on his financial earnings, policy impacts, and personal anecdotes.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fact-check-biden-makes-false-and-misleading-claims-during-pennsylvania-campaign-swing/ar-AA1nk4MX

Last month I attended a AFCEA.org contractor meeting with the SDVOSB (Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses) many think this is a very dangerous time for the Democrats and us, they will fight to stay in power with any and all means. They cannot allow Trump to win in 2024 they may lose everything...Power and Money.

They may not be able to rig enough p**********l v**es this time so, they will either focus on Congressional seats and Senate seats to make sure Trump can get little done, or we may expect a type of false f**g to get our USA Military directly in a war/s and claim you cannot change the Commander in Chief in the middle of a war prior to e******n. Try to pull off a Roosevelt scenario.

That's how bad the mood and thoughts are - the Democrats with some Republicans will do anything to protect the Military and Security Industrial Complex $$$,$$$,$$$,$$$,$$$ as self-serving basturds.

“We talk about the erosion for Biden and now you start to see it,” Kornacki said in response to the most recent survey, adding with surprise, “Look at these numbers.” When questioned about a variety of important characteristics and topics, such as handling inflation and the economy, 52 percent of respondents chose former President Trump, indicating that Trump had an advantage. Only 40% of respondents chose President Biden, which is a 22-point swing in favor of Trump.

https://republic-brief.com/all-hell-breaks-loose-live-on-nbc-when-shocking-news-about-biden-surfaces/