The entire estate was estimated to be worth between $100 - $300 million, depending on who was doing the calculating. But I loved your comment ... "Squandered it up to $3 Billion."

Any news source that is either 100% anti-republican or anti-democrat can't be viewed as a credible news source. And if you're not credible, you're not reliable.

Trump inherited less than $400M. This has been well-documented for years. Your statement is totally baseless and shows just how ill-informed and biased you are.

Find somewhere else to spew your nonsense troll.

What?!! A self-made billionaire didn't achieve one of his goals ... "Stop the presses!!"

Just more meaningless Trump bashing from the lunatic fringe.

Well, if the Huffington Post says it, it must be true.

Study have also shown that those who get their news strictly from disingenuous, hypocritical, left-leaning, agenda ridden, Trump-hating news sources quickly lose all objectivity and become mindless lemmings.

You shouldn't use news sources that are known to lean heavily one way or the other to support a point. You lose all credibility as a rational thinking human being and instead show yourself to be the regurgitating sheep that you are.

Richards, there isn't a great deal of new money entering the stock market. And, if you were to pick any NASDAQ stock and look at what corporate insiders are doing, you'd see most of them have been selling off over the past 12 months. (Example: https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/jnj/insider-trades ).

The stock market meteoric rise is based solely on stock buy-backs and central bank purchasing programs. Corporations are leveraging their companies to the hilt to borrow large sums of money at extremely low interest rates. This borrowed money is used to buy back existing stock thereby raising the price of all remaining stock. They all do it, which is why they are all carrying enormous debt these days (hence the outrageous P/E ratios).

Once the stock price hits a certain level, which it must have done, the insiders sell off. The pensioners and retirement fund holders will be the ones holding the bag when the stock market looses its liquidity.

Hey liberals, progressives, socialists, wh**ever you're calling yourselves these days ... your programs and policies aren't working and aren't popular if you have to flood the country with undocumented immigrants to have any hope of winning e******ns. In other words, if your ideology was so great, you'd be winning e******ns hands down and wouldn't have to flood the country with overseas v**ers.

So you don't have a problem with the DNC or Clinton campaign funding the dossier? Or that the author of the dossier is an admitted trump h**er? Or that no one in the Justice Department or FBI thought it relevant to share those relationships with the Court? If proven, you wouldn't have a problem with any of that?

Amen brother! I stopped watching TV as well -- totally cutting the cable. It became increasingly obvious to me that I was being manipulated by mainstream media ... and I include FOX in with that group. Not just giving me the news but telling me how I should think and feel about it.

Now I make a conscience effort to find news sources that only present the facts "as they seem them." Then I bounce those 'facts' against multiple sources to determine if the source of those facts is legit. This helps me formulate my own opinion without outside influence. I'll still watch the talking heads from time to time (via the internet), but I am much less likely now to be influenced by someone else's agenda. It really helps me maintain my objectivity.

I can't argue this point. I certainly don't know what the ratio is, but I do believe liberalism is based more on emotion than fact. If it feels right, then it's right - facts be damned.

One quick example of this might be the argument for or against a living wage ... or universal income ... or wh**ever it is they're calling it these days. All facts and previous attempts prove that minimum wage laws do not work but do in fact more harm than good. But facts don't really matter to the liberal/socialist. Raising the minimum wage to $15 just feels right. And anyone who FEEL differently MUST be a white, rich, greedy, capitalist. That's what they're told so that's what they believe. Because it's true? No. Because it feels right. Showering liberals with a mountain of empirical data isn't going to change their opinion because that opinion was not based on fact - it is based on what they perceive to right or good or just. Their thought process is two-dimensional really. Guns k**l children therefore we must eliminate guns. It just feels right.

I'm not slamming liberals really, it's just how I see them. I think conservatives, as a rule, could be a bit more empathetic. I know I could be. I think we'd be able to bridge this divide much better if both sides were a bit more balanced ... if conservatives were a bit more compassionate and liberals a bit more pragmatic.

The memo is just a memo. It is not proof of anything. We'll have to wait to see where it all leads. Until then I'm withholding judgement.

But clearly, the FISA Court was entitled to a few key pieces of information which seem, at least to me, to have been deliberately withheld.

My question to you is: Is there any part of this memo that might give you pause? Do you really believe that, if true, there's nothing of significance there?

I agree. And there's nothing new under the sun. There are just as many Trump h**ers in America as there are/were Obama h**ers (or would-be Clinton H**ers had she won). They just happen to be different halves of the same America. We are definitely a divided country. I fear civil war (or at least civil unrest) may be in our future. Thankfully I'm on the side that believes in the right to bear arms.

Yeah, I was talking more about his sources than his comment. I'm not interested in his opinion. All he does is insult the president at every turn ... he's a broken record.

As for the topic ... meh, who cares. Trump is obviously trying to get a rise out of the audience. Doesn't matter what he says though, DJRich is going to find fault with it. Or, even more likely, he'll just regurgitate something he's heard from somebody else. Not much of an original thinker this one.

According to the article JFlorio just posted: "The Republican National Committee raised $132.5 million in 2017 and ended the year with almost $39 million on hand and no debt. The Democratic committee took in $66 million and had $6.5 million in cash available, but also owed $6.1 million."

Guess it just depends on what you're reading. Another reason why you can't just trust a single source ... especially when that source is proven to have an agenda.

That's what I said. Are you playing word games now?