One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Turk182
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 17 next>>
Mar 17, 2019 11:26:35   #
Thought you might enjoy this. Check out: The reign of heavens and The American National Union.

Have you ever read: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/goatsledge/20081212%20Law%20of%20Nations.pdf

The T-ROW show talks about the Law of Nations.

Is it time to throw the government out of the United States of America.

https://t-rohshow.com/2019/03/15/the-118th-broadcast-of-the-t-roh-show/

This shows you are not apart of the Constitution if you have never signed it.

Why would a person want to fight and die for a corporation that does not protect him/her, that has never signed a compact?

You need to read the Law of Nations 3 or 4 times to understand it.

After reading the Law of Nations does it piss you off that you served in the military?

It does me.


Semper Fi
Go to
Feb 15, 2019 14:12:49   #
No Muslims Allowed: Was Islam Banned From the USA in 1952?

Nationality Act June 27, 1952
ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952, but Obama does not want you to know that nor does he respect or uphold US law. The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 19.52 revised the laws relating to immigration} naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414. established both the law and t he intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to o*******w the ,government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.11 This, by its very definition.1 rules out Islamic immigration to the United States1 but this law is being ignored by the White House Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran. Sharia Law and the Hadith ar e required complete submission to lslam, which is anti ethical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their means guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its •form of government..

Turk182
Go to
Feb 15, 2019 12:55:54   #
If you don't think that they're COMING FOR US, you've been asleep for at least 30 years. Janet Levy, expert on Islamic resurgence, lays it all out in her new article. - CB

'The foundation for AMJA's Roadmap exists in a 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document, the Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America, entered into evidence during the 2008 HLF-Hamas trial. The secret internal document, written by senior MB officials and a Hamas leader, clearly defined the Brotherhood's goals, activities and infrastructure in America. It elucidated plans to infiltrate and take over American democracy and the Constitution and replace them with an Islamic government and sharia. It clearly defines its "work in America as a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within."


February 15, 2019

“The Road to Shariadom” in America

By Janet Levy

The Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America (AMJA) is part of an international network of Muslim scholars that preaches shariah rule as a government system, even issuing a fatwa delineating sharia's "superiority" over democracy. It is one of many Muslim organizations now dangerously and politically active in the United States. They include the 25-year-old Council of Islamic Relations, CAIR, self-described as a "Muslim civil rights organization" with an Islamic perspective on American public issues. More recent organizations – created in 2015 and similarly politically dedicated – include JETPAC, the Justice, Education and Technology Policy Advocacy Center, which encourages American Muslims to get involved in local politics, and MPower Change, committed to creating a political platform for Muslim issues and organizing around it.

All these politically active Muslim-American groups, prominent Muslims and other Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organizations within the U.S. publicly avow that they have no intention of implementing sharia in the U.S. Yet, their stated political goals, public statements and recent reports, betray their true intentions: to grow in political strength sufficient to replace our democracy with their religious governance.


More than 100 top Muslim leaders belong to AMJA, which began in 2003. Imams at over 3,100 U.S. mosques look to AMJA for instructional guidance to lead their congregations. The group's name in Arabic, "The Group of Sharia Specialists in America," implies its purpose: to impel Muslims to follow its comprehensive, sharia-compliant fatwas. Many of the group's leaders attended Egypt's Al-Azhar University, the world's highest academy of Islamic learning and interpreter of the definitive sharia text – The Reliance of the Traveller.

Thus, AMJA possesses authority to provide legal rulings for the worldwide Islamic community and keep all Muslim Americans and affiliated Muslim Brotherhood organizations in line with unalterable sharia law. The organization rules on how Muslims must conduct themselves in the non-Muslim world until sharia becomes law. One fatwa revealingly instructs Muslim judges in non-Muslim countries to judge by Sharia "as much as possible, even if by ruse."

Following the 2016 e******n and the perceived "calamity" of Trump's victory, AMJA issued a major, fatwa-filled report: "AMJA Post-E******n Statement: Principles and Roadmap." It cited concern over three specific Trump administration actions: the executive order barring entry to those from "countries of concern" – Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen – support for a congressional bill to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization and the announced move of the American embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.


In response, AMJA's Roadmap calls on Muslims to defend Islam and use U.S. constitutional rights to their benefit. It cautions them to defer to trained scholars, assumedly AMJA leaders, and avoid violating sharia tenets. It calls for Muslim unity, alignment of their dawah efforts and coalition building with other ethnic and religious groups and movements that serve Muslim community causes. The Roadmap also issued veiled threats to American citizens.

The foundation for AMJA's Roadmap exists in a 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document, the Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America, entered into evidence during the 2008 HLF-Hamas trial. The secret internal document, written by senior MB officials and a Hamas leader, clearly defined the Brotherhood's goals, activities and infrastructure in America. It elucidated plans to infiltrate and take over American democracy and the Constitution and replace them with an Islamic government and sharia. It clearly defines its "work in America as a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within."

AMJA's general secretary, Dr. Salah Al-Sawy, who also founded Mishkah Islamic University of North America (formerly Sharia Academy of America) has proclaimed that the Muslim American community seeks to improve its position regarding jurisprudence, rather than imposing sharia, as they are not yet in a position to do so in the west.


However, Ibrahim Hooper, CAIR spokesman and co-founder, was more forthright in a 1993 interview when he stated that he wants the U.S. to be governed by Islamic law in the future. In 2003, he admitted that if Muslims became a majority in America, they would likely seek to replace the Constitution with sharia. CAIR, an un-indicted, co-conspirator in the HLF-Hamas trial, has thwarted efforts to protect fundamental constitutional rights, such as the American Laws for American Courts, ALAC, legislation which seeks to prohibit foreign laws from being used in U.S. courts. CAIR has falsely claimed anti-Muslim bias in a bill that actually protects Americans from foreign law and affirms America's commitment to the U.S. Constitution.

The newer Muslim American organizations not surprisingly echo the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR and AMJA positions and activism. MPower Change, co-founded by MB operative, Linda Sarsour, joined CAIR to fight for repeal of Trump's entry ban on people from designated terrorist havens. It also endorses the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement that targets Israel. It has worked to increase v**er turnout with #MyMuslimV**e partners national network and held the first ever, National Muslim V***r R**********n Day, registering new v**ers at 50 different nationwide events, including many mosques, and called 10,000 v**ers in a #CallingAllMuslims phone-bank effort.

Meanwhile, JETPAC developed proprietary software for social media outreach, fundraising, canvassing, and media communications. It also teaches promising candidates grassroots organizing techniques and how to leverage civil rights issues for Muslim community causes.


In November 2018, CAIR, JETPAC and MPower Change jointly published "The Rise of American Muslim Changemakers: Political Organizing in the Trump Era." The report showcased Roadmap and MB strategic plan results. It summarized successful efforts to increase Muslim participation in the American political process and reaffirmed the MB's commitment to influencing the political landscape and advancing Islam. Promoted as "an analysis of the rise of the American Muslim political class in the Trump era," the report profiles the 276 American Muslims who ran for office between 2016 and 2018. They raised $16.2 million and ran for mostly local, county and state legislative offices. Of those, 131 were elected, 36% women and 64% men. More than half of the candidates were in California, New Jersey, Minnesota and Michigan, states with the largest Muslim populations.

The report also used data on American Muslim v**er attitudes from CAIR's 2018 midterm e******n exit poll survey of 1,027 respondents to provide insight into increased Muslim participation and political success. It characterized Muslim Americans as "unapologetically Muslim" in the face of alleged "Islamophobia" and as aligned with progressive l*****t voices in the current political spectrum, citing a 78% Muslim v**e in the midterm e******ns for Democrats. It calls attention to the rise of anti-Muslim bigotry and discounts the role of understandable public concerns about rampant Islamic terrorism and of blatant attempts by Muslim leaders to integrate sharia aspects into American communities. The report also mentions, as an example of bigotry, opposition to build a mosque at the 9/11 site and fails to recognize the insensitivity of such a plan. It also fails to mention worldwide Islamic terrorist attacks and Muslim ideology spewed nationwide in mosques and universities that are radically antithetical to western principles of liberty and e******y. The report attributes "Islamophobia" to the Republican Party, particularly in the Trump era, rather than righteous caution concerning Muslims after radical Islamic activity in the U.S. and abroad.



Despite these conclusions, the report characterizes American Muslim candidates as focusing on community needs to ensure that "American political culture serves everyone, equally and equitably." It says most American Muslim candidates enjoy localized and highly networked support with overlapping constituencies or "intersectionality," affiliate with the Democratic Party and align their interests with those of other ethnic and religious minorities. Remarkably, given Islam's position on homosexuality and drugs, they support L***Q and promote marijuana decriminalization. As these positions are antithetical to Islamic norms and values, this smacks of pure opportunism to ally with the Left to advance Islam.

The political advances of these new American Muslim organizations, detailed above, are not surprising. For three generations, the Muslim Brotherhood in America has been building an observant Muslim base to integrate sharia and promote Islam. Their work is beginning to bear fruit as evidenced by the burgeoning of Muslim American political power. This a horrifying prospect given that Islamic doctrine unalterably prohibits the separation of mosque and state, mandates the supremacy of Muslims over non-Muslims and codifies the d******n of men over women. We should be alert and recognize that this movement represents a growing threat to democracy and American values.

Semper Fi
Go to
Jan 28, 2019 14:10:24   #
Why would the U.S. have C*******ts Goals if it was not a C*******t Government?

C*******T GOALS (From The Congressional Record, Jan. 10, 1963)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/922684/posts


Semper Fi
Go to
Jan 28, 2019 11:09:59   #
Art. I, Sec. 8, # 17. No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind wh**ever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

There has never been any attorney that had the consent of congress. That means all attorneys in congress are committing treason against the United States. That includes judges and prosecutors.

Semper Fi
Go to
Jan 4, 2019 10:55:18   #
badbob85037: Very good post. But why do the people put up with the C*******ts in the Congress. They don't follow the laws. lslam was Banned From the USA in 1952
No Muslims Allowed:
ISLAM:
" A Doctrine masquerading as a Religion for millennia based upon Laws ( Shari'a) , a Constitution ( the Qur'an) and an ideology that DEMANDS the death of ALL Jews, Christians and other infidels and is the most misogynistic society in the history of the world".Nationality Act June 27, 1952

The (congressmen) should be tried and hung for treason.
Maybe Trumps indictments will have their names on them and they will be sent to Gitmo. With the new Military Law anyone can file against the unlawful people. When the forms come out a lot of people will be filling them out and filing.


Semper Fi
Go to
Dec 3, 2018 17:04:44   #
"The blame is ultimately on "we the people" for not being vigilant
enough and holding our govt. accountable!"

The government taught the people what they wanted them to know, in (the school of fools).

We are under military rule, BUT, what does the constitution say? Art. 4, Sec. 3, # I. Section. 3.
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

So is your (State of wh**ever) lawfull? Lets say you are from Ohio, hold up a map of the Northern Continent and point to the "State of Ohio".
It is not there. That is Ohio. Where is the state of Ohio? The "State of Ohio" is a fiction, you can not put it on a stand, you can not question it.
So, who made the state of Ohio. Attorneys with a Title of Nobility made the "State of Ohio".

There are no lawful states after the original 13 colonies. Why? Because they were all made by people with a "Title of Nobility", that means attorneys who belong to the BAR, which is a franchise from the British BAR.

What does Art. I sec. 9,m #8 say?

It says: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind wh**ever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

There are no judges, attorneys, or prosecutors that have the consent of Congress. Did we the people give congress the power to give the consent to attorneys, judges, prosecutors, OR the military? Hell NO.

Now, who gave the military power in "The Law of Armed Conflict"? Congress did. What is in Congress? Attorneys. SO, are they lawful? Sorry but they are not lawful, because of the attorneys with a "Title of Nobility" that are in congress.

Are we at war? No. Who swore in Harry S. Truman? Chief Justice (attorney) of the United States Harlan Fiske Stone administered the p**********l oath of office.

Who was President during 9/11? Obama. Obama was an attorney. Enough said?

So what are these people with a "Title of Nobility" , (attorneys) doing in Congress, because they were BAR members before they got into Congress?


Congress blows smoke and makes laws that they do not follow, OR even make sure they are lawful, because they taught the public in their school of fools what they wanted them to know.

Watch this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyiOmwloszo&t=269s


Semper Fi
Go to
Dec 3, 2018 15:17:28   #
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Judges have far too much leeway. They are pretty much a law unto themselves. Part of the misunderstanding probably comes from that.


Where did the judges, police officers, sheriffs, prosecutors get the order to do what they do? Show me the order. They can't.

We are under military rule.

The sheriff do not have the power to take, confiscate or sell property.

Always check the oath of officers, (judges, (sheriffs, police who write tickets)). They probable don't have an oath or it is not lawful.

Watch the video below and learn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyiOmwloszo&t=269s

Semper Fi
Go to
Dec 3, 2018 07:29:05   #
That is the problem that everyone passes around what they think or what they have been taught.
Watch and listen: https://t-rohshow.com/2018/12/02/the-104th-broadcast-of-the-t-roh-show/

It is hard to teach on old dog a new trick.

Semper Fi
Go to
Dec 2, 2018 23:48:40   #
It is not an admiralty f**g, it is a military f**g.

You may want to read: LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT DESK BOOK, because we are under military rule.

Semper Fi
Go to
Oct 24, 2018 11:14:34   #
-----Original Message-----
From: ez4u2cme <ez4u2cme@aol.com>
Sent: Tue, Oct 23, 2018 11:26 pm
Subject: The President is now facing an existential moment in his Presidency.

The President is now facing an existential moment in his Presidency. This caravan has now swelled to 14,000 people some say. How does that happen? You’ve seen the footage, women pushing five children in stroller – we’re supposed to take care of all these people? Every third world impoverished person in the world is coming here and the t***h is we can’t take care of them all.

And here’s another t***h, there’s not a liberal listening to this who wants them here either. Do you think they are going to rush out and invite these people to their neighborhoods or into their homes? No. They don’t want their quiet little lives ruined.

Let’s be clear, this is an attempt by the Democrats to create mass hysteria against the President, against Republicans and against people who support them, that’s you and me. This is how evil they are. They would like to see Trump send the military to the border, and then they would like to see immigrants being shot and k**led at the border. Nothing has been more clear.

This is an invasion army. Make no mistake about it. You might say that no other country in the world would allow something like this to happen, but you’d be wrong. Germany did, and look what happened to them. Leaders in Germany now say there are no Germans anymore. So did France and England. Now there are no-go zones in those countries even the police are afraid to go to.

This caravan and the others that will come after it are the existential threat to the survival of America if this is not stopped. The question is how does he stop it? What should the military do when they are sent? What should be their rules of engagement? Water cannons? Rubber bullets? How far should they go?

Trump is the one in the driver’s seat. We put him there for this. So what does he do? How does he stop this human wave? Here’s a scary thought. It doesn’t matter what he does. If he sends the military to the border, the media will follow and they will take their pictures and videos and frame interviews to fit their narrative and they will make it look like Trump, the military, the border patrol, and the Republicans are all evil white men resorting to drastic measures to keep brown mothers and children from a better life in America.

They did the same thing with the separation policy at the border. Did you notice every media member, every Democrat in congress, every Democrat spokesperson, all of them said Trump was “ripping” children from their parents, “ripping” families apart. Do you think that’s a coincidence? That word was chosen on purpose and they all collaborated using it. It was to create a picture in your mind. It was to induce a mass hysteria.

In the battle of the Alamo, less than 200 brave men were defending their homes, something the Mexican government promised them they could have, luring them to uproot their families and move to Texas to live free and thrive as best they could. That Mexican government reneged on that promise and decided they wanted that land back. An army of over 2000 Mexican soldiers slaughtered every last man at the Alamo.

This is a new type of invasion. This invasion army is not bringing cannons and rifles, they are bringing cameras, and stories of woe to influence sympathetic ears and eyes. And where are the Democrats that caused this to happen, that are allowing and begging for this to happen? Why isn’t Chuck Schumer down there handing out corned beef sandwiches for all the migrants? Why isn’t Nancy Pelosi down there preparing footbaths for them after their long hike? Why isn’t Bernie down there handing each one a copy of Das Kapital for each invader? Where is Ocascio-Cortez there with a rack of designer dresses from Madison Avenue? How come Kamala Harris isn’t down there providing pro bono legal representation for every border invader?

They are nowhere to be found because they want the spectacle to unfold. They want the violence they want the desperation, they want blood. They don’t care about these people, they only care about creating hysteria among the masses. But make no mistake, you, Trump’s base is becoming impatient with the lack of immigration control, so if Trump doesn’t put the military on the border to stop this invasion this could be Trump’s Waterloo. That didn’t end well for Napoleon as the Alamo didn’t end well for the Texans.

We are at the Alamo wall and we’re waiting for President Trump to help us reinforce it. We must not allow another mass hysteria win the day.


Simper Fi

Turk182
Go to
Oct 11, 2018 13:02:59   #
https://t-rohshow.com/2018/10/06/the-ninety-sixth-broadcast-of-the-t-roh-show/
https://t-rohshow.com/2018/10/09/the-ninety-sixth-broadcast-of-the-t-roh-show-part-2/


Simper Fi

Turk182
Go to
Oct 4, 2018 09:37:20   #
I don't need a law degree.
You asking that question, shows you do not know the LAWS or why Trump is not the President.
The question you should be asking is: how do we take our country back?

Semper Fi

Joe
Go to
Oct 4, 2018 08:45:05   #
Bad Bob wrote:


Making fun of someone shows you do not know the law, but are a bully as well.

Semper Fi

Joe
Go to
Oct 4, 2018 07:40:35   #
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/09/29/judge-gives-green-light-to-lawsuit-claiming-trump-is-violating-the-constitution.html

A federal judge on Friday gave a green light to a lawsuit filed by 200 Democrats in Congress against President Donald Trump. The lawsuit claims that Trump has repeatedly and continuously violated the U.S. Constitution by doing business with foreign governments while in office.
The lawsuit is based on the Constitution’s emoluments clause, which prohibits presidents from taking payments from foreign governments without the consent of Congress. Trump still owns the business which has been the site of many foreign embassy events at its downtown D.C. hotel. In addition, many foreign government officials stay at his D.C. hotel in order to gain favor with the president.Attorneys for the Democratic Members of Congress said that Friday’s ruling in their favor was a very significant victory for their side.
“By recognizing that Members of Congress have standing to sue, the court proved to all in America today that no one is above the law, not even the President,” wrote Elizabeth Wydra, of the Constitutional Accountability Center, in a statement.
When Trump became president he reportedly gave up day-to-day management of his businesses. He has residential, office, hotel and golf properties in the United States and throughout the world. He still owns these properties and he can withdraw money from them at any time. Therefore when foreign governments pay money to these businesses it is like they are paying the money directly to him. The foreign emoluments clause prohibits payments from foreign governments, which it says cannot be accepted “without the consent of Congress.”
Trump did not ask Congress’s permission to take payments from foreign governments, which is a central point of the lawsuit. Trump’s attorneys claim he doesn’t need to seek permission from Congress. They claim that the business t***sactions don’t meet the Founding Fathers’ definition of “emoluments.” They are business deals, they claim, not payoffs from foreign governments.
In his ruling, Federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan agreed with the Democratic Members of Congress. He said that they have legal standing to sue and their case can proceed.-----MORE------
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/09/29/judge-give... (show quote)


First you must know the LAW, because the judge does NOT know the LAW.
Here is a letter I received in an e-mail from a friend.

"230 years of criminal activity by high placed federal, state and county government employees is now ready for public exposure, and recent news stories prove two facts;
1) American People know their government employees ARE the problem,
2) American People do not know how the problem continues to fester.

To understand the 'how the problem continues to fester', the American People, including 'trump' (lower case letters as he is not actually America's president yet), must first learn for understanding and application the single greatest document written to prevent the current government cancer.
For starters......if you do not know why 'trump' is not actually the president, this lack of knowledge is exactly what criminal government employees rely upon for their existence.

I am sending this message to shine light on others recently in the news, that do not understand the federal constitution as exposed in the articles linked.

The first link reports a federal judge ruled 'trump' can be sued for constitutional emolument(s) violations which is absolute bull-s**t no other American has reported as of this writing. The bull-s**t 'IS'.......

1) As 'trump' is still our president elect, and not actually president yet, he has not violated a single emolument clause found in America's federal constitution stated to be in effect by the judge ruling. The bull-s**t goes much further, so read on.

2) Now that the judge confirmed the constitution is the 'LAW', notice the reference to British legal crap. This British legal crap comes straight from the bill of rights which was added to the American People's back in 1791 for instances like last Friday's judge ruling.

Last Friday's legal ruling is based upon British legal theory the colonist fought the revolutionary war to throw off, by preventing all individuals with titled foreign government executive appointment, any position in any American government subdivision without congressional consent. The judge holds a british executive appointment without congressional consent to be an American federal judge. The judge is guilty of treason defined in the constitution confirmed to be valid in the article, and I can easily prove this. Here is the article.

Judge: Democrats in Congress can sue Trump over emoluments



Judge: Democrats in Congress can sue Trump over emoluments
ABC News
A federal district judge in Washington ruled Friday that a group of nearly 200 Democratic senators and represent...



Then....Kanye West got on the constitutional band wagon a couple days ago knowing something is wrong, but not what is wrong or by who's action(s).

He is correct in saying the current 13th must be abolished, as I prefer to say repealed which is also not actually correct either, but the current 13th is actually the current 14th as per several government law books I either own or have certified copy of, along with copy of and access to the original Lincoln signed document exposing Lincoln's treason thus removing the s***ery document by nullification due to constitutional fraud, Mr. West knows is a constitutional violation, but cannot prove the violation. Here is a weak report.

Kanye West calls for the abolition of the 13th amendment while wearing MAGA hat


Kanye West calls for the abolition of the 13th amendment while wearing M...
Kanye West has been having a very Kanye West 24 hours. West posted a message and photo to his Twitter account S...



I have been out of the fight for a few months while busy working, but am slowly getting back up to speed for another push for a meeting with president elect 'trump' before he is k**led.

This morning I received messages of the supreme court crap, and of some ford gal pictured with Soros. This is all to keep the American People distracted from their t***h that......with 'trump's' attention America's problems can be easily remedied. How you might ask, well part of the answer is found in a recent article in IMPRIMUS.

Since 1791, many of America's government positions have been filled by Americans holding British title of nobility and not a single one of these thousands of individuals received congressional consent. These individuals have slowly, but methodically moved America away from a sovereign Nation position with closed borders as required in the constitution above confirmed to be America's 'LAW', to a Globalism position of a 'border less world' for unrestricted love and compassion.

All criminals employed by America's government(s), both past and present, work for distance from the document that allows the People to control their government employees, by removing criminals from positions when the employee are found guilty of treason.

This is confirmed by learning treason is the only crime defined in America's constitution because the crime of government employees simply involves altering 'LAW' for individual gain which defines treason. The simplicity of the crime is why criminals put great effort into preventing the People from accessing 'trump', while the People continue to state something is wrong without access to 'LAWFUL' enforcement of the constitution.

LeVoy Finicum gave his life knowing something is wrong, being k**led by government employees altering 'LAW' for individual gain.

LaVoy Finicum




LaVoy Finicum
Robert LaVoy Finicum (January 27, 1961 – January 26, 2016) was an American spokesman for the m*****a group Citiz...



I attempted to stop the action causing LaVoy's death before the action started, but People turned a deaf ear to my offer, so the battle continues.

Today, criminals operating America's government require globalism and open borders simply because treason carries the death penalty. Treason is a citizen committing a crime against their nation, so with globalism and no nations, there will be no prosecution for treason, and thus no exposure to a death penalty.

In 1791, John Adams was the leading American individual behind the push for British legal crap to be added to America's federal constitution, while John Adams enjoyed a British title of nobility without American congressional consent. This is easily proven as no consent could have been granted 'BEFORE' the first congressional session was called to order, with John Adams being the senate president.

THEN......once Adams got away with the original crime, he was then part of the federalist conspiracy to replace 'LAW' with British legal bull-s**t through the addition of the unconstitutional bill of rights containing the 7th amendment containing the words common law, which is not 'LAW' by any stretch of the imagination, but the rule allowing the judge last week to rule sue 'trump', and Mr. West to claim abolish the 13th.

To go further, the s***ery amendment was required by government criminals because of the fraud of the bill of rights which then required the original 13th amendment to prevent to prosecution of treason in a nation with closed borders as America enjoyed in 1812. The words cease to be a citizen are the key to knowing if not a citizen, the definition of treason cannot be made, so......

From the time just before April 30, 1812, this original 13th was listed in American Law books, and for decades until the government criminals could get a civil war started to be ended with another amendment, this amendment was not referred to in a single case I can find in any state history. The original 13th only protects titled government criminals, and due to it's none-use, the importance of this amendment must be questioned. Then.....

As I have American government published law books showing both T.O.N.A. listed as the 13th amendment, AND s***ery as the 14th amendment in the same book, by simply getting me to president elect 'trump', we can expose America's problem to insure nationalism with closed borders as 'trump' wants, with the protection from treason as written in 1787/88 by American People after America's Revolutionary War.

In 1776, America's Declaration to the world stated the America People "are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown" making the evidence clear that the People rejected/reject today British theory common law which does not insure citizenship, but rather authorizes the theory of human beings labeled as subjects, thus inferior to the British ruler."

Written by Jim Porter
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 17 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.