permafrost wrote:
Honest now, can you not read???
Can you understand the differance between a private and a public Foundation??
It is explained fully in the posts I have made and others have made..
Pay attention....
Whoever made that meme is an i***t!!! Nobody gets placed in a police car because of an accusation. Your memes are getting more ridiculous each time. đ
Just shows where you get your information... sigh.
desparado wrote:
Most likely trump will get rid himself
Ummmm....errrrr....ahhhhh, what?
You try desperately to be relevant, try harder. đ
mouset783 wrote:
Going to the bathroom my him/herself is difficult for the ignorant baboon
Lol!!! Yeah, that and tying his shoes, feeding and dressing himself, the list of things is near endless. đ
E wrote:
Sounds like cover my a$$ and run.
Certainly seems as though Donna is distancing herself quite a bit here. Kind of raises my suspicion.
BigMike wrote:
What a chocolate chip and butt nugget cookie
that was!
She spills beans on the hag (chocolate chip) while downplaying her own role in c***ting for the hag (butt nugget). These people would be funny if they weren't dangerous.
Lol... I like that,
chocolate chip and
butt nugget. đ
Your last sentence, I couldnât agree more. đ
slatten49 wrote:
You're welcome. Sorry to read of your paternal grandfather as a curmudgeon. Kind'a like Loki, huh? I teasingly refer to him as OPP's resident curmudgeon. But of course, it is simply a term of endearment for our vocabulary Visigoth.
Curmudgeon!!! Thatâs the word I was looking for, but Loki couldnât hold a candle to that guy. I donât think Loki ever came home at 3 am in a drunken stupor and forced his children to get up and do yard work. That just happens to be one of the stories one of my uncles shared with me. It also happens to be one of the nicer ones. đ
Quote:
You should be thankful for not using contractions, as AuntiE h**es 'em, and probably would have chided you for it.
For that very reason, I often flood comments to her on the forum or in PM's with them, just to irritate her. The more, the better.
Chide me!!! I know how much she h**es them, but I think I get a pass. I am,
hers after all. đ
Quote:
BTW: http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-117354-2.html#2194565
Oh my word!!! I knew you like to live on the edge, but, yikes!!! I think you may have too much confidence in that buffer zone.
Donna Brazile: I found 'proof' the DNC r****d the nomination for Hillary Clinton.
By: Alex Pappas
âLast year's p**********l primary between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders was r****d by the Democratic National Committee - just as Sanders' supporters suspected - to hand the nomination to Clinton, according to a bombshell claim by Donna Brazile. The onetime Clinton confidante, CNN commentator and former interim party boss made the explosive claim Thursday while touting a new book that could sever her ties to Team Clinton for good.
"I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton's team had r****d the nomination process, as a cache of emails stolen by Russian hackers and posted online had suggested," Brazile wrote in a piece for Politico Magazine.
âBy Sept. 7, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart," Brazile said. The proof, according to Brazile, was a joint fundraising agreement document between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund and Hillary for America. It had been signed in August 2015, four months after Clinton announced her candidacy and a year before she officially secured the nomination over Sanders.
âThe agreementâsigned by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Eliasâspecified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy, and all the money raised," Brazile wrote. "Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff.â
Brazile took over as the interim DNC chairman in 2016 when Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was forced out as chairman over the emails, which indicated the party organization unfairly favored Clinton over Sanders during the primary.
The ardent supporters of Sanders, the Democratic socialist, have long accused the party establishment of actively taking steps to benefit Clinton during the primary.
DNC spokesman Xochitl Hinojosa, who works under current DNC chairman Tom Perez, told Fox News the party's official policy is to not take sides during the primaries.
"The DNC must remain neutral in the p**********l primary process, and there shouldn't even be a perception that the DNC is interfering in that process," Hinojosa said. She said joint fundraising committees were created between the DNC and the Clinton and Sanders campaigns during the 2016 cycle but Clinton was the only candidate who raised money for the party. The piece, titled "Inside Hillary Clinton's secret takeover of the DNC," is excerpted from Brazile's forthcoming book, which is being published this month.
After taking over, she said she went in search for "evidence of internal corruption that would show that the DNC was rigging the system to throw the primary to Hillary." "I had been wondering why it was that I couldn't write a press release without passing it by Brooklyn," she wrote. "Well, here was the answer." It's typical, she said, for candidates to make such arrangements with party organizations - but after they've won the nomination. Brazile said the arrangement does not appear to be "illegal, but it sure looked unethical."
"If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the v**ers had decided which one they wanted to lead," she said. "This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it c*********d the party's integrity."
slatten49 wrote:
Some of my greatest memories coincide in time with my maternal grandfather. He was, quite probably, the greatest influence in my life. So, I appreciate your wonderful story, WFOC...thanks for sharing. One question: Facing the photo, you are the little critter on the right, yes
Lol, yes. I wish I got to know him, my aunt always said I reminded her of him. I did get to know my paternal grandfather, he moved in with us during my early teenage years. Letâs just say I wouldâve preferred to swap them out, he was a mean, grumpy, miserable man.
I had written a totally different reply for this originally, but it got all messed up after I attached the photo. I used a lot of contractions and quotation marks. For wh**ever reason, when I add a photo to my post, all the apostrophes and quotation marks get changed to this â... so it ended up looking horrible and almost unreadable, so I had to rewrite it without using any. I put the quoted words to italics. I think my original wouldâve sounded better. After reading your post I was just flooded with old memories, and just wanted to thank you for that.
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
So where is your evidence of Mueller an yellow????????????? There is none!
It wasnât my claim, Raynman. But it will come, eventually.
Itâs ok that you didnât answer my questions, there was no way you could. You should join all your l*****t buddies on the new bandwagon, theyâre using the word conspiracy now. Lol đđ
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Exactly what did Mueller have to do with yellow cake, facts only!
https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-robert-mueller-uranium/
Lol, snopes. Snopes says theyâre âmixedâ not willing to confirm or deny. But you can bet, if snopes is trying to soften this up, itâs more than likely true.
Tgards79 wrote:
On all this stuff, I trust Mueller -- appointed by Bush -- and will abide by his findings. Do you? Will you?
I donât. Mostly because of his connection to the Uranium One deal, which seems at this point to be an obvious pay-to-play. I think heâs too deep to be objective and/or partial. I wonât be able to answer your second question until this case gets further underway.
At any rate, it was nice chatting with you, Tgards79.
Tgards79 wrote:
Let's agree for a moment that Don Jr. really did nothing after the meeting, so the meeting was the end of it. I'm no lawyer, so I don't know, but does it matter that there was no dirt? If I attempt to rob a bank, and hold up the teller, but there is absolutely no cash in the bank, am I innocent? I honestly don't know
No. You would guilty of attempted robbery. Even if you didnât go in the bank but waited in the car outside, still guilty. I donât intend this as an insult, but youâre conflating two different types of crime. Violating e******n laws most often results in a fine, not prison.
Quote:
-- obvioulsy there was an attempt to collude.
Collusion, is not a criminal offense though.
Quote:
Don Jr. should have called the FBI, not taken a meeting. Or ignored the whole thing. But he took the meeting on the premise of seeing if she had anything.
Maybe, but what he did is not criminal.
Quote:
You are allowed to buy oppo research, sure, but NOT from a foreign government. That is plainly illegal if you read the statute.
I have read it. Youâre correct in regards to a foreign government, Iâd have to double check if itâs illegal regarding a domestic situation. I donât think it is, however, the key is the exchange of money, which in respect to Don Jr., that never happened.
moldyoldy wrote:
Here is a short list of about 20.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/trump-russia/
I get an error code when I try to open your link. No matter though. Mueller was tasked with finding âcollusionâ not âconspiracyâ. And now that heâs filled charges, his legitimacy to conduct the investigation at all, is being questioned. Hold onto your hat, and that sense of humor, weâre in for a long ride.