One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: MarvinSussman
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 369 next>>
Aug 6, 2017 11:37:00   #
no propaganda please wrote:
Al Gore’s Shocking Environmental Hypocrisy Exposed by New Report
Posted On 03 Aug 2017
By : shawn

Former Vice President Al Gore has a new documentary out. “An Inconvenient Sequel: T***h to Power” has been labeled as unqualified bore even by liberal media critics who gushed over the first film, but Gore may have bigger problems than a substandard follow-up to his environmental propaganda movie. According to a new report by the National Center for Public Policy Research, Gore isn’t just guilty of turning the h**x of g****l w*****g into a mainstream Hollywood trend, he’s also guilty of rank hypocrisy when it comes to lowering his own “carbon footprint.”

The report shows that over the past year, Gore has used more energy than it would take the average American family to burn through in 21 years! At his Nashville mansion alone, Gore has eaten through 230,889 kilowatt hours of electricity to power his home, keep up his pool, and operate his electronic security gates. This can be compared to the 10,812 kWh of electricity the average family uses in a given year. And yet this douche has the audacity to fly around the world and lecture us on the importance of a green lifestyle.

In an op-ed for The Daily Caller, Drew Johnson of the NCPPR noted that this was not the first time his organization had caught Gore with his hand in the carbon cookie jar:

In 2007, the day after Gore won an Academy Award for “An Inconvenient T***h,” I revealed Gore’s hypocritically high electric bills. In some months, I discovered, his residence gobbled up to 20 times more electricity than the average American household.

When Gore’s inconvenient t***h became public knowledge, he promised to change his ways and gave his property a green makeover. Gore added 33 solar panels at a princely price tag of approximately $60,000. He also upgraded the home’s windows and ductwork, replaced the insulation, put in a driveway rainwater collection system, and installed a geothermal heating system.

The Nobel laureate also heroically went to the trouble of replacing his incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent ones.

In total, the renovations are estimated to cost well over $250,000.

But the home’s green facelift wasn’t enough to offset Gore’s colossal energy consumption.

Despite spending more than a quarter-million dollars on making his home more environmentally friendly, his energy consumption is higher than ever.

Gore, like his climate zealot buddies in La La Land, refuses to make the very same sacrifices he prescribes for others. He’s like a chain smoker on a crusade to make smoking illegal. Heal thyself, sinner.
Al Gore’s Shocking Environmental Hypocrisy Exposed... (show quote)


Individuals can't save the planet. Congress has to push g***n e****y. V**ers have to push Congress. It's v**es that matter, not light bulbs!

You are barking up the wrong tree!
Go to
Aug 6, 2017 11:33:41   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
The Deep State’s Final Solution for Trump Is Fast Approaching


Question: Why was there a Vietnam War?

Answer: Because JFK was assassinated.

Question: Why did America fall in 2018?

Answer: Because somebody very important had to die. The fundamental question is, who is going to die?

This article takes a long look at the current state of affairs with regard to the agenda of the Deep state and the fate of Donald Trump and possibly even Hillary Clinton.

This logic cuts to the heart of what is likely coming Trump’s way. Increasingly, it is becoming clear that for the Deep State to fulfill their goals of the fall of the United States, the subsequent installation of globalism and raping the American people of every last dime, someone has to die.

The Fate of the Independent Media Is the Barometer of the Nation’s Welfare

Without the Independent Media there is no Donald Trump Presidency. During the primary e******n, the Independent Media (IM) provided the only positive coverage enjoyed by Donald Trump. The IM was the only source of scorn and legitimate ridicule of Hillary Clinton.

The Deep State is being exposed for all of its Satanic evil thanks to the IM. Certainly, CNN is not going to expose itself.

In military strategy, the first objective of an invasion is to eliminate as much of the command and control of the enemy. In actual combat that entails taking out radar and other surveillance. In politics and in a c**p attempt, eliminating command and control means to obliterate the portion of the media that would expose the coming c**p and subsequent take down of America. This is precisely why Google, Youtube and Facebook are rearing their ugly heads and imposing c*******t Chinese media censorship policies against ALL of the IM.

The attacks upon the IM by social media should serve as the chest pains before the heart attack warning. America, here me clearly. You are witnessing the Deep State trying the severely eliminate the reach of the IM in educating the American people about what is truly going on, which is a c**p against the Republic. Hagmann, Quayle, Adams and yours truly will not be around at the end of this fight. By the time America’s fate is sealed we will all have but disappeared from the eye of the public.

When we look at the ramifications of these Deep State actions, we must conclude that something very big is coming. The Deep State must eliminate the Independent Media in order to make sure we are not around to report on the Deep State c**p against our country and our way of life.

Donald Trump Must Be Removed

There is a lesson to be learned from the fact that when the Viet Cong would take over a village, they would k**l the teachers and the politicians. They had to k**l the teachers because they needed to rewrite history to fit their own narrative. Donald Trump must be removed from office at all costs for exactly the same reason. He has provided America hope that we can roll back globalism to an extent that the middle class can be revived and the American people can preserve their liberties. Donald Trump is not just dangerous to the Deep State because of his policies, he is most dangerous because he has changed the psychology of the nation.

President Trump is an immediate threat to the Deep State because he threatens to eliminate open borders which would preserve our national identity. He is threatening to roll back the free trade agreements which have earned the g*******ts hundreds of billions of dollars from the acquisition of cheap overseas labor which has cost America millions of jobs and has divested our wage structure. The President is also attacking Deep State profiteering based on child-sex-trafficking, gun running, drug dealing and organ trafficking. Through his actions, Trump is dangerously close to fully exposing the Deep State and all of their evil to the mainstream of America. He must be stopped and he must be stopped at all costs.

Deep State Strategy to Rid Themselves of President Trump

To the average person, the easiest thing the Deep State could do would be to assassinate the President. However, as they discovered with JFK, there are negative implications that can last generations when this course of action is pursued. And it can be said with certainty, that America is done buying the worn out narrative of a single assassin with a narrative, who is a lone nut and who also has a diary stating what he is going to do. That fiction has been put to bed by the assassinations of RFK, MLK and JFK.

For the moment, the Deep State is pursuing administrative action against Trump. Yesterday, I exposed how the DNC’s Crowdsource webserver and top DNC personnel created the Russian narrative just in case Clinton was to lose. This is the basis for the possible upcoming impeachment proceedings. However, if they are not able to remove Trump from office quickly and through the indictment/impeachment process, they will take it to the next level as the same kind of power structure did with JFK.

Let me say it bluntly and boldly, many of us in the IM, believe that Trump will be assassinated if impeachment fails. I have often said that David Rockefeller would never have gotten away with the assassination of JFK if there was an Independent Media. And with the purge by social media of the IM, the stage is being set for an assassination and a subsequent c**p.

Wh**ever Is Going to Happen Will Happen Very Quickly

When Robert Mueller impaneled a grand jury to consider the affairs of Donald Trump, that told me that the Deep State is going for broke. If this grand jury does not produce the intended result of indictment/impeachment, the Deep State will take this to the next level because they will have exhausted all of their administrative/legal options.

What Would Follow an Assassination?

After John Kennedy was murdered, the phone system was taken down in Washington DC for over an hour. That was to prevent an anticipated counter-revolution to the c**p that had just taken place. Again, this is why the IM is being taken down because the Deep State fears our influence. The nation went on alert and was on the verge of martial law. There is one big difference between 1963 and 2017. Namely, in 1963, the people trusted their government. That is no longer true. Martial law will be imposed for this reason. Yes, that means FEMA camps, NDAA detentions and the likely use of death squads against anticipated agitators as that is what Jade Helm was primarily concerned with. I will explore these possibilities as long as I am allowed to publish and to broadcast.

Are There Any Counter-Measures That Can Be Employed?

When a ship or plane is about to be attacked by a heat-seeking missile, the intended target employs counter measures. Typically, a “hot” debris field is distributed to take the missile off course and explode it as it contacts the countermeasure releases. The American people could employ the same tactic.

If every aware American was to open their own website, or broadcast on a public platform, there would be too many targets for the Deep State to take down. The resulting increased level of activity would be impossible for the Deep State to contain. Command and control destruction of the IM would become impossible. And the ability of the people to shine the light of day upon these motives could give the Deep State pause. However, at this late date, this is very much a long shot at best.

The final option may prove the most effective. Do what the satanic Deep State h**es and fears the most, PRAY for Donald Trump’s safety!

By: Dave Hodges
The Deep State’s Final Solution for Trump Is Fast ... (show quote)


Paranoia can be cured. Get help!
Go to
Aug 5, 2017 08:18:52   #
Steve700 wrote:
Special Investigations & Prosecutor to be assigned to go after Clintons, Comey, Lynch, Obama, Holder and gang! (Now you know why they want Trump out so badly)
Just like the Bible says. In the end times all the secrets of the leaders will be revealed to the people -- And the sins of the people before a holy God Before The Destruction. What do you want to bet that the t***h about 9/11 becomes revealed and becomes public knowledge, and in fact worldwide common knowledge as well. That will in fact, make destruction easier to come upon our nation when the world finds out what has been done to get people behind a war that never should have been.

This Marxist Propaganda Tactic of Turning the American Success Story into a Story of Injustice Has Got to End.
.
Special Investigations & Prosecutor to be assi... (show quote)


F**e news!
Go to
Jul 23, 2017 08:43:37   #
Dr.Dross wrote:
They call this oppression "religious freedom." But wait. Let us enact Jewish Law, it is worse than anything the Koran could think of. Most breaking of the Commandments demands death. If Christians want to be true to Mosaic Law, or just the 10 Commandments, they are required to k**l offenders. They cannot cherry-pick and avoid the death-sentence consequence required of some commandments. Or STFU. Stop pushing the Ten Commandments. They are irrelevant for Christians.


Reference from King James? Or are you making stuff up?
Go to
Jul 23, 2017 08:42:08   #
2tap wrote:
This thought just came to me and I really think it would be just greatly enormous for President Trump to do this. What are your thoughts please.

President Trump. Here is an idea for you. Ask AG Sessions and assistant AG Rosenstein to join you for an impromptu and on the record in front of the American people on the News so everyone can watch and ask him. AG Sessions, I am ordering you to immediately start invesigating the Clinton Issues that former FBI Director Comey failed to do properly and to investigater the collusion between CLinton and the Ukraine matter, the Selling off of 20% of Americas uranium and the fact that Mueller is the one that t***sported the amount of Uranium directly to the Russians. What is your answer? Man, would that put Sessions, Rosenstein and the entire DOJ on the spot or what? If AG Sessions says he will look into it I would say right then and there, No you will make it happen or your Fired!!!! I would say to both of them Sessions and Rosenstien, no you will not look into only , you will start an immediate investigation of these matters along with the Podesta bulls**t or as of this moment both you and Rosinstien are fucking fired. The American people have been through enough with the two tierd justice system and the deep state members on both sides of the aisle. Either you will say yes Mr. President and that I will have the proper documents in place on my desk within 2 days or both of you are fired. If you say I cant do it your fired. Tell them, I have more the type of individuals that will take it to the enemies of the state. End Of Story. What the hell do you think would happen?
Semper Fi
This thought just came to me and I really think it... (show quote)


Got any links to information or are you making stuff up?
Go to
Jul 23, 2017 08:40:10   #
ACP45 wrote:
https://youtu.be/uGMm-XUf2Go?t=23m37s

Public information is exactly what the words mean. How can any reasonably intelligent person express an opinion on a subject if you don't have all the facts and data to support your claim? Are all of you critical of the President's commission on v***r f***d afraid that they are going to create false data? If there is no evidence of v***r f***d, then let the commission's findings support your claim.

For those of you who feel there is not an issue here, I suggest you review the following:
http://blackboxv****g.org/fraction-magic-1/

US: Robert Creamer, of Democracy Partners, was secretly recorded explaining how to commit v***r f***d through registering Hispanic i*****l a***ns. Creamer spent five months in federal prison in 2006 for $2.3 million in bank fraud related to his public interest groups. His name showed up on White House visitor logs 340 times beginning in 2009. In 45 of those instances, he was scheduled to meet with Obama himself. ZeroHedge 2016 Oct 19 (Story) (Cached)
US: Donald Trump says he is concerned over having the e******n s****n from him through v**e f***d. The establishment on both the Left and Right denies that meaningful v**e f***d exists or even is possible. However, here is a list of ten documented examples. [This problem could be a huge factor in the coming e******n. For every case of fraud that is documented, there must be a hundred that cannot be proved. How do you prove fraud when the only record is in the form of programmable digital impulses inside a computer chip?] Washington Times 2016 Oct 17 (Story) (Cached)
For the full back story, see Invisible B****ts.
https://youtu.be/uGMm-XUf2Go?t=23m37s br br Publi... (show quote)


Statements with no hyperlink: f**e news?
Go to
Jul 16, 2017 20:31:07   #
[quote=thebigp]-39jh.,b43
Our understanding of the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s State Department continues to expand as more of her illicit server’s emails are revealed.

This week we released 448 pages of documents from the U.S. Department of State revealing new incidents of Huma Abedin, deputy chief of staff to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, providing special State Department treatment to major donors to the Clinton Foundation and political campaigns.

The heavily redacted documents from Abedin’s non-government account include an email from Hillary Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, to Abedin revealing that he acted as a go between for a Clinton Foundation donor, Richard Park. And they reveal Clinton Foundation executive Doug Band instructing Abedin to “show love” to Clinton donor Andrew Liveris.

The documents included six Clinton email exchanges not previously turned over to the State Department, bringing the known total to date to at least 439 emails that were not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department, and further contradicting a statement by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails had been turned over to the State Department.
A number of emails show the free flow of information and requests for favors between Clinton’s State Department and the Clinton Foundation.

In July 2009, in reference to the US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, Clinton Global Initiative head Doug Band told Abedin that she “Need[s] to show love” to Andrew Liveris, the CEO of Dow Chemical. Band also asked for Liveris to be introduced to Hillary, “and have her mention both me and wjc”. Dow gave between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative. Band also pushes for Clinton to do a favor for Karlheinz Koegel, a major Clinton Foundation contributor, who wanted Hillary Clinton to give the “honor speech” for his media prize to “Merkel.”

The emails reveal that on June 19, 2009, Clinton’s brother, Tony Rodham, passed a long a letter for Hillary Clinton for Clinton donor Richard Park. Park donated $100,000 to Bill Clinton as far back as 1993 and is listed by the Clinton Foundation as a $100,000 to $250,000 donor.

The Washington Examiner reported:
In March 2012, Bill Clinton received an invitation to speak at the Kaesong Industrial Complex in North Korea…. Richard Park's friendship with Tony Rodham earned him a direct line to Hillary Clinton while she served as secretary of state. In January 2013, the Korean businessman sent Rodham an email and asked him to “forward this to your sister.”
On November 14, 2009, Clinton donor Ben Ringel, who has appeared in numerous prior emails asking for favors, emailed Abedin to get help in getting an Iranian woman a visa to come to the United States. He writes: “We need to get her clearance even only temporary to be with her granddaughter.” Abedin forwarded the request to Lauren Jiloty, asking her “Can U help Monday with consular affairs?” Jiloty replies, “Sure. Will look into it.” Ringel donated between $10,000 and $25,000 to the Clinton Foundation. In May, Band, working through Abedin, attempts to help Canadian concert promoter and Foundation donor Michael Cohl with the processing of a visa. Abedin passes the request to Monica Hanley, Clinton's “confidential assistant.”

The emails show that the Clinton Foundation operative Band was involved in personnel matters at the Clinton State Department. In a May 2009 email exchange between Band and Abedin, a “career post” to East Timor for someone is discussed. Abedin explains to Band that Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton's then-chief of staff, was working on the situation “under the radar.”

In August 2009, Band tells Abedin of someone who wants to be the ambassador to Barbados. Abedin replies: “I know, he’s emailed a few times. But she wants to give to someone else.”

The emails also show that Abedin received advice from her mother, Saleha Abedin (a controversial Islamist activist), on whom the Obama administration should appoint as the US Envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. She notes that she has obtained a recommendation from “Hassan” (NFI), and that she’d reached out to “Ishanoglu”. This is presumably Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, a Turkish academic and the former Secretary-General of the OIC. Ihsanoglu famously called on the West to enact anti-Islamic blasphemy laws.

On Monday, June 8, Clinton emails her aide Lona Valmoro and Abedin asking to attend a cabinet meeting: “I heard on the radio that there is a Cabinet mtg this am. Is there? Can I go? If not, who are you sending?” Valmoro answers: “It is actually not a full cabinet meeting today – those agencies that received recovery money were invited to attend/participate. We were welcome to send a representative though, not sure if we have anyone going.”

Other emails found in Abedin’s unsecure email account appear to show additional instances of the Clinton State Department’s lax approach to protecting national security.

On July 4, 2009, U.S. Ambassador to Kenya Jonathan “Scott” Gration sent Abedin an email that the State Department has classified in part and redacted because the information deals with “foreign governments” and “national defense or foreign policy.” Abedin forwarded Gration’s email to her personal, unsecure email account. In his email, Gration related his meeting with Libyan president Muammar Qadafi, saying: “I conveyed our appreciation for Libya’s role to improve relations between Chad and Sudan … Leader al-Qadafi promised to continue his nation’s close collaboration with the United States … and is eager to meet you and President Obama.…” Gration would later be fired for, among other things, using personal email accounts to send government information.

A document titled “HRC PRIVATE LINE BLOCK” gives the planned whereabouts for President Obama for Thursday, June 4, 2009: “Attend POTUS Foreign Policy Speech at Cairo University.” In another example of lax concern for security, Valmoro forwarded Clinton’s detailed daily schedule for July 15, 2009, to officers of the Clinton Foundation, including Doug Band and Justin Cooper. Again, on July 26 Valmoro forwarded Hillary’s detailed, sensitive daily schedule to numerous Clinton Foundation officials.

In other examples of lax concern for security, on June 11, there is a reference to testing the “Federal preparedness and response for an international terrorist threat to the United States. [Principal-Level Exercise] will be a scenario-driven discussion for Cabinet Secretaries, agency Directors and Administrators, senior officials in the Executive Office of the President, or their approved representatives.” A document in Abedin’s unsecure email account dated May 2009 is titled “The Secretary’s Phone Call with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang” is marked sensitive but unclassified and fully redacted, as is a document titled “The Secretary’s Phone Call with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov.”

I’m not sure how much more evidence of pay for play, classified information mishandling, and influence peddling from Clinton’s email server one would need to show for a serious criminal investigation is required.

sourec--judical watch, richard park, andrew liveris, karlheinz koega, wash ezaminer, lauren jiloty, ben ringel, michael cohl, monica hanley, saleha abedin, ekmeleddin ihsanogula, lona valmoro, oic, jonathan scott gration,[/quote]

Every administration since Washington has done favors for friends.

The money received went to the Foundation, not to an individual.

Every cent is open to accounting.

Much ado about nothing.
Go to
Jul 16, 2017 20:19:18   #
atomikmom wrote:
Facing Down the North Korean Threat
Steve Chapman
Steve Chapman
|
Posted: Jul 16, 2017 12:01 AM
Facing Down the North Korean Threat
Trending

Evan Sayet
He Fights
Kurt Schlichter
This Time We Liberals Have Totally Got Trump. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
Jonah Goldberg
Environmentalists Are Birthing Ever More C*****e-c****e Hype

Imagine this situation: The United States faces a hostile and possibly deranged dictator ruling an Asian c*******t state tightly closed off from the outside world. He has developed nuclear weapons and is on the way to building missiles capable of carrying those devices across the Pacific Ocean and vaporizing American cities. What can we do?

I'm reminded of the story about the pastor who was asked whether he believed in full-immersion baptism. "Believe in it?" he exclaimed. "I've seen it done!" We know how to deal with the threat posed by North Korea because we've encountered it before.

In the 1960s, when Chinese tyrant Mao Zedong was striving to build nuclear weapons, he inspired great anxiety in the United States. Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson considered launching an attack to prevent it, before deciding not to. When China advanced to building ICBMs, Johnson deployed an anti-ballistic missile system to intercept them in flight. A few years later, however, it was dismantled.

And guess what. The Chinese never carried out an attack. Launching their nukes against us would have guaranteed their destruction. They soon figured out, if they didn't know before, that the sole value of these weapons was to deter adversaries. Nobody in the U.S. worries much about Chinese missiles anymore.

Some people, possibly including members of Donald Trump's administration, think we can't count on being able to deter North Korean ruler Kim Jong Un, because he is callow, unpredictable and bellicose. But Mao seemed even more reckless. "I'm not afraid of nuclear war," he said in 1957. "China has a population of 600 million; even if half of them are k**led, there are still 300 million people left."
CARTOONS | Henry Payne
View Cartoon

Trump said flatly that Kim would not be allowed to develop a nuclear missile that could hit the U.S. "It won't happen!" he tweeted. But the president has found out that it's easier to make that vow than to keep it. The other day, North Korea carried out a successful test of a rocket that apparently could reach Alaska. It's just a matter of time before it equips such missiles with nuclear warheads.

This prospect creates a frightening dilemma. If we were to stand aside, one of the world's most vicious regimes would have the most destructive weapons, which it might use to coerce or intimidate the U.S., as well as our allies Japan and South Korea. Or Kim might wake up one day and decide to incinerate Anchorage.

But our options for heading off the looming threat fall into two categories: the futile and the disastrous. We've had no luck negotiating with Pyongyang to get it to give up its nuclear arsenal. Likewise with persuading or pressuring Beijing to make its ally capitulate.

That leaves some sort of military attack, which probably wouldn't wipe out North Korea's entire nuclear stockpile but would ensure that it would attack South Korea and our bases there, k*****g thousands of people at a minimum. If the Pyongyang regime resorted to chemical, biological or nuclear retaliation, the casualty count would be far higher.

We would win the ensuing war, but then we'd have to occupy an alien land harboring many aggrieved natives with military experience determined to drive us out. It would be like Iraq, but with loose nukes.

Speaking of Iraq, the same argument for pre-emptive war was made about Saddam Hussein, whom we deposed in 2003. President George W. Bush insisted, "America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof, the smoking gun that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."

In fact, we had already proved that we could deter Saddam from using weapons of mass destruction. We attacked his forces to evict them from Kuwait in 1991, and he chose to go down in defeat with his chemical weapons on the shelf rather than invite complete ruin by using them. Kim likewise shows no interest in suicide but fully appreciates the deterrent value of having a long-range nuclear arsenal.

Looking back, it's clear we suffered far greater harm from acting to pre-empt Saddam than we would have by standing back and trusting in our overwhelming capacity to punish him if he ever used his worst weapons. North Korea affords us an opportunity to learn from that colossal mistake. Or we could repeat it.

http://www.townhall.com



North Korea is not Playing!!! so we got to do our job!! and stop them in their tracks!!! It's a do or Die!!!. they remember the last time when we sent Troops right into their Country back in the days, with their Old Leader in charge. They made it clear, when they Fired that last shot into Alaska, as a warning. We need allies who will stand by and work with us. We will be Dead Ducks if we don't take action now, not after it is too late. Do y'all agree?
Facing Down the North Korean Threat br Steve Chapm... (show quote)


Faced with defeat by our superior conventional weapons, why would they not nuke the major cities of Japan and South Korea, if not
Alaska.

Nuclear deterrence? Ever hear of it?

Why do you think they developed nukes? To stay alive!
Go to
Jul 13, 2017 07:22:41   #
reconreb wrote:
The talking heads have seemed to taken over ? Why ? ........ Look folks ,, these people make their money by selling themselves as the NEWS source ???? I do not know about you but my news source is my understanding of importance .. Please consider .. most who are not involved or who work at the level of the so called average American just want to be left alone ..to prosper for their family and friends ,, its called FREEDOM from the state and Federal government ..The so called lawyers have twisted language to serve themselves and prosper ,, just look at congress ,, most are lawyers and self serving ..interesting ??

Duh fedrfill gummint dun busted mah pappy's still an dat wuz dayum gud whiskey ah tell y'all dayum gud whiskey!












l
The talking heads have seemed to taken over ? Why ... (show quote)
Go to
Jul 11, 2017 19:55:49   #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
Politically Incorrect

A LIBERAL Democrat Politician, a MSNBC Reporter and a Navy SEAL were captured by ISIS.

There was the usual sentenced to death by beheading.

Unexpectedly, the ISIS leader said they could have one last wish each, before sentence was carried out.

The Politician asked to hear a rendering of keep the "Red F**g" flying.

The MSNBC Reporter asked that the beheading be televised so that even when he was dead his face would be on TV.

The SEAL asked to be kicked three times in the a$$.

This was carried out first, and as the last kick landed the SEAL pulled a hidden 1911 .45 CAL gun, k*****g three terrorists, grabbed one of their fallen AK47s and k**led the rest of the terrorists.

The other two prisoners were amazed, and asked why he requested to be kicked three times before drawing his gun.

Because, said the SEAL, "When we get back to the U.S., I don't want you pair of a$$holes saying it was an unprovoked attack!!"

(A politician is a person who will lay down YOUR life for his country.) Terry H.
Politically Incorrect br br A LIBERAL Democrat Po... (show quote)


Do you get as much amusement making up such drivel as you get when you amuse yourself?

Or do you amuse yourself while making up the drivel?
Go to
Jul 8, 2017 08:45:45   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
GOP leadership is getting ready to sell out conservatives on Obamacare
Posted on July 7, 2017
by Sam Rolley

The current crop of GOP lawmakers in Washington are risking conservative v**er revolt in coming e******ns as it becomes increasingly clear that the Republican establishment is poised to give in to Democrat demands on the Obamacare overhaul.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Thursday left little doubt about the establishment’s lack of conviction when it comes to producing the Obamacare repeal and replacement the GOP promised v**ers for the past eight years. If the Senate can’t muster the 50 v**es required to pass the current Obamacare re-write, McConnell told a Rotary Club group in Glasgow, Ky., Republican leaders will be forced to work across the aisle with Democrats on an alternative plan.

“If my side is unable to agree on an adequate replacement, then some kind of action with regard to the private health insurance market must occur,” McConnell said. “No action is not an alternative. We’ve got the insurance markets imploding all over the country, including in this state.”

This is the second time McConnell has hinted that Republican belligerents pushing for a full repeal and replacement– which the party promised v**ers– are going to be responsible for forcing the leadership to give in to Democrat demands that Congress prop up, rather than do away with, Obamacare.

And already, GOP leaders are floating ideas that would further distance the current legislation from anything resembling the promised repeal in an effort to woo Democrats they may be working alongside on the legislation later.

For instance, the GOP leadership is now discussing leaving intact a 3.8 percent net investment income tax imposed by the Obama administration to help pay for Obamacare subsidies. Earlier iterations of the GOP’s rewrite left out the tax, bringing many Democrat lawmakers to the floor to carry on about how Republicans only care about wealthy Americans.

The investment tax applies to to earnings from capital gains, dividends and interest for single Americans earning more than $200,000 a year and couples earning more than $250,000.

Conservative opponents of the tax argue that it hampers the economy by increasing the tax burden on job creators.

“This tax, just like any tax increase, is an anathema to conservatives as it suppresses economic growth and opportunity throughout our nation,” Club for Growth President David McIntosh said recently. “Under no circumstances should the NIIT be included in any forthcoming Republican ‘repeal’ bill.”

Club for Growth is just one of about 47 conservative organizations throughout the country urging the GOP to resist Democrat pressure to keep the tax.

Americans for Tax Reform pointed out this week that the revenues raised by the tax is often insignificant, even negative, especially compared to the damage the net investment income provision does to the free market.

“This tax is a known job-k**ler. It would be a bad idea to leave this tax in the code for a second longer than necessary,” the organization said. “The faster we get the capital gains tax down, the faster we’ll get further growth and investment.”

Unfortunately, the tax is very likely to remain.

And, as The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board pointed out this week, it’ll be just the first of many concessions the GOP leadership makes to Democrats as the healthcare debate d**gs on: “Democrats will pocket the concession and continue demagoguing tax cuts for the wealthy as the tax debate begins — only more emboldened for having tasted blood.”

No doubt. But it shouldn’t come as a surprise. We’re witnessing the same duality within the GOP that we’ve been seeing for years: The Republican Party and its Washington establishment leaders understand that the average GOP v**er is very fiscally conservative and becoming more so every day. But the Republican Party and its Washington establishment leaders are not actually fiscal conservatives.

So they create messaging for the v**ers. Simple, chant-able messaging that plays well during speeches and rallies. Conservative American v**ers dislike the freedom-robbing provisions included in the healthcare law bearing the previous president’s name? Well, we’ll REPEAL IT! Repeal it! Repeal it!

And then they make symbolic gestures– more than 50, when it came to v****g on Obamacare repeal bills that were sure to die by the pen.

If Obama had wanted to destroy the GOP while still in office, he should have taken it on the chin and allowed a repeal to occur. Why? Two reasons. For most of the time GOP leaders raised money and wooed v**ers with repeal talk, they lacked any actual plan to pick up the pieces. And from the White House, Obama would have then been able to blame Obamacare’s failure on the GOP, while leveraging the bully pulpit to re-establish government-controlled healthcare. Look at this turmoil they created, he could have said. He must’ve known Obamacare wasn’t going to hold up, everyone else with a solar powered calculator did. So why not let a v**e the GOP leadership didn’t expect to go anywhere reach its conclusion and revel in the ensuing chaos. It’d be better than the slow death march the president’s healthcare law has endured without intervention.

Of course, Obama couldn’t do that. Giving in to the GOP would’ve damaged Hillary Clinton’s “inevitable” p**********l bid. Plus, acquiescing to the other party’s demands is the GOP’s job.

But if you think Obama didn’t know that the GOP would never achieve its repeal in any substantive way, even with a Republican president in the White House? Think again.

House Majority Leader Paul Ryan finally did come up with a plan last year. And, sure, it called for the dissolution of individual mandates. But it mostly kept Obamacare intact, taxes and all. It came after the e******n, before the inauguration. An effort to temper expectations, one might say.

Congressional Republican leaders in Washington have been doing everything but taking out full page advertisements in major newspapers to let American conservatives know, to borrow from former House Speaker John Boehner, that “outside groups” calling for real conservatism have no sway over the GOP establishment. No matter how much they advocate for GOP candidates they believe will cut taxes, restore freedom and get the government out of healthcare, the leadership will always spend any time that’s not e******n time acting as though conservative Washington outsiders have “lost all credibility.”

But why is the GOP establishment so against allowing for a full repeal like the one Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and other conservatives have been advocating in the first place?

Because a repeal will be painful for many Americans. Many will lose coverage, there will be a great deal of uncertainty and confusion. Establishment politicians h**e uncertainty– it makes it too hard to control the narrative. And when your stack of lies is as high as it needs to be to stay in Washington for more than a few years, controlling the narrative is important. Also, of course, the insurance companies Obamacare was written for have a lot of money sitting around.

If Americans want real conservative reforms out of Washington, it’ll take a level of comfort with the initial tough consequences. But first, it’ll take a national commitment to removing government lifers from Washington and checking the Republican Party establishment’s power all the way down to local council e******ns. If the Obamacare non-repeal accomplishes nothing else, it ought to at least serve as a reminder that often the biggest enemies of conservative reform are in plain sight within the GOP.
GOP leadership is getting ready to sell out conser... (show quote)


Single-payer gets rid of the insurance companies, cutting 20% of healthcare cost in one swell foop.
Go to
Jul 6, 2017 11:32:10   #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
Jimmie Lee Robinson (April 30, 1931 – July 6, 2002), also known as "Lonesome Lee", was an American blues musician who was predominantly known for his involvement in the Chicago blues scene in the 1950s and 1960s. He performed with other blues musicians of the period and worked as a session musician. Following a hiatus from music, Robinson returned to the profession in the 1990s to record his own material for full-length albums.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmie_Lee_Robinson



Jimmie Lee Robinson - I'll Be Coming Home
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRbTwW-kYZY

Jimmie Lee Robinson ~ ''3 O'Clock Blues'' 1996
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1EoJklbC3w

Jimmie Lee Robinson ~ ''Drifting Blues'' 1996
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8-igpjTi0g

Jimmie Lee & Artis - Blue and Lonesome -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0rz3NouLFk

Jimmie Lee Robinson ~ ''Rosa Lee''&''Twist It Baby''(Modern Electric Chicago Blues)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKO0MTUjw-0

First Time I Met The Blues : Buddy Guy, Lonesome Jimmy Lee, Freddie Below
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuI8AHJSqKo

Jimmie Lee Robinson - Angry Lover
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFeWzmdJHKY

Boss Man by Jimmie Lee Robinson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1LGdY7f31s&t=44s

LONESOME LEE - CRY OVER ME - BANDERA - Correct speed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yn4tcvbXogA

Lonesome Lee - Lonely Travelin'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eRvD3x1RIs

Jimmie Lee Robinson - Live
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnCYV54SKCQ
Jimmie Lee Robinson (April 30, 1931 – July 6, 2002... (show quote)


Thanks!
Go to
Jul 6, 2017 11:27:50   #
Mr Bombastic wrote:
Donald Trump said that he wants to help that sick boy in Great Britain. You've probably heard about him. I say good job, Mr. Trump. Always helping others. But the left has sunk to a new low. When they heard about it, They claimed that Trump was doing it for political reasons. How can they possibly know this, even if it were true? Are they mind readers? If anyone is playing politics, it is the scum bag l*****ts. I didn't see any of them trying to help. And then they criticize Trump for helping him. Seems like every day I find another reason to h**e them. Now, I know Christians aren't supposed to h**e...or so I hear. But that applies to one's enemies. I do not h**e my enemies. But I do h**e the enemies of God. And the L*****ts are the enemies of God. No doubt about it. They are in favor of every perversion known to man, k*****g babies, applauding gays...etc, and are against everything that is good and decent. Yes. I h**e them. And with good reason and a clear conscience.
Donald Trump said that he wants to help that sick ... (show quote)


We don't applaud gays, we ignore them, which you are incapable of doing. Just mind your own effing business!
Go to
Jul 5, 2017 18:09:21   #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Omar Khadr, Ex-Gitmo Detainee, Gets $10.5 Million From Canada

Omar Khadr, a former Guantanamo Bay prisoner who pleaded guilty to k*****g a U.S. soldier in Afghanistan when he was 15, with Canada's Supreme Court later ruling that officials had interrogated him under "oppressive circumstances," will get millions of dollars and an apology from the Canadian government.

An official familiar with the deal said on Tuesday that Omar Khadr will receive 10.5 million Canadian dollars (US $8 million). The official was not authorized to discuss the deal publicly before the announcement and spoke on condition of anonymity. The government and Khadr's lawyers negotiated the deal last month.

The Canadian-born Khadr was 15 when he was captured by U.S. troops after a firefight at a suspected al-Qaida compound in Afghanistan that resulted in the death of an American special forces medic, U.S. Army Sgt. First Class Christopher Speer. Khadr, who was suspected of throwing the grenade that k**led Speer, was taken to Guantanamo and ultimately charged with war crimes by a military commission.

http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/omar-khadr-gizmo-detainee-canada/2017/07/05/id/799875/?ns_mail_uid=8572630&ns_mail_job=1740039_07052017&s=al&dkt_nbr=qdgrer7f
Omar Khadr, Ex-Gitmo Detainee, Gets $10.5 Million ... (show quote)


If there was evidence he threw the grenade and was guilty of murder, why was torture needed?

Torture pays for the victim of torture.
Go to
Jul 1, 2017 15:10:57   #
Jean Deaux wrote:
Frankly, I think you are whistling past the grave yard. The biggest national debt in the history of the world is not the real problem, only a small part? I can only conclude that you must have lost your senses. The interest on this monstrosity is incredible and growing yearly and very little way to pay it off short of genuine national prosperity. Should the rest of the world decide that our money handling capabilities do not warrant our dollar continuing to be the world's reserve currency and they make other arrangements, the good life, the easy road, the prosperity we have become used to for years is going to disappear with a gigantic sucking sound. At that point, I believe you'll find that the federal debt was, in fact, a major problem, ignored with the hope it would go away. What are you going to do when you run out of suckers to fund a nation that can't control its spending? Go begging?
Frankly, I think you are whistling past the grave ... (show quote)


US debt needs to be auctioned ONLY to drain deficit spending from the bank reserves or for the Treasury’s convenience and NEVER because Congress is running out of money.

DO FEDERAL TAXPAYERS PROVIDE CONGRESS WITH SPENDING MONEY ?

No! Only the contrary is true: Congressional spending provides taxpayers with money to pay their taxes. To spend, Congress uses only its “…power to…coin money…” (Article I, Section 8, of the US Constitution). Only Congress, by spending, can create debt-free money. (Banks can create loans up to a multiple of their reserve assets. The Fed, created and empowered by Congress, can lend money and buy certain financial assets.) Money spent by Congress enters circulation and exits circulation only when taxed by the IRS or saved or exported for trade. Savings may circulate again but the Treasury effectively destroys all federal tax revenues and loan payments, keeping taxpayers’ and creditors’ money out of Congress’ reach, as told here:

After a bank is closed, its loan officer compares its outstanding loans against its reserve requirements. If reserves need to be increased or decreased, they can be borrowed or lent in the overnight federal funds market at an interest rate close to the Fed’s federal funds rate, which is the most important interest rate because, via arbitrage, it anchors all other rates.

To keep the federal funds interest rate on the Fed’s target, the total quantity of money in the nation’s bank reserves must be kept fairly constant.
While the reserve balance is not changed by ordinary checks that cause equal debits and credits, it is changed by the Treasury check, which credits the recipient’s account and the bank’s reserve account but debits no reserve account. The balance is also changed by payments to the Treasury for US debt instruments and by tax payments to the IRS. All payments to the federal government debit the payers’ accounts and the banks’ reserve accounts but credit no reserve account. Change of the bank reserve balance is minimized when checks to and from the federal government are treated as follows:

The public randomly deposits Treasury checks at an average rate of about $25 million per minute but often at a much greater rate. To maintain a near-constant bank reserve balance, the incoming Treasury credits must be matched with near-equivalent debits provided by the checks paid to the government. As payment checks are deposited, they debit the private accounts but not the banks’ reserves. Instead, they are placed in a “Tax and Loan” (T&L) account grouped in “debit bundles” valued near $25 million, $50 million, $100 million, etc. As incoming Treasury check credits exceed the desired reserve balance by the value of one of the debit bundles, that bundle debits the reserve accounts and approximately restores the bank reserve balance.

Deficit spending or a seasonal shortage of tax payments could require added debt payments, forcing the Treasury to auction bonds. Thus, US debt needs to be auctioned ONLY to drain deficit spending from the bank reserves or for the Treasury’s convenience and NEVER because Congress is running out of money. A surplus federal budget (with an excess of tax payments) would require additional Treasury checks to be deposited, forcing the Treasury or the Fed to purchase bonds from private owners - and possibly causing a shortage of debt in the market!

So, by matching debits with credits, these exceptional checks cancel each other and are effectively destroyed. In fact, cash payments received by the IRS generate equivalent payment checks while the paper bills are physically shredded and any coins are melted for scrap.

If Congress doesn’t need our stinkin’ money, why do we have a federal income tax? Mostly because, otherwise, consumer spending would increase and eventually cause harmful inflation.

© 2017 Marvin Sussman, All rights reserved.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 369 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.