President Joe Biden’s chief economic adviser struggled to explain a simple economic question during a newly released documentary titled “Finding The Money.”

Jared Bernstein stuttered several times when asked why the government borrows trillions of dollars when it can easily just print its own currency.

Critics of Bernstein are also quick to point out that Biden’s economic advisor graduated with a bachelor's degree in music from the Manhattan School of Music.

“Like you said, they print the dollars. So why, why does the government even borrow?” A reporter asked.

In response, Biden’s economic advisor said that the language of it was “confusing,” sparking concern that Bernstein has no idea how bonds actually work.

Bernstein continued to say that he doesn’t “get” what people mean when they propose that the government should print more money rather than borrow it.

This is absolutely priceless. And probably the most frightening clip you'll ever watch on the people in charge of the US economy.

Jared Bernstein is literally the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, the main agency advising Biden on economic policy.

He also struggled to describe basic concepts regarding the U.S. monetary system, indicating that he didn’t know how it worked himself.

“Well, um, the uh … so the … I mean, again, some of this stuff gets — some of the … language that — some of the language and concepts are just confusing. I mean, the government definitely prints money and it definitely lends that money, which is why … um … the government definitely prints money and then it lends that money by, uh, by selling bonds. Is that what they do? … They, they uh … they, yeah, they um … they sell bonds … yeah, they sell bonds. Right? Since they sell bonds and then people buy the bonds and lend them the money.

“Yeah, I mean I can’t really talk about it. I don’t get it. I don’t know what they’re talking about because it’s like, the government clearly prints money. It does it all the time, and it clearly borrows. Otherwise we wouldn’t be having this debt and deficit conversation. So, I don’t think there’s anything confusing there.”

This economic advisor has been a crucial part in promoting Bidenomics, which was supposed to slow inflation down and has reached historic levels since the president entered office.

Researcher George Barna said in a report that dissatisfaction with American society is linked to the lack of a biblical worldview.

Barna wrote in the “American Worldview Inventory 2024” that “social problems troubling the majority of Americans are likely a symptom of the unprecedented change in worldview preferences, in which longstanding biblical beliefs are being discarded in favor of a wide range of alternative views.”

Americans are increasingly holding to Syncretism, the adoption of numerous philosophies that an individual blends to their own content.

Ninety-two percent of American adults say Syncretism is their “dominant philosophy,” Barna explained. “Syncretism is the result of people relying upon their emotions to appropriate elements of various recognized worldviews toward creating an idiosyncratic, personally pleasing understanding of and response to reality,” he added.

This worldview is not “internally consistent,” but is instead “emotionally and intellectually comfortable.”

While 66% of Americans profess to be Christians, only 4% have a biblical worldview.

One-third of American adults also say they “depend mostly on their reason and emotions to distinguish right from wrong – the Bible calls it someone doing “what is right in his own eyes” – whereas Bible-believing Christians say “God is the source of all t***h, and that He conveys t***h to humans through the Bible.”

The idea that “as long as you do no harm, do wh**ever you want,” is held by an estimated 40 million American adults. This same belief is central to Wiccans and Satanists.

Gen Z adults are most likely to hold this belief (66%).

Other commonly held beliefs within American society are: “success is being a good person,” humans are to live in harmony with nature, and verifiable t***h is the only means of t***h.”

“American adults are increasingly embracing a host of unbiblical perspectives,” Barna wrote, “and this profound shift in beliefs is causing many of the disturbing social patterns and lifestyles responsible for the deterioration of our society and leading to the overwhelming level of national dissatisfaction.”

The report comes as data from Gallup revealed that church attendance has declined across most religious groups in the United States.

Between 2000-2003, 42% of U.S. all adults attended religious services. That number dropped to 38% between 2011-2013. Thirty percent of American adults attended religious services between 2021-2023.

Twenty-one percent of Americans attend weekly services, 9% attend “almost every week,” and 11% attend church or religious services once a month.

The majority of U.S. adults (56%) “seldom” or “never” attend church services.

Earlier in the week, CBS News reported that the Biden administration is considering a plan to bring Gaza 'refugees' to the United States. I hesitated to share it at first, wondering whether this wasn't some sort of error that the White House would slap down immediately. After all, Joe Biden's approval ratings are especially dreadful on immigration and the Israel/Hamas war, and this sort of scheme might somehow drive both numbers lower. Indeed, the prospect of this president welcoming Gazan 'newcomers' into America almost felt like a caricature -- something a hardened Biden critic might dream up. Still, though, a major outlet reported it, so somebody must have given it to them.

But who, and why?

Four theories: First, this was just a big miscommunication and has no connection to any reality. Second, someone is blowing the whistle on a disastrous idea in order to prevent it from advancing or happening. Third, Bidenworld wants this possibility in the bloodstream as a bone-toss to the implacable 'Genocide Joe' crowd, without any real expectation of following through. Fourth, Bidenworld wants this in the bloodstream as a bone-toss to the implacable 'Genocide Joe' crowd, and they might actually plan to follow through. Based on this White House non-denial, it seems like the answer lies behind door number three or four.

“So, let me just, first, start saying that we just don't have anything to announce at this time... in terms of the refugee admissions program, which is what I believe you're asking me about, we are constantly evaluating policy proposals to further support Palestinians who are family members of American citizens and may want to come to the United States. So, we’re evaluating it. I don't have anything to announce at this time.”

With these leaked reports percolating, the administration could have issued a quick, categorical denial. What they offered is very much not a denial at all. The Biden administration is not a hard no on this idea, and might even be teasing a 'yes.' Donald Trump, however, is a hard no.

There are surely some innocent Gazans who could benefit from relocation, and who do not pose a national security threat. But how is that vetting process supposed to work? Just because they may have relatives in the US does not mean they would be safe to bring in. Popular opinion among Palestinians is exceptionally and lopsidedly anti-Semitic, anti-American, and pro-terrorism -- and has been for years. A number of critics of this alleged plan are re-circulating clips and reports like this.

And then there's this alarming data, which is far more recent (March 2024):

A poll released Wednesday found a growing number of Gazans view the terror group’s October 7 onslaught favorably, and 52% of Gazans also said they want Hamas to rule Gaza at the end of the war, up from 38% since December...According to the survey, which sampled 1,580 Palestinian adults in early March, 71 percent of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank believe that the October 7 massacres in which in terrorists k**led some 1,200 people and kidnapped 253 others was “correct,” versus 72% who said so when the organization’s previous poll was published in December... The poll found the number of Palestinians who admit Hamas committed war crimes fell from 10% to 5%.

Seven in ten Gazans endorse Hamas' orgy of murder, rape, torture and hostage-taking. Only five percent believe those acts were war crimes. Properly vetting a population in which these sorts of beliefs are so widespread (including, sickeningly, among children, who are indoctrinated from birth to h**e and k**l Jews) will strike most Americans as extremely difficult and risky, if not impossible. Nearby Arab states like Egypt want to no part of it. UNRWA employees were presumably "vetted" in some way, and we know how that turned out. How many Americans would have confidence in the Biden administration's competence (ahem) to exclusively admit harmless, innocent "refugees" from a territory long dominated by virulently America-hating, bloodthirsty terrorists? Maybe this guy could vouch for them? Or these guys? Is Biden trying to lose?

The last week of April saw a disaster of a Q1 GDP report in which inflation surged more than expected and economic growth slowed more than projected. By not-insignificant margins, economists' estimates were off and the three components of "stagflation" (high inflation, slow economic growth, and high unemployment) were on the radar. The report was another rubber-meeting-the-road rebuke of "build back better," "Bidenomics" or wh**ever the White House calls its economic policy now. Likely to the chagrin of the Biden administration — and re-e******n campaign — the first week of May did not bring any better news.

First, the Federal Reserve announced on May 1 that it would again leave interest rates unchanged after raising them to the highest level since early 2001 in response to inflation's spike to 40-year highs. The Fed admitted that inflation "remains elevated" and said "there has been a lack of further progress toward the Committee's 2 percent inflation objective" — seen clearly in that GDP report at the end of April. By keeping rates elevated, the Fed (rightly) denied the Biden administration its desired rate cut that could be used to (falsely) claim the president's economic agenda is working.

In a related development, the April 25 failure of Philadelphia-based Republic First Bank — the first forced closure by the FDIC in 2024 — spurred a report this week that found hundreds of small and regional banks in the U.S. are at risk of failing under "the dual threat of commercial real estate loans and potential losses tied to higher interest rates," according to CNBC. Not for nothing, the Federal Reserve's press releases about interest rate decisions dropped the boilerplate line insisting that the "U.S. banking system is sound and resilient" starting with its January 2024 release – just like inflation was t***sitory back in 2021.

By Friday, the April employment situation report dropped with a huge miss — just 175,000 jobs were added instead of the more than 240,000 estimated. Previous months were revised down by 22,000 jobs, the labor force participation rate didn't increase, the average hours worked in a week fell, and the unemployment rate ticked up to 3.9 percent. More bad news to end a bad economic week for Biden with fewer than 190 days until the e******n.

All this mess — slowing job growth, surging inflation, a slowing economy, and banks on the brink — means that few Americans can honestly say they're better off, just economically speaking, than they were four years ago. This reality has not stopped President Biden and his administration from cherry-picking the lone positive-looking number to take a victory lap, but Americans haven't been buying it. With more weeks like this on the horizon between now and November, his 2024 campaign ought to stock up on heartburn meds.

The U.S. government has been sending "humanitarian aid" to Gaza, and to make that task more efficient President Biden recently announced that $320 million would be spent (and you know that price will go up fast) to help facilitate the delivery of the aid:

The U.S. and allies are scrambling to pull together a complex system that will move tons of humanitarian aid into Gaza by sea. Nearly two months after President Joe Biden gave the order, U.S. Army and Navy troops are assembling a large floating platform several miles off the Gaza coast that will be the launching pad for deliveries.

But any eventual aid distribution — which could start as soon as early May — will rely on a complicated logistical and security plan with many moving parts and details that are not yet finalized.

On the subject of "humanitarian aid", (I put that in quotes because who knows what's in these boxes) to Gaza, the following story will only come as a surprise to the Biden White House and State Department.

Color me shocked!

Hamas managed to seize a major shipment of humanitarian aid that was delivered to Gaza from Jordan earlier this week, US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said Thursday, after the supplies were the first to be shipped to the enclave through a newly reopened Israeli border crossing.

[...]

According to Miller, the aid shipment was unloaded by the Jordanian military inside the Strip before being “picked up by a humanitarian implementer for distribution inside Gaza, and that aid was intercepted and diverted by Hamas on the ground in Gaza.”

“The UN is either in the process or has by now recovered that aid, but it was an unacceptable act by Hamas to divert this aid to begin with,” he said during a press briefing.

Ah yes, the "top men" at the U.N. are saving the day so I'm sure it'll all work out just fine.

The question I have is now much of the aid has NOT ended up in the hands of Hamas? That list is certain to be a short one.

The Biden White House and United Nations are the same people who will take Iran's word when it comes to what billions of dollars in released funds will (and won't) be used for and they also trust Hamas. America's enemies must be laughing their asses off at this administration.

On Thursday, President Biden flew to Charlotte, North Carolina, to meet with the families of the law enforcement officers recently k**led in a shootout. That's good; that's the kind of thing a president ought to do, and kudos to wh**ever anonymous staffer got this on the schedule because it's unlikely in the extreme that the befuddled president thought of this on his own. It's showing leadership, something the Biden administration hasn't been particularly good at, and as the political saying goes, the optics are good.

But the optics of the president's arrival in Charlotte? Not so good.

The president, at least, managed to make it down the short stairs (I will forgo the obvious "short bus" comparison), and, to be fair, the Secret Service agent mentioned wasn't hovering over him, instead trotting quickly down the stairs some moments after the president's slower, rather halting descent.

But then this happened.

Look at these optics! The president is clearly confused; he is clinging to Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles' hand like a lost child. He seems to have little idea where he is or what he is supposed to do next.

This is not an elderly man with a poor memory. This is a man whose physical and mental decline can no longer be denied.

Will the president make it to the e******n? Will he make it to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago? If he does, how will he react to the likely replay of the 1968 Democratic National Convention, also in Chicago? It's looking increasingly doubtful. It's no wonder the polls are, daily, looking worse for the president.

Whoever is propping Joe Biden up is committing elder abuse. Joe Biden was never the sharpest knife in the drawer to being with, but now his decline can no longer be denied. Every day brings another embarrassing example of his decline. There's no way the Democrats can let him go on to the e******n — not if they hold out any hope at all of retaining their hold on the White House.

If Joe Biden is forced out of the race – or I should say, his handlers are forced out of the race, as more and more of the time Joe has very little idea what’s really going on – it will almost certainly be at the Democratic National Convention, where a smoke-filled room deal can be made, where Kamala Harris can be quietly shown the door, probably by being bought off with a fat patronage position, and someone younger (which leaves the field wide, wide open) could be anointed at the candidate – which still leaves that new candidate with little time to get their message out.

It's come to the point where the only thing more embarrassing for us as a nation than having Joe Biden as president would be to have him win ree******n.

As I previously documented, the Biden White House has employed a new strategy in recent weeks designed to make the way President Joe Biden shuffles when he walks across the South Lawn a little less noticeable to the public.

It's what I call "Operation Hide Joe Biden," and up until Thursday, the hiding consisted of his handlers swarming him as he either walked towards or away from Marine One, making it harder for him to be visible and in some instances effectively making it impossible to see him.

"Some Biden advisers have told Axios they're concerned that videos of Biden walking and shuffling alone — especially across the grass — have highlighted his age" and mobility challenges, Axios reported on Friday, while also mentioning that it was Biden himself who "suggested that they walk with him."

This strategy has another benefit for Biden in that it also helps in shielding him from media scrutiny, which he gets so little of as it is.

But just shortly after the pathetic three-and-a-half-minute speech Biden gave earlier on the pro-Hamas campus encampments, "Operation Hide Joe Biden" took a troubling turn.

As OANN White House correspondent Monica Paige shared on her Twitter/X feed, his handlers actually had him board Marine One *BEFORE* they allowed the press corps through to see him.

So, for those keeping score at home, the so-called leader of the free world delivered a short, scripted speech that d********gly equivocated on one of the most pressing issues our country is facing right now with the pro-Hamas unrest. Then afterward, his staff ensured he'd get to take no follow-ups on it by squiring him off to Marine One ahead of his trip to Charlotte, North Carolina, before reporters could see him and question him.

This is not what leadership in a time of crisis looks like--like not at all. And again, it's crazy that Team Biden thinks strategies like this are actually going to help him in the court of public opinion ahead of the November p**********l e******n.

The basement hideout strategy might have saved Biden's bacon in 2020, but 2024 is a whole different ball game altogether, with polls showing him in a continued free fall in key battleground states against Donald Trump.

Simply put, if Joe Biden wants to turn the tide, he's got to get out more to convince v**ers that he deserves another four years. The problem is that it is Joe Biden who has to do the heavy lifting on that, not his handlers, and that is proving to be an increasingly tall task indeed, especially now that the toothpaste is out of the tube.

According to a growing number of Christian conservatives, including Tucker Carlson, Charlie Kirk, and Andrew Torba (CEO of GAB), the new House bill opposing antisemitism actually outlaws quoting parts of the New Testament? Is this true?

Kirk, who is a strong supporter of Israel, asked on X, “Did the House of Representatives just make parts of the Bible illegal?”

Carlson, who has increasingly been accused of harboring antisemitic views, responded with, “Yes. The New Testament.”

Torba, who himself is frequently accused of antisemitism, sent out an email on May 2 titled, “The House Passes H.R. 6090: A Threat to the Christian Faith.”

He then claimed that, “The bill adopts the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of ‘antisemitism’ which includes the basic Biblical T***h that the Jews k**led Jesus Christ as ‘classic antisemitism.’ The bill has raised serious concerns among Christians who believe that their First Amendment rights are being threatened. For example, H.R. 6090 could potentially make it a crime for pastors to preach sermons that adhere to Biblical passages, of which there are many, which explicitly state that the Jews k**led Jesus.”

And note that Torba wrote this urgent warning as a “Christian nationalist,” signing off with “Christ is King.”

On what basis are these men raising these concerns? It is the fact that the House Bill uses the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism which states, “Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

The IHRA then provides examples of Jew hatred, including, “Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.” Or, “Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.” Or, “Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews k*****g Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.”

Based on this last example, concerned Christians are claiming that this bill will make it illegal to quote passages such as these:

Let all the house of Israel therefore know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified. (Acts 2:36, Peter, preaching to a Jewish crowd in Jerusalem)

The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified his servant Jesus, whom you delivered over and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided to release him. But you denied the Holy and Righteous One, and asked for a murderer to be granted to you, and you k**led the Author of life, whom God raised from the dead. To this we are witnesses. (Acts 3:13–15, again, Peter, preaching to a Jewish crowd in Jerusalem)

For you, brothers, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea. For you suffered the same things from your own countrymen as they did from the Jews, who k**led both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out, and displease God and oppose all mankind by hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles that they might be saved—so as always to fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them at last! (1 Thessalonians 2:14–16, Paul writing to Gentile Christians in Thessalonica)

Are these concerns justified? Not in the least.

The IHRA definition simply states that it would be antisemitic to accuse Israelis today (or, all Jews, for that matter) as Christ k**lers or as responsible for the death of Jesus. That’s it.

It neither states nor implies that a Christian could not quote these passages of Scripture, nor does it state or imply that it is antisemitic to state that some Jewish leaders in the first century were complicit in the death of Jesus, which is historically true. It would not even be antisemitic to state that these leaders acted on behalf of the nation.

But to extract from this that Israelis today were guilty of deicide (k*****g Christ, who was God incarnate) would be to grossly misuse Scripture. And to make that claim would be antisemitic.

As for a right reading of the New Testament passages, they are written against a backdrop where: 1) large crowds of Jews followed Jesus and it was mainly Jewish leaders who rejected Him (see, for example, Matthew 21:33-46); 2) all the first followers of Jesus were Jews; 3) Peter and Paul are presented as observant, Torah-keeping Jews (see, e.g., Acts 10; 23:6); and 4) before the Temple was destroyed, there were tens of thousands of Jewish followers of Jesus (Acts 21:20).

As for Paul’s words to the Thessalonian believers, a more accurate rendering would be, “For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s communities in Christ Jesus that are in Judea—for you suffered the same things at the hands of your own countrymen as they did from the Judean leaders [or, simply “the Judeans,” speaking of the Jews of Judah who were guilty of these acts], who k**led both the Lord Jesus and the prophets and drove us out. They [meaning, these same troublemaking Judean leaders who rejected Jesus and the prophets and apostles He sent] are not pleasing to God and hostile to all people, hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they might be saved. As a result, they constantly fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them at last” (compare the Tree of Life version).

In short, then, this bill says nothing whatsoever about citing these New Testament passages or affirming their t***hfulness. Rather, it addresses the historic (and still present) antisemitic libel that all Jews were and are Christ k**lers, a libel that has led to the slaughter of Jews throughout history.

Whether the bill infringes on free speech in general is a separate issue entirely, but that is a far cry from the hysterical, patently false charges being raised against the bill today.

Pay them no heed.

When President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, he promised it would lower Medicare costs for America's seniors. Loaded with the all-too-familiar political rhetoric of "taking it to drug companies"-- what is missing from this talking point is how the President "took it to seniors."

Thus far, however, seniors' costs have skyrocketed. A new report reveals that for those with a Medicare Part D drug plan, this year's premiums have increased by a crushing 21%, on average. Next year's prices are expected to be even higher.

The IRA is unraveling the "Part D" drug benefit -- and hitting seniors with bills that few can afford. It's high time to review what went wrong.

The IRA's most heralded reform gave Medicare officials the authority to set prices on a growing list of medicines covered by the program. Most thought the law would t***slate into savings at the pharmacy counter, but the IRA's price-setting provision was designed to save the government -- not patients -- money.

The IRA's framers knew that the law wouldn't reduce drug prices immediately, so they included other sweeteners. One, a cap on monthly insulin costs at $35, has taken effect and is rightly popular. Another, lowering the cap on out-of-pocket drug expenditures, could have been popular -- except that it doesn't take effect until next year, and was so poorly designed it's already producing surprise premium increases.

The scheduled decrease in the out-of-pocket maximum for prescriptions was a classic bait-and-switch. Seniors who take only brand name drugs thought they would save when the out-of-pocket maximum went down from about $3,300 under the old rules to $2,000. The IRA's framers knew perfectly well they had no magic wand to make the $1,300 differential disappear, and the government had no intention of picking up that tab. So, lawmakers shifted financial responsibility for most of the $1,300 to insurers.

Unsurprisingly, insurers have simply passed that cost back to consumers through higher premiums and tighter management on access to drugs. Put another way, seniors are paying higher premium prices today for promised out-of-pocket savings starting in 2026.

This year, Part D premiums are up roughly 21%. Next year, they could increase by close to 50%. Medicare beneficiaries will start to see these price hikes when they start shopping for a plan on October 1 of this year. Just as President Biden campaigns on "lowering drug costs" this fall, many seniors' jaws will drop over sky-high premiums for the prescription drug benefits they need.

A second troubling consequence of the IRA is fewer choices for seniors. At the time the team of congressional staff who designed and wrote the law that created Part D in 2003, it was not clear that any health insurers would participate in the program, largely because seniors tend to have high healthcare needs, and stand-alone prescription drug coverage was a new concept at the time. Yet surprisingly, more than 1,400 plans joined the Part D market within a year.

In 2024, the number of prescription drug plans available is less than half of what it was when the program launched. Nearly 100 plans disappeared last year alone, and the current se******n is the smallest in history.

While the situation is bleak for all Medicare recipients, low-income enrollees are suffering the most. The number of Part D plans available to them has fallen by 34% in just the past year.

Already, one major health plan has indicated they are pulling out of the Part D market in 2025, which could force almost 200,000 seniors to find a new plan. We expect more plans to leave the market in the coming years, further reducing options for beneficiaries.

Another impact of the IRA is that Part D insurers are aggressively cutting costs by adding more "prior authorization" requirements and by pushing patients toward the cheapest therapies first.

None of this damage was necessary. Bipartisan proposals to redesign the drug benefit in a smarter, less disruptive way were proposed -- but ignored in the interest of rushing a partisan bill through Congress.

More than 50 million American seniors are enrolled in Medicare. They were told the Biden administration was improving the drug benefit. They're now learning the IRA is breaking it.

Joe Biden is feverishly working to oust Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and is standing in the way of total Israeli victory against Hamas. Read on to see what’s happening.

Tell Congress to counter Joe Biden’s anti-Israel agenda.​​​​​​

You’ve seen it ... the endless war Joe Biden is waging in the Middle East.

But it’s not against Hamas, Israel’s bloodthirsty enemy that committed the heinous Oct. 7 assault, which included the butchering, burning, and raping of more than 1,200 Israelis, mostly innocent civilians.

Nor is it a war against the tyrants of Tehran ... the fanatical Islamist enemy of Israel that has defiantly proclaimed “Death to Israel!” and to the U.S. since 1979.

Joe goes easy on the brutal thugs ruling Iran who are now at the nuclear threshold. The terror state pours hundreds of millions into its “ring of fire” — the militant terror armies encircling Israel in Lebanon, Gaza, Judea and Samaria, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.

But Joe Biden isn’t confronting and demonizing this foe. Instead, just last month, he signed a sanctions waiver giving Iran access to more than 10 billion dollars! INSANE is an understatement.

So, who does Biden have in his crosshairs?

You’re right — Israel! And dead center in Joe’s bull’s-eye is Israel’s democratically elected prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Biden is using every devious tactic he can to OUST Netanyahu from office — doing so while the Jewish state is fighting an existential war to ensure its very survival ... and almost to the point of victory.

That’s why you and I need to speak out NOW on Israel’s behalf. Our nation is today led by the most anti-Israel White House ever.

But your voice matters in Washington — ESPECIALLY in an e******n year. Please take a moment right now to tell your Congressman and demand they counter Joe Biden’s anti-Israel schemes and instead support total victory for Israel.

Please continue to pray for Israel and her people, especially the 133 Jewish women, children and elderly Hamas is still holding hostage. Hopefully they're still alive.

God's covenants trump EVERYTHING. There will be peace in the region and God's in control making it happen on His timeline even as we speak.

No, I meant Jill Stein supports Hamas as evidenced by her arrest this past week.

You do realize that the v**e difference in California only was 3 million meaning that in the rest of the country it was virtually a tie. So, in the end, the e*******l college went to Trump as it should have because it wasn't just the population centers but the WHOLE country.

Employment Situation Summary
USDL-24-0796
8:30 a.m. (ET) Friday, May 3, 2024

THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION -- APRIL 2024
Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 175,000 in April… the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.

Both the unemployment rate, at 3.9 percent, and the number of unemployed people, at 6.5 million, changed little in April.

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for February was revised down by 34,000, from +270,000 to +236,000, and the change for March was revised up by 12,000, from +303,000 to +315,000. With these revisions, employment in February and March combined is 22,000 lower than previously reported.

Not so stellar. Where's Joe's victory lap? Was able to find little to none of the MSM reporting on this.

So you would v**e for a Hamas supporter... speaks volumes.