One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: IrreverentOne75
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8
Mar 2, 2019 12:50:07   #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Unfortunately...


Not really. I believe it is better to know where the altra-liberals are. That way we, Conservatives, can eliminate their affects.
Go to
Mar 2, 2019 11:57:27   #
nwtk2007 wrote:
Opinion, of course. Let me rephrase; he is all bark and very little bite. Is that better??


Everyone is entitled to their opinion.
Go to
Mar 1, 2019 22:18:02   #
nwtk2007 wrote:
He isn't as tough as he appears.


And you know that for a fact or is this your opinion? If you have verifiable information to back up your statement I would like to see it.
Go to
Mar 1, 2019 12:29:44   #
Bcon wrote:
Trey Gowdy , South Carolina Congressman, recently responded to a

reporter about the military in response to a question from a

CNN reporter about the DoD ban of t*********rs from joining

the U.S. armed forces. As Trey typically does so very

well, he nailed it rather succinctly.





Question: How can President Trump

claim to represent all U.S citizens, regardless of sexual

orientation, when he banned t*********rs from joining the

military? Isn't that discrimination?





Trey Gowdy's Response: " Nobody

has a right to serve in the Military. Nobody!

What makes you people think the Military is an equal

opportunity employer? It is very far from it - and for

good reasons - let me cite a few."





"The Military uses prejudice

regularly and consistently to deny citizens from joining for

being too old or too young, too fat or too skinny, too tall

or too short. Citizens are denied for having flat

feet, or for missing or additional fingers." he went on

to explain: "By the way, poor eyesight will

disqualify you, as well as bad teeth.

Malnourished? Drug addiction? Bad back?

Criminal history? Low IQ? Anxiety? Phobias?

Hearing damage? Six arms? Hear voices in your

head? Self-identification as a Unicorn? Need a

special access ramp for your wheelchair?"





"Can't run the required course

in the required time? Can't do the required number of

push-ups? Not really a morning person? and refuse to

get out of bed before noon? All can be

legitimate reasons for denial"





"The Military has one job:

Winning War. Anything else is a distraction and a

liability. Did someone just scream? That isn't

Fair? War is VERY unfair, there are no exceptions made

for being special or challenged or socially

wonderful."





"YOU must change yourself to meet Military standards

and not the other way around."





"I say again: You don't change the Military

- you must change yourself. The Military is not about

being fair, it is about taking advantage of others and about

winning.





The Military doesn't need to accommodate anyone with

special issues. The Military needs to Win Wars

and keep our Country safe - PERIOD!"

"If any of your personal issues are a liability that

detract from readiness or lethality... Thank you for

applying and good luck in future

endeavors."



"...any other questions?"
Trey Gowdy , South Carolina Congressman, recently ... (show quote)


It is truly unfortunate that this man appears to be reluctant to ever put his hat in the arena and announce that he will be a candidate for the highest office in America. Having watched many of the videos and read many articles about Rep. Gowdy I would be than happy to v**e for him as well as campaign for him.
Go to
Mar 1, 2019 12:18:50   #
BBianch wrote:
Trump "squeaky clean"??????????????????


No one is ever squeaky clean but based on what is publicly available the President is not a criminal. On the other hand there are several current members of Congress that cannot make that claim.
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 12:52:19   #
woodguru wrote:
What BS did Obama do that was like this? Giving free passes like Trump is doing with the Saudi's and Kim?


Well let us see. Obamacare, Fast and Furious, DACA, Secretary of State Clinton, B******i, 150 billion to Iran. Need more?
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 12:25:31   #
Kevyn wrote:
Here is a real conservatives take on Trumps Hanoi fiasco.

President Donald Trump's decision not to hold North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un responsible for Otto Warmbier's death was "reprehensible," former Republican Sen. Rick Santorum said Thursday.
"This is the conundrum of Donald Trump for many of us who like his policies and don't like a lot of the things he does and says," Santorum said of the decision to CNN's John Berman on "New Day."
"But, this is reprehensible, what he just did. He gave cover, as you said, to a leader who knew very well what was going on with Otto Warmbier," Santorum, who is a CNN political commentator, said. "And again, I don't understand why the President does this. I am disappointed, to say the least, that he did it."
Earlier Thursday, Trump, who was in Hanoi for a summit with Kim, said the North Korean leader "felt badly about it. He felt very badly," telling reporters the two discussed the matter privately. "He tells me that he didn't know about it and I will take him at his word."
North Korea released Warmbier, an American student, in June 2017 after more than a year of imprisonment, returning him to the US in a coma. Warmbier died days after returning home and US officials quickly blamed North Korea for the brain damage Warmbier suffered that led to his death.
Santorum praised Trump's decision to abruptly cut short the meeting with Kim, leaving Vietnam without a deal on North Korean denuclearization.
"What he did in Hanoi was the right thing to do -- he walked away from a bad deal. He hopefully saw this as a learning experience that the North Korean's can't and shouldn't be trusted," Santorum said, adding this is a "wonderful moment in (Trump's) presidency."
Here is a real conservatives take on Trumps Hanoi ... (show quote)


Can any of the Conservatives on this site recall any liberal, progressive, socialist member of the Democratic Party publicly trashing the BS that Obama did while he was in office? If "former" Senator Santorum had issues with what our President did he, as a supporter of Conservatism, should have sent the President a personal note and not aired his OPINION on the Crappy News Network.
Go to
Feb 27, 2019 13:13:53   #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Former PM of Liberals’ Favorite ‘Socialist’ Country Just Blasted Bernie Sanders

While the right points to Venezuela, Cuba, the defunct Soviet Union and other failed or failing socialist/c*******t regimes, the left dismisses those failures as poor examples of “real” socialism, pointing instead to several Nordic nations — Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden — as illustrative of the the “democratic socialism” they want to impose on the United States.

There’s just one problem with that: Those nations aren’t really “socialist,” at least not in the way that most Americans who came of age during the Cold War would view it.

That may come as a shock to folks like independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, whose was singled out Monday by a man who knows those countries well — Carl Bildt, who served for four years as prime minister of Sweden and later served as the nation’s minister of foreign affairs for another eight.

Bildt, in reference to old videos of Sanders praising Soviet-style socialism after visits to Nicaragua and Russia in the 1980s, tweeted, “Bernie Sanders was lucky to be able to get to the Soviet Union in 1988 and praise all its stunning socialist achievements before the entire system and empire collapsed under the weight of its own spectacular failures.”

Ouch. Indeed, The Washington Post’s fact-checker, Glenn Kessler, noted in a tweet of his own that Bildt’s remark constituted “quite a burn” of the l*****t senator, in that it came from the former leader of a nation that Sanders often points to as being an example of “socialist” success.

Jeffrey Dorfman, an economics professor at the University of Georgia, published an article in Forbes in July 2018 that more thoroughly took to task wanna-be socialists like Sanders by showing that the Nordic nations often cited by l*****ts as examples of successful socialism aren’t really socialist.

“It is certainly true that Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark are notable economic successes,” Dorfman wrote. “What is false is that these countries are particularly socialist.”

True socialism involves a centralized government exerting control or maintaining ownership of businesses or entire industries, which is often confused with nation-states that levy high taxes to provide funding for a plethora of social and welfare programs.

The Nordic nations listed by Dorfman fall into the latter category.

“Regardless of the perception, in reality the Nordic countries practice mostly free market economics paired with high taxes exchanged for generous government entitlement programs,” Dorfman explained.

In other words, not true socialism.

The professor pointed out that the Nordic nations only began offering these welfare programs after their economies had flourished under capitalism, meaning the capitalistic wealth provided the means to fund the benefits, rather than the benefits creating the wealth and prosperity and societal economic security that l*****t want to emulate.

Furthermore, Dorfman noted that the economic prosperity of the Nordic nations came about not because of governmental interference in the economy, but rather a hands-off approach to the market. Indeed, the only areas where the Nordic nations might be considered somewhat socialist are government-subsidized health care and education (though it is worth noting that the government vouchers can be used by Swedish parents to send their children to any school they desire, including public, charter or private school).

The Nordic nations are actually ranked quite high in terms of economic freedom for their respective populations, as those nations really don’t interfere with the free market much — certainly not to the extent that truly socialist governments (or a President Bernie Sanders) would.

Dorfman concluded that the l*****ts who espouse the virtues of “democratic socialism” in the Nordic nations are confused.

“Perhaps a better name for what the Nordic countries practice would be called compassionate capitalism,” he wrote.


https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=libertyalliance&ff_campaign=dailyam&ff_content=libertyalliance
Former PM of Liberals’ Favorite ‘Socialist’ Countr... (show quote)


The very best example that I have seen in response to individuals like Bernie that have most recently popped up in DC claiming that Socialism is the only way to go. If America was as homogenous as Norway, Sweden, and Denmark that type of "Compassionate Conservatism" might work. Unfortunately we have millions of i******s living here who absolutely refuse to assimilate as well as several million adherents to a religion that is contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America. A former President once said, and I paraphrase here, "there can only be Americans, there cannot be loyalty to any other country".
Go to
Feb 26, 2019 13:38:41   #
eagleye13 wrote:
"What I find extremely difficult to understand is just how anyone can be unhappy with the direction our country is in today." - IrreverentOne75

The Dems are unhappy, because they know that it will be costing them v**es.


We can always hope that is true but I believe that the masses that v**e for Democrats have been brainwashed since they entered the government school system.
Go to
Feb 26, 2019 13:35:01   #
BBianch wrote:
I don't know, that's why I asked .. I didn't know that when you become a member of the DOJ or FBI you became owned by anyone .. tell me more ..


This is a perfect example of a l*****t showing that they are nearly as intelligent as a box of rocks.
Go to
Feb 25, 2019 14:29:11   #
redpill wrote:
Welcome aboard. The more minds on here the better. One point before you get caught by someone. Use Quote Reply when addressing someone's post. Otherwise, we will not know to whom you are addressing.

On topic.... It will not matter to the left that those snagged in the broad net thrown in the waters that those crimes have nothing to do with Trump or collusion.


Thank you redpill. It may not matter to anyone on the left but it does mean something to the supporters of President Trump and it tends to make us pretty angry. If the left believes that this circus has lowered our support for him they are in for a huge surprise come 2020. What I find extremely difficult to understand is just how anyone can be unhappy with the direction our country is in today.
Go to
Feb 25, 2019 00:09:29   #
I suggest that it makes a huge difference when the DOJ and the FBI are both completely owned by the l*****ts. You seem to forget that Comey is a died in the wool Obama believer and that the DOJ was being run by the likes of Loretta Lynch who had the tarmac meeting with Wild Bill Clinton.
Go to
Feb 24, 2019 23:51:49   #
Thanks for the welcome. Am looking forward to reading more and contributing when I can.
Go to
Feb 24, 2019 22:20:00   #
The individuals that have been caught up in the Mueller investigation and have been either formally charged, arrested, tried, and/or convicted have not been connected to the campaign of the President. Nothing brought forward has tied President Trump to any of the crimes committed by any of them. The charge of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign has not been proved. No one has claimed that any Russian attempt at influencing the e******n had an affect on how v**es were cast.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.