According to "know it all" AOC....WE have 12 years to live!!!...So what do you think is more manufactured h**x...Crisis at the Border or that we have 12 years to live???....I'll say the BIGGEST manufactured h**x is that We all gonna die in 12 years!!!... ......Just so you all understand..Crisis at the Border IS REAL....NOT manufactured!!!

Why People V**ed for Trump:
The folks speaking out against Trump helped us make up our minds a little more each day!
Was he the Perfect Candidate whose thoughts mirrors ours on all fronts? NOPE
Does he say everything the way we wish he would say it? NOPE
Were weI absolutely sure that his motives are absolutely Pure? NOPE
Can I point to any other Dem Politician that we like better? NOPE
Is there any of the other RINO Politicians we like better? NOPE
Were we going to sit home, refuse to V**e, and let Hillary win; because he is NOT Perfect? NOPE
Did we like what I have seen for the last 7-1/2 years with the Jerk that slept in our White House? NOPE
Did we like the "fundamental changes" that same Jerk has brought about in our America? NOPE

Trump's p**********l qualifications…
Obama is against Trump... Check
The Media are against Trump... Check
The establishment Democrats are against Trump... Check
The establishment Republicans are against Trump... Check
The Pope is against Trump... Check
The UN is against Trump... Check
The EU is against Trump... Check
China is against Trump... Check
Mexico is against Trump... Check
Soros is against Trump... Check
Black L***s M****r is against Trump... Check
Move On is against Trump... Check
Koch Brothers are against Trump... Check
Bushes are against Trump ... Check
Planned Parenthood is against Trump....Check
Hillary & Bernie are both against Trump ... Check
I*****l a***ns are against Trump ... Check
Islam is against Trump ... Check
Kasich is against Trump ... Check
H**eful, r****t, violent Liberals are against Trump.. Check
NOW THAT BEING SAID...
It seemed to us that Trump HAD TO BE the Best Qualified Candidate we could ever have.
If you have so many political insiders and left wing NUT CASES--- all SCARED TO DEATH, that they all speak out against him at the same time!
Most of all, it was the People's Choice, not the race fixers.

PLUS
He's not a Lifetime Politician...Check
He's not a Lawyer.....Check
He's a Natural Born American Citizen born in the USA from American parents. . .
Bonus points !
Whoopi said she will leave the country...
Rosie said she will leave the country...
Sharpton said he will leave the country...
Cher said she will leave the country...
Cyrus said she will leave the country...
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights will prevail....
Hillary will go to jail.....
The budget will be balanced in 8 years....
Americans will have first choice at jobs.....
You will not be able to marry your pet....
You will be able to keep your gun(s) if you qualify...
(Not a criminal or crazy, etc.)
Only living, registered U.S. citizens can v**e....

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/democrats-are-pushing-the-biggest-tax-increase-youve-never-heard-of

by Joseph Semprevivo | March 15, 2019 12:05 AM

House Democrats are currently pushing the biggest tax increase that nobody's heard of.

Rep. John Larson, D-Conn., along with more than 200 Democratic cosponsors, recently introduced the Social Security 2100 Act. The legislation would raise the effective payroll tax rate by 2.4 percentage points, split between employer and employee, to 14.8 percent. And this tax increase would apply to all earned income.

At a Capitol Hill hearing this week, I testified about how this tax increase would hurt workers, entrepreneurship, and small businesses like mine.

Larson’s plan would increase small businesses’ annual payroll tax burden per employee earning $50,000 per year by $600, to $3,700. While the plan calls for a donut hole exemption between the current payroll tax cap of $132,900 and $400,000 of earnings, this ceiling is not indexed to inflation, meaning that within a couple of decades all employees, no matter their income, would be subject to it. Eventually, for an employee earning $200,000 a year, a business like mine would have to pay $2,400 more in payroll tax than we do today.

Consider the impact on a business employing 50 people at an average annual salary of $50,000. This tax increase would raise the business portion of payroll tax costs by $30,000, to $185,000. That increase amounts to the cost of hiring one new entry-level employee or giving significant wage increases to existing employees.

Businesses would fund such a tax increases by holding off on hiring or reducing employee wages. It would undo the benefits of the tax cuts that took effect last year and are allowing small businesses like mine to hire, raise wages, and expand.

This payroll tax increase would also directly tax wage increases. This is a peculiar public policy strategy, given the bipartisan push to increase the wages of ordinary Americans. Every time I consider raising an employee’s wages, I would have to factor in the increased costs of this associated payroll tax hike to see if the potential pay raise still makes financial sense.

For some small business owners who operate on tiny profit margins, this tax increase will put them out of business. Consider the restaurant industry, where profit margins pivot around 3 percent. Labor makes up about one-third of their total expenses. To raise restaurants' labor costs by 1.2 percentage points is enough to put some of them out of business altogether.

This proposed tax increase would hurt my employees as much as it would hurt me and other small business owners. For many employees, the payroll tax is the biggest tax burden they face. Raising the payroll tax burden to 7.4 percent will push some workers into poverty. It will prevent other workers from having the funds to make their car or housing payments. It will prevent others from having the funds to take a vacation.

Particularly negatively affected by this tax increase would be sole proprietors, including Uber and Lyft drivers, realtors, and insurance agents — people who, working independently, make up the vast majority of small businesses in this country. Sole proprietors must pay both the employer and employee sides of the payroll tax. This means that a sole-proprietor earning $100,000 would have to pay nearly $15,000 in payroll tax in addition to their federal and state liabilities under this tax proposal, an increase of $2,400 from the current tax regime.

This tax increase would hurt entrepreneurship rates as workers will be disincentivized from striking out on their own in the face of a nearly 15 percent flat payroll tax on their earnings. This is a worrying prospect, given the important role that entrepreneurship plays in job creation, standards of living, and economic growth. I don’t know whether I would have started my business if I had to pay 15 cents in payroll taxes on every dollar I earned.

Competing testimony was offered by the AARP, which supports boosting Social Security payments. As Rep. Tom Rice, R-S.C., indicated at the hearing, while we have to keep our commitment to seniors, we also need to keep our commitment to young people by giving them more economic opportunities, opportunities that this tax hike would curtail.

Another witness was Maya Rockeymoore Cummings, who leads a group called Global Policy Solutions. According to its website, Ms. Cummings has experience "spanning federal, state and local government, academia, think tanks, and nonprofit organizations." Yet, at the hearing she described herself as a small business "expert."

Aside from me, there were no small business owners or ordinary American workers testifying. I would encourage the committee and all politicians to get out and ask these people about whether they want a tax increase before moving forward with Larson's bill. I think people will tell them that they are taxed enough already.

Joseph Semprevivo is the president and CEO of Joseph’s Lite Cookies in Florida and a member of the Job Creators Network. He is an adjunct professor of finance, real estate and insurance at Indian River State College and the author of “Madness, Miracles, Millions."

First, think of our brains in terms of gray matter. Now, when we are conceived, this gray matter is poured into our heads by Angels, and it’s fluid, allowing thoughts to travel in every way imaginable. The gray matter slowly begins to congeal, and by our twenties, it’s a solid mass. By our forties, a few cracks, minor flaws, appear. By our sixties, narrow crevices are formed. And seeing as I’m only in my sixties, I can’t imagine what the next twenty years may produce, but the prospects don’t seem good.

Second, I see our memories are linked by what I see as a road system. When we’re born, and until we are about five, we have a small enough amount of memories stored, and the roads are all local and easy to travel. By five and through our thirties, our brains start paving highways, but the traffic is still manageable. By forty, a few of the highway bridges and overpasses collapse, so short local detours are set-up and it sometimes takes a second or two longer than it use to to remember. By sixty, whole sections of the highways are closed, and the local detours have detours, and there are times we need to call for help to remember. And again, seeing as I’m only in my sixties, I can’t imagine what the next twenty years may produce, but the prospects don’t seem good.