One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: acknowledgeurma
Page: <<prev 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 77 next>>
Nov 18, 2017 19:38:22   #
PLT Sarge wrote:
Jobs for humans in the future will be servicing these robots so they can do all the tasks that we are either to lazy to do or don't want to do.

I think there will be robots to do that too. I just hope that when AI(s) take(s) over it/they will value humans and will want to keep us around.
Go to
Nov 16, 2017 01:02:41   #
[quote=Pennylynn]Read it again....this time without editing what was written. We all edit as we read, so this is not a disparaging remark about you or your haste to defend the author.

Here is what I gleamed from the post. Her [i]accusers[i] not "abusers" were the pastor's son and her uncle. She did not identify her "abuser." As stated, they said "her father" would not love her, and she waited 40 years and his death, and the only one in her narrative who would not love her if she told, implying her "father." She wait 40 years for "his" death so he could not withdraw his love. Later on she tells how her father, or one of the accusers(?) tried to initiate personal contact in the form of a hug at her mother's funeral. And went on to say that he lives alone, implying that her father is still alive. So, which is it.... did her father die during the past year and she is finally free to tell her story? Or was her father the "abuser"? Or was the entire thing made up in a marijuana induced delusion? You decide.

Sorry, too many years dealing with people who are not candid with their stories of neglect or abuse. There is always a nugget of t***h in their stories and a great deal that they make up.[/quote]

Given Singularity's clarification, "As I clearly explained, I waited 40 years for.my FATHER to die before I confronted my RAPIST, his baby brother." I think my understanding of her first statement conforms with her clarification pretty well. And like I said, her first statement does not hold contradictions.
Go to
Nov 15, 2017 23:43:47   #
Pennylynn wrote:
The story contradicts itself..... She wait for him to die, but he now lives alone. Sorry, but I find the "story"
to be questionable. And, it is much more than I need or want to know! Great Point Wolf!!

There's no contradiction, just confusing use of "he" to refer to her father and her abuser (her father's younger brother).

To clarify:

"I waited fourty years until he [her father] was dead so he [her father] wouldn't stop loving me. Logically I knew better but my tongue would never move when I tried to tell anyone. Last year at my mothers funeral, he [her abuser, her father's youngest brother] kept trying to get me to give him [her abuser, her father's youngest brother] a hug. I gently declined. In his [her abuser, her father's youngest brother] seventies. Lives alone. Sick I hear. His [her abuser, her father's youngest brother] daughter refuses contact. Justice is served.
Go to
Nov 14, 2017 18:15:49   #
Hemiman wrote:
Sounds like a speech Chamberland would have given.There are people in this world that have to be stopped and sometimes it requires a war,no sane person likes it but at times it must be done,the consequences for not going to war sometime are worse than the war itself and in the long run create more victims.

Hmm...I think it sounds more like a speech Debs would have given at the outbreak of WWI. Some think WWII was just a continuation of WWI. And think, if there had been no WWI, there would have been no Hitler, no Bolshevik revolution, no Soviet Union, no Cold War, no Korean Police Action (aka War), no Vietnam War, etc. The fruit of war seems to always carry the seeds of future wars.

You say, "no sane person likes [war]". I ask, can a sane person actively participate in war?
Go to
Oct 13, 2017 19:26:34   #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
ABC, NBC, MSNBC and the NY Times all are more trusted than Fox News!

I think the chart you showed, would make your statement true for only ABC and NBC. The chart shows MSNBC, NYT, and Fox all have them "mostly trusted" by three groups. Also we don't Know the size of the five different groups. I would guess that in the USA, the self labeled conservative groups would have greater numbers, so Fox might be trusted by more people in the USA.
Go to
Oct 13, 2017 18:39:46   #
MS. FACTUAL wrote:
Do a search and find out how many f**e news stories that the media has had to own up to and retract. CNN. MSNBC, ABC, CBS all lead in the f**e news stories. Sadly each of those media sources are merely an extension of a political campaign for the DNC.

Hmm...this seems like just the opposite way of choosing who to trust. Someone willing to admit to mistakes, I would think, lends some support to their trustworthiness.
Go to
Oct 8, 2017 14:31:53   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
The Man Who Changed Everything
Posted by Keith Broaders on October 8, 2017


In 1913 the Woodrow Wilson was responsible for laying the foundation for the tyranny we are experiencing America today. He revealed his political agenda when he stated that he wanted to make the world safe of democracy.

With his support the Federal Reserve Act was passed by Congress in 1913 which delegated the power to issue our money and regulate its value to a privately owned banking corporation.

The second treasonous act was the fraudulent ratification of the

16th Amendment that made extortion legal by imposing an unconstitutional form of taxation.

The third and final nail in our coffin was hammered home with the passage of the 17th Amendment.

As a result of the 17th Amendment the state legislatures lost the authority to choose their own senators.

This action helped to destroy our republican form of government in favor of a democracy where the majority could v**e to deprive the minority of their God given rights.

Of all of the Presidents in the history of America none have done more to convert our Constitutional Republic in to a democracy Thanks to Woodrow Wilson and a Congress controlled by the financial elite our nation is on verge of self destruction.
The Man Who Changed Everything br Posted by Keith ... (show quote)

Keith Broaders wrote, "This action helped to destroy our republican form of government in favor of a democracy where the majority could v**e to deprive the minority of their God given rights."

As opposed to a government where a minority can v**e to deprive the majority of their God given rights.
Go to
Oct 3, 2017 23:07:02   #
Docadhoc wrote:
Not according to several sources including the Federalist.

To which Federalist article are you referring? Was it:

http://thefederalist.com/2015/09/03/the-australian-gun-ban-conceit/

Here's a quote from it:
-----------
But at the same time Australia was banning guns and experiencing a decline in gun homicides, America was more than doubling how many firearms it manufactured and seeing a nearly identical drop in gun homicides. That throws a bit of a wrench into the idea that Australia’s gun ban must be the reason for its decline in gun crime.

However, what’s more important is the fact that overall suicides and murder have not “plummeted” in the years after the gun ban. Yes, as with the gun-happy United States, the murder rate is down in Australia. It’s dropped 31 percent from a rate of 1.6 per 100,000 people in 1994 to 1.1 per 100,000 in 2012.But it’s the only serious crime that saw a consistent decline post-ban.

In fact, according to the Australian government’s own statistics, a number of serious crimes peaked in the years after the ban. Manslaughter, sexual assault, kidnapping, armed robbery, and unarmed robbery all saw peaks in the years following the ban, and most remain near or above pre-ban rates. The effects of the 1996 ban on violent crime are, frankly, unimpressive at best.
------------

Note in the above, "the murder rate is down in Australia".

The main argument seems to be, that any decline was not due to the ban, but some other factors.
Go to
Oct 3, 2017 21:20:56   #
payne1000 wrote:
More likely the false f**g shootings are designed to put more policemen on duty while giving them more military-type equipment which further enables the looming police state in the U.S.

Since POTUS Trump already lifted Obama's ban on military equipment, I doubt that would be the reason.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/27/trump-plans-to-lift-obama-era-ban-on-giving-local-police-military-equipment-report-says.html

Given the overwhelming response for calls for blood donations, perhaps it was a False F**g Operation executed by the blood collection cartel.
Go to
Oct 3, 2017 21:07:03   #
Docadhoc wrote:
Rummy, good to hear from you. I hope all is well.

2 comments:

1. Did Australia have a 2nd amendment that this action violated?

2. Since this gun control has been inacted, the Australian murder rate has gone up.

Docadhoc (and others) wrote, "the Australian murder rate has gone up."

Not according to:

https://theconversation.com/e******n-factcheck-is-crime-getting-worse-in-australia-60119
Go to
Oct 3, 2017 15:06:33   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
And the HITS just keep coming as the scumbag authorities, FBI and Media go into full damage Control....


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


False f**g in Vegas?

By Jon Rappoport

False f**gs always target the psychological state of mind of the public. Mind control is the goal.

To boil it down, a false f**g is an operation staged to blame someone for a crime, someone who didn't commit the crime.

Why? Because by blaming that person or group, and by convincing many others to blame that person or group, you achieve an important objective.

Simplistic over-exaggerated version: "Last night, a homeless man was found shot dead in an alley. The gun was found next to his body. The Mayor's fingerprints were on the [planted] gun. The Mayor was arrested at his office. The e******n nears. The Mayor's opponent now appears to have a clear path to victory..."

Less simplistic version: "...the worst mass shooting in US history. Stephen Paddock, 64, has been named as the Las Vegas shooter. He is dead. He k**led 58 people at a concert and wounded 515 others. In the Congress, calls are rising for new gun control laws..."

But, as it turns out, the evidence suggests there were multiple shooters in the Mandalay Hotel. Paddock may or may not have been one of them. The overall operation was designed to invoke widespread horror and fear, and usher in new restrictions on gun ownership...

The other possible shooters in the hotel would have been professionals, tasked with k*****g as many people as possible at the country music concert.

Gun control would not be the only agenda in this false f**g.

Heavily militarized police all over this country would be another agenda.

Putting a significant dent in the economy would be another---if attendance at public events and in crowded public places diminishes.

Such a reduction in attendance could even affect political forums and other gatherings where free speech and the right to assemble are vital. (We've already seen significant disruptions of these events.)

Invoking fear and passivity in the population is another basic agenda. This leads to the attitude: "Let the authorities handle everything."

We could see new, more outrageous violations of Constitutional search and seizure principles, all in the name of "the need for security."

As in the aftermath of Sandy Hook, there may be new calls for psychiatric screening of the population, including young children, in order to "spot criminals before they commit crimes." This is sheer madness, because no so-called mental disorder is based on any defining lab test, and many of the prescribed drugs (SSRI antidepressants) push people over the edge into committing violence. ---More violence, more calls for psychiatric screening, more drugs, more violence: an escalating scenario and repeating cycle, leading to tighter Control from above.

When was the last time you saw a major false f**g exposed by the mainstream press, and then admitted to by the actual perpetrators, who then explained their true objectives?

Never.

False f**gs are, over the long term, essential to maintaining and expanding the status quo: power is collected and increased at the top, and then exerted downward.

Note: All prior analyses I've made about the duration of the shooting, and numbers of people k**led and injured, are subject to change. Why? Because as yet, we have no accurate reports on how many of the 515 people injured were actually shot versus trampled or hurt in some other fashion. Also, police reports that are emerging differ on the duration of the shooting. The NY Times is talking about roughly 7 minutes. Newsweek suggests the duration is longer.

Nevertheless, the background of the purported shooter, Stephen Paddock, gives no indication of any competence with auto weapons, gives no indication he could have dealt with the problems and challenges of using such a weapon---and on top of that, his state of mind at the time, as an non-professional, would have been unstable, to say the least.

Any reasonable law-enforcement group investigating this mass shooting would certainly keep its options open, regarding other perpetrators. But that is not what is happening here. The books are closed on this case. There is no going back.

The desired result has been achieved. One shooter, mass k*****gs. End of story. Objective achieved.

That rush to judgment and "closure" is also a prime feature of the false f**g. It has to be.
And the HITS just keep coming as the scumbag autho... (show quote)

Assuming for the moment that the shooting was a "False F**g Operation" (FFO), who would gain? Rapoport suggests gun control advocates. Given the overwhelming response to previous mass American shootings being no new gun control laws, but instead significant increases in gun and ammunition sells and increases in stock prices for their manufacturers. It might be more reasonable to assume the FFO was meant to cash in on this typical American response. We're not Australians after all.
Go to
Sep 28, 2017 20:24:47   #
padremike wrote:
If you do not understand the meaning of patriotism, if it does not live and burn in your heart, you must be a Progressive.

Well, there are those who release the heat of that burn in the form of hot air, and there are those who turn that heat into work for greater justice.
Go to
Sep 26, 2017 20:42:38   #
Carol Kelly wrote:
It may well be that Trump started this, but it was long past due. So good for him. They are not the gods they think they are. Patriotism is the responsibility of each and every-
one of us. B****s are not given special dispensation.

And who is to say what patriotism is?

Is it the adherence to particular ritual forms?
Or is it adherence to the principles that define the substance of our country?

As attributed to, Carl Schurz, 1872.

“My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right.”
Go to
Sep 26, 2017 01:49:00   #
Docadhoc wrote:
If you don't know, there is no point to talking with.you.

Just keep reading your sources. Apparently you believe in what they say.

If you ever ran a large business.you might have an inkling.

What about Blue Cross/Blue Shield supports your contention that "cost rises exponentially"?
Go to
Sep 24, 2017 15:51:01   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>

So you dont believe any of this correct ?

To quote, "The Popes and the British Monarchs thus surreptitiously empowered have contrived to "redefine" the nature of government on Earth into a form of Commercial Feudalism."

I mean, really?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 77 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.