One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Oliver
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 26 next>>
Sep 10, 2015 11:03:08   #
Bad Bob wrote:
Who cares what your traditional Christian wackos do?


Who cares? I would say that there are millions of us "traditional wackos" who are very much concerned relative to the direction our formerly Judeo-Christian society has now taken into the abyss of destruction.
Go to
Sep 10, 2015 10:44:54   #
Richard94611 wrote:
Does that go for the books written but not included in the King James version ?


No, but the Apocrypha does contain some very interesting history and a few amusing myths. All other books not conforming to the scriptures of the King James version can be summarily dismissed as someone's unchecked imagination or someone's serious attempt to undermine God's word.
Go to
Sep 10, 2015 10:28:27   #
PeterS wrote:
How do you know there is no wiggle room if you don't know how god created man? You are assuming that when Moses took dictation he got it 100% correct. Well, evidence from the world around us says that he didn't...


"And the words of the Lord are flawless, like silver purified in a crucible, like gold refined seven times." Psalm 12:6 (NIV)

"Heaven and earth shall pass away but My words shall not pass away." Matthew 24:35

Did Moses get it 100% right? You bet he did!

Yes, it is "evidence" from a worldly perspective that says otherwise as all "evidence" looked at is always INTERPRETED according to the prevailing evolutionary "point-of-view". Unlike the forever changing evolutionary "points-of-view", God's word remains consistent from the beginning of time and has not changed since originally written. Even this world will pass away but God's word will remain intact forever.
Go to
Sep 10, 2015 10:12:33   #
reconreb wrote:
As you pointed out null and void, not rewriting law!!


Precisely right-on!
Go to
Sep 10, 2015 10:08:31   #
Bad Bob wrote:
Oliver, did ya ever hear about the thing called the Constitution?


Precisely, for no where in the Constitution does it give the JUDICIAL system the right or duty to "make" law.
Go to
Sep 5, 2015 16:12:50   #
unique wrote:
WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO SEPERATION
OF CHURCH AND STATE.

SHE WAS HIRED BY THE STATE TO DO A
JOB AND NOT MAKE JUDGEMENTS.


Now that you mention it: If, for the sake of argument, that there is such a thing as a "wall of separation between church and state" (there is absolutely no mention of the wall of separation between the church and state in all of the Constitution), then it must work BOTH WAYS; that is, the state cannot dictate to an individual what to say, think, or do.
Go to
Sep 5, 2015 16:06:28   #
JW wrote:
========================================================

That would be, au contraire, and your observation is welcomed but your partipation is pointless since you are uninterested in challenging your opinion. Please don't clutter the thread.


I wanted "oh" not "au". I am very glad my observation is welcome; but just who is it that is "uninterested in challenging" my "opinion"? Are you really not that interested in challenging your own opinion?

A cluttered thread, depending upon the "eye of the beholder" can be a thing of beauty. Who are you to judge?
Go to
Sep 5, 2015 15:28:29   #
She Wolf wrote:
I am not an attorney but it was my understanding the Supreme Court ruled gay marriages are legal. I may not agree with their ruling but now it is the law. There are many laws I feel are the legislating of morality and quite stupid. As long as they are laws, I am subject to them. Regardless of why, she broke the law.

Anyone who does not follow the law will be prosecuted. Is this right? No. A great many of our laws are petty but as long as they are the law, we are subject to them. As a public servant, she will be scrutinized more than the average person. We can't pick and choose the laws we obey.
I am not an attorney but it was my understanding t... (show quote)


Only the legislative branch of government (state or national) can "make" a law. The Judicial system (state or federal, including the supreme court) can not "make" any law. The Judicial system is charged with upholding the laws that have already been made by the legislative branch. The supreme Court can only offer its "opinion" as to whether or not something is constitutional. The Supreme Court is not authorized to "make" any law.

And it is solely here where the Supreme court overstepped its bounds as it rode rough-shod right over her 1st amendment rights and presumed that what everyone heard would be taken as ultimate "law" when in fact it was no more than an "opinion" and a very poorly executed one at best.

Please, if you have one, show me the legislative (NOT JUDICIAL) law where homosexual rights override the 1st amendment rights of us citizens.
Go to
Sep 5, 2015 15:02:15   #
JW wrote:
No one "believes" in evolution. Evolution is a fact and it has been proven repeatedly in the fossil record. Whale evolution is well documented as is that of birds and human beings.

Evolution is only nay-sayed by those who have no knowledge of what evidence there is.


Please be advised what William D. Stansfield (evolutionist scientist) admits in his book, The Science of Evolution: "It is obvious that radiometric techniques may not be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to be. Age estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often quite different (sometimes by hundreds of millions of years). There is no absolute reliable long-term radiological 'clock.' The uncertainties inherent in radiometric dating are disturbing to geologists and evolutionists..." And a s a true evolutionist, die-hard to the very last, he concludes the above with "...but their overall interpretation supports the concept [please note "concept", not "fact"] of a long history of geological evolution."

Oh, contraire! It is the fossil record that gives the most difficulty to any knowledgeable evolutionist as it, above everything else, shows absolutely NO T***SITIONAL FORMS of any lower species to an advanced one. As all fossils appear fully formed, evolutionist (not to be left without an answer) have come up with the form "punctuated"; that is, suddenly formed with very little to no t***sitional or intermediary forms. But that is just like grasping at the proverbial straw with tongue-in-cheek.

Oh, contraire! Whale, bird, and man's evolution have never been "well" documented for no scientific proof of observation has ever occurred and no experimentation has ever proved successful. Without observation and experimentation, there can never be any true science...only belief.

One can put their faith in a godless evolutionary system or in a Creator-Savior God Who did exactly what He said He had done in scripture.

As far as I am concerned, I will serve the living Lord and not a godless system.
Go to
Sep 4, 2015 13:03:43   #
Anigav6969 wrote:
True !.....k**l a million people....accept Jesus the next day and bam you go to heaven !!.......somehow that makes sense to some people here.....to me , not so much


That is why it is written:
1. "There is a way which seems right to man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." (Proverbs 14:12)
2. "For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength." (I Corinthians 1:25)
3. "For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My [God's] ways higher than your ways and My thoughts than your thoughts." Isaiah 55:9
4. "All those the Father gives Me will come to Me; and WHOSOEVER comes to Me I will never drive away." John 8:37

The 1st verse and refrain of the "The Love of God is Greater Far" say it very well:
"The love of God is greater far than tongue or pen can ever tell;
"It goes beyond the highest star and reaches to the lowest hell;
"The guilty pair, bowed down with care, God gave His Son to win;
"His erring child He reconciled, and pardoned from his sin."

Refrain: "O love of God, how rich and pure!, how measureless and strong!, it shall forevermore endure--the saints' and angels song."
Go to
Aug 25, 2015 16:35:28   #
RETW wrote:
Poll - 10057 - Should Barack Obama be impeached?

Should Barack Obama be impeached?
1. Yes, if Obama isn’t guilty of “high crimes and misdemeanors” then the phrase has no meaning (90.5%)
2. No, he has done nothing that rises to the level of an impeachable offense (6.19%)
Not Answered (3.20%)
How would you describe your political opinion?
1. Conservative (55.8%)
2. Liberal (3.27%)
3. Independent (28.6%)
4. other (9.00%)
Not Answered (3.19%)


So I ask again what is stopping congress from acting?
\
RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)
Poll - 10057 - Should Barack Obama be impeached? b... (show quote)


What is stopping congress from acting?
Most everyone is complicit in the same crimes in which are those on the opposite side of the isle. To call one person to task and to give and accounting would bring themselves into the same scrutiny and complicity. And those not complicit either have not the "guts" to do so or are more interested in the security of their jobs than in serving the American people.
Go to
Aug 25, 2015 16:11:38   #
WARRIOR wrote:
1. How is it that certain individuals i.e. Obama, McCain, can have information about themselves sealed for life. They serve " We the people " we have a right to know about who we really have in office.

2. As recently stated again " The Supreme Court does not make laws. it only offer an opinion " If that is the case why are Americans accepting " their opinion " on Same-sex marriage as a law. It is NOT!!
There again why are county clerks being forced to hand out marriage licences to same sex couples?
1. How is it that certain individuals i.e. Obama,... (show quote)


For three very good reasons:
1. Ignorance is bliss. That is, they are ignorant of our so-called check & balance system of democracy: the legislative branch (the law making body), the judicial branch (the body authorized to carryout the already established laws), and the executive branch (those mandated to enforce the laws of the land).
2. It is far easier to have others do one's thinking for them than for one to think on their own. That is, it is far easier to accept someone else's homework then to do your own homework.
3. We are a people of "itching ears" who prefer to have our ears "tickled" with entitlement than to listen to the t***h. That is, we are a people whose political party and its favorite "sons" are all that matters and the t***h be damned. And to many, their political party and its favorite "sons" are their t***h, the whole t***h, and nothing but the t***h and anyone who says differently is to again be damned.
Go to
Aug 21, 2015 10:41:59   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
COMPROMISING ON PRINCIPLES IS COSTING US OUR COUNTRY


By Coach Dave Daubenmire
August 20, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

Show Me the Law

Conservatives are always on the retreat. In fact, our constant giving of ground has created a government that no longer even follows its own laws.

The conservative “battle” goes something like this: “Sodomy is illegal because it violates God’s law.” So the “Supreme” Court decides to legalize it.

“OK”, says the conservatives, “but we aren’t baking any cakes for homo weddings.” The “Supreme” Court then says it is illegal to refuse to do so because it “discriminates” against homos.

“OK”, says the conservatives, “but no way are we going to let them get married.” The “Supreme” Court then rules that homos can get married.

The conservatives respond, “OK, but no way will we violate our conscience.” “Oh yes you will”, says the “Supreme” Court, because of the equal protection clause.

“OK”, says the conservatives, “but we will make a law restoring our religious freedom and solicit funds from like-minded supporters to “fight” the evil.”

Round and round the mulberry bush the courts chase the conservatives…

The reason we end up running up against all the legal mumbo jumbo is because we always end up fighting the wrong battles. The homo marriage and the a******n issues are classic examples of this failed strategy. Just show me the law.

So much of what you and I choose to believe is simply not true. Do you really want to be set free? Then stop believing lies! We have all been programmed with cleverly crafted lies and propaganda. It has often been stated that if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the t***h.

Hold on folks, I am about to give you a dose of real T***h. You don’t have to believe it, but it’s still the T***h. Until we are willing to challenge the lies that we’ve been taught and fight back on the proper premise, we will continue running around the tree trying to head off the wolf at the pass.

The “Supreme” Court does not make laws, it simply offers opinions on whether or not a “law” meets Constitutional muster. If the law violates the Constitution, then the law is remanded back to the Legislative branch so that the law can be re-written to fall in line with the Constitution. This is how our government is supposed to create laws.

Bear in mind that offering an “opinion” does not change the law. They just tell us that it does and we believe their lies. We then repeat their lies and teach them to others. The lies soon become “t***h”, although it is not The T***h. I’ll say it again. Courts do not make laws.

A******n is not legal anywhere in America. That’s right, there is no Federal Law on the books regarding a******n. None! There is a “Supreme” Court opinion called Roe v Wade, but that is merely an opinion…not a law! They just tell us that it is and we believe them, follow the lie, and teach it to others.

In fact, if you were to ask any judge anywhere to show you the a******n law, he or she would have to refer you to state law because that is the only place you will find any law regarding a******n. In 30 U.S. states a******n is illegal. In the other 20 states it is legal only with exceptions for the life or health of the mother.

Access to a******ns of “convenience” is illegal in all 50 states. A “Supreme” Court decision cannot and does not change the law. They just tell us that it does, and we, like gullible subjects, believe them.

Planned Parenthood has been violating the law in all 50 states and should be closed, and all of the directors and a******nists should go to prison as accessories to murder. That is the law of the land, and that is the T***h.

The same T***h also applies to homo marriage. Before the recent “opinion” of the “Supreme” Court, marriage was strictly between a man and a woman in 39 states. 11 states had legalized it through the legislative process, 3 by direct e******n of the people, and 8 by action of State Legislatures. Today, marriage is still illegal in all 39 of the states where the law is still on the books. The “Supreme” Court cannot change the law, but can only offer opinions about it.

Interestingly enough, there actually was a Federal Law regarding homo-marriage. It was called the Defense of Marriage Act and was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1996. The activist courts illegally overturned it by judicial fiat in 2013; however this did not nullify the law that was on the books. They only told us that it did, and we believed it, and told others to believe it.

This is called Judicial Tyranny and it has radically t***sformed the direction of this nation. Laws can only be made by one of two ways in America: by an act of the Legislative Branch, or by a citizen’s initiative through a direct v**e of the people. Courts can never make laws. They just tell us that they can, and we believe it, and teach it to others until the lie eventually becomes accepted as “t***h.”

A******n is still against the law. Marriage is still the union of one man and one woman. There is no separation between the church and the state as is currently accepted in America. They just tell us there is, we believe it, and we teach the lie to others.

We have to begin to push back. We must attack the lies head on. They have distracted us and they have us focusing on “religious liberty” or “conscience” or “deeply held religious beliefs.”, but those are the wrong arguments. We must stand and fight on the T***h. Courts do not make laws. A court decision does not carry the force of law, and it most certainly does not “change” the law. A******n is illegal, homo marriage is a fraud, and religious values cannot be separated from government.

It's time to make one simple request of the judges: Show me the law! Show me the law that legalizes a******n. Show me the law that legalizes homo-marriage. Show me the law that separates church and state.

Show me the law…

© 2015 Dave Daubenmire - All Rights Reserved
COMPROMISING ON PRINCIPLES IS COSTING US OUR COUNT... (show quote)


Thank you for your excellent post. Thank you for seeing through the spin of "law" v "opinion" and calling our attention to it. You are right-on for no court (including the Supreme Court) has the authority to make any law. Laws can only be created through the legislative process and the authority (responsibility) of all courts is solely to enforce those laws.
Go to
Aug 15, 2015 11:01:02   #
Anigav6969 wrote:
Can't you make up your own mind ? A sin is a sin in Gods eyes....murder 1 or murder a million....same thing....you support murder....you're going to hell


Yes, a sin is a sin and "The wages of sin is death" regardless whether it is one or more "white" sins or "black" sins; however, 1 murder never EQUALS 1,000,000 murders as any elementary student can tell you. The sin of the former is compounded by a million in the latter.

And yes, the sin of 1 murder will get you the same place as 1 million murders; but the great news is that whether 1 or a million, "the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord."
Go to
Aug 10, 2015 08:45:31   #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Threatened? It is impossible to be afraid of something you know that doesn't exist! Only those with weak minds worship false idols!


Stephan Hawking is right when he says that religion is based on authority but that is the major problem with "religion" as all religions are based upon the authority of one or more persons; therefore, they are all subject right from the start with fallibility. The only "religion" (if you can call it that) that is based upon the infallible person of God (Jesus Christ) is Christianity. True Christianity is not a "religion" but a "relationship" with one's Creator and Savior. If I had a "religion" with my wife she would have thrown me out right from the start.

Again Stephan Hawking is right when he says that science "is based on observation and reason"; but herein lies another insurmountable problem of whose observation and whose reason. Fallible man's of course! No true scientist will ever say that his observations and reasonings are infallible. Garbage in, garbage out.

As God is the very Author of all true science (How He "scientifically" created and put the universes and everything in them together); yes, "science will win because it works" as it follows the Creator's principles of all the sciences which He established from the very beginning.

However, the great travesty concerning Stephen Hawking is that in his p***e and arrogance he held this t***h in unrighteousness. It is too bad that Mr. Hawking did not take to heart the reading of Luke 13:10-17 where Christ set free the woman with an eighteen year infirmity and could not straighten herself up. This would have been a far greater hope for Him to enter into his heavenly Father's care than for him to hopelessly enter his satanic father's "care" for all eternity. What a travesty and a shame. "The fool has said in his heart that there is no God." Psalm 14:1
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 26 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.