The San Francisco Chronicle writes:

A student senator at UC Berkeley abstained from a v**e supporting t*********r rights last week, then took a moment to explain her thinking. Now, more than 1,000 people have signed a petition demanding that she resign from student government or face a recall.

Hundreds packed a Senate meeting Wednesday night to insist that she go. On social media, students labeled her a “horrible person” and a “mental imbecile.” Her campus political party severed ties with her. And the Daily Californian, UC Berkeley’s storied student newspaper, ran an editorial critical of her statements and refused to publish her written defense.

The uproar began Oct. 31, when the Q***r Alliance Resource Center asked the student Senate to pass a bill condemning the Trump administration for considering a legal definition of g****r that would require it to match a person’s sex at birth…

Reading a five-paragraph statement explaining her decision, Chow told her 18 fellow senators, who all v**ed for the bill (another was absent), that discrimination “is never, ever OK.”

“That said,” Chow continued, v****g for the bill would compromise her values and force her to promote groups and identities she disagrees with.

“As a Christian, I personally do believe that certain acts and lifestyles conflict with what is good, right and true,” she said. “I believe that God created male and female at the beginning of time, and designed sex for marriage between one man and one woman…”

Student Senator Chow was never given the opportunity to defend herself.

The campus newspaper would not publish her op-ed defending her position and her beliefs.

L*****ts are engaging in a campaign to “de-platform” Chow so they can have free rein to smear her and rile up their “mob” protesters.

In an interview with a local TV news station, one protestor even said Chow’s beliefs are “not valid.”



The school administration – which at one time professed to support the First Amendment – has not taken any action to condemn protesters threatening Chow for her religious beliefs.

UC Berkeley recently updated their “Free Speech” policy with the stated claim to protect First Amendment rights of all students and faculty.
her
Yet once again, the radical left is getting their way in censoring anyone that disagrees with them.

Do you think Isabella Chow should be forced to resign from the UC Berkeley Student Government for her Christian beliefs?

You seem to disregard the obfuscation that Obama intentionally caused in presenting his birth certificate for review, how long it took, and the several questions never satisfactorily answered regarding it.

What concerns me still is that his mother was a c*******t. His father was a c*******t. His American grandparents were c*******ts. His mentor, some claim his real father, was a c*******t. In college he associated with c*******ts as reported in his book. He was a heavy drug addict and he attended a Marxist church. So riddle me this, with this background he was unquestionably ineligible for military service and also a security clearance. How was he ever allowed to become president and Commander-In-Chief? This goes straight to the FBI. Something is very wrong here! There's something stinking in the corrupt woodpile.

I just want to remind you liberal Goobers that the Muslims are taking complete advantage of 'your' stupidity.

They are busy undermining your democrat party because your dumb leaders are the most gullible elected morons in the nation's history.

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are a national embarrassment and a national security threat because of their ignorance.

And the rest of you l*****t quacks have had your brains washed into atrophy.

Islam is the enemy of liberty and it should be swept from our shores immediately.

And since you dolts are too ignorant to understand the depth of what could result from the growing presence of Islam in America, I take it upon myself to inform you this.

Your ignorance is what they rely on to infiltrate your own house.

Keith Ellison, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, André Carson.

They should be ejected from their seats and sent packing over to Mecca.

And you dupes need a thorough education on patriotism.

The Naturalization Act of 1790 was an extreme ban that kept Muslims at bay.

So Trump ain't the first American to implement a ban on Muslims.

The act was totally r****t but since you whiners label everything you disagree with as r****t, it doesn't come as a surprise.

If being r****t means keeping America free of the threat posed by Islam, then you better learn to be a r****t... Goober .

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-anti-muslim-stance-echoes-a-us-law-from-the-1700s/2016/08/18/6da7b486-6585-11e6-8b27-bb8ba39497a2_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.def02fc343c6

Here: U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor in Fort Worth agreed with a coalition of Republican states led by Texas that he had to eviscerate the Affordable Care Act, the signature health-care overhaul by President Barack Obama, after Congress last year zeroed out a key provision -- the tax penalty for not complying with the requirement to buy insurance. The decision is almost certain to be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court.

“Today’s ruling is an assault on 133 million Americans with preexisting conditions, on the 20 million Americans who rely on the ACA’s consumer protections for health care, and on America’s faithful progress toward affordable health care for all Americans,” California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement. A spokeswoman for Becerra said an appeal will be filed before Jan. 1.

Texas and an alliance of 19 states argued to the judge that they’ve been harmed by an increase in the number of people on state-supported insurance rolls. They claimed that when Congress repealed the tax penalty last year, it eliminated the U.S. Supreme Court’s rationale for finding the ACA constitutional in 2012.

The Texas judge agreed.

I’ve got news for you: Row vs Wade isn’t part of the constitution.

A baby with a heartbeat isn’t a mere blob, it’s a life, and that’s a biological fact. Snuffing out a human life is called murder. Murdering an innocent life in order to remove responsibility from sex is not a guaranteed “right”, but, protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the foundation of our Constitutional Republic.

So for all your appearances of being pro-Constitutional, you’ve completely missed the whole point of it and set yourself in opposition to its core principles!

HYPOCRITE!!! MURDERER!!! Baby K**ler!!! People who justify murder under the pretext of law are the worst, because they have no conscience!

Burned bodies after two rival gangs clash in Mexico is a "national crisis" for our nation? Pfft, more like an average Friday night down there. The Trumpublicans had two years to fund Herr Hair's wall, isn't it funny how it became a "crisis" only when the DEMs took control of the House?

Even GOP Senators from the border regions see the lunacy of funding a wall: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trumps-border-wall-every-congressperson-along-southern-border-opposes-border-wall-funding-2019-1-8/

Trump's real goal with his shutdown was to hamper the judiciary and the FBI investigations as well as placating his ever-shrinking base, 36% of the nation, who lap up his swill. The majority mandate he will never claim are opposed to it.