Very good post Dutchman -- this is all very frightening. Obama has been catering to Islam from the beginning. He has shunned our long-time friends in Israel, and given strength to Islam across the middle east. Why would you give arms to Al-Qaeda to fight Syria, our long-time friend. And why would you drop economic sanctions against Iran over a handshake that they will dev**e nuclear development to only peaceful purposes. We are Islams sworn enemy. They will shake hands, nod, and wink; but never hold their end of the bargain. And why would you give a free ticket to thousands of them to settle in the country? It's as though Obama wants Islam to succeed.

Very good post Dutchman -- this is all very frightening. Obama has been catering to Islam from the beginning. He has shunned our long-time friends in Israel, and given strength to Islam across the middle east. Why would you give arms to Al-Qaeda to fight Syria, our long-time friend. And why would you drop economic sanctions against Iran over a handshake that they will dev**e nuclear development to only peaceful purposes. We are Islams sworn enemy. They will shake hands, nod, and wink; but never hold their end of the bargain. And why would you give a free ticket to thousands of them to settle in the country? It's as though Obama wants Islam to succeed.

Islamic militant group that captured two major cities last week posted graphic photos that appeared to show its fighters massacring dozens of captured Iraqi soldiers.
The pictures on a militant website appear to show masked fighters of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, or ISIL, loading the captives onto flatbed trucks before forcing them to lie face-down in a shallow ditch with their arms tied behind their backs. The final images show the bodies of the captives soaked in blood after being shot.
The grisly images could further sharpen sectarian tensions as hundreds of Shiites heed a call from their most revered spiritual leader to take up arms against the Sunni militants who have swept across the north. ISIL has vowed to take the battle to Baghdad and cities further south housing revered Shiite shrines.
A car bomb meanwhile exploded in central Baghdad, k*****g 10 and wounding 21, according to police and hospital officials. Baghdad has seen an escalation in suicide and car bombings in recent months, mostly targeting Shiite neighborhoods or security forces.

So, is this what 40 billion US dollars buys us with Obama and the democrats at the helm? Yes it is. No democrat has won a war since 1945, Harry Truman did. If you where paying attention back in 2008 you heard him say he wanted gas to cost $5.00 plus, well you soon will see it, remember he has 2 more years for fundamentally change America, look's to me he is well on his way.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/06/15/Militants-post-images-of-mass-k*****g-in-Iraq

The sketchy details surrounding the shooting in Las Vegas of two police officers as they ate pizza, gives me cause for grave concern. People armed with guns, k*****g cops and shouting “revolution” should always concern us, much as the Manson “Helter Skelter” murders concerned the country in 1969.

Because while some may say that the shooting is an isolated incident, I think it could be a trend if the country doesn’t draw away from the precipice from which we are currently perched. Like the Manson murders, the shooting represents in microcosm much of the action and reaction created by a decade of h**e disguised as love.

I’m concerned of course for the families of the victims above all else. And I’m concerned for the city of Las Vegas, which is kind of a second home to me. I spent most of 2010 in Las Vegas educating v**ers about the issues important to conservatives.

So I know and love many people who call Las Vegas home.

But I’m concerned on another level for the country right now.

And if, as initial reports indicate, this was the work of w***e s*********ts, I lay it off all on Obama. In fact, it almost doesn’t matter who it was shooting and shouting “revolution”—it could have been liberals from union local 1180-- somewhere down in there the motive drive at work was the worst, most d******e president we have ever had in this country.

That he’s a black man just makes matters even worse and more concerning.

Because we have come full circle in race relations where the party on the Left argues that their brand of r****m is a positive good. Obama is their hero, their drummer and the chief propagandist of an ideology that counts color of skin over content of character.

And if there is a segment of the conservative movement that’s tinged by r****m-- like every cross section of society-- then there is no part of the Democratic party that isn’t obsessed with it. Liberals have created a kind of segregation of thought and community that divides every American against our own house.

And race is just one component of this.

Class, g****r, income, age, religion—all of the things we have been told shouldn’t matter at work, home or in the classroom—are the only things that seem to be of the moment for progressives under Obama.

The guy who was going to lead us into the post-racial age, according to gushing predictions by the news media, is instead all-racial, all the time.

I don’t know that Obama h**es white people, like some have claimed. But I certainly know this much: the man h**es someone, a lot.

It would be hard to find a person who has benefited so much from, the tolerance, good will and decency at the heart of America—as Obama has-- who has so much contempt for the things that make that tolerance, good will and decency possible.

And while Obama stokes the embers of r****m, good people, black, white, brown, men, women and teenagers need jobs.

Obama could care less about jobs.

All he cares about is remaking America into something that he approves of and he’ll do it by force if he has to.

As a consequence, revolution is openly talked about in a way that would have been unthinkable twenty years ago. Revolution, as Americans distinctly and historically view it, is privately considered even by generous, just and sober people, and not just the people on the margins.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, says our founding document, the Declaration of Independence, “pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security…. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

This column has no room to submit to a candid world all the usurpations of Obama, but I do submit this one: Obama has usurped our God-given right to be what we want, through our own efforts, regardless of our race, creed, religion or g****r. He has usurped, in other words, our “pursuit of happiness.”

And as long as that’s true, I expect k*****gs like those in Las Vegas, Santa Monica, Colorado and the Navy Yard to continue. The k*****gs will come from black and white, rich and poor, men and women, liberals and conservatives, as they have in the past.

It’s a kind of Helter Skelter, Obama style, after a decade of h**e disguised as love.

John Ransom, Townhall.com

Did you ever wonder what the difference between the two is?
A young black kid ask his Mother, Mama what's Socialism and R****m?"
"Well son, Socialism is when white folks work every day so we can get all our benefits. You knows, like free cell phones for each family member, rent subsidy, food stamps, EMC, free healthcare, utility subsidy, free computers and Internet connection, free food, free clothing, free gifts at Christmas, and on and on, you knows? That's Socialism".

"But Mama, don't the white people get pissed off about that?"

"Sure they do son, that's called R****m!"

With Morsi gone as president of Egypt and El Sissi in his place, Israel is once again considered to be Egypt's friend and Hamas is an enemy. What a change! This is the nation that was taken over by the Muslim Brotherhood in alliance with Al Qaeda, with the assistance and approval of Barack Obama. It was Obama who withdrew our financial aid when Morsi was booted out by a massive uprising of the Egyptian people, Obama who demanded Morsi, the Islamist and dictator, be re-instated. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/06/08/el-sissi-takes-reins-3-big-things-to-know-about-egypt-new-pharaoh/?intcmp=latestnews

But then Russia stepped in and offered to provide the money, and military support, that Obama had withdrawn and he had no choice but to back off or lose any hold on Egypt entirely. Another international policy triumph by our Muslim in Chief.

"For the time being, Sisi is fighting our enemies, who are also Egypt's own, and has even increased cooperation with our friends, the Israelis." I bet that has our head Muslime frothing at the mouth.

It won’t help the peace process in any way, because we don’t believe in the peace process.” - Zabihullah Mujahid, Taliban spokesman

The Bowe Bergdahl saga continues on as now even the Afghans are furious about Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s trade of five Taliban terrorists for one American t*****r.

And why shouldn't they be as these terrorists will now put a bulls eye on any and all Afghans who they even suspect of aiding the Americans, treating them as if they were Americans themselves. Gives new meaning to Obama's infamous line about standing with the Muslims if political winds shift in an ugly direction...now doesn't it.

In fact, these five...the five highest-ranking members of the Afghan Taliban...were classified as being “high-risk” and “likely to pose a threat” by the Pentagon, so Afghan President Hamid Karzai being beyond angry at his being kept in the dark about this trade, more than justifies his public declaration accusing Obama of NOT only failing to back a peace plan for his country but of actually throwing a wrench into it. And now he's even more distrustful of U.S. intentions than he was before, and rightly so, for Karzai knows firsthand what the Taliban are capable of, and he is more than a bit fearful of their return to the battlefield to feed into and egg-on the insurgency just as we are preparing to leave the country...and they know the date for that as our t*****r-in-chief announced said date for the enemy to hear and to prepare for.

And in a statement he issued, Karzai went so far as to say that this trade violated international law and had possible regional repercussions... especially for Pakistan and India. And he also criticized the deal as a violation of international law. “No government can t***sfer citizens of a country to a third country as prisoners” Karzai said, and he's right as five of its citizens have now been handed over to a third country as prisoners.

But more important than either international law violations or regional fallout is the fact that this trade also violated our U.S. laws in the very nature of its handover of said Taliban to a third country ...specially to a country we have NO t***sfer agreements with.

According to our own Justice Department, NO prisoner should be traded if said prisoner "has criminal ties to the receiving country, as t***sferring him could well be more likely to facilitate reintegration into his criminal milieu than to facilitate rehabilitation into civil society." And of course these five have criminal ties in Qatar as the main Taliban office is located in Qatar...an office that is directly connected to the Taliban military command back in Afghanistan.

Also, according to our Justice Department's 'Guidelines for the Evaluation of T***sfer Applications of Federal Prisoners,' the United States can only t***sfer a prisoner to a country with which it...the U.S...has a prisoner t***sfer treaty agreement and of which the prisoner is a citizen. Now remember, the terrorists were NOT freed per se, but were 't***sferred' to the custody of the Qataris but they are NOT citizens of Qatar...they are Afghan citizens being t***sferred to a third country...that being Qatar...so right there the t***sfer was ILLEGALLY done and done by knowingly breaking our laws by Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

And this next little bit of information is a biggie folks as the U.S. does NOT...I repeat NOT...have a prisoner exchange agreement, a bilateral t***sfer agreement, or any such t***sfer agreement NOT only NOT with Qatar, in fact, we have NO such agreements in place with Afghanistan or Pakistan either...all countries involved to one degree or another with Berghdal and his captivity. And you can see the list of those countries we do have t***sfer agreements with right on the Justice Department web site itself by clicking on this link: http://www.justice.gov/criminal/oeo/iptu/lists.htm...

So here we have proof positive that Barack HUSSEIN Obama knowingly, willfully, and with malice ...as he knew what this t***sfer ultimately means for the Afghans... broke the laws of the United States of America...and this sitting Congress still does NOTHING but talk the talk instead of walking the walk.

And besides this being a form of 'aiding and abetting the enemy' during a time of war...a treasonable offense in and of itself...this prisoner exchange is a move done by this president...besides to appease his islamic brethren...for NOTHING but political expediency as it disengages us from the Afghan war theater by a date sure to influence v**es in the November mid-term e******ns, especially the v**es of those Americans tired of this long drawn out war...a war gone on too long simply because America's 'supposed' Commander-in-Chief has our soldiers NOT being allowed to fight to win, but who are being forced to fight solely to 'win the hearts and minds' of the enemy...something this White House knew from the start would never happen.

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/06/07/5-high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-for-which-obama-deserves-to-be-impeached-n1848789/page/2

5 High Crimes And Misdemeanors For Which Obama Deserves To Be Impeached

1) For Illegally Changing Obamacare: It doesn't matter if the Affordable Care Act is called "Obamacare;" Barack Obama doesn't have the authority to unilaterally change the law. Changes to the law have to be made by Congress and then signed into law by the President. Barack Obama has broken the law repeatedly by making at least 23 unilateral changes to the law. Saying, "The Republicans won't work with us," or more disturbingly, "It's politically convenient," is not an excuse for overriding the Constitution of the United States.

2) Engaging In An Illegal War In Libya: While the President is the Commander-in-Chief, the Constitution gives Congress the ability to declare war. In the modern era, that has just meant an authorization of force from Congress, which Obama did not pursue. Additionally, we've tended to give Presidents the benefit of the doubt when American lives are at stake. However, in Libya, Obama didn't seek the permission of Congress and we had no national security interest in Libya. In other words, Obama's real justification for bombing that country and o*******wing its government was that HE FELT LIKE IT. Using the exact same precedent, the next President could bomb Mexico or Cuba without Congressional authorization. Incidentally, bombing either of those nations would probably make more sense than bombing Libya, although that's not saying much since our intervention there has been a complete disaster.

3) Lying To Sell Obamacare To The American People: When Barack Obama told the public if they liked their plan, they could keep their plan, he was lying. When he told Americans if they liked their doctor, they could keep their doctor, he knew it wasn't so. When he told Americans Obamacare would cut costs by $2,500 for the average family, he was deliberately misleading the public. For a President of the United States to PERSONALLY spend months telling deliberate falsehoods to the American people in order to convince them to support something as massive as a government takeover of the health care system is beyond the pale. If the wilful lies Barack Obama told to sell Obamacare don't merit impeachment, then there are no lies that a President could tell to the American people big enough to merit impeachment.

4) Violating I*********n L*w And Illegally Implementing The DREAM ACT: Simply put, Barack Obama has ceased to enforce most i*********n l*w. As Senator Jeff Sessions has noted, “at least 99.92% of i*****l i*******ts and visa overstays without known crimes on their records did not face removal.” In other words, we've already stopped deporting anyone other than SOME hardcore criminals and gang members. Additionally, when the DREAM ACT didn't make it through Congress, Obama simply implemented it ANYWAY. Not only is he explicitly telling i*****l a***ns they can stay in the United States, he's illegally giving them work permits that he has zero right to offer. Even if Congress is too split on the issue to unify and put a stop to what Obama's doing, that doesn't change the fact that it’s flatly illegal. If this is allowed to stand, tell me ANY LAW on the books that the President is obligated to enforce?

5) Releasing 5 Taliban Terrorists In Exchange For Deserter Bowe Bergdahl: Barack Obama was legally required to alert Congress 30 days before he released terrorists from Gitmo. Not only did he fail to do so, but more seriously he released five high level terrorists who he knew were likely to help k**l Americans in the future. One of the terrorists has ALREADY SAID he intends to go back to Afghanistan to fight America. Barack Obama spent a lot of time bragging about getting Bin Laden, but he just released five Bin Ladens back into the world and a lot of Americans who didn't desert their country are likely to die because of it.

"Is Washington really stupid or just so arrogant they have lost all grasp on reality?"

Obama never had a grasp on reality, so how can he loose it? He is also stupid. He thinks the world revolves around him, but I have news for him, it doesn't. Obama thinks the world will always do what he says, but then again, maybe he is getting bad information form Jared. She isn't so smart either. Just because he wants something doesn't mean he is going to get it. He has been in office for 6 years and he is still stupid enough to think that the entire world will do everything he wants. I got news for him, he still doesn't know how the world works.