One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Olden McGroen
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 65 next>>
Mar 13, 2016 10:10:15   #
eagleye13 wrote:
Senator Ted Cruz has been inconsistent in his "conservativism". A lot of lying maybe?
Republicans must make sure Cruz is not a fraud. Frauds are very dangerous. They sell their supporters out.
The CFR is not Conservative. It promotes a one world government. The CFR has been vetting candidates in both parties for the NWO Bilderbergers. This has gone on for decades.

I wish Ted Cruz was for real. A true Conservative; BUT
What if he is another fraud?
Real old line Conservatives have had enough of those.
With so much at stake in 2016 for our country, we simply can't afford to get another fraud as the Republican Nominee.
We need a President who we can trust. We need a President who means it when they promise to defend our liberty.
Sadly, Senator Ted Cruz has just not been an authentic, genuine voice when it comes to defending liberty.

For example, since even before his e******n to the U.S. Senate, Senator Cruz pledged to help Rand Paul Audit the Fed.
Then, when a U.S. Senate v**e on Audit the Fed was forced; -- after fighting side-by-side the Liberty Movement for five years -- Senator Cruz couldn't be bothered to show up.
He was too busy campaigning.
Now we learned he failed to disclose a large loan from Goldman Sachs, and his other ties to Wall Street are coming to light as well.
It's hard not to wonder if his claims to support Audit the Fed aren't just a bunch of hot air -- especially given his actions on other issues.
Last year, when the fight to force Section 215 of the so-called "PATRIOT Act" was set to expire -- the section of federal code the NSA used to justify their bulk collection of innocent Americans' phone records -- Senator Cruz claimed to be advocate for reform.
Then, despite Rand's loud objections, Cruz v**ed to pass the so-called "USA Freedom Act."
Just weeks ago, in a debate exchange with Senator Rubio, we found out why. It had nothing to do with reform.
Senator Cruz stated he supported the USA Freedom Act because "The old program only covered 20 to 30 percent of phone numbers . . . The new program covers nearly 100%.”
That's right. Senator Cruz admitted he's for more spying and more data collection on American citizens.
He's also called for making "sand glow in the dark" in the Middle East. Those are NeoCON sentiments. The NeoCONs got America in the Middle East mess it is in.
After the foreign policy disasters of the last two Presidents, the last thing we need are more military interventions that only work to embolden radical Islamists like ISIS.
It's time for the boots on the ground in the Middle East to be Arab boots on the ground -- not Americans'.
We've gotten precious little in return for the precious lives and resources.
The Liberty Movement understands that, and Senator Cruz doesn't. Cruz's wife was/is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations also. This should be a red f**g also.
Conservatives must not get played again
There's just too much at stake. MEET HEIDI CRUZ - TED'S NEW WORLD ORDER WIFE
http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/meet-heidi-cruz-teds-new-world-order-wife/
Senator Ted Cruz has been inconsistent in his &quo... (show quote)
==========================================================================

Thanks for this laughable material. Now, put down the Trump-aid and go do your research on Trump.

If you can, with a straight face, claim that Cruz is the one that's dishonest and Trump is on the up and up, then you get what you deserve. And that will be Hillary Clinton. Enjoy the next 8 years of Hillary's autocratic rule, because that's what's going to happen.

I don't want to hear one f*cking word from you Trumpsters when Hillary gets elected. She will get elected because of your blind stupidity.

It's 2008 & 2012 all over again. Add up the Sanders, Clinton and Trump supporters ...and about 3/4ths of this country is ate up with f*cking morons.
Go to
Mar 11, 2016 14:29:11   #
This is one of those, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" threads.

Meaning: One thing I can agree with liberals on is that Trump is unfit for the office of POTUS. Hence, we tend to vehemently agree to disagree with Trumpsters. On this we can unite.

Uhhhhh, but that's pretty much where the road ends on that little honeymoon..because I feel the same way about Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. Hillary should be in prison and Bernie, while he's well-intentioned, he's woefully misguided. His diagnosis of the problems are often correct, but his solutions are not.
Go to
Mar 11, 2016 14:23:00   #
Gatsby wrote:
PROFILE OF A TRUMP SUPPORTER:

"ONE WHO WOULD BITE OFF HIS OWN NOSE TO SPITE HIS FACE"

WILL THE TRAGIC HISTORY OF ROSS PEROT'S CANDIDACY PROPELLING THE VICTORY OF SLICK WILLY BE REPEATED BY A TRUMP CANDIDACY? IS THIS NOT HILLARY'S ONLY HOPE?
==========================================================================

Yes, indeedy, I believe you have it Watson! Good show!
Go to
Mar 11, 2016 14:20:37   #
Glaucon wrote:
How about ambiguous? Feel free to use it in your next rant.
==========================================================================

Ok, "Dodge", I will.

There's nothing ambiguous about Trump or Hillary's record, yet they are masters of using ambiguity to dodge questions. Bill Clinton wrote the book on it. You can add "equivocate" as a similar tactic as well.

How's that for a bonus word? I can go all day.

Of course, Trump would phrase it like, "I use the biggest and greatest words like, 'tremendous', which is my favorite of all the words, this I can tell you". "Believe me, It's a uuuuuge word that I use at least 100 times in a speech or interview".

Hillary would phrase it like, "I'm not going to dignify that question, besides...at this point, what difference does it make?"
Go to
Mar 11, 2016 10:57:44   #
Glaucon wrote:
If this guy is unable to impress you with his blind h**e, perhaps his vocabulary will: disingenuous? Lucidity? Ascertain? WOW! I am impressed with his vocabulary, not his blind h**e.
==========================================================================

You're almost as good at deflection as the Donald himself.

Read it again.

I agree with your assessment of Trump. How does that make me a h**er?

You made the statement about Trump. I agreed with it. I'd say that if there's any h**e involved, then there's culpability on both our parts. However, my agreement with you is based on facts, not on h**e.

Recognizing that you are a staunch liberal (from past posts) I noticed that while you cast stones at Trump, you missed the elephant in the room, so to speak. And that elephant is Hillary. If you can, with a straight face, tell me that Hillary is no less corrupt than Trump, then that is the very definition of disingenuous.

The short version of this thread is simply that you are being a hypocrite by calling out Trump and leaving out Hillary. They are equally corrupt and unfit for the office.

I hope "hypocrite" isn't too big of a word for you. If you don't know what it means, just go look in the mirror, or snap a quick selfie and have a look-see.
Go to
Mar 11, 2016 10:48:17   #
cesspool jones wrote:
Disingenuous is a big word
==========================================================================

Yet, precisely accurate, don't you think?
Go to
Mar 11, 2016 08:52:30   #
Glaucon wrote:
I think Trump is a con artist and I think we have had too many con men. America is better than to elect Trump. Some people do not agree that America doesn't deserve more than a con man, but they are the minority again.
==========================================================================

I would agree with your statement...except that you left out one glaring thing....HILLARY CLINTON.

If you can, with all lucidity, ascertain that Trump is a con man, but you can't make the same assertion about Hillary, then you are being disingenuous.
Go to
Mar 11, 2016 08:48:08   #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
You mean the ones support Hillary are smart???

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


For the love of Pete! We're still in the primaries.

Anyone with an ounce of integrity and intellect can clearly see that Trump has no in-depth knowledge of the issues. A couple of scatter-shot nonsensical rambling comments sprinkled with phrases that give the illusion that he knows what he's talking about (when he doesn't) isn't good enough for me. It may be good enough for the uneducated and weak-minded, but not for me.

Trump is an executive. He's a CEO. When is he going to start acting like it? When is he going to take the debate stage and school everyone on his command of the issues with in-depth analysis and smart solutions like any CEO" would do? WHEN?

Last night's debate was another shining example when Trump was questioned about Cuban foreign policy. Trump demonstrated that he has no idea, contrasted with Rubio's well-versed response. This happens over and over again in the debates where either Cruz or Rubio destroy Trump on policy issues. But, all Trump has to do is make a sophomoric snarky remark and his followers think he won the debate. WTF? Are you serious? THAT's what matters to you i***ts? Silly childish comeback remarks and insults?

Trump is not taking any of this seriously, because he's playing with house money. He's not wasting any of his valuable time away from "making deals" to enrich himself by studying up on all of these issues the country is facing. No, he's winging it. He's a used car salesman that has gotten by with bulls**tting and bluffing his way through life with the help of daddy's money...and his followers are so gullible and desperate to win, that they can't see the forest for the trees. Good friggin' golly people, wake up!!!!

And by the way, I don't have a problem with Trump enriching himself. I love capitalism and the free market. Although, I would consider Trump a crony-capitalist, but... That's not the point. The point is, he does what he does, says what he says and his followers do not take him to task on it.

For the sake of the Republic, you Trumpsters should do your civic and patriotic duty in really looking at Trump with honest eyes.

Won't matter though. If somehow Cruz eeks out the Rep Nom, Trump will run 3rd party and split the v**e. Hillary wins in every scenario. And that's why Trump is in the race to begin with. Trump is a Democratic mole sent by the Clintons to get her elected and it's working to perfection.

CRUZ 2016 - PRINCIPLE BEFORE PARTY
Go to
Mar 10, 2016 17:57:25   #
Glaucon wrote:
Trump will lose for a very important reason: America is better than that.
==========================================================================

Since we're still in the primaries, and you're a liberal, I'm assuming that you mean that he'll lose in the general against Hillary? He may lose the primary too, but he'll run 3rd Party Independent if he does.

If he wins the primary and gets the Rep Nom, he will indeed lose to Hillary...and it'll be because it was all set up by Bill/Hillary/Trump.

Trump campaigns like a man with nothing to lose. Ever wonder why? That's because he's looking ahead to the general. He wants to lose. He has not intention of winning in the general.
Go to
Mar 10, 2016 17:49:11   #
Trump is winning because people are stupid.
Go to
Mar 9, 2016 08:39:07   #
Mom8052 wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well................Trump is 100% defending the Second Amendment of the Constitution, dear Sir.

He has contributed copious amounts to Both Romney and the Bush's.

He has stated his positions at:

http://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions

Don't think you have the right to judge anyone. Stones are being throw at Trump, from Cruz, Rubio and H**e Groups in the Republican Party. Christian Conservatives...........I think not.

I was going to join your ranks, but I've decided that I will stay were I'm at. As the republican brand is a little bite tarnished because of the elite. So don't be pointing your skinny little finger at those that are tired of living hand to mouth, or working 2-3 jobs so the can pay their monthly Obamacare premiums as well as put food on the family table.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br Well........... (show quote)
==========================================================================

Trump's campaign platform is hardly tantamount to Cruz defending the constitution and bill of rights in the supreme court. One is saying what they have to say to get v**es, the other has quietly gone about the business of defending liberty.

I would also argue that Trump doesn't even know what his platform is. He demonstrated that in the debates. His knowledge of the issues and solutions are as shallow as his claim to be a conservative.

I have every right to judge a candidate running for the office of POTUS. I base my judgments on actual facts, not hearsay, sound-bites or bumper sticker rhetoric. Trump, or any other candidate that is running for public office, is subject to all due scrutiny by the people. That includes me. I'm one of the people. They work for us. They aren't royalty. They are servants, not the other way around. This campaign is a huge job interview and I, being an experienced manager , will ask the questions and do the background check on any potential employee.

Stones are being thrown at Trump? Everybody's thrown stones at everybody in this e******n and every e******n in history. It's politics. Where have you been your whole life? Trump is the front-runner, so of course he's going to receive the lion-share of the criticism. Cruz faced the same thing after winning Iowa. They called him a c***t and a liar. Did you have a problem with that? Of course not, because then it was politics and it wasn't thrown at your guy (Trump). Now that it is, you've got a huge problem with it.

Put down the koolaid, I think you've reached your legal limit.
Go to
Mar 9, 2016 08:17:26   #
Gatsby wrote:
Ted may not be the perfect candidate for everyone.

Ted IS he best hope that the United States Constitution has

There is no other candidate that I would trust as much to appoint Supreme Court justices who have demonstrated a firm belief in strict interpretation of the constitution and the bill of rights.

==========================================================================

Good to see the number of the sane growing on OPP.
Go to
Mar 8, 2016 13:45:06   #
snowbear37 wrote:
Cruz has a record one can look at and see that he is "conservative".

Trump has a record that is the opposite of what he says he believes in. He is a master salesman and has sold himself to many by "talking tough". It's anybody's guess as to whether he would conform to his campaign rhetoric or his past performance. I don't trust him.
==========================================================================

Nicely done!
Go to
Mar 7, 2016 14:03:41   #
Loki wrote:
I tend more toward the second version.
==========================================================================

I second that emotion.
Go to
Mar 7, 2016 13:39:12   #
America Only wrote:
Trump. President Trump.

Sadly for you, most of the USA really is sick and tired of you jerk wads that LOVE the c*******t agenda and the destruction of our Nation and our US Constitution. Well this time around, all of you dip sticks are in some deep doo doo! YOU are your phony baloney butt buddies are not going to be elected again. YOU are all done. People are wise now as to what you and your sick and pathetic gang is all about.

You say you don't believe in any miracles? Live and learn, buck wheat. The Miracle you have lived through is that main stream citizens have not taken up our Arms, and literally wiped all of you t*****rs off the face of the earth.

Now go find some articles written by some slime bag that suit your pathetic slime bag agenda. You are nothing but scum. Period.
Trump. President Trump. br br Sadly for you, most... (show quote)
==========================================================================

I'm a CRUZ supporter. There isn't a candidate in the race with more stellar record of defending the constitution...literally (Supreme Court). What has Trump ever done to defend the constitution?

CRUZ is the ONLY candidate in the race with a stellar record of fight against, Obama's agenda, the Democrats AND the Establishment Republicans. What has Trump ever done but contribute copious amounts quid pro quo money to the likes of Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and even Anthony Weiner...it goes on.

So, shove your stupid assumptions and irrational support for Trump where the sun don't shine you silly b***h.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 65 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.