One you haven't proven one thing I've posted is wrong. This coming from someone who complained that I didn't offer facts or sources for my claims...."Noticed right off the bat old Brucey who can't defend his positions with actual facts goes to the old and getting tiresome liberal playbook....". And you should run off because of all your unsubstantiated claims about Hillary. You better brush up on your "Alternative Facts", you're going to need them when you argue with people who have actual facts and the t***h on their side. One last thing about the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom, Conservatives tried to make it sound that this deal was a devastating blow to the U.S. because the Obama administration allowed Russia to buy a company that controlled twenty percent of the uranium produced in the U.S. Well the deal is actually meaningless. And personally I think Republicans couldn't care less about the sale, they just wanted something else to blame on Hillary. Something that their ignorant base would believe was a bad deal, for the U.S., and was entirely Hillary's fault. It was a made up crisis and quite simply a lie. What do you think would happen if we went to war with Russia? Do think we would allow them to continue to take the uranium produced in this country? This uranium deal is simply another chip the U.S. can use if we ever decide to impose sanctions on Russia. Which is highly unlikely as long as Trump and Putin are sleeping together.

I don't believe Hillary had more of a relationship with Putin than Trump did, but if she did it was only because she was Secretary of State. But didn't Trump receive the highest Russian medal a foreigner could receive, from Putin?

And do you really absolve all the other agencies, and the President, from responsibility, for not speaking out against the deal? Hillary is the only one to blame, because she failed to object to the sale? You're a work of art.

And btw learn to spell the loser, so people don't think the same about you.

Please stop, haven't you embarrassed yourself enough? Do you even read what you post? ..."I said Hillary was the only one involved in actually helping the Russians."... Are you serious? This statement alone is the basis of my argument. If the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom, which gave the Russians access to twenty percent of the uranium produced in the United States, benefitted the Russians, which I'm sure it did, then no one person or agency is solely responsible for the sale. Which means your assertion, that "Hillary was the only one involved in actually helping the Russians", is bogus. Your assertion is absolutely absurd. You're implying that no other member of CFIUS, or the POTUS, bore any responsibility for the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom? You have not offered a scintilla of evidence that what I posted is erroneous. And that means that you've offered no proof that Hillary was solely responsible for the sale. Give us proof that Hillary is the only one involved in helping the Russians. Btw witf, in your mind, is the difference between "solely responsible for" and "only one involved in"?

You don't have to believe me, you can remain ignorant. No one is stopping you from being an i***t, least of all me. I gave you an article that tells you how the misconception that Hillary Clinton was solely responsible for approving the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom got started. And how this misconception led to speculation that the approval of that sale was a quid pro quo t***saction for donations by the parties involved, to the Clinton Foundation. And all you could do is cite some Right Wing biased source that tries to discredit my source. You say nothing about the substance of my post. You don't offer any evidence or source that contradicts what I posted. You simply try and deflect my post by implying that my source is Liberal in nature and can not be trusted. But the problem is that there are many other sources that back up my post. And you offered nothing to counter the crux of my post, which is that Hillary could not single handedly approve the sale of Uranium One nor veto its sale. She is but one of nine members on the "Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States" who were charged with reviewing International sales t***sactions and then passing their recommendations on to the POTUS for a final decision. And only the POTUS had the authority to approve or disapprove of the sale. All you've done is post a source by "matchdoctor" that calls into question the political motivations of my source. This in no way invalidates nor calls into question the validity of my post. What makes your source any more credible than my source? The real issue is you simply attack my source, not the substance of my post. You think that by simply linking my source to the Annenberg Foundation who is supposedly linked to Bill Ayers that this automatically renders my post invalid. This is why you look like a fool. Read my post and address the subject matter I posted. Show me where anything I posted about the Uranium One/Rosatom sale was inaccurate or wrong. Do you doubt there is a "Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States"? Do you doubt there are nine agencies that comprise the "Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States". Do you doubt what their duties are? (Here is an excerpt from the U.S. Treasury web site explaining what "CFIUS" is..."CFIUS is an inter-agency committee authorized to review t***sactions that could result in control of a U.S. business by a foreign person (“covered t***sactions”)". That is taken directly from the U.S. Treasury web site). Do you doubt that the U.S. Treasury web site is a legitimate non partisan web site? Do you have a source that says the U.S. Treasury web site is a politically biased web site? Don't be lazy look this stuff up, you know how to Google, don't you? Show me where Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, single handedly approved the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom. Show me one shred of evidence that she had the power to veto that t***saction, you can't . I'll repeat it there were nine members on the "Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States" none of them had the authority to approve or veto the sale, anyone of them could have recommended that the sale not be approved, but the ultimate decision on the sale was with the POTUS. Yet some fools continue to assert that Hillary was solely responsible for that sale, and that somehow she approved the sale in order to receive sizable donations to the Clinton Foundation. I anxiously await your evidence that Hillary was solely responsible for that sale and that there was any quid pro quo concerning that sale. Remember just because you don't like my source doesn't mean that my source is incorrect.

You're kind of biased, aren't you? I assume you're referring to the sale of Uranium One, a Canadian-based company with uranium mining stakes in the West, to Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency, when you referred to Hillary helping Russians. You seem to operate on a very base level. Complex issues are extremely difficult for people, like you, to completely grasp and understand. I'm sure like many of your cohorts you get your biased opinions from Fox News, maybe not, but it is highly unlikely that you don't. I trust you can read, so do yourself a favor and read this...www.factcheck.org/2015/04/no-veto-power-for-clinton-on-uranium-deal. You will find out that Hillary represented one of nine agencies that comprised the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States. This committee was responsible for the approval of the deal between Uranium One and Rosatom. Where the simple mind, such as yours, gets confused is when Conservative news sources, such as Fox News, reports and supports "Alternative Facts". They did this when they interviewed Peter Schweizer, who wrote a book entitled "Clinton Cash", which erroneously reported that Hillary could have vetoed the sale of Uranium One, which controlled about 20% of the Uranium production in the U.S. That, quite simply, was a lie. Yet for simpletons, such as yourself it is much easier to blame the entire sale of Uranium One to Rosatom on one person, Hillary, than it is to report the facts. Now if you loons were to blame that sale on the Obama administration that would've been much more accurate and honest than trying to lay the entire blame, of the sale, at the feet of Hillary. The reality is that Hillary represented just one of nine agencies that were involved in approving the sale. Any one of the nine members could object to the sale but none of the nine members had the authority to veto the sale, only the POTUS had that authority.

Hello lindajoy, nice to hear from you. Hope things are going well for you, although I suspect they are now that Trump is President. For me personally, I think Trump has some serious mental issues. This whole idea of living in a world of "Alternative Facts", quite frankly scares me. Only time will tell if Trump is the right man for the job. I do like his appointment for Head of DHS, Kelly and SecDef., Mattis. Being a Marine those are two good choices. I do have questions on what our relation with Russia is going to be like. I find it curious that Trump has named individuals to some cabinet posts that were vocal critics to the posts they were named to head. Like DeVos to head the Dept. of Education, Perry to head the Dept. of Energy and Price to head Health and Human Services. I am curious to get your take on "Alternative Facts".

Oh, "contrer" grasshopper. Now you loons may have varying degrees of Conservativism, but if you are Republican, you are Conservative. You fools can argue amongst yourselves who is more Conservative, but there is no one who adheres to the Republican platform that is not a Conservative. I realize there are fifty shades of lunacy in the Conservative movement and you may disown each other, but nonetheless you're all Conservatives in the end.

Boy there is so much stupidity in your post, nwtk, that it is hard to respond to all the bull s**t you put out. But I must admit you found me out, I'm a pregnant Mexican mother who has come to America to have hundreds or anchor babies, and I've already had three thousand a******ns already. I am not for Hillary selling American influence through her phony charitable organization. I would much rather have Trump sell out American interests to the Russians, and any other country who will put up a Trump hotel. I think you're a little confused Trump's top adviser, Steve Bannon, is responsible for much of the "F**e News" Trump listens to. Maybe you didn't get the memo, Bannon ran Breitbart News, a bastion of "F**e News". On a more serious note I have to believe that you are confused every time you use a public restroom. Oh btw, I don't totally dislike the Conservative agenda. It is just that you can never know where Conservatives stand on any one issue from month to month. Like the "ACA" the Republicans have been screaming to repeal this piece of legislation ever since it was enacted. What is funny is they are basically going to repeal it and replace it with almost an identical plan. You see the "ACA" was the Republican plan for health care, in this country, until the Democrats introduced it. Remember what I said about not knowing what a Conservative's position was on anything because it changes from month to month. Republicans are like spoiled little children, they can not stand anything they don't get credit for. But you see I gave them full credit for the economic melt down our country suffered in 2008. Also the original 700 billion dollar bail out was introduced by Paulson and the Republicans, the "bail out" that ultimately saved the American auto industry, but Republicans quickly disowned the bail out as soon as the Democrats were in charge of administering it. See what I mean about spoiled little children. For eight years the Republicans obstructed every major bill the Democrats introduced, and now that they have total control, of the government, they say that we should all work together. Where was that "work together" attitude for the last eight years?

Steve you're just a loony as ever. Steve have you ever been in the military? Well I retired from the military, and I definitely don't "h**e" my country. But you posting such nonsense shows you are in lock step with the loons of the world who, like Trump, have no use for facts or t***h. You live in this "Alternative Facts" world. Which means you're in La La Land every day of the year. Also like Trump you're under the illusion that T***p w*n by a landslide and has a mandate from the people. That, quite simply, is just not true. He lost the popular v**e by nearly 3 million v**es, and despite you and Trump's delusional efforts to say those v**es were illegal, you can not prove it, because it simply is not true. I see Trump is going to investigate the v****g process, to determine if there were 3 to 5 million illegal v**es. I'm sure this investigation will turn out to be like his investigation of President Obama's birth certificate, it will produce nothing. And just like Trump's investigation into Obama's birth certificate Trump will once again have to admit he was wrong. He would have never admitted he was wrong about the investigation into Obama's birth certificate if he had not run for President, but after being confronted by every sane individual in the world, plus the fact that his investigation turned up absolutely nothing, he had to admit what everyone in the world knew, that Obama was born in Hawaii and a legal American citizen and eligible to run for President. And where do you loons get the audacity to assume that if there were "v***r f***d", which there isn't, that the people committing the fraud aren't v****g for Republicans. I mean really you're the party that is trying to deny certain legal Americans the right to v**e, it is not a stretch to assume that those committing v***r f***d are Republicans.

On a side note, I for one am happy about Trump's nomination of Generals Mattis, for SecDef, and Kelly, head of DHS, two fine Marines that I hope will counteract Trump's propensity to live in the world of "Alternate Facts".

And what about this completely inane and asinine comment..."since the c*******t radicals didn't get crazy enough to enable him to declare martial law but he pushed the limit of the his subversion just enough to wake up the majority of Americans causing Hillary to lose." Boy Steve you are certifiable. Speaking about "C*******ts", what about Trump's love affair with Putin? Tell these two to "get a room".

Semper Fi, mongo. Thanks for the kind words. Hope everything has been well with you.

Brother Willy, great to hear from you. Hope you're celebrating Trump's win. You have it all now, for the next four years. I hope Trump is successful in some things, like the Infrastructure bill. Not so much on banning people from entering this country, I realize most Conservatives are scared s**tless about letting immigrants into this country. Oh well Go Patriots, as you well know Brady is a Michigan man. Take care brother, I'm always pulling for you.

That's rich, Steve700 calling someone "Dumb Ass". Btw Steve, you know we all come to you to see what the future holds for the U.S., especially when it comes to the economy, have you made any bold i***tic predictions lately?

And what exactly do you and other Conservative fools, like you, do now that Obama isn't President any more? I seem to recall you and other Conservative i***ts always preaching that Obama would declare martial law and take over the government. Meanwhile I always said that come Jan. 20, 2017 President Obama would step down as President and a new President would be sworn in. I guess that makes me a much more reliable prognosticator than you and all the other Conservative loons, that come to this forum. Really Steve, you're actually calling someone a "Dumb Ass"? Such hypocrisy.

Conservative loons shouldn't b***h for the next four years, they have a fellow loon in the White House. And true to Conservative principles Trump lies habitually. Something Conservative loons always accused Obama of doing. Obviously if Trump's lips are moving he's lying. Trump is the "Liar in Chief". The sad part is he is as mentally disturbed as his followers.

You mean scum bags like Nixon and GW Bush?

Sign up for what?

I too believe in freedom of speech and the internet. The freedom to point out the lies the Tea Party and Conservative Right promulgate. The right to call for accountability from the Chief Liar, Donald Trump, for all the lies he promulgates. So as long as you're fighting for everyone's right to free speech and a free internet, I am with you. I will continue to call out all the liars on the Right, and make sure they don't take control of this country and run it into the ground. Most of them could care less about the Left's freedom of speech and some, if allowed, would eliminate the Left, all together. They are quite simply hypocrites. Here's a lie the Right has promulgated since President Obama took office..."Barack Obama was not born in the United States", and thus is not an American citizen. An out and out lie, that many Right Wing Nut Jobs still believe. But face it they suffer from mental diseases and are not viable functioning citizens, of the U.S.

One question, Einstein. How many other Presidents, and they were all white, were asked to produce their birth certificated? Please give the names of the Presidents and your source.