Here's another one! And on this one, should any of you mush-heads (Liberals,Progressives,Intellectuals,etc.,etc.,ad nauseum) have the balls to challenge me,I can produce the victim and you can take a scalding bath in the t***h. Again!
Several years back my friend,a young lady and a born citizen, was lawfully operating her vehicle here on the streets of Phoenix AZ when her car was collided with by another car. This other car was being operated UNlawfully by an individual of Mexican origin who had no driver's license, had no insurance, and who had NO RIGHT TO BE IN The United States. My friend was injured and suffers from those injuries to this day.
Because of a policy edict issued by our gutless,v**e-whore mayor (at that time), the offending driver was summarily released without so much as a misdemeanor citation. I sincerely doubt that my friend's case is an isolated one.
The main culprit? Our (then) mayor,the gutless v**e-whore, who decided to IGNORE the mayor's oath and Arizona law for fear of taking a hit at the polls. Sound familiar?
So let's add such as this to our list of reasons to deport 'em.
P.S.; Can we get these people to take their pet bedbugs with 'em?
Hooray for ol roy AND North Dakota! But . . . waitaminit! Ain't N. Dakota over real close to Wisconsin? How'd THAT happen,then?!?! :shock:
It's been a while,sports fans,and I am glad to be back. (And NO, I wasn't in jail !) Actually my absense was solely because of economic austerity brought on by not enough bucks to maintain my internet account. Pthhht! Anyhow, it's a sure bet I've missed this/y'all more'n this/y'all missed me. Regardless,it's good to BE BACK!
I agree with the foregoing column and the statement it sets down (I think) in words not written. It's my opinion that the unstated consists of this; The failure of the now "lame duck" Congress to impeach and convict Obama for egregious High Crimes and Misdemeanors constitutes strong grounds to suspect all,or nearly all of them of complicty with his actions.
Randall_S wrote:
That's because they are intelligent :)
But seriously, maybe I just know a little too much about drugs and drug culture... I have no tolerance for coke heads in public office. The guy should have enough decency to step down, and if not the Party should make a stink of it.
You may be surprised to learn the extent to which our current political and terrorist problems result from cocaine. In many ways, it makes the world go round. And an addict can be blackmailed, threatened, and bribed with just cocaine.
You ever wonder what on earth Governor Sanford was doing in Peru, in the Andes? He claimed he was having an affair - maybe he was. But is it just a coincidence that he'd act so strangely, disappear for a week at a time? These are not the behavior of a sober person.
Moreover, don't you find it strange that his Treasurer in South Carolina, Thomas Ravenel, was busted for cocaine DISTRIBUTION? And then months later, this same Thomas Ravenel was busted for drunk driving in the Hamptons, on Long Island? Wonder what he was bringing to the hoity toity out east?
Isn't that just a little too much to take?
Seems likely that what was going on is that Mark was going down to Peru, picking up a load, using his stature as a governor to get around airport security, and then the GOP in South Carolina was distributing. Yeah, that's pretty messed up. But I can't say it's not likely, given what we know about our elected officials. Ted Kennedy, anyone?
It would also explain why his wife left him so quickly (unlike many other women whose husbands have had affairs, especially publicly), and why Jim DeMint decided to get out of politics in South Carolina.
It's been said that if you want to know the t***h behind the political posturing, follow the money. Well, as a friend of mine is fond of saying -- FOLLOW THE BLOW.
That's because they are intelligent :) br br But ... (
show quote)
Hmm . . . I ain't certain if this here's any better. Sure as hell is longer. Thing is, though, you've still not advised me where it was that I had said I "didn't care what he was on".
Since you did NOT RESPOND to that small request, I'm going to do it for you. The t***h of it is that I DID NOT SAY THOSE WORDS. Further,were you not handicapped by delusions about your superior(?) intelligence (not evidenced herein), you would've known better than trying to take what I had not said and use it to poke derision at this Paul fellow, AND me! While I was "still in the area" to boot!
You, Sir, are some piece of work.
Randall_S wrote:
That's all fine and good for a stump speech at the Ron Paul winter getaway in Colorado, but these same people spend our tax money and send us to war.
You sure you really don't care what they're on?
Wow. Ordinarily, your postings seem intelligent. Just for sake of idle curiosity, kindly advise me where it was that I said that.
bmac32 wrote:
Let the v**ers decide, I would likely not v**e for him without checking this out closer.
As a confirmed believer in Freedom and Liberty; It is absolutely none of the business of our government what any ADULT may VOLUNTARILY want to ingest. The individual in question is such a person, and as I understand it, this is FORMER behavior. Therefore, let the v**ers decide. PERIOD.
Hi, y'all. Just going to lay this down for examination, reflection, and maybe even some introspection. I love this here forum, but far, FAR more do I love all of our RIGHT to set down our opinions, philosophies, ideas and . . .you get it. This RIGHT was EARNED for us by not just the founding fathers whose names we know, but also by men (and yes,women too!)whose names we will NEVER know in this life. OUTLAWS each and all. This RIGHT was set down in writing and legitimately ratified under the laws as were in those times.
That'd be our Constitution,of course, and for well over two hundred years it's been preserved, defended, revived, and then defended some more and now the principles codified in that document are passed into OUR HANDS. Even those who malign it and it's principles are heirs to and beneficiaries of it's precepts.
With THAT fact always present in my consciousness, I am not about to sit by and allow it, and the gifts of LIBERTY it bestows on us ALL be destroyed by ANYBODY.
If I did, I could never bear to look a child in the eye again. Nor would I ever deserve to. And so please, just think on that and be true to the t***h!
Inyourface wrote:
The year saw the end of DOMA and the odious,California,Prop 8, The momentum for e******y for gays, is clearly on the side of gays. Every time a r****t let his or her mask slip they got whacked.Examples like Paula Deen and others come to mind.
We are seeing the beginning of the end of "the mighty whitey". The demographic changes and the embarrassment caused by the low IQ Teaparty types is speeding up the changes.
There will be no going back. HAPPY NEW YEAR!!
All Americans have the SAME RIGHTS. Some of them are specifically enumerated in our U.S. Constitution. Your entire position is bogus on it's face. What you, et al, are trying to achieve through misinformation, disinformation, distortion, hysterics, and plain old, garden variety bulls**t is NOT e******y. Lets call it "E******y-PLUS". In all regards imaginable, there is no difference in gays/lesbians/bisexuals/etc. and the remainder of the population. Save for one.
That difference isn't hard to discern nor understand. That difference is that the demographic I've identified in the previous paragraph DEFINES THEIR WHOLE EXISTENCE by their sexual preference and subsequent behavior. That fact fails to make that group entitled to anything even remotely akin to "E******y-PLUS". And you're not fooling anybody.
Mr. BoJester, all jokes (BARBED or otherwise) aside, and writing now with genuine seriousness . . . I feel so terribly sorry for you.
Not quoted for brevity's sake, but a nonetheless excellent posting, Sir! I ain't got a CLUE how many eyes will read it or how many minds will ponder it, but you've done a significant service of patriotism to all the owners thereof! Since I am one of the aforementioned owners, THANK YOU! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :D
vernon wrote:
i think that 75%of the laws could be repealed and no one would miss them,except the lawmakers.
Let's not forget about LAWYERS (one of the predominant professions found in legislative bodies at all levels), and COPS of all stripes. Those of EITHER GROUP who are right-thinking men and women, however, are not likely to find that 75% of the laws which now exist have suddenly vanished to be a thing worthy of much weeping and wailing. Hurrah for the good guys!
Wow! Born and raised on a farm in Alabama, I emerged from the Corps, moved to Arizona and went to raising horses. Hmm . . . But, then, I never had any cows to start with! Seriously (?), yeah! That's some funny s**t right there! Thanks for posting it! :-D
Hi, y'all! I reckon this here ain't a reply so much as just a general statement. When I set out to "DO", or "NOT DO" a thing I have what I'll call my "Standard" for making my choice. MY CHOICE. Goes something like this; 1. Is it a "THING" (activity, action, utterance, writing, or some item of personal conduct) that I WANT to do? 2. If I do it will it harm anyone else? 3. Will it deprive anyone else of anything RIGHTFULLY theirs (including their OWN ability to make their OWN choices)? 4. When wh**ever it is fits within these parameters, I'm pretty much going to "DO" wh**ever the hell it is. If there be some law against this theoretical "thing", then it's a damn good bet that that law (or laws) is a repressive chunk of s**t which is about to get ignored. Those who clamor FOR laws like that, along with those who enact them are MANY. Too bad there ain't a bounty on 'em.
mikeinco wrote:
First, a thank you to Papa Bear, Hick and all others who served, the Nation owes you a respectful gratitude.
The prospect of an impeachment of Obama while very appealing to Patriots, is far from a possibility. The current Republican leadership will I doubt allow the proceedings to take place, they are to beholden to the powers behind the throne to allow it. A Republican majority in the Senate will no doubt slow the progress of the destruction of our Republic, but IMO the RNC and a majority of Congressional Republicans are simply Progressive Light. The RNC has consistently failed to support any Tea Party or true Conservative in a bid for e******n, they believe they are "to radical" and "to conservative" to be electable. They believe the only way to be elected is to offer similar versions of Democrats with only minor differences. They believe e******n of people like Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and some others is an abberation, and not the true feelings of the majority. This is why they continue to lose e******ns and will continue to lose unless we make our voices heard loudly and clearly.
First, a thank you to Papa Bear, Hick and all othe... (
show quote)
You're very welcome, Mr. mikeinco! I agree with you, so I think I'd best go and volunteer some time to work at promoting tha principles I believe in.