One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: boofhead
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 79 next>>
May 20, 2018 23:24:37   #
rumitoid wrote:
"You are part of the group that supports a******n on demand for no reason other than convenience which means you support the murder of over a million babies a year in this country. So long as you support murder of babies you have no moral right to object to less than 10,000 a year k**led by guns, only a small number of which are school shootings."
I am and always have been against a******n.

The rest of your tirade is nonsense.


It is not a tirade it is fact, something the Left has no understanding of. Or is that, in your definition, another tirade? If you cannot understand it or cannot accept the t***h it is a tirade? Yet you probably call yourself educated and civilized? When you are incapable of reasoning?

What I wrote is correct, but you only accept the part you agree with. Which means you cannot be reasoned with (actually I already knew that) so what is the point of even entering into a discussion with you?
Go to
May 20, 2018 19:39:18   #
rumitoid wrote:
What other conclusion can you come to? Not only do nothing but actively resist with big money any gun-control bills. "Screw our kids and grandkids; we got our guns." A small (literally) price to pay for the the freedom to k**l (O'Reilly) at random. So far down the rabbit hole of logic no one but the insane gun enthusiasts understand. This is evil incarnate. The NRA works against Christ.


You are part of the group that supports a******n on demand for no reason other than convenience which means you support the murder of over a million babies a year in this country. So long as you support murder of babies you have no moral right to object to less than 10,000 a year k**led by guns, only a small number of which are school shootings. All school shootings are terrible and there is no way to justify it but I am yet to hear you or any of your liberal ilk say the same thing about murdering babies. Hypocrites all of you.

In that same year over a million lives are saved when good people with a gun stop a criminal intent on taking their lives and property. If the good people did not have guns while the criminals had them, the death toll every year would rise astronomically but you liberals would seemingly be happy to see that, so long as you got your way in k*****g the 2nd Amendment and taking away my rights.

The same Liberals want to take down any border restrictions and allow open invasion with no checks by some of the most dangerous and evil scum in the world (never mind we have our own dangerous and evil scum already here - we call them Democrats) which would lead to the destruction of this country in a short period of time; Sharia law, MS13, financial ruin and the like, all due to Liberals. Yet you single out the law abiding good guy for your destruction and would willingly stand aside and watch the rape, murder and addiction to drugs that would result. I don't think Hypocrites is a strong enough word to describe you lot.

So far, if you had your way, we would see several million more deaths every year but you would call it Progress!

The real reason for the school shootings and other outrageous evil being committed in the world and in this country is the fact that we as a nation have lost our way. We have no standards any longer; we are not a moral people partly because of the attacks on religion, on the family, on education, on the police and military, on babies and the young, while encouraging drugs and celebrating brain-dead politicians, film stars and celebrities instead of the many good people who are still there, although in the minority, who are showing us how to live together without violence by example but never rate a mention by the Liberal (therefore lying) press.

Use what little intelligence you might have to study the real reasons for the school shootings and other crimes and join the Conservatives to get this country back on track. If all you can say is what your left-wing heroes tell you to say, save your breath because I for one am s**k of hearing it.
Go to
May 18, 2018 22:56:20   #
rumitoid wrote:
I expected this kind of perverse logic. Do not do anything to protect our children because gun violence is worse elsewhere. Huh?


The murder rate by white males is about the same as it is in Australia and England. About 3 per one hundred thousand (most studies lump some of the Hispanic murders into the white numbers so the actual rate is lower than usually quoted). The murder rate by white females is so low it barely registers.

The murder rate by black males is over 20 per one hundred thousand.

But b****s are only 12 percent of the population so their rate represents a huge increase over the white rate. Even more so when you consider that the murders in the black community are committed by young black men between 16 and 46, or about 3 percent of the population or a rate of about 80 per hundred thousand, an incredible figure that should frighten everybody in the country but most especially the black community.

The police know who these guys are; there are not too many of them in actual numbers and many go on k*****g. If you took them out of the population somehow the overall murder rate would be about the same as the other industrialized countries. That we allow this to continue shows we are not really serious about murder.

BTW the black murders are usually committed against fellow b****s. Is this genocide encouraged perhaps? It certainly seems so, just as the Sanger a******n plan was conceived to reduce the black population, another fantastically successful program still in action.
Go to
May 2, 2018 22:11:14   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
I was a professional firefighter for nearly 20 years, Nik, so please don't make a fool of yourself trying to explain anything to me about fire science. Fires contained inside buildings, rooms, or any other enclosed spaces ARE NOT open flame fires, they are compartmentalized fires. Open flame fires are those in which the fuel and heat are both located in open air, such as brush fires, camp fires, or a wooden building fully involved in fire. Compartment fires are an entirely different animal.

All the fires in the twin towers were compartmentalized. Even though we see flames escaping through windows and blown out walls, the fuel and heat sources are still contained inside the building. For a host of reasons, fire behavior in enclosed or partially enclosed spaces can be extreme resulting in temperatures and conditions that are dangerous, not only to human life but to the structure itself. Combustion can occur in enclosed spaces where temperatures are very high yet no flame is produced, just superheated gases and particles. in such conditions temps can attain 1800 to 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, or if you wish, 982 to 1093 degrees Celsius, and these conditions, known as flash over, have k**led many firefighters.

The 900 degrees Celsius that you quoted is 1652 degrees Fahrenheit, definitely hot enough to turn steel red hot and weaken it critically. Support steel under compression loads heated to this temperature will FAIL.
I was a professional firefighter for nearly 20 yea... (show quote)


Absolutely! The fire was compartmentalized! In maybe four floors of the building. Therefore the floors above and below that zone were not subject to the extreme heating and would be able to stand without failing. If the top floors did fail and begin to collapse, the lower floors, being still intact and structurally sound, would have no problem holding up which means the buildings did not freefall as the videos show they did. My lying eyes have failed me again!

I saw a video of a building failing in South America on my Facebook over the weekend but could not save it to file and I cannot find that video again. Does anyone know what I am referring to? The building was fully engulfed in flame, the entire 42 floors were totally burnt out from the ground to the top of the building. There was one side facade still standing but it did not appear to be connected to the structure any longer. When the building fell it appeared to be a freefall collapse just like the Twin Towers. However as I said it showed clearly that the entire building was burnt out, nothing remained except the frame and it still held up until the final collapse when there was nothing left; just a column of fire with the outside walls totally consumed and barely any structure left. It did not collapse early, floor onto floor, as we are told the Twin Towers did when the majority of the building was still intact and not burning. The fires that can be seen in the vicinity of the airplane impact had been burning for only a short while and most of the fire was external because the jet fuel had been blown through the building to escape in the open air on the other side; it does not look compartmentalized to me but what do I know? And if Mohammed Atta's passport survived the fire to be found pristine on the street below, the fire could not have been too bad, surely? Maybe it was a compartmentalized passport! I am glad I have learned a new word and will use it as often as I can it will make me seem smart!

So it is possible to have it both ways: When the fire is compartmentalized it will collapse at freefall speed. When the fire is not compartmentalized it will collapse at freefall speed. Both are correct?
Go to
Apr 27, 2018 20:08:34   #
JIM BETHEA wrote:
There have been hundreds of takeoffs and landings with remote control 757's for years ~ as a matter of fact, these landings are more accurate than humane pilot landings ~ If you watch the ground crews working on commerical airlines out on the tarmacs, you will see them hook-up their "roll around consoles" to these jets which takes over "full control" of these planes ~ Once connected the pilots have no control whatsoever over these aircraft ~

As for the building uprights, these were what the buildings were "suspended" on ~ sorta like free standing with attachments ~ it is absolutely impossible that these beams would all break apart with the same slanted cuts ~ if you were to buy the pancakel effect, then these uprights would have remained independant and would have remained mostly entact with some twists, etc ~ If was also a bit suspect that these [Thermite cut beams] were rapidly hauled off in a caravan of trucks that had GPS systems installed to monitor them so they could get evidence loaded on bargages and off to China for salvage sales??

Of all of the hundreds of unanswered questions, I find that the most "hard to swallow' is that a fairly fragile airframe of these jets can just blow right through 3 walls of 3 feet thick re-enforced w steel walls of the Pentagon?? Many small missiles will not even do this feat!!!

And for the noted scientist that were trying to explain away everything; I never heard their explanation of how all of these cars in the surrounding areas were catching on fire and explosing from the "INSIDE" out and and not ignited from the outside in by smoke and dust? EMP of their electrical systems....
There have been hundreds of takeoffs and landings ... (show quote)



Your first paragraph is simply nonsensical. Not only does it not make sense I think it is meant to be a joke. "Rollaroundconsoles". Where did you d**g that from? Automatic landings more accurate than manual? Total garbage. The auto landing is done when the vis is too low for the pilot to see the runway but if he can see he is always capable of putting the airplane right where he wants it on landing. The auto land does not improve the accuracy, just allows it to be legal when the vis is too low for a visual landing. And so far there is NO Automatic Takeoff system in a commercial airliner. It could be fitted but it is NEVER done and there are no systems available in these types of aircraft to allow it to happen. Military airplanes designed for the purpose can do it but even then I doubt that it would actually take place especially with people on board. The pilot can easily take off even with zero visibility and can do it accurately so why bother with auto systems?
Go to
Apr 3, 2018 19:19:57   #
Radiance3 wrote:
=====================
This just prove how EVIL the democrats/liberals are. They are also brain washing those innocent public school children to become like them. They are using them as tools to commit crime and become like them. EVIL IS EVIL. They have nothing positive to do for other human. They are target the innocent Baron as their victim.

Because they are evil, dumb and filthy, the democrat women sell and expose their bodies to men highest bidder or by tempting them to commit mortal sins, like Stormy Daniels. She stinks!
They are demons like Stormy Daniels. Their mean of living are selling their bodies. Any men who are tempted to look at them are sued for sexual abuse. Then they sue them for hundreds of millions of dollars. A very lucrative demonic means of living. These are the filthy Sodom and Gomorrah people whose lifestyles have gone to the TRASH! I H**E DEMOCRATS AND LIBERALS!
===================== br This just prove how EVIL ... (show quote)


You can get used to them, they are not so bad. Just stuff your ears with cotton wool in case one tries to talk to you, carry a sharp stick to push them away, have a spray can of compressed carbon dioxide or similar and label it :WARNING! COMMON SENSE!" and wave it around as if you are going to spray them with it (they are terrified of that), put vapor rub under your nostrils to disguise the stink and if you do accidentally get within 3 feet of one, go home immediately and take a two hour shower as hot as you can stand it to wash away any residue of their presence. Scrub hard, use a good chlorine bleach and hard-bristled brush if there has been physical contact. For practical guidance, watch a couple of the shows The Walking Dead; they have Democrats disguised as Zombies (no self-respecting Zombie would actually be a Democrat but the similarities are there) and you can learn a lot of effective techniques to protect yourself from them by watching that show. But please don't try to hurt them; they are a protected species for some reason and there are penalties. Better to avoid them just in case they infect you. The only cure for Democratitus is an immediate lobotomy which will reduce you to a mindless i***t only 50 IQ points higher than the brightest Democrat. But at least if that happens you can be comforted by the knowledge that in this case, the disease IS actually worse than the cure!
Go to
Apr 3, 2018 14:13:24   #
Bad Bob wrote:
F*** the archaic 2nd amendment.


Meanwhile 1.4 million babies murdered by Democrats for CONVENIENCE just in this country every year. Hypocrites beyond belief.
Go to
Mar 29, 2018 12:27:54   #
straightUp wrote:
Yup...

And now for a simulation of what the Parkland shooting would have looked like if Nicholas Cruz had the most advanced firearm available at the time the 2nd Amendment was ratified...

He walks into the building carrying a British Land Pattern Musket. He stops for a moment to reach for a paper cartridge, bites down on the tail to tear it open. He half-cocks the musket and pushes the frizzen forward to open the flash pan. He pours a small amount of the black powder from the cartridge into the pan, then pulls the frizzen back. Meanwhile kids are gathering around wondering what he's doing. Next he holds the musket with the muzzle pointing up being careful not to spill the powder out of the pan. He pours the rest of the black powder into the barrel. Then he pushes a lead ball in the barrel. Next he wads up the empty cartridge and pushes that into the barrel. After that he removes the ramrod from the channel beneath the barrel and rams the paper wadding and the lead ball down the barrel into the breach. Then he looks up at the kids as he put the ramrod back in the channel. He raises the weapon... and he fires.

The kids all look at him with wide eyes... the shot breaks a window. He missed his target because it was too far away, he needs to get at least within a few yards for any accuracy but the kids panic a little and start backing away. The shooter shakes his head and reaches for another cartridge bites down, rips it open, half cocks the musket. A teacher comes out and says "what's going on?" One of the kids scream - "It's a mass shooting!" Suddenly the whole school is freaked and they start running for cover, meanwhile the shooter having poured some black powder into the flash pan, pulls the frizzen back and carefully tips the musket upward, again being careful not to spill the powder, and pours the rest of the powder into the barrel, followed by another lead ball then the wadded up paper cartridge. Then he uses the ramrod again to push it all down to the breach, put the ramrod back in the channel then tries to find a target... Ah, the kid on crutches I can catch him he thought but no, the kid managed to escape through the exit. The shooter looks out a window to see kids running around and screaming and a deputy Sheriff hiding behind a car on the radio calling for back up.

"Sir there's a sho, a sho, a shooting..."
"At the school?"
"Yeah. I need help"
"How many?"
"One shooter."
"What's he got?"
"A Land Pattern Musket."
"A what?"
"A Brown Bess!"
"Well go in there and take it. Damnit"
"But he might hurt me."

Suddenly there's another explosion and a plume of smoke.

"What was that?"
"That was him he just fired again."
"Get him now... He can't fire again until loaded that gives you like 30 seconds."
"Oh, yeah."

So the deputy jumps out from behind the car and runs toward the door where the shooter is pouring black powder into his flash pan, for dramatic effect the deputy starts running in slow motion. The shooter pulls back the frizzen and tilts the musket upward... The deputy takes another slow motion lunge... "Aaaaaaaaargh!!!!" The shooter pours the rest of the powder in the barrel, then another lead ball then the paper wad. The deputy is within range now still screaming and running in slow motion. The shooter takes the ram rod to barrel and pushes ball and paper down to the breach, the deputy jumps on him, takes the musket away and becomes a hero.

Total casualties... one broken window, one destroyed locker and one shattered perception that the Founders who wrote the 2nd Amendment could have ever thought one kid with one gun could possibly k**l 17 kids in six minutes.

;)
Yup... br br And now for a simulation of what the... (show quote)


I wasted three minutes of my life I will never get back again. What total codswallop!
Go to
Mar 28, 2018 14:41:11   #
eagleye13 wrote:
Kids will be kids. Kids will be used.

The Mental illness drug prescription problem, has been ignored by the MSM for decades.
Any one wonder why?
How about the bucks Big Pharma spends on Boob Toob advertising.
AND those long warnings at the end; are warnings the sheep have been conditioned to ignore.


Many of the school shooters have had a history of being bullied while at school. This should be easy to fix, if every kid knew to call it out when it was seen happening, and if every kid refused to participate. Maybe we should have a campaign against bullying; it would be more effective than taking guns away from law-abiding citizens. Hey, why don't we have mass protests against bullying? Have the kids get out of school and bus them to public venues where they can get on TV and scream against bullies and the type of environment where bullying is accepted as normal? Have Soros pay for it, have the teachers support it, put it all on TV!
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 16:43:51   #
woodguru wrote:
Don't even start, Trump supporters don't have a clue what the constitution is, and they don't give a damn when the GOP writes their own rules when it suits their purposes. They change the rules to fit their agenda, then when dems try to do the same thing Mitch McConnell gets all indignant and forgets the rules he used for things like senate confirmations as one example. McConnell submitted a comprehensive list defining how Obama confirmations would be done, that they would not happen until the FBI and OGE vetted them. If the GOP had complied with the rules they enforced for Obama nominees Trump still would not have a single one, they never would have gotten through the FBI and ethics part of the process.

Not that I need to ask, but what did you think of McConnell refusing to confirm Obama's SCOTUS pick Merrick? Wait until the e******n to serve the will of the people? Let the people decide? One year was plenty of time, the people already spoke when they elected Obama the second time, the people wanted Obama's person to go through the confirmation process. Yeah, the right is all about following the constitution.

The constitution says it's legal to have an a******n, conservatives think the constitution takes a back seat to the bible. E******n laws mean nothing to red states with majorities and supermajorities, they do what they want in obvious violation of constitutional laws, when challenged and blocked by their state supreme courts they just move it up to the US supreme court. The right doesn't care about the law. Trump has been blocked by circuit courts for violations of the constitution several times, that is Trump's regard for the constitution.
Don't even start, Trump supporters don't have a cl... (show quote)


The Constitution does NOT say it is legal to have an a******n. The Declaration of Independence declares we are entitled to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. The Constitution does not disagree with the Declaration. There is nothing in either document that could even remotely be considered as ratifying murder.

The blocking of trump's executive decisions does not say anything about the legality of his actions but it says a lot about the illegalities of the lower courts and does not amount to law. Those decisions themselves are not lawful.
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 16:28:32   #
JoyV wrote:
This is a far better supporting link. One problem I see is they combined evidence from well respected unbiased sources such as the CDC, with biased propaganda organizations such as Guttmacher Institute. If you look just at the CDC, the conclusion is opposite of what this study reached. The other problem is that when a woman dies from complications after having an a******n, the death certificate will not mention a******n. No where in the article is there a breakdown on what the cause of deaths were. They simply numbered the deaths. For example, the direct immediate cause may be either emboli or stroke due to a blood clot. Yet the clot may be due to the a******n. The death certificate will list the stroke or emboli but not what caused the clot in the first place.

So while I find the study to be interesting and based on much factual information; the inclusion of biased reports and the elimination of certain other information (such as the causes behind the "cause of death"); it results in this study being flawed. But I applaud you on making the attempt!
***************************
ABSTRACT:

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of a******n compared with childbirth.

METHODS: We estimated mortality rates associated with live births and legal induced a******ns in the United States in 1998–2005. We used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System, birth certificates, and Guttmacher Institute surveys. In addition, we searched for population-based data comparing the morbidity of a******n and childbirth.

RESULTS: The pregnancy-associated mortality rate among women who delivered live neonates was 8.8 deaths per 100,000 live births. The mortality rate related to induced a******n was 0.6 deaths per 100,000 a******ns. In the one recent comparative study of pregnancy morbidity in the United States, pregnancy-related complications were more common with childbirth than with a******n.

CONCLUSION: Legal induced a******n is markedly safer than childbirth. The risk of death associated with childbirth is approximately 14 times higher than that with a******n. Similarly, the overall morbidity associated with childbirth exceeds that with a******n.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II
This is a far better supporting link. One problem... (show quote)


You forget that there were two individuals here; the mom and the child. The morbidity rate for the child in these cases was 100,000 per100,000, or in other words, 100% DEAD. And the cause of death was MURDER.

For convenience.
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 12:50:27   #
Bad Bob wrote:
Where did you get this "over high 90's % of a******ns are for contraception"? Crazyzealot?



I wrote this for another tread but it applies:

Whenever I see any reference to the Democrat attempts to take away our rights using those k**led by guns or under threat of gun violence I am sickened. Not only by the utter lack of reason or common sense but mainly because of the hypocrisy. Given that some 8000 people are murdered every year by guns in the USA every year and 1.4 million innocent children are murdered by a******n, the comparison beggars belief and surely any reasoning human being would recognize the bigger evil. Take away the politics and imagine a world where a group of people living in a country encouraged the murder of children when they are most at risk, most unable to defend themselves, purely for the convenience of the mother, and insisting that the general populace pay the costs of such murder, what would the citizens of that country feel about those murderers and those who support them? If you take away the politics as I say, you would have to agree with me that that group would be ostracized, attacked, drummed out of town on a rail, drawn and quartered or wh**ever because they would be seen as evil scum, dangerous and depraved. The best you could say about such a group is that they are amoral or perhaps immoral, but I prefer the word evil because that is what they truly are, to believe that it is OK to push a needle into a child's body while it is still in the womb and inject a poison, or to slash it apart with a pair of scissors, or stick those scissors into the back of it's head after it has been partly born, just for convenience. Maybe there is a case for a******n when there is a true medical reason but as a substitute for birth control? Really?

But this is the real world where honesty and reason are suspended and replaced by politics. A Topsy-Turvy world indeed. Political correctness makes those depraved murderers heroes! Murdering babies is heroic? Maybe in your world but not in mine.

I know I am outnumbered but I still speak up. Someone has to. Someone has to speak up for the babies. Someone has to open your eyes.

I believe that every Democrat, every Progressive, every RINO should be ignored and despised because of their support of a******n, their opinions and advice discarded. None of them is fit to hold any public office nor to live in our society. They should be living in boxes at the local dump. Their opinion about guns and gun deaths particularly should be ignored and reviled, as we should revile Islamic murderers or terrorists and school shooters. Take them out of the discussion and go on without them. Make our decisions based on fact and reason. I used to think they were just misled and were really nice people who did not mean to be monsters but after years of discussion and conversation with them I can see they really are evil and not worth any further attention. Especially on the subject of guns and gun control.

Whenever they bring up their opinion on guns, all we need to say in reply is "a******n". No need to say anything else. I know they don't feel shame, in fact they are proud to be murderers and supporters of murder but truly, if you waste your time talking to them you would have to spend hours a day under a hot shower scrubbing the filth off.
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 12:48:53   #
woodguru wrote:


A******n is legal, Period. Those who oppose it do so on religious grounds.


What crap. I am not religious and I oppose it. Some of my family have had a******ns and they pay for it all their lives.

The Constitution says it guarantees Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Poison or stab a baby in the womb and you take away all those rights. Therefore a******n is not supported under the Constitution and therefore is NOT LEGAL.

I wrote this for another thread but it applies here too:
Whenever I see any reference to the Democrat attempts to take away our rights using those k**led by guns or under threat of gun violence I am sickened. Not only by the utter lack of reason or common sense but mainly because of the hypocrisy. Given that some 8000 people are murdered every year by guns in the USA every year and 1.4 million innocent children are murdered by a******n, the comparison beggars belief and surely any reasoning human being would recognize the bigger evil. Take away the politics and imagine a world where a group of people living in a country encouraged the murder of children when they are most at risk, most unable to defend themselves, purely for the convenience of the mother, and insisting that the general populace pay the costs of such murder, what would the citizens of that country feel about those murderers and those who support them? If you take away the politics as I say, you would have to agree with me that that group would be ostracized, attacked, drummed out of town on a rail, drawn and quartered or wh**ever because they would be seen as evil scum, dangerous and depraved. The best you could say about such a group is that they are amoral or perhaps immoral, but I prefer the word evil because that is what they truly are, to believe that it is OK to push a needle into a child's body while it is still in the womb and inject a poison, or to slash it apart with a pair of scissors, or stick those scissors into the back of it's head after it has been partly born, just for convenience. Maybe there is a case for a******n when there is a true medical reason but as a substitute for birth control? Really?

But this is the real world where honesty and reason are suspended and replaced by politics. A Topsy-Turvy world indeed. Political correctness makes those depraved murderers heroes! Murdering babies is heroic? Maybe in your world but not in mine.

I know I am outnumbered but I still speak up. Someone has to. Someone has to speak up for the babies. Someone has to open your eyes.

I believe that every Democrat, every Progressive, every RINO should be ignored and despised because of their support of a******n, their opinions and advice discarded. None of them is fit to hold any public office nor to live in our society. They should be living in boxes at the local dump. Their opinion about guns and gun deaths particularly should be ignored and reviled, as we should revile Islamic murderers or terrorists and school shooters. Take them out of the discussion and go on without them. Make our decisions based on fact and reason. I used to think they were just misled and were really nice people who did not mean to be monsters but after years of discussion and conversation with them I can see they really are evil and not worth any further attention. Especially on the subject of guns and gun control.

Whenever they bring up their opinion on guns, all we need to say in reply is "a******n". No need to say anything else. I know they don't feel shame, in fact they are proud to be murderers and supporters of murder but truly, if you waste your time talking to them you would have to spend hours a day under a hot shower scrubbing the filth off.
Go to
Mar 21, 2018 10:42:02   #
Weasel wrote:
There may be some unborn babies floating around in the wombs of protesters who will be at Saturdays March march against school shootings & the NRA. It would be a shame to see them die under a false f**g for the purpose of some political agenda.
There may be some unborn babies floating around in... (show quote)


If the mothers are democrats they are doomed anyway.
Go to
Mar 20, 2018 19:45:33   #
Weasel wrote:
IT is a hideously horrible idea to let your child or grandchild gather in a crowd under the watchful eye of Shooters, Bombers, and Fanatics who are sure that this protest is targeted at the destruction of our 2nd Amendment!
And will do anything to stop them, in order to stop all threats against our right to buy a gun!
Did you catch that? Our Right To SIMPLY Buy A GUN. No more hunting, No more self Defence, No more Sporting Events where target shooting, and trophies are involved, and no more ROTC.Training in schools where those wooden things that look like guns are waved around in front of crowds.
This is a big deal, organized by bigger deal makers, who could care less if your child is injured in the effort to push their agenda. Actually, an injury or two would be a good point in their favor of shutting down the NRA and our right to bare arms.
Please keep your kids home this weekend.
PLEASE KEEP THEM SAFE.
IT is a hideously horrible idea to let your child ... (show quote)


Whenever I see any reference to the Democrat attempts to take away our rights using those k**led by guns or under threat of gun violence I am sickened. Not only by the utter lack of reason or common sense but mainly because of the hypocrisy. Given that some 8000 people are murdered every year by guns in the USA every year and 1.4 million innocent children are murdered by a******n, the comparison beggars belief and surely any reasoning human being would recognize the bigger evil. Take away the politics and imagine a world where a group of people living in a country encouraged the murder of children when they are most at risk, most unable to defend themselves, purely for the convenience of the mother, and insisting that the general populace pay the costs of such murder, what would the citizens of that country feel about those murderers and those who support them? If you take away the politics as I say, you would have to agree with me that that group would be ostracized, attacked, drummed out of town on a rail, drawn and quartered or wh**ever because they would be seen as evil scum, dangerous and depraved. The best you could say about such a group is that they are amoral or perhaps immoral, but I prefer the word evil because that is what they truly are, to believe that it is OK to push a needle into a child's body while it is still in the womb and inject a poison, or to slash it apart with a pair of scissors, or stick those scissors into the back of it's head after it has been partly born, just for convenience. Maybe there is a case for a******n when there is a true medical reason but as a substitute for birth control? Really?

But this is the real world where honesty and reason are suspended and replaced by politics. A Topsy-Turvy world indeed. Political correctness makes those depraved murderers heroes! Murdering babies is heroic? Maybe in your world but not in mine.

I know I am outnumbered but I still speak up. Someone has to. Someone has to speak up for the babies. Someone has to open your eyes.

I believe that every Democrat, every Progressive, every RINO should be ignored and despised because of their support of a******n, their opinions and advice discarded. None of them is fit to hold any public office nor to live in our society. They should be living in boxes at the local dump. Their opinion about guns and gun deaths particularly should be ignored and reviled, as we should revile Islamic murderers or terrorists and school shooters. Take them out of the discussion and go on without them. Make our decisions based on fact and reason. I used to think they were just misled and were really nice people who did not mean to be monsters but after years of discussion and conversation with them I can see they really are evil and not worth any further attention. Especially on the subject of guns and gun control.

Whenever they bring up their opinion on guns, all we need to say in reply is "a******n". No need to say anything else. I know they don't feel shame, in fact they are proud to be murderers and supporters of murder but truly, if you waste your time talking to them you would have to spend hours a day under a hot shower scrubbing the filth off.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 79 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.