by staffwriter-potus post-October 27, 2023—printed off 11/19/23
In the world of politics, skeletons have a knack for tumbling out of closets at the most inconvenient times. The latest bone-rattler comes as a damning audio clip from 2006 featuring none other than Hillary Clinton, former U.S. Senator and P**********l candidate. This shocking revelation, once swept under the rug by mainstream media, has reemerged amidst the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict, raising eyebrows and questions about Clinton’s political integrity.
The leaked audio clip, originally divulged by the New York Observer back in October 2016, reveals Clinton suggesting the rigging of a foreign e******n to garner a favorable outcome. The e******n in question was the January 25th, 2006 e******n for the Palestinian Legislative Council, where Hamas clinched a victory over the preferred Fatah party.
In the clip, Clinton expresses regret over the U.S.’s encouragement for the e******n, suggesting that had the U.S. interfered, it could have ensured a more favorable outcome. She stated, “I do not think we should have pushed for an e******n in the Palestinian territories. I think that was a big mistake…And if we were going to push for an e******n then we should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win.”
This audacious sentiment, coming from a national leader, is not just shocking but downright scandalous. It implies a tolerance towards meddling in foreign e******ns, which is a gross violation of democratic principles. This explosive story, however, was largely ignored by major news networks during the 2016 P**********l campaign, perhaps for fear of damaging Clinton’s chances in the race.
But now, this controversial piece of history has resurfaced, casting a long shadow over Clinton’s political career. The audio leak raises serious questions about her judgement and character when dealing with foreign policy issues. It also brings to light the lengths to which certain candidates may go to secure power – even if it means compromising their integrity by manipulating another country’s democratic process.
This revelation could have been extremely detrimental to Clinton’s chances at winning office in 2016, had it been given the attention it deserved. Yet, it was conveniently overlooked. As we delve into this scandalous saga, one can’t help but wonder: were similar tactics employed during her own campaign? Was there successful manipulation?
In an era of increasing political t***sparency and accountability, such explosive revelations serve as a stark reminder of the necessity for integrity in our leaders. It’s high time we held our politicians accountable for their actions, both past and present.