One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Old Thinker
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 37 next>>
Apr 15, 2022 14:01:25   #
Ginny_Dandy wrote:
Those people are NOT brainwashed! They liked what Trump was doing for the country - as opposed to what the DemocRats are doing to the country now. That's why they show up at Trump rallies - because Trump kept his promises.


He knows that. His comment is right out of the rules for radicals, accusing others of the evil you perpetuate.
Go to
Apr 15, 2022 13:54:08   #
woodguru wrote:
Imagine if you can to John's reaction to the way republican morals have declined...

...the video of trump saying you can grab em by the (crotch) and they'll let you...boom/dead
...preachers involved with sex scandals...boom/dead
...threatening women and their family because you don't agree with their politics...shot like the snakes they are

Trump would never have lived through an encounter with the west's epitome of real man values in terms of respect for women


John Wayne would just look you in the eye and say, "You're wrong pilgrim." I doubt you really know anything about John Wayne or how he would see the republican party but I would guess that he would have v**ed for Trump....
Go to
Apr 13, 2022 21:12:26   #
Maxim wrote:
Woody is just yanking your chain. No one is that stupid.


I tend to agree, but then again, he has come across as stupid before. Just the idea that he thinks he will change someones mind on this forum is pretty stupid.
Go to
Apr 13, 2022 10:42:26   #
woodguru wrote:
It is fairly clear at this point that our freedom loving, patriotic, we the people's not only cherry pick what parts of the country they want made great again, but they prefer Russia and a dictator like Putin to our democracy if they don't like the elected president of the united states.


Just another ill-thought ignorant statement without any reason. I guess you are admitting that you and others like you that didn't/don't like Trump would prefer Putin. your perspective, not mine.
Go to
Apr 11, 2022 16:24:16   #
AuntiE wrote:
Agree.


I agree but I can't understand how they are allowed to compete at all. Most sports have very strict limits on drug use but I guess the rules are different for the left. I suppose another alternative would be to make all sports non-g****r. Somehow that doesn't seem fair either. Why should less than 1% of the population set the rules? It's like the left wants us all just to sit down and shut up while they deny the undeniable differences between the sexes. Oh well, just like them to preach about democracy all day and then tell you that a minority should rule.
Go to
Apr 11, 2022 16:09:13   #
Milosia2 wrote:
This is Not an act of the Biden Administration . The VA is under the watchful eyes of those who want to privatize it. Any way they can diminish its capacity brings them closer to their argument of poor
Performance to allow it to be privatized.
When will youz fools learn to see through the phony rhetoric always on display with the right ?


Are you actually saying that the VA is not controlled by the administration? That the DHS makes the rules? I would love to see the paper on that argument. And here I thought the administration was in control of veteran's affairs. silly me. But I do agree that Biden doesn't have a clue about what is going on. He isn't really in charge of anything, is he?
Go to
Apr 11, 2022 15:42:58   #
Milosia2 wrote:
Are you trying to tell me , trump, a confirmed liar and Russian secret agent ,
Who heisted top secret documents to sell to Russia has more credibility than the FBI ?
Gestapo agents ?
Government Agents trying to preserve the safety and sanctity of our nation from foreign sources , you compare to Gestapo ?
Why does trumpy have these things at maralago?
Has anyone thought to ask him ?
I would love to hear his answer.

Gestapo . For flux sakes.


I got it! I finally figured you out. You're a novelist right? and you only deal with fiction. I'll be watching for the book and I'm sure that MSNBC and CNN will gladly promote it for you. Have you considered non-fiction? People really like true stories too.
Go to
Apr 11, 2022 15:36:05   #
Milosia2 wrote:
Is Hillary living rent free in your little brains ?
HRC has had zero theft charges levied against her.
Keeping recipes on her own private server is not against the law.
She was not charged for anything and after 11 hours of grueling testimony, they found nothing un lawful !
So for you to continue your Hillary is a criminal avails you to lawsuits for defamation of character.


Many people, over several years have called Hillary a criminal but I haven't heard of one defamation lawsuit. I doubt that she would want any details to come out in court as she knows it's true.
Go to
Apr 11, 2022 15:32:05   #
rjoeholl wrote:
1. Apparently

2. Might be.

3. Could.

4. Need to determine.

Yep, BIIIGGGG bombshells.


Go to
Apr 10, 2022 10:29:48   #
Kevyn wrote:
A proud historical moment for our nation. And you mark it with r****m and sexism. How predictable.


Historical? I suppose so but not proud. More like sad and it isn't about sexism or r****m, but I know that's all you have. How predictable you are.
Go to
Apr 10, 2022 10:23:46   #
Milosia2 wrote:
No , they were not true. This is an occlusion
That the right continually suffers from.
Every time a Republican was president the upwards swing of the economy set in motion by the previous democratic president was always destroyed and squandered.
Clinton left Bush43 a thriving economy, and a surplus budget.
When 43 left everything was destroyed .
And he never paid for his Iraq war ($11Billion)
Obama took control of a disaster created by 43. Jobs were leaving the country at 43’s
Behest to the tune of 265,000 per month,
Bush was paying companies to leave the country . Giving them your tax money to move their companies to off shore places.
The right seems to think that their selective memory allows them to trash the Dems for problems , they themselves created.
Woody didn’t need to be rescued, facts are still facts are still facts.
Selective memory is not Facts.
No , they were not true. This is an occlusion br T... (show quote)


Clinton left Osama Bin laden free to murder over 3,000 Americans. He turned down the chance to stop him. Maybe that had something to do with the economy. I may be mistaken but I think Clinton also had a republican congress controlling the purse strings. No praise for Bush either. He was and is a G*******t RINO, just look at his record since he left office. He pals around with the Clinton and Obama and he h**es Trump. I haven't heard of Bush supporting any Republican for office and he goes public only when he is promoting an issue with the approval of Obama and Clinton. I do agree that Woody doesn't need to be rescued, you both just need to be educated about all the facts.
Go to
Apr 10, 2022 10:08:24   #
RickyDCUSMC wrote:
Woodgoof; laws were passed years ago, decades ago in some places requiring cyclists to follow the same traffic laws as Motorcycles and Cars. I personally NEVER road on the sidewalks and in my home town (Ventura, CA) sidewalks were everywhere. We as children were given a safety presentation by the CHP when we were in grade school (1963) about how long it takes for cars to stop even when they see you on a bicycle or walking. Also my wife used to go on walks during her lunch break where we live now and it is against the law here to ride a bicycle on the sidewalk. It is very rude to ride a bicycle where people need to walk. Walking on the street (not in a crosswalk) can be called "J" walking, riding a bicycle on the street is called following the law.
Woodgoof; laws were passed years ago, decades ago ... (show quote)


You may be right about the law but it seems a bit ridiculous to have bicyclists in the streets where they can be easily k**led instead of off the street where an accident with a pedestrian is less likely to be life-threatening. btw, anyone ever heard of a bicyclist being ticketed for not honoring stop signs? I haven't. They generally think they own the streets.
Go to
Apr 6, 2022 12:45:44   #
Milosia2 wrote:
How will anything mr good said change anything in your life.?????
Go ahead and give us a few of the rights whiney excuses.
How does border crossings affect your life.
Is there at least one topic that the right could bring up on the floor that might affect your life in a positive way.?


Try competing with contractors that hire i******s. You have to put your profit margin so low that you live in poverty. They have monopolized the trades and our young people of today have little chance of entering that labor market. Years ago the head of the carpenters union in Phoenix Az. was convicted of putting i******s on the payroll and getting a kickback while at the same time, I was told that the union wasn't accepting any new members and was denied employment. After paying only a $20,000 fine, the same man was indited for a repeat offense two years later. Don't preach to me that lives aren't affected. I lived it.
Go to
Apr 6, 2022 12:21:00   #
RascalRiley wrote:
Your denials would be amusing if the disconnect with reality was not so disconcerting.


You are either totally propagandized, ignorant of the facts or just part of the plan to fundamentally t***sform the U.S. into a g*******t-regime-controlled, f*****t state.
Go to
Apr 5, 2022 10:18:04   #
slatten49 wrote:
By Doug Marlos

Why is the J****** 6 Commission playing softball with Donald Trump and his inner circle of co-conspirators? Why not a single charge against any of them?

Perhaps this will help. Everybody wants to see Trump d**gged away in chains yesterday, myself included. So how does that happen with the J6 Select Committee…?

Do they just subpoena him and demand answers…? Does anybody think he will tell the t***h…?

No, he will sit there and answer only questions his attorney deems valid, the rest will be “I don’t recall’ and “I believed the e******n was r****d and so I acted to right a wrong with the powers of the POTUS”

It doesn’t matter the DOJ said it wasn’t r****d. And the DHS. And the courts. And the recounts. And the multiple investigations by GOP-only panels. And every e******n official in the nation.

But now the Grifter-In-Chief has set the narrative. And every lackey from that point on has a blueprint of how to testify and cover everybody’s ass….

So why the gloves on treatment of those the Committee IS interviewing…? Why play nice with those in Congress and the former administration who were complicit in his multiple c**p attempts…?

Because they have a record of their efforts. Despite what the right may claim, those subpoenaed were first sent polite letters asking them to testify. They negotiated times to interview them allowing for their schedules. They tried to work with them and only used subpoena as a last resort.

That same record was used by the Congress to argue for contempt. It proves that the Committee did not resort to political attacks on supposed enemies but acted with non-partisan fairness at every turn. This record will be used against the s******nists if they decide to plead in court this is all a political witch hunt.

Make sense, now. …?

What jury or panel can accept that claim when they took, in some cases, months to try to get them to testify…? This is the type of backbone the DOJ needs to actually prosecute these people.

Along with the mountains of evidence and testimony provided, the DOJ will have tight cases wrapped in a bow once the Committee is finished. All done with non-partisan commitment to finding the t***h, of finding those who were involved…every damn one of them.

Accountability is coming and justice will lead the way…have patience. These people know what they are doing with the immense power they have under the law.

Be patient, as the wheels of justice turn slowly.
By Doug Marlos br br Why is the J****** 6 Commiss... (show quote)


If you believe that so-called bi-partisan committee is legitimate then you are as badly misinformed. Two RINO Trump h**ers and the f**e impeachment bunch? Give us a break. but go ahead and be patient, maybe we will get to see the 1400 hundred hours of video that they won't pursue. Or maybe Garland has figured out that there is no way to go after Trump without exposing the whole t***h. hmmm... wonder who that could expose? You people are so afraid that Donald Trump would win again (for a third time) that you are willing to lie, c***t and steal to stop him.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 37 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.