there should be no need. But I still say forced sterilization is unacceptable.
Forced parenthood is also bad, but k*****g the baby is not an acceptable solution. Adoption is. And adoption should also be fully government subsidized.
I hope santa is good to you BB! 😉
Bad Bob wrote:
The question was:
"I asked, how would you accept (forced by the government)?"
I didn't cast any blame, but how about a church that teaches real birth control is a sin? I asked you a simple question and the spin was yours.
Your blame hasn't worked very well has it? So how can we stop unwanted pregnancies in the real world?
oh, I didn't understand that you are concerned about birth control and church teaching. And cutting through all the BS and making a real difference.
Back when I was making babies I wasn't Catholic so I didn't care much about sin. I did what I thought was right. My wife is agnostic so she still doesn't care. But we didn't use birth control pills, rather natural family planning.
I believe the best way to prevent unwanted pregnancy is a FORCED government program of sex education in schools. VERY graphic and robust! Starting in Middle Schools. And the churches, fitness centers, YMCA, homeless shelters, soup kitchens, etc. should follow suit. This would include free birth control pills, morning after pills, teaching fertility cycles, fun alternatives to vaginal intercourse, and the horror of unwanted pregnancy and graphic video of a******ns.
Single mothers should also be well cared for with FORCED government employment upgrades and housing upgrades including on site child care, meals, health insurance, etc.
There may be some sin involved in this, but I will kneel before the Lord and say sorry but this is what I believe will reach the most people, save the most lives and bring some relief for the oppressed.
Bad Bob wrote:
Dec 20, 2023 21:16:18 #
Bad Bob
Roamin' Catholic wrote:
I think the question was, to paraphrase, how would... (show quote)
I asked, how would you accept (forced by the government)?
I answered that clearly.
I think your spin is that the government is forcing women to have babies.
Bulls**t.
Why don't you blame the women and men who stupidly conceive children that they don't want? Or blame the a--holes that rape women into pregnancies?
And then, since it is once again rightly the state that decides the legality of a******n, you can blame the v**ers of that state for allowing or not allowing pre-born babies to be k**led.
Liberal Lily wrote:
So you don't believe in denying a******n rights to women since you don't support forced vasectomies for men... each government mandated?
I don't understand the logic of your statement, maybe because there is none. But I can safely say, I would not support forced a******ns, nor would I support forced vasectomies.
Would it not be more logical to equate vasectomy with the tying or cutting of fallopian tubes? Again, the government has no business mandating any form of forced sterilization. Leave that to the Chinese.
Anyway, I don't see the connection between a******n and forced sterilization. One is the ending of a life, the other is the disabling of a bodily function.
Bad Bob wrote:
Please answer the question.
I think the question was, to paraphrase, how would I accept the government forcing vasectomy on men after fathering two children?"
I'm sorry Bad Bob, I don't understand the question. If you mean, would I be in favor of forced vasectomy or not, I say no, I would not be in favor of the government forcing any kind of surgery on anybody for anything.
So what prompts you to ask such a thing? That's my question.
Which reminds me of a funny conversation I heard on the radio. A Catholic priest that I listen to has a friend who's a Rabbi. One day while they were talking, Father says, "Rabbi Lefkovitz, why do rabbis tend to answer a question with a question?"
To which the Rabbi replied, "So what's wrong with a question?"
By the way Bad Bob, Merry Christmas!
Bad Bob wrote:
R/C, how would you accept the government forcing a vasectomy on men after fathering two children?
It would be typical government stupidity to come up with such a plan. Human replacement rate is around 2.5 children, this maintains the population with no growth. If the replacement rate is not met or exceeded, humans would become extinct in a few generations. China found out, now those dumb c****es are promoting larger families.
I v**e Pro-Life. Not only do I grieve the dreadful slaughter of the innocents for their own sake, but also that makes one less thing for which I will be chastised when I come before the Lord on Judgment Day.
Repent while you can! ✝️
She is very beautiful and I assume she is of good character, for I don't recall hearing bad things about her. That being said, she is a fine example of Woman- the Epitome of God's Creation!
🥰
don't click on all that junk (I mean besides the liberal posts) like surveys, pretty girls, merchandise, more pretty girls, links, hot women, etc. I'm sure there is adware, malware, and cursed stuff that can wreck your equipment, not to mention wreck your internet devices.
🖕😈🖕
Ri-chard wrote:
Did on the second day, God said he created the sky or the firmament, which separated the waters above from the waters below. The waters below refer to the oceans and seas on the earth’s surface, while the waters above refer to the water vapor in the atmosphere. The firmament is described as a solid dome-like structure that separates the waters above from the waters below. This concept of the firmament was common in ancient Near Eastern cosmology, where the sky was believed to be a solid dome that held back the waters above.
I think the “firmament” is mentioned about 15 times in the King James Version of the Bible and refers to the expanse of the heavens above the earth. In the story of creation, as found in Genesis, God formed the firmament to divide the "waters above" the earth from the "waters below" the earth.
Chapter 6 of the Biblical Book of Jasher describes the events leading up to the flood and where the waters came from, including the instructions given to Noah by God to build an ark and gather two of every kind of animal, bird, and creeping thing 3. The flood began in the 600th year of Noah’s life and lasted for 40 days and 40 nights 3
Biblical Enoch described a place where there was nothing. Job describes the same: Job 26:7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing. Enoch clearly describes the earth on a foundation (like so many other authors as seen above).
http://www.testingtheglobe.com/enoch.html#:~:text=Enoch%20described%20a%20place%20where%20there%20was%20nothing.,a%20place%20beyond%20the%20ends%20of%20the%20earth.
https://biblehub.com/genesis/1-6.htm With many versions
I hope this helps!
Did on the second day, God said he created the sky... (
show quote)
Thank you for the explanation. Being firmly entrenched in heliocentric dogma I was just curious about the tenets of Flat Earth belief. There seem to be inconsistencies, but being Biblically grounded is always a good place to start.
Hopefully one fine day we will find ourselves in Heaven where all will be revealed. Both of our camps will be astonished I'm sure, when we behold the T***h which eye has not seen and ear has not heard. ☮️
Ri-chard wrote:
Which of the following models obeys Occam’s Razor the best?
Heliocentrism:
There are four vectors of contrary motion that The Earth and Sun experience as they fly though an expanding Universe, according to the wildly magical and imaginative Heliocentric Theory:
1. First, the Earth is allegedly spinning at approximately 1000 mph.
2. Second, while the Earth spins, it is also allegedly moving 67,000 mph around the Sun.
3. Third, while these two motions are occurring, the Sun is also allegedly, and in fact, our whole Solar System is allegedly orbiting around the center of The Milky Way Galaxy. We are supposedly moving at an average velocity of 828,000 km/hr.
4. Fourth, the entire Milky Way Galaxy is also allegedly going 670,000,000 mph on the membrane of an expanding Universe.
Enclosed Cosmology:
The luminaries are moving above you and you are standing on a flat, non-rotating plain with various Topographical features.
You decide.
Which of the following models obeys Occam’s Razor ... (
show quote)
My question is, in the Enclosed Cosmology model, is the flat, non-rotating plain suspended in space or does it rest upon some other object?
Milosia2 wrote:
You cannot condemn anyone to hell but yourself .
You’re delusional if you think you can . That you possess the power to change or motivate Gods will .you cannot petition the Lord with Prayer.
You cannot petition the Lord with Prayer!
The Soft Parade has now begun...