One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Doc110
Page: <<prev 1 ... 588 589 590 591 592 593 next>>
Apr 27, 2015 21:44:34   #
[quote=saltwind 78] Reply; Saltwind, I didn't realize that Obama in the President of General Electric. Thanks for the info.

Reply; Saltwind, Please don't be so "NIAVE" and a smart aleck, in my reply to "Guess who's moving their business overseas ?"

Be realistic, and be black and white on the subject of Obama. Be realistic Saltwind, and try not to be so corrosive as you name is. Obama has a forked tongue and speaks with a forked tongue.

It's all about his inner circle of friends with money, influence of power and patronage to President Obama and his office, and loyalties to Obama’s core ideology and belief systems. There is no grey area here with Obama, he is a Socialist a “Manchurian candidate.

Obama is a politician who will say anything and do anything to get elected to office. Look how many times he has reversed his political positions. and publicly stated that he lied to the American public. You know that power corrupts, and power corrupts absolutely. Beware the hearts and minds of politicians.

We had eight years of Bill and Hillary Clinton.. Now we can see for ourselves the same eight years of corruption in the Obama Administration and Big Government spending practices and his share of scandals. So far since Obama took office, the Federal Debt has increased by almost 70 percent over $ 8 Trillion Dollars and counting. By the end of his Presidency we are looking at $ 22 Trillion Dollars of national Debt by the end of his P**********l term.

This will be President Obama’s Fiscal and Economic Legacy. Not that he was the nation’s first mixed racial President, he had a white mother. Obama legacy will be $12 Trillion in Government debt, that is three times the amount of Bush Jr. who had 4 Trillion dollars in eight years. Obama even criticized Bush Jr. for his reckless Government spending debt. President Obama is a hypocrite socialist politician.

You also know, what Obama's chief advisor, Valery Jarett and personal trusted, hatchet adviser said. Quote" “After we win this e******n, it’s our turn. Payback time. Everyone not with us is against us, and they better be ready, because we don’t forget. The ones who helped us will be rewarded, the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve. "There is going to be hell to pay." Congress won’t be a problem for us this time." "No e******n to worry about after this is over, and we have two judges ready to go.”

Obama was quoted and told a crowd of supporters. “V**e! V****g is the best revenge.” Looks like both 2010 and 2014 midterm e******ns told President lame duck Obama, where to take his social and political agenda. Except, Obama nows has a pen and a phone, and chooses to use his executive actions into signing new law's, his agenda.

So tell me how do you think General Electric (GE) GE Chairman Jeff Immelt got to be appointed by President Obama, to head his commission on job creation (Job's Czar) in 2009. Do you think it might be because of his political donation to Obama's President e******n campaign.

check out this site http://www.followthemoney.org
http://campaignfundingrisks.com You can find out every thing that a politician has accepted in donations.

1. Do you think Obama has influence over the White House Commission on Job creation and the influence over the "Person and Job's Commission?

This position has no governmental over site by Congress, because it is not a Executive Department Office. i.e DOD, FBI, CIA, Labor, Interior, HHS ect.

Do you GE Chairman Jeff Immelt, think's he has the ability to voice his concerns to GE Corporate Office's, and the board of trustee's and as a CEO he has a lot stock share's of GE. Immelt, is a premium share holder of GE stock and capital. Yes I do believe he does have a direct ear to the General Electric (GE) corporate leadership...

Remember when your in the game, it's all about "Who's Who, buddies, enemies, I'll scratch your back, and favors given and owed.

So please, don't be so "NAIVE" in your comments. Back up your claims with facts and write something interesting. Boring reply, Saltwind, and “Touche”

Doc110,

So what kind of internetting Troll are you ?
a. Sea-Lioning Troll's, Self-Appointed "Good Cop"
b. Concern Troll's, Pseudo-Displays of "Constructive Criticism"
c. Gish Galloping Troll's, Falsehoods nitpicking arguments unrelated details
d. Impersonation Troll's, create h**x impersonation accounts in your name
e. Dog-Piling Troll's, Online silencing, Cyber Mob to discredit a target
f. Gas-Lighting Troll's, Giving false information to cause self-doubt.

Inquiring minds want to KNOW.
Go to
Apr 27, 2015 16:59:56   #
Guess who's moving their business overseas? I wonder why !

General Electric Corporation (GE) is moving from Waukesha, Wisconsin. See http://www.dailyjobcuts.com/

That’s our good old President, trying to helping Americans people get back to work again. But our President is hard at work, golfing, traveling and his implementing his fiscal, social policies and responsibilities on the American taxpayer. I'm sorry to tell you, fellow (OPP) readers and Obama supporters, by disappointing you once again.

Obama and Congress are spending, your country’s money into bankruptcy here's how. There are 49 Million Americans are on the Food Stamp program, entitlement programs, our military has ben gutted and there is no NASA, or coal that is being mined because of Obama's economic polices. These are but a few problematic economic issues, and scandals that have rocked the Obama Presidency that I can name and not mentioning other about Obama's wasteful economic polices and his current Administration and Congress.

There is no accountability, for our lawless President Obama and do nothing Congress, to do the right things for American citizens and it's taxpayers. Except to pass a Balanced Budget Amendment. Or do what several other States, like Wisconsin and Maine have done, financial fiscal accountability.

I digress, so back to explaining General Electric Corporation (GE) and how my post article unites these topics and comes together.

Because the federal layoff laws currently being implemented, you will not see the actual figures until six months down the road from GE. There will be major federal financial penalties per worker, if this was done immediately. Look it up if you don't believe me, these laws are firmly in place. Keep your eye on Waukesha, Wisconsin this story is not being reported.

The Wisconsin largest manufacturing employer, just moved out of the State. General Electric (GE) is how moving it's 115-year-old X-ray division from Waukesha, Wisconsin, to Beijing, China. In addition to moving the headquarters, (GE) will now invest over $2 billion in manufacturing in China, then educate and train more than 65 engineers and create six new research centers in China, not in the United States.

This is the same (GE) that made $5.1 billion in the United States last year, in 2014, but paid no taxes. This is the same company that employs more people overseas than it does in the United States.

So let me get this straight. This same President Obama, who appointed GE Chairman, Jeff Immelt, to head his commission on job creation (Job's Czar) Here's where it all ties in. This same Obama’s Job's Commissioner, Jeff Immelt, is supposed to help create jobs in the United States of America, not the other way around. I guess our the President, forgot to tell him in which country he was supposed to be creating those jobs, for people who live in America.

If this doesn't show you the total lack of job creation and leadership from our President, I don't know what does.

No doubt our President Obama figured out a way to get back at Governor Scott Walker (Rep). Just in time for the P**********l e******ns. (More on this subject and Obama vendetta.)

So you understand what the issue were about in the State of Wisconsin.
Governor Walker stood up to the Democrats, and the Unions, his fiscal policies turned around the States bankrupt economy, by being a job creator and fiscaly responsible to it’s taxpayers and State’s citizen.

The State of Wisconsin then became fiscally responsible to the tune of $900 million in the black. In just one year, from being in the red $ 600 Million dollar deficit, from a former Democratic Governor. That's a $ 1.5 million dollar turn around for the State of Wisconsin taxpayers.
By the way, Governor Walker survived a State recall e******n and won a second term as Wisconsin's Governor.

Governor Walker turned around the states economy and fought against the former Democratic deals and the sweetheart pensions that the Democrats and Unions made, which were bankrupting and hemorrhaging the state of Wisconsin.

These same Democrat, Union, same sweetheart pensions deals are now bankrupting and happening all around the United States in local Counties, Cities and towns. Notable examples, Detroit, and soon the City of Chicago next year. Unfortunately no one wins in these negotiated pension battles.

Worst of all this fight and these issues, were directed and orchestrated by Washington D.C. and the Democratic party officials, and no less was championed and spoken on, by President Obama nationally many times.

This was all about States citizen rights vs. and Washington D.C. form of social economic Federalism and not about the Union's sweetheart pensions deals and the crony Democratic machine.

Now, lets get back to our free wheeling and spending President Obama and Congress.

American citizens, That's you and I (OPP) readers, Americans, we owe almost ( $19 Trillion dollars ) and counting, on ( Obligated Federal U.S. debt's. ) i.e. Social Security, Military, Medi-Care and countless other Social federal programs. The United States debt clock has stopped ticking, for some reason. But we are still spending and browning from bank creditors and issuing more financial U.S. bonds, as the debt clock has stopped ticking until the next crisis this, June 2015 in Congress

Wake up American citizens, That's you and I (OPP) readers, taxpayers.
Americans owe over ( $100 Trillion dollars ) and counting on ( Non-Obligated debt's ) that the USA has borrowed and which is not talked about our President, Congress and by both party Politicians.

So we just keep on spending and borrowing like drunken sailors, until our Congress and President, pass another spending resolution, that kick the can, our USA's debt obligation can down the road again.

By the way, OPP) readers the USA taxpayers pay ( $ 5 Trillion dollars ) on interest alone, every year to World Bankers, creditors and Countries that buy our debt's and bonds.

As you know at the same time 94 Million Americans are out of work and are not counted on unemployment statistics because they have been out of work for over six months. The media, politicians and the President fail to tell us the true, unemployment numbers. Supposedly they are 5.8% in this country. The true unemployment numbers are probably around 12% to 18% and higher and lower in various locations in the USA.

Remember this is the same same President that said ( “ Job creation is our highest priority under my leadership.” ) "Just another snow job, to the American Worker." This is totally unacceptable.

Lets get back to the issue at hand.

Do you really think our President Obama is this vindictive to Governor Walker (Rep) and States that assert their responsibilities to its citizens? This is a play card right out of the Clinton playbook, except Obama's playbook card's are on high energy steroids by this P**********l is Administration.

So how did we get in this mess anyway. ( T look into the "Time Machine," the Clinton card playbook. )During the Clinton Presidency, we had a bipartisan Congress that stood up to President Clinton and made him fiscally responsible...

This is the same President Clinton that supported the home loan default swaps. i.e. People who could not afford homes, but purchased homes anyway and were given US government backed home loans by the Clinton Presidency and the United States. Very similar to the Savings and Loan crisis in 1988. A $2 trillion banking crisis stimulus bailout that US citizens had to pay for. Millions of i*****l a***ns home loans, and 15 million low income home owners defaulted.

Those same Corporate Banks and financial institutions who sold those loans and mortgaged backed securities to other financial lenders as stocks without Corporate backed equity securities. These financial institutions used an insurance ploy, (AIG Insurance who did not have the money to pay off the the mortgage loans. And the S**t hit the fan in 2007 and 2008. "The Great Recession." Were still in a recession and its world wide.

Hence U.S. spending and anemic GDP growth for eight years, the ($1 Trillion stimulus package in 2009, ) and the Federal Reserve printing called, Quantitative Easing. i.e. QE1 $1.3 Trillion x three year's, QE2 $1.3 Trillion, QE3, $1.3 Trillion and our current U.S. fiscal debacle including interest.

It's all so hard to believe what our politicians did to Americans, but it is right in front of your very eyes (OPP) readers. History has a way to repeat it's self.
"How's that Hope and Change" working out for you. If this docent get you rilled up. Check out the (Daily Job Cuts) • job layoff news • bankruptcy, store closings, business economy news. http://www.dailyjobcuts.com/
My suggestion is for you too "Think about it," before you buy a GE product again in the store. Thanks Jeff, (“I-Smelt,”) you're a "real" American, and give Obama our Best!

Later, Doc110

“What a Country” As Yakov Smirnoff would say, a Russian comedian on the Johnny Carson show, in the 80's. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pEApsuaa1o
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 12:39:27   #
PennyLynn,

I'm sorry, did you put your foot in your mouth again, I GOT NO REPLY, regarding, rereading my post and your reply to me.

I summarizes the key point from my original post below. Eating crow ?

Re-read the post again and "stop commenting for the sake of commenting" this what you do, in a lot of your reply's. Your still a self-appointed hypocrite.

"WE ARE NOT TRYING TO SILENCE THEIR OPINIONS" !!!!

"AS THE "TROLLS" THEY TRY TO DO TO US."

WE ARE ONLY POINTING OUT THE WAY AND HOW THEY OPERATE.

ONCE YOU CAN DEFINE THE SOCIALIST PROGRESSIVE POLITICAL AGENDA AND NARRATIVE, YOU CAN TRULLY EXPOSE THE "INTERNETTING WEBSITE "TROLL," AND COUNTER THEIR AGENDA.

So in your words, Re-read the statement above, and re-think your reply to me.

As for Jihadi Jeloon, I was being deliberately obtuse with him/her and I achieved my desired result.

When your wrong, your dead wrong PennyLynn.

What no apology ! Not expecting one !

DOC110
Go to
Apr 25, 2015 12:33:04   #
jelun,
I'm sorry, did you put your foot in your mouth again, I GOT NO REPLY, regarding, rereading my post and your reply to me.

I summarizes the key point from my original below. Eating crow ?

Re-read the post again and "stop commenting for the sake of commenting" this what you do, in a lot of your reply's. Your still a self-appointed hypocrite.

"WE ARE NOT TRYING TO SILENCE THEIR OPINIONS !!!!

AS THE "TROLLS" THEY TRY TO DO TO US.

WE ARE ONLY POINTING OUT THE WAY AND HOW THEY OPERATE.

ONCE YOU CAN DEFINE THE SOCIALIST PROGRESSIVE POLITICAL AGENDA AND NARRATIVE, YOU CAN TRULLY EXPOSE THE "INTERNETTING WEBSITE "TROLL," AND COUNTER THEIR AGENDA.

So in your words, Re-read the statement above, and re-think your reply to me.

As for Jihadi Jeloon, I was being deliberately obtuse with him/her and I achieved my desired result.

When your wrong, your dead wrong Jihadi Jeloon.

DOC110
Go to
Apr 19, 2015 21:46:14   #
Pennylynn here is what your buddy on this (OPP) website said in his reply to me.

You see, Doc101(?), you certainly have a right to disagree. You do not have the right to make the rules.
This is how discussion works. You say something, another person responds, and a third person adds their 2 cents.

Now you can call that hijacking if you want. I call it a living, breathing, active conversation.

What happens on a thread is that then someone comes in who responds to the initial or an early post and the conversation shifts again. The realities of life.

You can talk about not appreciating that style, you cannot do much to change it. There is that "unwatch" action to be used when you are no longer interested in a thread. I use it often.

As for Jihadi Jeloon, I was being deliberately obtuse with him/her and I achieved my desired result.

Pennylynn,

Here is my reply to, Jihadi Jeloon, the "Sea-Lioning Troll's" and the Self-Appointed "Good Cop." for the (OPP) website.

jelun,

You still don't get my post, Nor have you EVEN read the post.

And I refuse to have people, I mean, "Trolls", On This Website "TO STOP PUTTING "WORDS IN MY MOUTH" as you and PENNYLYNN have done."

You have nit-picked and chosen what words you wanted to read in my post. And you left out the most important key facts, in the post and article...

This is exactly my point, you just became a "Sea-Lioning Troll's",
Self-Appointed "Good Cop." Stop inflating your ego on this website and read the post. You are still full of crap... still a hypocrite on this website.

Re-read the post again and "stop commenting for the sake of commenting" this what you do, in a lot of your reply's. Your still a self-appointed hypocrite.

IN MY ORIGINAL POST, I WROTE AND STATED.

"WE ARE NOT TRYING TO SILENCE THEIR OPINIONS !!!!
AS THE "TROLLS" THEY TRY TO DO TO US.

WE ARE ONLY POINTING OUT THE WAY AND HOW THEY OPERATE.

ONCE YOU CAN DEFINE THE SOCIALIST PROGRESSIVE POLITICAL AGENDA AND NARRATIVE.

YOU CAN TRULLY EXPOSE THE "INTERNETTING WEBSITE "TROLL," AND COUNTER THEIR AGENDA.

So in your words, Re-read the statement above, and re-think your reply to me.

As for Jihadi Jeloon, reply to me I was being deliberately obtuse with him/her and I achieved my desired result.

When your wrong, your dead wrong Jihadi Jeloon.

jelun, You see, Doc101(?),

It's Doc110, asshole.

Stop being sarcastic, being stupid does not make you a better person on this website, it show's that you are a "Troll and a self-appointed hypocrite.

Jihadi Jeloon, To get respect, you need to show and give respect.
Grow up you are exposed for who and what you are.

You certainly have a right to disagree. You do not have the right to make the rules. This is how discussion works.

jelun, Your still a self-appointed hypocrite on this web site.

My post was all about exposing the "Troll" on the website, you are so ignorant and your opinion is still flawed.

Get a life and look at the "Troll" definition and like in an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting, when the alcoholic states before the group.
I am an alcoholic.

Now in your case, tell the (OPP) Website and state publicly before the (OPP) website, and say "I am a Troll" and "I've always have been a troll."

When your wrong, on Your Opinion, your Just Plain Wrong.

OHHHH your bad. So jelun, get a life and stop wasting peoples time on this website "Troll" . . . you are so full of conflict and full of ignorance.

Read the article.

As "Bugs Bunny said. "What a Moroon" in other words

"What a moron you are.
Go to
Apr 19, 2015 21:23:53   #
jelun,
You still don't get my post, Nor have you EVEN read the post.

And I refuse to have people, I mean, Trolls On This Site To Stop Putting "WORDS IN MY MOUTH" as you and PENNYLYNN have done."

You have nit-picked and chosen what words you wanted to read in my post. And you left out the most important key facts, in the post and article...

This is exactly my point, you just became a "Sea-Lioning Troll's",
Self-Appointed "Good Cop." Stop inflating your ego on this website and read the post. You are still full of crap... A still a hypocrite on this website.

Re-read the post again and "stop commenting for the sake of commenting" this what you do, in a lot of your reply's. Your still a self-appointed hypocrite.

IN MY ORIGINAL POST, I WROTE AND STATED.

"WE ARE NOT TRYING TO SILENCE THEIR OPINIONS !!!! AS THE "TROLLS" THEY TRY TO DO TO US.

WE ARE ONLY POINTING OUT THE WAY AND HOW THEY OPERATE.
ONCE YOU CAN DEFINE THE SOCIALIST PROGRESSIVE POLITICAL AGENDA AND NARRATIVE, YOU CAN TRULLY EXPOSE THE "INTERNETTING WEBSITE "TROLL," AND COUNTER THEIR AGENDA.

So in your words, Re-read the statement above, and re-think your reply to me.

As for Jihadi Jeloon, I was being deliberately obtuse with him/her and I achieved my desired result.

When your wrong, your dead wrong Jihadi Jeloon.

jelun, You see, Doc101(?),

You certainly have a right to disagree. You do not have the right to make the rules. This is how discussion works.

jelun, Your still a self-appointed hypocrite on this web site.

My post was all about exposing the "Troll" on the website, you are so ignorant and your opinion is still flawed.

Get a life and look at the "Troll" definition and like Alcoholics Anonymous meeting, when the alcoholic states before the group. I am an alcoholic.

Now in your case, tell the (OPP) Website and State before the (OPP) web site, "I am a Troll" and I've always have been a troll.

When your wrong, on Your Opinion, your Just Plain Wrong.

OHHHH your bad. So jelun, get a life and stop wasting peoples time on this site "Troll" . . . you are so full of conflict and full of ignorance. Read the article.
As "Bugs Bunny said. "What a Moroon" in other words "What a moron you are.
Go to
Apr 19, 2015 03:14:14   #
Don't give me that hurt girl stuff, and let's be fair stuff. And can't we all just get along crap. You stepped in a pile of crap !

Just remember "To gain respect you have to give respect."
And thats not what you did in either one of your comments.

You only gave an opinion and did not back it up with any facts or dialogue or even add to or disagree with my portion of the post. You commented, for the sake of commenting.

I do a lot of reading of posts on this site, and take in that information, I don't have to always respond to a post. But I must point out that you do your fair share of commenting to excess. Your site history say's exactly that.

You left your comment bland and porous and full of holes. So I gave you a comment in return and looked at your site record and read some of your posts and responses. I saw a pattern, and a cyber buddy back up your claim and narrative. Your comment and reply fits the bill for trolls. from the post.

So what if i'm new to this site, and am well aware how to post an article and write.

You did not even respond or even comment on new name terms for trolls, now they have a definition and actual terms, As for plagiarizing the article I posted her woman's article and posted it as a political article. She got credit for her article.

The post was intended to inform (OPP) site members to the article and my post that incorporated the article. That was the Post. Nothing more than to expose the Socialist progressive liberal Democrat Troll on this site and to give him an exact name. That is how the post was written. Plain and simple.

Read the post again, Learn something new. instead of commenting for the sake of commenting.
Go to
Apr 19, 2015 02:33:54   #
Ed, great reply to the troll... and I like your comment, here is what I posted back to ( Pennylynn and jelun ) I came back swinging.

Ed, these two ignorant, know-it-all "Do-gooders" "trolls" have not even heard of these term internetting terms before today.

Both ( Pennylynn and jelun ) criticize, for the sake of criticizing and add nothing to the conversation except to say I wish I had some new insight and or had thought something new to add constructively. Just go to their profile and read the posts, and the Number of messages and feedback.

My reply to the both of them.

Doc110, Semper Fi

You two, are a bunch of hypocrites ( Pennylynn and jelun ) and have violated the heart and soul of my "Internetting" post, “A Guide to "Internetting": The internet breakdown of every type "Trolling" on online blogging trolls”

It is quite apparent and obviously that you two (OPP) Socialist are pretending to be Neocon Conservative commenters on this website and are “Holier than Thou” attitude just sucks. And your website track record, collusion and commenting are always in the attack mode.

I’m calling you out, for what you both are, and you both fell into the trap by exposing you’re selves. This article, it is written about the both of you. “This Bud is for you,

Don’t you see he beauty of this website: Look at your (OPP) website history it’s all public record. Remember that you both are not anonymous, and cannot hide from your true nature... people and "Trolls" really don't change.

All one has to do look is research from the website history comments, feedback, messages posted and read and see. That you are either, one and the same person, or that you two, are a match born in heaven. I choose the second alternative.

In this case it would be a match made in hell, because you both are saying the same thing, and get the same results (See below) ("Internetting Trolling Attributes.")

All one has to do, is read your diatribe reactions and comments from other members on the (OPP) website... We see your vile inflammatory responses to (OPP) members posts. By the way, your history together is very interesting and view your similarities and comments together.

What is funny and un-canny and which is not purely purely coincidental?
Is that you didn’t even read the heart or soul of the article and went into attack mode.

For me to merely suggest that this could not even happen on this (OPP) website, i’m not that naive. I don’t put it past the two of you, that your both paid “Trollers.”
All one has to do is read your consistent track record, (A regular here) (No personal information, just blank and anonymous) on this (OPP) website. Afraid of exposing your dark personal secrets?

Here’s is your website history.
1. Number of topics created: (102) & 78 (list) respectively.
2. Number of messages posted: 7646 & 3860 (list) respectively.
3. Feedback/rating: 0, positive 0.0% and 5, positive 40.0% (list)

It’s actually funny that you to have no bio-background and are both in hiding :)

Here are the 6 of the "Trolls" or "Trolling attributes that you both have joined, and should be labeled as:

a. Sea-Lioning Troll's, Self-Appointed "Good Cop"
b. Concern Troll's, Pseudo-Displays of "Constructive Criticism"
c. Gish Galloping Troll's, Falsehoods nitpicking arguments unrelated details
d. Impersonation Troll's, create h**x impersonation accounts in your name
e. Dog-Piling Troll's, Online silencing, Cyber Mob to discredit a target
f. Gas-Lighting Troll's, Giving false information to cause self-doubt.

Looking at your comments on the "Internetting" post, “A Guide to "Internetting": The internet breakdown of every type "Trolling" on online blogging trolls.”

You both are the blind leading the blind, that’s what website trollers do, create anarchy and your doing a bang-up job of it. Get some real backbone and stand for something. You criticize, for the sake of criticizing and add nothing to the conversation except to say I wish I had some new insight and or had thought something new to add constructively.

Blaa Blaa Blaa, your are both boring, to the response to this article and Post. Online Trolls now have a name, and they should be called out, just as I have called you out in my reply to your comments.

You have never even heard. of these terms before today. Why don't you comment on that and their definition and add to the conversation ? You both went into the attack and defend mode as well as Cyber-Mob mode.
Sea-Lioning Troll's,
Concern Troll's,
Gish Galloping Troll's,
Impersonation Troll's,
Dog-Piling Troll's,
Gas-Lighting Troll's.

After looking at your comments there is nothing to respond to.

1. You both seem to be “Self-appointed” "Good Cop" for the website.
2. The intention of masking your hostility in pseudo-displays of vile troll's disingenuous comments i.e." Constructive Criticism." is your bread and butter of your kind of website trolling.
3. You both focus on nitpicking on minor unrelated details, each loaded with implied accusations. Your disingenuous arguments that sidetrack the core issues.
4. You create h**x social media impersonation website accounts in order to post inflammatory statements in your name. Who really are you.
Change your Bio-history, blank and anonymous profile.
I’m calling you out ! “Troll”
5. You both just did a "Cyber Mob" attack. And tried to silence, discredit, and humiliate the target. The post “A Guide to "Internetting": The internet breakdown of every type "Trolling" on online blogging trolls.”
Which actually points the Trolls, as you.

As I read many of your comments and feedbacks, I see a pattern, that you both are a pair of serial abusers and present false information or a false narrative to the posts on the (OPP) website.

Blindly you comment for the sake of commenting, your feedback to many posts are pathetic and have narcissistic behavior pattern that is all too common for “Troll’s” like the both of you.

Your not even worth another comment. Both of you fit the Troll line, Hook line and sinker.

Best Regards, Doc110

Pennylynn, comment broken down:
Well this is interesting. I think in the descriptive portion of this comment, you have just about named all posters on OPP as one type or another Troll. And there is no distinction, because who has not tried to join a topic out of the blue?

I have done it on more times than I can count. How else can you share your opinions on the topic, wait for someone to send a PM and invite you?

Who has not asked for references to particular claims?

If one says that peanuts grown in Georgia is contaminated, would you not want proof?

A while back I put up a Let's take back OPP thread about profanity.

Does that make me a Cop Troll? And I often defend a principal or comment made by another, does that make me good Cop.


jelun, comment broken down:
I suppose by responding to you, you are saying to yourself, see there is another kind of troll, those that post comments about trolls.
Go to
Apr 19, 2015 02:23:10   #
You two, are a bunch of hypocrites ( Pennylynn and jelun ) and have violated the heart and soul of my "Internetting" post, “A Guide to "Internetting": The internet breakdown of every type "Trolling" on online blogging trolls”

It is quite apparent and obviously that you two (OPP) Socialist are pretending to be Neocon Conservative commenters on this website and are “Holier than Thou” attitude just sucks. And your website track record, collusion and commenting are always in the attack mode.

I’m calling you out, for what you both are, and you both fell into the trap by exposing you’re selves. This article, it is written about the both of you. “This Bud is for you,

Don’t you see he beauty of this website: Look at your (OPP) website history it’s all public record. Remember that you both are not anonymous, and cannot hide from your true nature... people and "Trolls" really don't change.

All one has to do look is research from the website history comments, feedback, messages posted and read and see. That you are either, one and the same person, or that you two, are a match born in heaven. I choose the second alternative.

In this case it would be a match made in hell, because you both are saying the same thing, and get the same results (See below) ("Internetting Trolling Attributes.")

All one has to do, is read your diatribe reactions and comments from other members on the (OPP) website... We see your vile inflammatory responses to (OPP) members posts. By the way, your history together is very interesting and view your similarities and comments together.

What is funny and un-canny and which is not purely purely coincidental?
Is that you didn’t even read the heart or soul of the article and went into attack mode.

For me to merely suggest that this could not even happen on this (OPP) website, i’m not that naive. I don’t put it past the two of you, that your both paid “Trollers.”
All one has to do is read your consistent track record, (A regular here) (No personal information, just blank and anonymous) on this (OPP) website. Afraid of exposing your dark personal secrets?

Here’s is your website history.
1. Number of topics created: (102) & 78 (list) respectively.
2. Number of messages posted: 7646 & 3860 (list) respectively.
3. Feedback/rating: 0, positive 0.0% and 5, positive 40.0% (list)

It’s actually funny that you to have no bio-background and are both in hiding :)

Here are the 6 of the "Trolls" or "Trolling attributes that you both have joined, and should be labeled as:

a. Sea-Lioning Troll's, Self-Appointed "Good Cop"
b. Concern Troll's, Pseudo-Displays of "Constructive Criticism"
c. Gish Galloping Troll's, Falsehoods nitpicking arguments unrelated details
d. Impersonation Troll's, create h**x impersonation accounts in your name
e. Dog-Piling Troll's, Online silencing, Cyber Mob to discredit a target
f. Gas-Lighting Troll's, Giving false information to cause self-doubt.

Looking at your comments on the "Internetting" post, “A Guide to "Internetting": The internet breakdown of every type "Trolling" on online blogging trolls.”

You both are the blind leading the blind, that’s what website trollers do, create anarchy and your doing a bang-up job of it. Get some real backbone and stand for something. You criticize, for the sake of criticizing and add nothing to the conversation except to say I wish I had some new insight and or had thought something new to add constructively.

Blaa Blaa Blaa, your are both boring, to the response to this article and Post. Online Trolls now have a name, and they should be called out, just as I have called you out in my reply to your comments.

You have never even heard. of these terms before today. Why don't you comment on that and their definition and add to the conversation ? You both went into the attack and defend mode as well as Cyber-Mob mode.
Sea-Lioning Troll's,
Concern Troll's,
Gish Galloping Troll's,
Impersonation Troll's,
Dog-Piling Troll's,
Gas-Lighting Troll's.

After looking at your comments there is nothing to respond to.

1. You both seem to be “Self-appointed” "Good Cop" for the website.
2. The intention of masking your hostility in pseudo-displays of vile troll's disingenuous comments i.e." Constructive Criticism." is your bread and butter of your kind of website trolling.
3. You both focus on nitpicking on minor unrelated details, each loaded with implied accusations. Your disingenuous arguments that sidetrack the core issues.
4. You create h**x social media impersonation website accounts in order to post inflammatory statements in your name. Who really are you.
Change your Bio-history, blank and anonymous profile.
I’m calling you out ! “Troll”
5. You both just did a "Cyber Mob" attack. And tried to silence, discredit, and humiliate the target. The post “A Guide to "Internetting": The internet breakdown of every type "Trolling" on online blogging trolls.”
Which actually points the Trolls, as you.

As I read many of your comments and feedbacks, I see a pattern, that you both are a pair of serial abusers and present false information or a false narrative to the posts on the (OPP) website.

Blindly you comment for the sake of commenting, your feedback to many posts are pathetic and have narcissistic behavior pattern that is all too common for “Troll’s” like the both of you.

Your not even worth another comment. Both of you fit the Troll line, Hook line and sinker.

Best Regards, Doc110

Pennylynn, comment broken down:
Well this is interesting. I think in the descriptive portion of this comment, you have just about named all posters on OPP as one type or another Troll. And there is no distinction, because who has not tried to join a topic out of the blue?

I have done it on more times than I can count. How else can you share your opinions on the topic, wait for someone to send a PM and invite you?

Who has not asked for references to particular claims?

If one says that peanuts grown in Georgia is contaminated, would you not want proof?

A while back I put up a Let's take back OPP thread about profanity.

Does that make me a Cop Troll? And I often defend a principal or comment made by another, does that make me good Cop.


jelun, comment broken down:
I suppose by responding to you, you are saying to yourself, see there is another kind of troll, those that post comments about trolls.
Go to
Apr 19, 2015 02:22:27   #
You two, are a bunch of hypocrites ( Pennylynn and jelun ) and have violated the heart and soul of my "Internetting" post, “A Guide to "Internetting": The internet breakdown of every type "Trolling" on online blogging trolls”

It is quite apparent and obviously that you two (OPP) Socialist are pretending to be Neocon Conservative commenters on this website and are “Holier than Thou” attitude just sucks. And your website track record, collusion and commenting are always in the attack mode.

I’m calling you out, for what you both are, and you both fell into the trap by exposing you’re selves. This article, it is written about the both of you. “This Bud is for you,

Don’t you see he beauty of this website: Look at your (OPP) website history it’s all public record. Remember that you both are not anonymous, and cannot hide from your true nature... people and "Trolls" really don't change.

All one has to do look is research from the website history comments, feedback, messages posted and read and see. That you are either, one and the same person, or that you two, are a match born in heaven. I choose the second alternative.

In this case it would be a match made in hell, because you both are saying the same thing, and get the same results (See below) ("Internetting Trolling Attributes.")

All one has to do, is read your diatribe reactions and comments from other members on the (OPP) website... We see your vile inflammatory responses to (OPP) members posts. By the way, your history together is very interesting and view your similarities and comments together.

What is funny and un-canny and which is not purely purely coincidental?
Is that you didn’t even read the heart or soul of the article and went into attack mode.

For me to merely suggest that this could not even happen on this (OPP) website, i’m not that naive. I don’t put it past the two of you, that your both paid “Trollers.”
All one has to do is read your consistent track record, (A regular here) (No personal information, just blank and anonymous) on this (OPP) website. Afraid of exposing your dark personal secrets?

Here’s is your website history.
1. Number of topics created: (102) & 78 (list) respectively.
2. Number of messages posted: 7646 & 3860 (list) respectively.
3. Feedback/rating: 0, positive 0.0% and 5, positive 40.0% (list)

It’s actually funny that you to have no bio-background and are both in hiding :)

Here are the 6 of the "Trolls" or "Trolling attributes that you both have joined, and should be labeled as:

a. Sea-Lioning Troll's, Self-Appointed "Good Cop"
b. Concern Troll's, Pseudo-Displays of "Constructive Criticism"
c. Gish Galloping Troll's, Falsehoods nitpicking arguments unrelated details
d. Impersonation Troll's, create h**x impersonation accounts in your name
e. Dog-Piling Troll's, Online silencing, Cyber Mob to discredit a target
f. Gas-Lighting Troll's, Giving false information to cause self-doubt.

Looking at your comments on the "Internetting" post, “A Guide to "Internetting": The internet breakdown of every type "Trolling" on online blogging trolls.”

You both are the blind leading the blind, that’s what website trollers do, create anarchy and your doing a bang-up job of it. Get some real backbone and stand for something. You criticize, for the sake of criticizing and add nothing to the conversation except to say I wish I had some new insight and or had thought something new to add constructively.

Blaa Blaa Blaa, your are both boring, to the response to this article and Post. Online Trolls now have a name, and they should be called out, just as I have called you out in my reply to your comments.

You have never even heard. of these terms before today. Why don't you comment on that and their definition and add to the conversation ? You both went into the attack and defend mode as well as Cyber-Mob mode.
Sea-Lioning Troll's,
Concern Troll's,
Gish Galloping Troll's,
Impersonation Troll's,
Dog-Piling Troll's,
Gas-Lighting Troll's.

After looking at your comments there is nothing to respond to.

1. You both seem to be “Self-appointed” "Good Cop" for the website.
2. The intention of masking your hostility in pseudo-displays of vile troll's disingenuous comments i.e." Constructive Criticism." is your bread and butter of your kind of website trolling.
3. You both focus on nitpicking on minor unrelated details, each loaded with implied accusations. Your disingenuous arguments that sidetrack the core issues.
4. You create h**x social media impersonation website accounts in order to post inflammatory statements in your name. Who really are you.
Change your Bio-history, blank and anonymous profile.
I’m calling you out ! “Troll”
5. You both just did a "Cyber Mob" attack. And tried to silence, discredit, and humiliate the target. The post “A Guide to "Internetting": The internet breakdown of every type "Trolling" on online blogging trolls.”
Which actually points the Trolls, as you.

As I read many of your comments and feedbacks, I see a pattern, that you both are a pair of serial abusers and present false information or a false narrative to the posts on the (OPP) website.

Blindly you comment for the sake of commenting, your feedback to many posts are pathetic and have narcissistic behavior pattern that is all too common for “Troll’s” like the both of you.

Your not even worth another comment. Both of you fit the Troll line, Hook line and sinker.

Best Regards, Doc110

Pennylynn, comment broken down:
Well this is interesting. I think in the descriptive portion of this comment, you have just about named all posters on OPP as one type or another Troll. And there is no distinction, because who has not tried to join a topic out of the blue?

I have done it on more times than I can count. How else can you share your opinions on the topic, wait for someone to send a PM and invite you?

Who has not asked for references to particular claims?

If one says that peanuts grown in Georgia is contaminated, would you not want proof?

A while back I put up a Let's take back OPP thread about profanity.

Does that make me a Cop Troll? And I often defend a principal or comment made by another, does that make me good Cop.


jelun, comment broken down:
I suppose by responding to you, you are saying to yourself, see there is another kind of troll, those that post comments about trolls.
Go to
Apr 18, 2015 14:25:39   #
Dear Fellow (OPP) readers,

I felt it germane, to define the subject on "Trolls" or "Trolling" on the (OPP) web site. Specifically this post and article is to discuss, educate and inform (OPP) readers about the political socialist liberal attack and agenda on the American center, Libertarians and Conservative voice's in America.

This post is to express my personal outrage at the political Democratic socialist left's narrative policies, of the political "Do-gooder" mentality and thought process of progressive Democrat party, or to put it succinctly
( "The Big Lie Theory," ) and their political narrative and their conscious ability to try and limit our freedoms and voice's in America.

This post is re-write of article that I read, "A Guide to “Internetting” While Female," The patron saint of internet warriors breaks down every type of trolling type. (See) http://www.marieclaire.com/culture/news/a13403/online-harassment-terms-fight-back/

This article points will try exposes "L*****t's Democratic Political Trolls," and their negative attacks on our freedoms and political viewpoints on the (OPP) and many other political websites.

This is how political socialist "Trolls" operate, by being counterproductive in their opinion, by using false or ambiguous inflammatory facts and try manipulating political narrative, to justify the actual l*****t political talking points.

One Political Plaza readers.
We are obligated as Americans to correct there political lies and the socialist liberal deceit, on the (OPP) website, by naming the socialist, liberal progressive Democrat as "Internetting Trolls :
a. Sea-Lioning Troll's, Self-Appointed "Good Cop"
b. Concern Troll's, Pseudo-Displays of "Constructive Criticism"
c. Gish Galloping Troll's, Falsehoods nitpicking arguments unrelated details
d. Impersonation Troll's, create h**x impersonation accounts in your name
e. Dog-Piling Troll's, Online silencing, Cyber Mob to discredit a target
g. Gas-Lighting Troll's, Giving false information to cause self-doubt.

By explaining these "Trolling" definitions and terms we identify and can cut down their liberal diatribe and stop waisting our precious time to discuss the real facts and issues facing American citizens. By exposing these (OPP) "Trolling Hacks," (OPP) readers will be better informed and have facts, to point out what is wrong in their posts, comments and information that they provide.

Only by exposing and by defining their socialist agenda, can we change the political liberal left's utopian society, “Do-Gooder narrative,” and the Left's thinking narrative, on this site and many other website.

We are not trying to silence their opinions !!! As the "Trolls" they try to do to us. We are only pointing out the way and how they operate. Once you can define the socialist progressive political agenda and narrative you can trully expose the "Internetting website Troll," and counter their agenda.

As Americans, we can uses these definitions of "Trolling" by identifying their methods, as to how they operate and infiltrate their thinking to the thought post, opinion remark process, and by rationally thinking and contributing to the American viewpoint here, their only goal, is to be inflammatory to your view point and "Lie," and repeatedly lie.

That is what the Democratic socialistic progressive liberals do and the socialists Media prostitute's continually do, which is to lie and distort the t***hful facts.

How many articles in the media are just inaccurate and are false? There are to many to count, and if a conservative or Libertarian were held to the same standard, there would be hardly any democrat in political office.

Remember that we are constitutional abiding Americans and have "Free Speech," authorized by the 1776 "Bill of Rights as defined by our founding fathers from the American revolution, through war, and secession from the British royal crown.

In my next post, will be about the "Art of Argument," and "How's and Why's"
to expose the l*****t socialist methods trolling on web sites. How to read and decipher their political socialist political agenda.

This will be a conservative guide for (OPP) users to "Internetting" to point out the fallacies to their argument, and how the liberal socialists political trolls directs your posts, opinions and America voice. This is a argument tactic to question their thoughts and ideas and how to write and express our ideas as we live our lives in America.

Do Americans just give up in believing in freedom ? The liberal socialists Democrat and the Media are trying too define your freedoms, in America and what your freedoms should be.

It all comes down to the ( "The Big Lie Theory," ) and how the Democratic socialist progressive left's “Alinsky” narrative policies are pushed forward into your face and the American people. We are not R****ts, Anti-Religious H********c, Anti-Immigrant and are not Anti-Feminists. This is how they triumph their socialist progressive message and hide behind these slogans and issues.

We are Americans and are not to be marginalized, we have the same Bill of Rights, as the Democratic socialistic progressive liberals do into silencing Americans political speech. The difference between the American center, Libertarians and Conservative voice's in America are that we do not hide behind these catch phrases, of politically motivated issues, that they constantly scream and hammer us all the time.

Cry "Wolf" too many times, and this is one American response...

We Americans are assaulted on a daily basis to question our own beliefs on religion, marriage, child rearing, politics, banking, finance, etc. The list goes on and on what and how we are to think and believe by the Democratic socialist progressive left's policies and the prostitute media corporations complex anti-American collusion agenda.

"The Bill of Rights, and the Constitution" are truly living breathing documents and are not "Dead"documents as some progressives may think. Don't let the liberal socialists Democrat and the Media tell you what your individual rights are, direct their attack against them. An example if someone called you a r****t, which has no merit to the conversation, call them a "R****t for calling me a Raciest.. Their opinion is a knee jerk reaction to the facts and the "The Big Lie Theory," they espouse.

1. Sea-Lioning Trolling: is when an uninvited stranger pops into your conversation and peppers you with unsolicited and insincere questions. The sea-lion politely demands evidence for even the most mundane or self-evident statements and insists that you justify your opinions until they are satisfied—Which they never do, since they are asking the questions in bad faith. The Sea-lion is basically the self-appointed "Good Cop" in an interrogation for a crime you didn't commit.

2. Concern Trolling: is when harassers pose as fans or supporters with the intention of masking their hostility in pseudo-displays of "Constructive Criticism." When targeting bloggers and comments, this is most often done through "Helpful" suggestions on how to improve one's thoughts or adopt a more pleasant tone. The concern troll's disingenuous comments are actually designed to undercut or demean you. Veiled (and sometimes not-so-veiled) accusations of hypocrisy are the bread and butter of this kind of troll.

3. Gish Galloping Trolling: is a device used to derail a conversation with a flood of falsehoods and tiny arguments that focus on nitpicking or minor unrelated details, each loaded with implied accusations. The Gish galloper will often assert the same argument simply rephrased over and over again. Rather than expressing sincere concerns, these petty comments are designed to distract and overwhelm you by wasting your time with tangential or disingenuous arguments that sidetrack the core issues you are discussing.

4. Impersonation Trolling: is a strategy whereby harassers create h**x social media impersonation accounts in order to post inflammatory statements in your name. The intention is to try to get as many people as possible to believe the f**e quotes and thereby defame you. These f**e quotes are then integrated into the other forms of harassment mentioned above.

5. Dog-Piling Trolling: the mother lode of online harassment, is when a group collectively works together using dozens of tactics at once to overwhelm a target through sheer volume, clogging and choking online accounts with a cascade of disingenuous questions, insults, slurs, threats, and more. When a large group comes together to try to collectively shame, harass, or discredit a target, it's also called a "Cyber Mob." The goal is to silence, discredit, and humiliate the target by creating an online environment so unbearable that they are driven offline.

6. Gas-lighting Trolling: one of the most psychologically damaging types of harassment, is when serial abusers present false information or a false narrative to make you doubt your own memory, perceptions, sanity, or professional knowledge. The harassers are attacking you and simultaneously sending the message that their behavior is not actually abusive. This intentional confusion can lead blogers to internalize feelings of self-doubt and uncertainty about their own reality.

Gas-Lighting Trolling: is the undercurrent traveling throughout online harassment, forcing bloggers to question their own experiences. and are told that they are not reliable witnesses to their own lives," historian Rebecca Solnit, "That t***h is not their property, now or ever." When we dare speak up about digital abuse, the response is a cacophony of voices insistently telling us we're making it all up, or that it's not really as bad as we think it is.

We are told: "Just ignore it," "It's not real," "It's just the Internet," "Toughen up," and "Grow a thicker skin." These flippant sentiments are an aggressive denial of our lived realities, erasing our experiences and suggesting that the abuse inflicted on us is not real and, by extension, our fears and anxieties about it are not real.

But the harassment is real, and if you've experienced it, you aren't alone. We must actively work to create a digital world where we don't ask bloggers to disconnect from their emotional capacity or to jettison their own humanity in order to deal with a constant barrage of threats, slurs, and abuse.

Doc110
Go to
Apr 15, 2015 21:06:47   #
Neoconservatism, variant of the political ideology of conservatism that combines features of traditional conservatism with political individualism and a qualified endorsement of free markets. Neoconservatism arose in the United States in the 1970s among intellectuals who shared a dislike of c*******m and a disdain for the counterculture of the 1960s, especially its political radicalism and its animus against authority, custom, and tradition.

Intellectual influences
Among their intellectual ancestors neoconservatives count the ancient Greek historian Thucydides for his unblinking realism in military matters and his skepticism toward democracy, as well as Alexis de Tocqueville, the French author of Democracy in America (1835–40), who described and analyzed both the bright and the bad sides of democracy in the United States. More recent influences include the German-born American political philosopher Leo Strauss and several of his students, such as Allan Bloom; Bloom’s student Francis Fukuyama; and a small band of intellectuals who in their youth were anti-Stalinist c*******ts (specifically Trotskyites) before becoming liberals disillusioned with liberalism. The latter include Irving Kristol, Nathan Glazer, and Norman Podhoretz, among others.

Culture and religion
In its respect for established institutions and practices, neoconservatism resembles the traditional conservatism of the 18th-century Irish statesman Edmund Burke. Neoconservatives, however, tend to pay more attention than traditional conservatives to cultural matters and the mass media—to music, art, literature, theatre, film, and, more recently, television and the Internet—because they believe that a society defines itself and expresses its values through these means. Western (and particularly American) society, they charge, has become amoral, adrift, and degenerate. As evidence of the moral corruption of Western culture, they cite violent and sexually explicit films, television programs, and video games, and they point to popular music that is rife with obscenities that have lost their capacity to shock and disgust. Actions once regarded as shameful are now accepted as normal. For example, most people in the West now consider it perfectly acceptable for unmarried men and women to live together and even to have children. These phenomena amount to “defining deviancy down,” as the neoconservative sociologist and U.S. senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan once charged.

Such degenerate behaviour, say neoconservatives, indicates a broader and deeper cultural crisis afflicting Western civilization. The American political scientist James Q. Wilson, for example, traced the crisis to the 18th-century European Enlightenment, which encouraged people to question established authority, to criticize religion, and to reject traditional beliefs. Other neoconservatives blame the “adversarial” counterculture of the 1960s, which dismissed traditional values and religion as old-fashioned, irrelevant, or even reactionary. Wh**ever its source, neoconservatives maintain that this degeneration represents a real and present danger to Western civilization.

Neoconservatives agree with religious conservatives that the current crisis is due in part to the declining influence of religion in people’s lives. People without a sense of something larger than themselves, something transcendent and eternal, are apt to turn to mindless entertainment—including drugs and alcohol—and to act selfishly and irresponsibly. Religion at its best is a kind of social cement, holding families, communities, and countries together. At its worst, however, religion can be fanatical, intolerant, and d******e, tearing communities apart instead of uniting them. Most neoconservatives thus believe that the principle of the separation of church and state, as enshrined in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, is a good idea. They also believe, however, that it has been pursued to extremes by adherents of modern liberalism, who are bent on banishing religion from public life, resulting in a backlash from religious-right conservatives.

Neoconservatives also hold that the modern liberal ideal of cultural diversity, or m**************m—the principle of not only tolerating but also respecting different religions and cultures and encouraging them to coexist harmoniously, tends to undermine the traditional culture of any country that tries to put it into practice. It also encourages the excesses of “political correctness”—that is, an overly acute sensitivity to offending people of other backgrounds, outlooks, and cultures. These trends, they believe, are likely to produce a conservative backlash, such as those that took place in Denmark and the Netherlands, where anti-immigrant political parties became increasingly popular in the 1990s and early 2000s.
Go to
Apr 15, 2015 21:01:10   #
Eagleeye13,

Doc; you have the Democrats figured. You lack in having the NeoCONS figured out, and who pulls their strings.

Who and what are NeoCONS; a former liberal espousing political conservatism and conservative who advocates the assertive promotion of democracy and United States national interest in international affairs including through military means.

1. http://www.cfr.org/world/heck-neocon/p5343
2. http://www.cfr.org/united-states/think-again-neocons/p7592
3. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/000tzmlw.asp
4. http://www.globalresearch.ca/neocon-101-what-do-neoconservatives-believe/6483
5. http://www.theamericanconservative.com/whats-a-neoconservative/
6. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/neoconservative
7. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1075556/neoconservatism

Instead of me explaining NeoCONS here is the basis of neocon's belief from the media pun-dent. Tell me what you think. am I on the mark ?
Go to
Apr 15, 2015 20:44:29   #
Try and put the two technologies together: with HAARP and Geo-engineering.
this thought process does not make conclusion, for cause and effect.

Geo-engineering deals with metal air dispersion to produce a ecology effect across the USA. To combat G****l w*****g.

The other technology is, HAARP which has to do with underground seismic directed sound frequency waves. A probable government weapon?

We are waiting to find out the desired effect, some say it has caused the California drought.

California's drought is most probably caused by the La Ninia, (Drying weather effect) that co-incides, with the 13 year solar cycle in which the sun reverses the direction flow, from right to left, and in 13 years back to left to right.

This has been going on for billions of years. The science show's in ice core analysis and the tree ring analysis.
Go to
Apr 15, 2015 19:13:44   #
Sorry, Geo-engeneering Chemical-engerning, Chem-trails, Nothing to do with HAARP
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 588 589 590 591 592 593 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.