One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: acknowledgeurma
Page: <<prev 1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 77 next>>
Dec 20, 2017 12:48:26   #
jSmitty45 wrote:
We are on a fixed income, and I understand the taxes won't hurt those people. However, most didn't really get a raise on SS, due to medicare premium went up. I didn't get anything more, same as the last 5 years since I have been on it. My brother got $7.00. They forgot to mention medicare costs going up when they promised us the raise. Medicare went up $25.00 a month, so there goes your raise. Some got $2.00 more. I understand Ryan wants to change some rules on SS and Medicare, but I believe that is for the ones not retired yet, either raising the age or something more. I know Trump said when running that he was not going to do anything to Social Security or Medicare. I guess time will tell. Hopefully not. Thank God I am healthy and can work. I feel sorry for those that was looking forward to the raise, and got disappointed like I did! That is the good old government for you! Promises, but does not deliver. The dems would never give you a raise, they are too greedy, and just want you to die, so they can keep your money. Bad enough that you lose a ss check when your spouse dies, you only get the higher of the two. So they keep that money for themselves. Doesn't seem right!
We are on a fixed income, and I understand the tax... (show quote)

jSmitty45 wrote, "The dems would never give you a raise, they are too greedy, and just want you to die, so they can keep your money."

The "dems" are the people that created SS and Medicare in the first place.
Go to
Dec 19, 2017 18:10:38   #
From:
https://www.uuworld.org/articles/obamas-religious-roots

“Gramps” liked investigating religions as sampling cuisines, Obama suggests. So, too, did Stanley Ann, who took her son on religion sampling tours. On Easter or Christmas, Obama tells us in The Audacity of Hope (2006), his mother “might d**g me to church, just as she d**gged me to the Buddhist temple, the Chinese New Year celebration, the Shinto shrine, and ancient Hawaiian burial sites.” With each new venture, however, Stanley Ann made certain her son understood the protocol: taste the cuisine, chew on it, but don’t swallow the dip.

These religion samplings, Obama notes, “required no sustained commitment on my part—no introspective exertion or self-f**gellation.” Nor was there any requirement for personal reflection when he read the Bible, the Qur’an, the Bhagavad Gita, Greek, Norse, and African mythology, or any of the other religious texts that sat side by side on a bookshelf in his home. He studied religions for the sake of a well-rounded education. “It was one of many ways—and not necessarily the best way—that man attempted to control the unknowable and understand the deeper t***hs about our lives.”
...
Some of Obama’s political enemies have portrayed his exposure to Unitarian Universalism as evidence of his “socialist” or even “Marxist” upbringing. When Young told a reporter for the conservative website WorldNetDaily that the Unitarian Sunday school “has always been and to this day is involved in political activism,” the website launched a scathing attack against Obama, citing Young’s statement to prove that Obama’s presence as an eleven-year-old in the Sunday school exposed him to a “far-left activist church” that participated in “draft-dodging activism” linked to the Students for a Democratic Society and its Weatherman subgroup leader Bill Ayers. Obama probably learned his values, the reporter Aaron Klein concluded, “during his Sunday school days at the First Unitarian.”

Another conservative journalist also trumped up the Unitarian Universalist activist charges against President Obama in June 2009, shortly after the introduction of legislation that would become “Obamacare.” Obama, Andrew Walden alleged, kept secret this radical link during the 2008 p**********l campaign because he didn’t want people to know “the church was part of the 1968–1970 sanctuary for deserters movement.” If this isn’t enough evidence of Obama’s far-left, un-American activities, Walden continued, the Unitarian church that Obama’s grandparents attended near Seattle “was infamous as ‘The Little Red Church on the Hill.’”

Conservatives, Mike Young wisely notes, are trying to hang the 1960s social activities of the Honolulu congregation “around Obama’s neck at eleven years old.” “That’s not fair to him,” Young said. “He is a liberal and the conservatives are going to attempt to paint him as pink as possible.”
Go to
Dec 19, 2017 02:21:11   #
Homestead wrote:
Austria v**ed to make Hitler Chancellor of Austria by 98%.

They did that because no one looked into who Hitler was and what he stood for.

All they had to go on was what was printed in the news papers and broadcasted over state media.

And your right, they never read Mein Kampf, just as you refuse to view videos posted by those who are trying to educate people on Islam.

A lot of those people are former Islamists themselves.

That's like the Jews ignoring ex-N**i's trying to expose the dangers of N**ism in the 1930's.

But, I'm sure there were a lot of people like you that defended the N**i's because, they were a minority and learning the t***h about them would be bigoted.
Austria v**ed to make Hitler Chancellor of Austria... (show quote)

I think your analysis of why the Austrians v**ed for Hitler might fit with the consensus opinion.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/higher/history/roadwar/anschluss/revision/1/
If an e******n is r****d, it doesn't seem wise to make assumptions about why people v**ed.

Regardless, bringing in the Austrian v**e, is stretching an overextended analogy way beyond any sense.
Go to
Dec 19, 2017 01:44:54   #
ghostgotcha wrote:
You want specifics? Well now, let me see: What to do with the Socialist liberals and i*****l a***ns.....
We could mimic the N**I and set up a bunch of internment camps where we force their labor -- Or like Stalin we could set up gulags - Or perhaps we could even model government re-education camps like found under Mao . After all our resident socialist liberals idolize both Stalin and Mao Zedong....

Hey we learned a lot when we interned the Japanese Americans into the desert during WWII

http://veritasintezet.hu/images/resized/GULAG-stalin.jpg

Then again to do that would mean we are no better than the socialist here.
You want specifics? Well now, let me see: What ... (show quote)

I was more interested in how liberals are rewriting history and how this rewriting destroys our freedom.
Go to
Dec 19, 2017 01:37:30   #
11r20 wrote:
Salon.com is another l*****t disinfo site.

And yet it behooves one to check it out, if only to know how your "enemy" thinks.
This article:
https://www.salon.com/2017/05/01/historian-timothy-snyder-its-pretty-much-inevitable-that-trump-will-try-to-stage-a-c**p-and-o*******w-democracy/
has an interview with Timothy Snyder, who was referenced in:
https://ipatriot.com/beware-trump-c**p/
Go to
Dec 19, 2017 01:24:36   #
Airforceone wrote:
No what part of that agenda are you not in agreement with. You’re hell bent on destroying everything that made this country great. Tell me one piece of legislation in the last 30 years that the right passed that actually does anything for the poor or middle class. And not some BS propaganda that Fox News puts out. Actual legislation

I'd have to say that I'm not too fond of any of the 28 you listed. An interesting thing about 17. NAFTA was supported by more Republicans than Democrats when it first passed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/05/09/history-lesson-more-republicans-than-democrats-supported-nafta/?utm_term=.5ba9deeb7f50
Go to
Dec 19, 2017 00:52:11   #
boofhead wrote:
By Islamic law as written in the Koran and supported by the Mullahs' writings, anyone born of a Muslim mother or Muslim father is a Muslim. Just as anyone born of a Jewish mother is a jew.

A Christian has to be baptized and there is no penalty for leaving that faith. You will note that Reverend Wright was asked why he allowed BO to attend his church without being of the Christian faith and not being baptized and he said he did not require that; anyone could attend his church without pressure to join.

Unless that person publicly renounces the Muslim faith before he reaches puberty (and that would be on record) he cannot do so afterward because it automatically makes him liable to death by stoning as an agnostic. Even the punishment for a youth who denies his Islamic faith is pretty Draconian; to be beaten until he recants.

So he IS a Muslim and always will be a Muslim, no matter how much you deny it. If he denied it himself, as I said, he would be in trouble with the rest of the Muzzies. Which is why he is careful not to utter those words. And under their religion he is allowed to lie about being a Christian (which he is also very careful not to actually say). That is called Taqqiya and is permitted when living in a non-Muslim country if being a Muslim would be dangerous to him or hurt the Islamic faith.

There are photos online that are clearly not f**e showing BO in the Indonesian Madrassa learning the Koran and Arabic. He is said to be very talented in both. He has on several occasions stated his love for the Muslim faith, I have heard him say it in his own words on several videos that again are not likely to be f**e. His actions are not those of a Christian they are like those of a Muslim. If it hisses like a snake, crawls on its belly like a snake and spits poison like a snake, surely it can be called a snake?

There is no evidence he was born in the US, his birth certificate and SS card and any other documents not sealed do not show his place of birth was the US. We do not even have his word on it, his own writings claim he was born in Kenya. He laughs at us and our ignorance. He could clear it up easily if he was born in the US; all he has to do is produce the documents. Why will he not do that? It is fishy and any reasonable person would come to doubt the claim of being born in the US. If his father was also named BO then he has dual nationality, in fact triple because Kenyans of the time also had British citizenship so even if he was born in the US he would have three citizenships which no matter how you slice it, it makes him unable to be declared Natural Born because his allegiance is not clean.

This is so easy to research and there is no room for opinion; I wonder why so many stick their fingers in their ears and call "lalalalalalalala" when the subject comes up? If you deny the t***h often enough does that make it not true? Seems that the Left thinks it does. Very difficult to have a conversation with people who do not understand what is being said.

Is it still important? He is no longer the President, so who cares? My opinion is that it matters a lot. Just wait for the outcry from the Left if Cruz tries to run again. If it is OK for BO to be President without being qualified, why not Cruz? Why not ask Kim Jong Un to take the job?

We are a nation of laws or we are not. Until we resolve this issue, I posit that we are not.
By Islamic law as written in the Koran and support... (show quote)

I have been told that being a Jew by birth is determined by ones mother being Jewish, because the mother has strongest influence in passing on a religions traditions. To understand Obama's religious development, it might serve to look at his mother's religion. The following might be relevant:
https://www.uuworld.org/articles/obamas-religious-roots
Go to
Dec 18, 2017 23:04:53   #
boofhead wrote:
I love it and it is very accurate!


Go to
Dec 18, 2017 22:47:02   #
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://ipatriot.com/beware-trump-c**p/

Rather than relying on a second hand account of Timothy Snyder's views, here is an interview to read:
https://www.salon.com/2017/05/01/historian-timothy-snyder-its-pretty-much-inevitable-that-trump-will-try-to-stage-a-c**p-and-o*******w-democracy/
Go to
Dec 18, 2017 19:09:26   #
Airforceone wrote:
Why not just GFY you are v****g against you’re own self interest.

Go Find Yams?

Perhaps my post was a bit vague. I understood your post to be ironic, but because irony is often not recognized, I presumptuously suggested that you give an Irony Warning to forestall misunderstandings. Was I wrong in interpreting your post as ironic? Were you actually suggesting that we accept the Republican agenda as you listed it?
Go to
Dec 18, 2017 17:19:43   #
Why do all the threads on OPP almost always devolve into ad hominem attacks? Sad.
Go to
Dec 18, 2017 17:04:59   #
permafrost wrote:
we are really a stupid bunch, and that includes me..

all this birther garbage was debunked as the trash that it is years ago.. Now, in desperation, the right hauls it out again, and we are dumb enough to use 17 pages to argue about a non existent claim..

While we do this, the orange con man and his criminal cohorts, are doing things that will affect our children for decades at least..

But do we make a murmur about that?? Heck no... we rehash old lies about Obama which never have and are not now of any importance..
we are really a stupid bunch, and that includes me... (show quote)

Amen
Go to
Dec 18, 2017 16:54:26   #
boofhead wrote:
If you accept that Cruz is a citizen, then he is legally a Senator.

At the time of his birth (which was in Canada I think) his father was a Cuban so he got Cuban citizenship and his mother was a US citizen so he got US citizenship. I read that his Mom had renounced her US citizenship to take Canadian citizenship and at the time dual citizenship was not recognized so at that time she and Ted would not have been entitled to US citizenship but obviously that was either wrong or fixed when she and Ted returned to the US. If he has a passport and it was issued legally (which we have to assume because his records have not been sealed) he is a US citizen (even if he was naturalized) and perfectly entitled to be a US Senator.

He is not, under the rules of the Constitution as it was intended when written, entitled to be President. I still v**ed for him last time around because if it is OK for a Kenyan (self-proclaimed by the way) to be President, it is OK for Ted as well.

Congress had to affirm that McCain was qualified to run because he was born in the US controlled part of Panama to two US citizen parents, but in fact he did not need Congress help because he was qualified under the Constitution as written.

We call for BO to go to jail for illegally holding the office of President but in fact the blame must go to the DNC because they were the ones who stated, as required under the law, that he was qualified. At least for his first e******n; they did not make such a claim for his second term, I wonder why?. So if the law was broken it was done by Pelosi and company. There is no law, apparently, preventing an unqualified person becoming President, provided he/she is elected. Everything done during that term is of course invalid, what a mess. But if we are stupid enough to appoint a person not qualified, all we can do is dismiss him. If he had signed a declaration that he was qualified when he was not, that is fraud and punishable but he did not need to do so and most likely did not sign such a document so is not liable.
If you accept that Cruz is a citizen, then he is l... (show quote)

Looking up boofhead in the Urban Dictionary:
Boofhead
Australian saying. A boofhead is one who is a little slow, or maybe just does silly things. I'm a boofhead, thats why im writing this, it's silly. Generally good natured. The sort of person who drinks and gets so pissed they decide it's a good idea to shout people you barely know drinks.

Should I accept posts under the rubric, boofhead, as silliness?

I'll refrain from relaying Urban Dictionary's definition of boof.
Go to
Dec 18, 2017 12:49:36   #
S. Maturin wrote:
You are most generous.

I cannot accept your sanguine view RE: Obama's particular situation as there are no reliable facts to support 1) who his father actually was/is. 2) Whether or not his mother had, as suggested, given up her American citizenship. 3) What is there with all the nebulous nonsense about the birth certificate being forged, coming from a hospital that was not in existence at the time of his birth, etc., etc.,....

No real comparison- Cruz & Obama.. none.

Why am I not surprised by your response.
Go to
Dec 18, 2017 11:37:16   #
S. Maturin wrote:
No.

Can you explain that "illegal" v**es business?

Well, if we judge Ted Cruz's citizenship by the same rules that some would have us judge Obama's citizenship, then Cruz is not a US citizen and therefore not a legally valid US Senator. Presumably, any v**es Cruz has made or will make are invalid.

I accept that Cruz is a US citizen by birth, despite having been born outside the USA. By the same token, Obama is a US citizen, at the very least.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 77 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.