One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Louie27
Page: <<prev 1 ... 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 ... 609 next>>
Feb 12, 2016 11:48:59   #
Sons of Liberty wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: The condom had me rolling.


I agree with that one also. I think that no truer words have been stated.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 12, 2016 11:45:25   #
3jack wrote:
So what?

"Unlike federal prosecutors, inspectors general have the authority to subpoena documents without seeking approval from a grand jury or a judge. But their power is limited. They are able to obtain documents, but they cannot compel testimony."


Don't they have the power to request an investigation? I believe they do.
Go to
Feb 12, 2016 11:39:45   #
Kevyn wrote:
Our government is made up of hundreds of thousands of employees. The vast majority are hard working, have a vested interest in doing a good job and most importantly are good patriotic Americans. Do I trust my Mailman, doctors at the CDC, the inspector who insures safe food production, the air traffic controller who guides the aircraft my family flys, the soldiers, sailors and marines who serve us around the world? In a nutshell the answer is yes. I realize that in any organization there are some who are dishonest, the same is true of government but to believe there is some great conspiricy of tens of thousands of public health careemployees to somehow arbitrarily lock people in mental institutions is ludicrous.
Our government is made up of hundreds of thousands... (show quote)


I guess that you have not been is a government office for a extended length of time. I have watched government employees at their desks, just looking around, getting up to talk with others in that office laughing and not seeming to accomplish any given task for any length of time. I have seen that many times while I was in their offices do remodeling of their areas. That was in Federal buildings and many times over a span of about five years.
As far as them having the sole discretion over whether people are mentally unstable, I would leave it up to a Dr. that is not employed by the government that can control its employees by many methods of coercion.
Go to
Feb 12, 2016 11:27:22   #
snowbear37 wrote:
Our government should have no role in mental health screening, especially with regard to treatment. The track record of government shows that they are ineffective and over-zealous. They have shown that they will find a way to either tax or make a profit on anything they become involved with. The Federal government is already "drunk with power" over people (including the USSC), to give them even more power is ludicrous as well as dangerous. They already use the 10th amendment to manipulate situations to their advantage. They screwed up health care, energy, etc. They could screw up a solid steel ball.
Our government should have no role in mental healt... (show quote)


I could not agree with you more.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 12, 2016 11:25:20   #
Kevyn wrote:
Diagnosis and treatment for mental illness doesn't consist of mind control. There are currently diagnosis criteria for mental illness as there are for other diseases they are determined by groups of health care providers. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is the most common reference for determining as you put it "what is mentally sound vs insane" it is not produced by the government.


But in the hands of this particular administration there is a great expectation of incompetence and false accusations.
Go to
Feb 12, 2016 11:21:01   #
Little Ball of H**e wrote:
This test is really simple. It consists of a single question that requires a yes or a no. This test will determine how intelligent you are, as well as being a good indicator of what political party you belong to. Here's the question. Do you trust our government?


No
Go to
Feb 12, 2016 10:56:57   #
Cool Breeze wrote:
You will never convince those who are receiving public assistance you are cutting their benefits for their own good. People aren't that stupid


They are that stupid because they will not get out and try to improve their lives on their own. They think that they are entitled to free benefits.

Here is a comprehensive list of everything you're entitled to and what the world owes you.
-------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
Go to
Feb 11, 2016 18:10:02   #
oldroy wrote:
Do you remember how much e******n f***d there were in the last two national e******ns? Do you know how much noise there has been about picture ID or not for these e******ns? If you remember all that here is an example of what is going on in New Hampshire these days. I would not be surprised to learn that maybe even thousands of non-registered v**ers v**ed there yesterday.

Watch the video to find out just some of the things people were caught doing there yesterday. Now there is no mention of party in the whole thing but I smell Democrats all through it.

It seems little headway was made by the New Hampshire legislature when they were told to clean up their v****g laws.

http://projectveritasaction.com/video/undercover-video-shows-it’s-still-very-easy-commit-v**er-fraud-new-hampshire
Do you remember how much e******n f***d there were... (show quote)


Just another bunch of law breaking progressives.
Go to
Feb 11, 2016 18:07:49   #
Nickolai wrote:
I don't believe that for a minute James O'keeffe and his girlfriend Hanna Giles peddled a selectively edited video to destroy ACORN but escaped prosecution when he released the entire video to the attorneys general of MASS and CAL with an agreement for immunity from prosecution. The conclusion wad the only crime committed was filming the ACORN employee with out his permission. In a civil suit Okeeffe had to pay the Employee $100,000


Acorn destroyed itself with its illegal v****g registration actions.
Go to
Feb 11, 2016 18:01:10   #
Airdale wrote:
The Democrats pick an isolated case like this to prove their broad general point. It's political, not a human issue which is their goal. Picture ID is required for almost everything we do today including applying for a library card, cashing a check, picking up a prescription or as a new patient at a doctors office or in an emergency room. So why not require it where fraud is very possible like in v****g? They claim to be progressives, so why not show it by living in the 21st Century world for heavens sakes? Even though it is i***tic and unreasonable, they will probably push this down our throats like the l*****ts do everything else in this tanking country.
The Democrats pick an isolated case like this to p... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 11, 2016 17:57:00   #
Loki wrote:
The First Amendment was intended to prevent organized religion from gaining the political power that the Churches in Europe exercised. The Roman Catholic Church's power in both France and Spain rivaled and sometimes exceeded that of the secular government. It was, in effect, a State Religion. You could not become a Spanish subject unless you converted. I believe the same was true of France. The line of separation between Church and State was so blurred it was indistinguishable.
The nonsense about prayer in schools, (legal for most of this country's history ), and religious observances in public places, prayer before Government functions has been a fixture for most of our nation's history, and has only been re-written in the last 50 years or so by activist, Liberal Judges who think they are Congressmen.
The First Amendment was intended to prevent organi... (show quote)


I agree with your first sentence and that is as it should be. I see no where in the country where the religious organizations have interfered with the government. They state their positions and do not force anyone to adhere to those statements.This administration, many liberals and the political correct squad want to stop prayer by sports teams that have their coaches pray with them. That is not their job. That is not the government of the school districts job, even if a minority of people want certain proceedings to stop.
Go to
Feb 11, 2016 16:19:39   #
Comment wrote:
OZ: I find a defect in your logic. U may not realize that welfare up or down does effect you. I effects America. All monies that are paid out in entitlement is borrowed. The question is not that your taxes do not go up, it is when will they go up. And they will, When money is not borrowed it means that the ND (National Debt) will stop growing. If it does not stop growing the results will be the destruction of the economy. It does not mean that the ND will get any smaller; it is such that taxes have to be raised in order to stop the borrowing. There is a gamble with the interest on the ND. For every 1% rise increases the costs to $200,000,000,000. Analysis project the interest on the ND to be $808 billion in 2025. Being in business 40 years, I have analyzed my cash flow and balance sheets for a long time. Taxes can be trippled but cannot pay for a ND reduction and all other components of society as of today. 3/4 of a billion was paid last years to i******s for health insurance. Obama promised that would not happen. Remember Congressman Brown calling Obama a liar. He was right but, the pansy ass Republicans castrated him and gave Obama everything he wanted except Obamacare. Hundreds of billions of moola is spent foolishly or just wasted, like 10s of billions paid out by the IRS to fraud. The ND and the interest owed on is is the biggest Nuke to ever hit the USA.
OZ: I find a defect in your logic. U may not reali... (show quote)


Could not agree with you more. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 11, 2016 16:15:02   #
saltwind 78 wrote:
Louie, The meaning of the First Amendment is clear. The Congress shall MAKE NO LAW respecting the establishment respecting the establishment of a religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, etc. In Everson v Board of Education (1947) the court called for " a wall go separation between church and state " as Thomas Jefferson called for. This separation is what gives us freedom of religion. For those that disagree with the First Amendment, I suggest a vacation to The Islamic Republic of Iran to check out what society might look like without freedom go religion. This amendment is one of the great things about America, lets not screw it up!
Louie, The meaning of the First Amendment is clear... (show quote)


That 1947 decision was by Judge Black and his interpretation of the first amendment. MY interpretation is such that I believe a separation of Church and State was, the State should not interfere with religious beliefs and that the Church should not interfere with State business. That in no way states a wall between the Church and the State. That is just what Jefferson wanted but that was not adopted. I do not disagree with the first amendment, but the interpretation of others, to what the founding fathers meant at that point of time. I believe I am not alone in that line of thinking. The wall was not meant to be a law preventing religious events at schools. If they are held that does not mean that the State believes in any religion. It just means that the people have the right to express their own beliefs and do not intend to force anyone to engage is such activity if it against there will or beliefs. Everyone has that option.
Go to
Feb 11, 2016 15:37:29   #
Cool Breeze wrote:
Therefore those who say this is a Christian Nation is lying!


In my humble opinion it will not be for long if Obama keeps bringing in more Muslims. They will soon have to be eradicated like what I have done to some rats I had found in our yard last week.
Go to
Feb 11, 2016 15:33:17   #
Cool Breeze wrote:
I happen to like lemonade


I believe you are on these sites to spread around the sourness of your disposition. :lol: :lol:
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 ... 609 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.