As a matter of fact, the inteligence qotient of the various races has been carefully and accurately configured.

The IQ gap....From an article by James DeMeo, PhD.
For those who don't already know, there absolutely IS an objectively measurable IQ gap between people with ancestors from different geographical areas (aka "races", which is the term I will use from here on out).
Psychologists don't debate this fact. The gap is well known and has been well known for decades. IQ test scores break down like this: on average, East Asians score higher than w****s, who score higher than hispanics, who in turn score higher than b****s. The average scores are:
Asian-Americans -106, W***e A******ns - 103, Hispanic Americans - 89, African-Americans - 85.
This means more than one in five American b****s have an IQ below 75; whereas around one in twenty w****s have an IQ below 75. An IQ of 70-75 is considered "borderline r****ded" by psychologists.
Studies also show there are some significant differences in what is called the structure of mental abilities. For example, if you took a sample of black and white children, all of whom had scored around 100 on the WISC-R (the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised) meaning the black kids in the sample were well above the black average -- you would find significant black-white differences on six of the thirteen subtests. The average black child would do better on Arithmetic and Digit Span; where the average white child would do better on Comprehension, Block Design, Object Assembly, and Mazes.
The gaps are not limited to the United States either. European w****s average - 100, East Asians from Asia - 106, and Sub-Saharan Africans - 70.
The difference in native Sub-Saharan African IQ scores versus American Black's IQ scores can be explained by the fact that American B****s have, on average, 20%-25% European ancestry. Lynn and Vanhanen's books 'IQ and the Wealth of Nations' and 'IQ and Global Ine******y' are a good start if you are looking for data concerning the average IQ scores of different nations.

1.
The intelligence gap was first noticed among psychologists in the early 20th century. In the 1960s and 70s, rigorous IQ testing of people of difference races began in earnest, and the IQ gap began to become undeniable. Throughout the 70s and 80s, liberal-minded scientists attempted to close the gap via alterations in the testing apparatus, since they believed that the tests must be biased in some way. They changed the parameters, made a whole slew of so-called "culture fair" tests, some were nonverbal tests (Leiter Scale), some changed the language of the questions, others were pure math, or pure reasoning, they even made questions that weren't language based at all (like Raven's Progressive Matrices or Kohs block design test)... they did twin studies, adoption studies (like the Minnesota T***sracial Adoption study), everything to try to determine some reason (besides the obvious one) why this gap exists... and the studies consistently came back with the same sized gap: 15 IQ points, or 1 standard deviation (SD) between White and Black people no matter what version or type of IQ test was used.
Eventually, in 1994, The Bell Curve was published. The book was extremely controversial, despite being filled with relevant data from valid and repeated studies. Ironically, the majority of the criticisms were aimed at the validity of IQ and general intelligence as meaningful measurements (a topic I will go over in a later section) and NOT on the results of the studies.
Eventually, amid all the controversy about The Bell Curve in the media, a group of 52 well known university professors specializing in intelligence and related fields signed a public statement titled "Mainstream Science on Intelligence". They saw there was a great deal of misinformation of unfounded criticism of The Bell Curve, so they wanted to set the media straight. The statement consisted of 25 conclusions:
1."Intelligence is a very general mental capability ... it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings ..."
2."Intelligence, so defined, can be measured, and intelligence tests measure it well. They are among the most accurate (in technical terms, reliable and valid) of all psychological tests and assessments."
3."While there are different types of intelligence tests, they all measure the same intelligence."
4."The spread of people along the IQ continuum ... can be represented well by the ... ‘normal curve'."
5."Intelligence tests are not culturally biased"
6."The brain processes underlying intelligence are still little understood"
7."Members of all racial-ethnic groups can be found at every IQ level"
8."The bell curve for w****s is centered roughly around IQ 100; the bell curve for American b****s roughly around 85; and those for different subgroups of Hispanics roughly midway between those for w****s and b****s. The evidence is less definitive for exactly where above IQ 100 the bell curves for Jews and Asians are centered"
9."IQ is strongly related, probably more so than any other single measurable human trait, to many important educational, occupational, economic, and social outcomes ... Wh**ever IQ tests measure, it is of great practical and social importance"
10."A high IQ is an advantage because virtually all activities require some reasoning and decision-making"
11."The practical advantages of having a higher IQ increase as life’s settings become more complex"
12."Differences in intelligence certainly are not the only factor affecting performance in education, training, and complex jobs ... but intelligence is often the most important"
13."Certain personality traits, special talents, [etc] are important ... in many jobs, but they have narrower (or unknown) applicability or ‘t***sferability’ across tasks and settings compared with general intelligence"
14."Heritability estimates range from 0.4 to 0.8 ... indicating genetics plays a bigger role than environment in creating IQ differences"
15."Members of the same family also tend to differ substantially in intelligence"
16."That IQ may be highly heritable does not mean that it is not affected by the environment ... IQs do gradually stabilize during childhood, however, and generally change little thereafter"
17."Although the environment is important in creating IQ differences, we do not know yet how to manipulate it"
18."Genetically caused differences are not necessarily irremediable"
19."There is no persuasive evidence that the IQ bell curves for different racial-ethnic groups are converging"
20."Racial-ethnic differences in IQ bell curves are essentially the same when youngsters leave high school as when they enter first grade ... black 17-year-olds perform, on the average, more like white 13-year-olds"
21."The reasons that b****s differ among themselves in intelligence appear to be the same as those for why w****s ... differ among themselves"
22."There is no definitive answer as to why bell curves differ across racial-ethnic groups. The reasons for these IQ differences between groups may be markedly different from the reasons for why individuals differ among themselves within any particular group"
23."Racial-ethnic differences are somewhat smaller but still substantial for individuals from the same socio-economic backgrounds"
24."Almost all Americans who identify themselves as black have white ancestors – the white admixture is about 20% ... research on intelligence relies on self-classification into distinct racial categories"
25."The research findings neither dictate nor preclude any particular social policy, because they can never determine our goals. They can, however, help us estimate the likely success and side-effects of pursuing those goals via different means."

1.
An important thing to remember is that the ancestors of all Sub-Saharan Africans separated from the ancestors of all other modern humans around 100,000 years ago. One group stayed in Sub-Saharan Africa, and the other spread out and populated the rest of the world. 100,000 years is over 5,000 generations. And yet there ARE still people today who believe that all races have the same exact brains, and same exact inherent intelligence.
Despite the fact that so much time passed with those races apart, and such large number of observable traits evolved differently... like skin color, fat distribution, average hormonal levels, hair type and texture, dental layout (some Asian's don't ever develop wisdom teeth, and different races have differently shaped teeth), to the skeletal structure like the ratio of length of long bones or skull shape or any number of variations (a small example being some sub-Saharan Africans have fused triquetral bones in their wrists), to the many different blood types, and fat distribution and so many other traits... some people still refuse to accept the possibility of inherent biological differences of intelligence.
However, it would actually be an amazing coincidence if there WEREN'T an average intelligence gap between different groups of humans who have evolved separately for many thousands of years. Think about it, given the facts that 1)evolution is true, 2)IQ is heritable, and 3)different groups of humans have been separate for more than 5,000 generations... it would be statistically improbable that all those groups have the same average IQ. The brain is a highly complex organ, it is extremely difficult to believe that that complex biological organ remained exactly the same over 100,000 years while nearly every single other biological trait diverged. An IQ gap is exactly what we would expect given the facts. Even if we didn't have IQ test results and didn't know there was a gap, all good scientists would hypothesize that one exists based on the other information

But as I just pointed out, the USSR was (and called itself ) The Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics (My capitalization) the "USSR". They did not call themselves a c*******t country, That was their espoused ultimate goal, from a capitalist to a socialist and finally the ultimate goal c*******t state. The idea was that first you had to destroy capitalist ens***ement of the people, get rid of Capitalists by developing a Socialist state, and ultimately you would destroy that state to achieve C*******m. Unfortunately the c*******t philosophy while useful in a brief emergency situation such as the Pilgrims first hungry year in Massachusetts, is not suited for human Psychology; you are, after all not Bees or Ants.

Calling your above example states C*******t was done so that the Goyem would not object to the comming One World Government, which would of course be a True Socialist State, which the "NWO" will of course be, owning everyone and everything.

Of course it was a blatant trial run. But to what purpose? Imagine the following note in your mail.

It is interesting to watch you humans get all excited by the machinations carried out to distract you from reality and get you to react to “False F**g “ events and reports.

"Attention!!!
As you watch the read the internet you are going to sleep, deeeep asleep. With each breath you take you will fall deeper asleep. With each TV program you watch you will fall even deeper asleep, so very deep. With each news article you read, radio show, conversation you have you will fall deeper into the sleep we have induced. You will believe all the silly nonsense that we put out to distract you. You will allow us to manipulate you through Fear and Make Believe. You will allow us to v******te you and your innocent children with deadly poisons. Poison and destroy your food supply, steal your hard earned money through various manipulations of the economy. You will not object to us poisoning you to help reduce the world population. You will not wake up.

Sincerely,

G.S."

Payne1000,

Actually I thought that I had made it clear that my use of the word Goyem related to people who were living in a dream world created for them to distract them from the realities of life on this “civilized” planet.

There are many people involved in this and some of them are “Jews”, many of them are “Gentiles”, many are, etc. etc. etc.. The ethnicity is not restricted. It just so happens that in the fantasy world created in the minds of (my use of the word) Goyem living in our sphere of influence one of the boogymen we have had created is the Jew. Another is the C*******t, (although the political life the average Goy calls C*******t is in reality what the dictionaries Describe as Socialist). This is a perfect example of the confused brain of the Goyem, who are too lazy and confused to even get their definitions of the various political philosophies correct. (Under C*******m there everything is owned by the “People” own the means of production and each work at what they do best, contribute the results of that work to the common pot and take from that pot only what they need. There is no need for government under that philosophy. Under socialism The government owns everything, including the people, the means of production and assigns people to the workplace, provides living quarters, allots food, “health care”, clothing, etc. Russia, which was called “C*******t Russia” was really a socialist state, which is why they called themselves “The Union of Soviet Socialist States”. Even Goyem who seem to be reasonably bright on this forum have used the terms wrongly, showing that they are really Goyem.

Long winded explanation, but I don’t have time at the moment to write a clear shorter one.

Paine1000,

I’m not quite sure if I read you right, and maybe my last post isn’t clear.

You speak of innocent Muslims, I don’t speak of them at all on this string since they are not the topic. The topic as I see it involves the justification for the use of mass k*****gs of all sectors of all country’s citizens. (Note that citizen’s already accept the fact that they are the chattel of specific political domains.)

Rather I speak of the fact that the Goyem are manipulated, using make believe, and terror, because the Goyem are ubiquitous, most can not think an original thought, only parroting what we teach them. They are essentially predators, as are all human kind and extremely dangerous to themselves, us and the planet. They must be kept under control, and the various “governments” cooperate in creating constant strife, chemically and intellectually weakening their populations, and keeping them busy eking out a living. Now of course using so called “health care” and destruction of the food (quality and soon quantity) we will see a massive die off which will bring the population down to the point where it is no longer as dangerous.

The process will involve a feudal system with mandatory hypnotic/brainwashing type education, much as it is used now but with drug reinforcement, resulting in a more easily controlled/directed populace.

Direct control with 1/3d of the Goyem being tasked as police to control the other 2/3ds of the Goyem population will result in relative “peace”. Careful evaluation of each member of the populace will allow the advancement in training and position that will allow scientific progress of the members of the planet despite the drastic reduction of population from which to draw candidates.

What we see going on at this time is not new.

No, I mean that the people are being played big time. More blatantly than any time in history. Nothing the Goyem think they know about politics, health care, religion, history, economics, science, in fact anything you can think of, is true and valid. They are stupid and dangerous and very numerous.

Payne1000

First note that I did not say Goyim. I said Goyem. In my lexicon the term is not pejorative, but rather only identifies an outsider, and therefore not in the know, confused.

An example would be Governments keeping their people under control by keeping them in a position of confusion and fear...Goyem.

Deazu,speaseak Cezarny?

Incidentally, the desert did not turn into black glass, nor was there any ditch or hole dug by the bomb blast.

In 1952 I was at the first Atom Bomb test involving military troops (US.Marines) at Yucca Flats Nevada near Las Vegas.

The Bomb, which was of the same power as the Hiroshima bomb, was set off at 1200 feet.
We Marines were in slit trenches four miles from Ground Zero, and after the bomb went off walked to within 900 feet of G.Z., mimicking an invasion of the area.
From having been shown films of atomic tests, and of Hiroshima, I expected something monstrous. But alas the test was a great disappointment.

1...½ Hour before the drop they tested the seismic equipment meant to measure the blast effect. The sound of the test by 2000 lbs of TNT was about the same as the bomb. And there was no Roaring sound following, as the films depict. Just a loud, sharp Boom.
2...The pressure wave when it reached us in our trenches which were four miles away from Ground Zero, and which I was braced for, turned out to be a gentle breeze.
3...There was a Sherman Tank at ground zero which other than some charring of the paint and having been flipped so that the front was buried in the sand, causing the tank to stand at about a 20 degree angledid not seem too badly damaged. The tank’s gun was not bent or appearing otherwise injured. The tank appeared as though you could climb in and drive it away.
3...At ground zero, the dummies of soldiers, one of which was in a 6 foot fox hole, one was in a 6 inch hole and one which was standing were all charred and destroyed. (I didn’t actually see the ones in the holes as we were only allowed to get within 900 feet of GZ.) There were also dummies set up the same way at 300 feet and 600 feet, which showed much less damage, with the furthest out having the standing scare crow dummy still standing, and 2 charred, the deepest wasn’t even charred, we were later told.
4...The desert was not turned to glass, nor was there a big cavity (none at all) blasted into the soft desert sands.
5...After walking down to within 3 football fields of GZ and standing around for about ½ hour we walked back out, picking up lots of sand dust, especially on our boots. We were checked with a gieger counter to determine how much radiation we had picked up, then sent into a portable shower and threw away our uniforms and received new ones. As the fellow with the Geiger counter was going over me, I could hear the instrument ticking. I asked the fellow how much radiation I had received, and instead of answering me he went over me again, slowly so I could hear the clicking clearly. He held the counter pickup over my hair and I heard a relatively slow clicking, then over my boots which clicked about twice as fast, then over my wrist watch which had radium painted onto the 12, 6 and 9 as well as on the watch hands (which in those days would allow you to see the time in the dark, all night long; I notice that my watches now a days only glow for a couple of hours). The watch made the Geiger counter ROAR.

I concluded that the films we had been shown, were selectively chosen or f**ed. I realize that an atomic explosion is not something you want to be involved with, but it is not something like they depict to scare the H out of all the Goyem.

Kevyn,

You parrot the party line nicely. For example your attack Rappaport as a Germ theory denialist. It so happens that Rappaport's description is right on. If the germ theory and contagion theories were true, how come all the doctors, nurses and other hospital workers are willing to work in the environment of a hospital loaded with germs? Why aren't they all sick all the time? How much would they have to pay those people if THEY truly believed the nonsense the public is taught? How often have you slept in the same bed with a spouse who was suffering from a contagious, “germ caused” illness, and you didn’t get sick. How come no scientist or doctor has ever been able to apply the steps of Koch’s postulates to prove that a specific germ causes a specific disease? As I was taught back in college, “The patient is everything, the germ is nothing.” And that is why you don’t have to worry about getting sick every time you visit a sick friend. It all depends on how healthy you are.

I worked as a doctor in the field of Health Care for 47 years with great success. What you have been taught to call "Health Care" has no relation to health. Rather people practicing medicine and associated fields are involved in symptom suppression, and first and last aid. What they do is in some cases very important and even occasionally saves life, and sometimes prematurely ends life, but don't ever confuse it with health care. "Health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social wellbeing, and not merely the absence of disease and infirmity." This is the definition in Dorland's Medical Dictionary. I was curious as to what "wellbeing" meant; could not find a definition in any medical dictionary, so I went to Webster's and found that "wellbeing" means "Health" ??? So I looked further for definitions of health that really made sense and the best in my opinion stated that “Health is a condition in which all organs and parts of the being are functioning as nature intended”. And that includes the body’s immune function.

Sorry to be so long winded, but I felt you might need a lengthy explanation, no time to figure out a short one.

Boy , Loki got me!

Do I feel foolish. Apparently I’ve been trying to hold an intelligent discourse with a person who is a middle school student and is known as a bully by his fellow students.

Should have realized it by his second post.

You really are an obnoxious character, aren't you? Your avatar is appropriate.
Believe what you want.

Loki,

A friend of mine dropped in and read this string. He chided me, saying that I had not explained things clearly enough and that I owed you an apology. You are, after all not a doctor who would understand that with no food a person can easily go from a robust being to a human skeleton in less than a week, under conditions of stress. That this would affect the i****e s****m and little diseases like the common cold could easily k**l the weakest among them.

That there would not be the option of proper burial, due to the lack of strength and energy of the remaining survivors. So, as during any plague period the dead would be piled up, a mass grave gouged out of the soil with a bull dozer and the bodies buried en mass.

If at this point someone who ran across this activity was told by the Army's propaganda division who wanted to stir up a fighting spirit in tired soldiers, that the starvation and death were purposely caused by the evil enemy they were fighting, how would the soldier told this know it was a lie.

So what he saw would seem to confirm what he was told. He wouldn't question it. After all he saw it right there.

If you will check the past posts I have written, you will not find that I ever called your relatives liars. What I said was that I doubted that they had actually seen what they thought they saw. You did not clarify what they told you; only stating that they had been there toward the end and saw something.

Your relatives, not being doctors, wouldn't question the propaganda lies.

If the true story was that due to lack of food because there was no way to bring any food in, due to your country bombing the hell out of the their country, these people were starving. Of course your relatives would want to believe the propaganda rather than thinking about what had really happened. Quite understandable, especially when Eisenhower had propaganda films made and shown to all the troops.

e.marine,

I'm not sure how old you are, but have you seen the grade, highschool and college history texts that are being used these days. Sure look nothing like what we used in the fourties and fifties, right? Aren't today's students being taught a bunch of lies? Or maybe we were. Do you believe what our papers, magazines, T.v, Radio, etc. tell us? What do you think of people who do believe what our Government controlled schools and media teach us is true?

Over the years I have met a number of people who claimed to have been in a "Death Camp" in Europe. Every one
turned out to be lying.

If you ever run into someone who claims to have been scarred or injured or even to have been interred in an internment camp, ask them politely to show you the tattoo on the inside of their left arm. If they can't show you that they are liars. All internment camp inmates were immediately tattooed with an identification # on their arrival at the camp. (I understand the the Japanese prisoners in our camps were also tattooed, though I don't know that for a fact.)

Millions claimed r********ns from Germany for their internment. Many more than were ever supposed to have been in the camps. There are even some collecting r********ns to this day. How old would that make them in 1942 or 3? Look it up.

Btw, when you look up stuff about the "Death Camps" try to find a refference written by an independent investigator. More than 9 out of ten refferences on the internet come from Jewish organizations and of course they all follow the party line. You have to look hard to find one that isn't part of the ruling propaganda group.

Finally remember that the International Red Cross was monitoring POW and concentration camps in Germany, Poland and here. ( I don't know whether the Red Cross was in Jap or Russian Camps.). If you have seen the Frank Sinatra movie, Von Ryan's Express, you will see references to that as Sinatra, playing an American Army Airforce Col. berates the Italian POW Camp comander for not giving fresh uniforms to the POWs.

( You might not know that the English were the first to use "concentration camps" in So. Africa. The mostly dutch "survivors" of those also made charges of brutality against the English at that time. Seems to be a routine propaganda procedure.