Posts for: Morgan
Sep 3, 2017 09:51:32 #
(Main)
Big Bass wrote:
C*******ts do: you take welfare and try to destroy the democratically elected government at the same time.
What happened to I'm not worth commenting to? I was really counting on that. Aren't you a man of your word...guess not.
Sep 3, 2017 09:49:45 #
(Main)
Nickolai wrote:
That is so typical of a right winger Me My self and I and fuck every body else. I have some cute grand kids whom I care fore a lot
Sep 3, 2017 09:47:19 #
(Main)
Super Dave wrote:
You are conflating political policy changes with scientific research.
We've made many great changes, many unnecessary changes, and many stupid changes.
In case you don't know this the " Earth is Flat Theory": was also a scientific consensus at the time, and those that said the Earth was round were shunned and k**led as heritics.
We've made many great changes, many unnecessary changes, and many stupid changes.
In case you don't know this the " Earth is Flat Theory": was also a scientific consensus at the time, and those that said the Earth was round were shunned and k**led as heritics.
This isn't political unless people make it that way, I'm not and I'm not the confused one here.
Sep 3, 2017 09:45:29 #
(Main)
karpenter wrote:
A 500yr Cooling Period Seems Fairly Catastrophic
Maybe It Wasn't Volcanic Or Solar
Is There Another Crater In The Oceans No One Has Stumbled Across Yet ??
Maybe It Wasn't Volcanic Or Solar
Is There Another Crater In The Oceans No One Has Stumbled Across Yet ??
Yes you can go throughout times and find cataclysmic changes, but that does not disprove the negative affects WE are creating by f****l f**ls, or equate that we should continue on the same exact path,why ignore it? Changes need to be made it is the respectable thing to do. Meaning you don't eat where you s**t, even animals know that.
Sep 3, 2017 09:40:05 #
(Main)
Super Dave wrote:
You are conflating political policy changes with scientific research.
We've made many great changes, many unnecessary changes, and many stupid changes.
In case you don't know this the " Earth is Flat Theory": was also a scientific consensus at the time, and those that said the Earth was round were shunned and k**led as heritics.
We've made many great changes, many unnecessary changes, and many stupid changes.
In case you don't know this the " Earth is Flat Theory": was also a scientific consensus at the time, and those that said the Earth was round were shunned and k**led as heritics.
Now you're proving my point
Sep 3, 2017 09:35:32 #
(Main)
karpenter wrote:
And Yet The Debate Is Inconclusive To Whether Past Changes Were Volcanic Or Solar
(When Human Activity Could Not Possibly Have Been A Factor)
As Per The Article I Posted Earlier
319million To 29Billion
For Measurements +/- In Less Than Tenths Of One Degree
Still Doesn't Solve What Is The Optimal Global Mean Temperature
And We Do Need To Know That
If We Are To Personally Regulate Our Climate From Here Out
(When Human Activity Could Not Possibly Have Been A Factor)
As Per The Article I Posted Earlier
319million To 29Billion
For Measurements +/- In Less Than Tenths Of One Degree
Still Doesn't Solve What Is The Optimal Global Mean Temperature
And We Do Need To Know That
If We Are To Personally Regulate Our Climate From Here Out
I'm not sure who's trying to regulate the climate, maybe the military, but the debate is how are actions are affecting the earth an air negatively and at this point in time, crucially. Every action has a reaction correct, our past accumulative actions/practices with disregard has finally caught up to us.
more like ten times the amount
Sep 3, 2017 09:16:16 #
(Main)
Super Dave wrote:
That's not so. It tells us what we think we unders... (show quote)
Yep, Dave and the earth is not really round it's just a theory, a hypothesis. Gravity is an illusion, and all the things we produced and created like sending people in rockets to the moon, or nuclear power, even electricity, the radio! All based on speculation, isn't that correct according to you. How about the changes we made through detergents to save the water or controlling freon to save the ozone? All just on speculation and a guesstimate right?
Sep 3, 2017 09:02:47 #
(Main)
archie bunker wrote:
Why denigrate those who don't follow this religion... (show quote)
Why, because there are other influencing factors aside from our constant pouring of pollutants and CO2. For one you may not know is the inevitable shifting of tectonic plates is also a driver of c*****e c****e, as is the changes in the sun. There are many variables without a doubt, but it is time for us to be responsible for what we do and I believe that is the point in the argument from the left. We try and move forward with our responsibility to the earth and the industrialists keep preventing substantial change and it is only due to their present pocket. This can create jobs too.
Sep 3, 2017 08:51:35 #
(Main)
karpenter wrote:
Neither Of Which Is Wide Ranging Or Extensive
Especially The Ocean Bottom Sediments
And These Sciences Are Still Fairly New
Especially The Ocean Bottom Sediments
And These Sciences Are Still Fairly New
Sure they are, but those are not the only studies, as I've stated earlier, there are also the volcanic carbon recorded studies. One being that total volcanic emission was as high as 319 million tonnes/year, to total world CO2 emissions 29 Billion, that is a huge difference. This reported by the department of energy.
Sep 3, 2017 08:37:18 #
(Main)
Nuclearian wrote:
Well lets see. Some scientists actually said that the Polar ice cap is growing. Hmm, that cant happen if the world is warming up.
The earth goes in cycles. A moderately long period of warmth, and then long periods of cold. Its a NATURE thing, you wouldn't understand. Hell, these stupid scientists don't even understand that.
The earth goes in cycles. A moderately long period of warmth, and then long periods of cold. Its a NATURE thing, you wouldn't understand. Hell, these stupid scientists don't even understand that.
That's perfect, really...maybe you can write to them and explain it to them.
Sep 3, 2017 08:08:37 #
(Main)
trucksterbud wrote:
Life itself is gonna k**l you dumbphuk.... Is the... (show quote)
I don't know what crazy show you're watching but that is completely false, and just the reverse. Just as your car theory, both carbons are exhausted out, while monoxide is extremely toxic, the other dioxide does add to the build up of CO2 in the atmosphere and causing a green house effect.Changes in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere explains the overall pattern of climatic change. Carbon dioxide influences the mean global temperature through the greenhouse effect.
Sep 3, 2017 08:02:04 #
(Main)
karpenter wrote:
And Some Scientists Claim From The 17th Century To 1870s
(Suggesting Two Rounds ??)
And The Causes Of The Cooling Is Speculative
Volcanic ?? SOLAR ??
All Of It Is Academic Because Nothing Can Be Known For A Fact From Those Times
(Suggesting Two Rounds ??)
And The Causes Of The Cooling Is Speculative
Volcanic ?? SOLAR ??
All Of It Is Academic Because Nothing Can Be Known For A Fact From Those Times
One way is through evidence derived from marine sediments which provide a detailed, and fairly continuous, record for c*****e c****e. The other is through artic core samples which tell us the global history.
Sep 3, 2017 07:41:58 #
(Main)
byronglimish wrote:
You are partially correct, but the Democrats who bailed on the murderess and v**ed for "the winner" ...our President Donald J Trump... mostly dropped the maggoty thinking and cockroach persona when they v**ed for Donald J Trump the 45th President of the real Americans..you remaining cockroaches v**ed for the biggest loser in our history as a nation...and we all know that, that makes you maggots the real LOSER'S... Right???..."yes indeed"
Nope it was you deplorable's who v**ed for Bush and the Republicans who tanked the country once AGAIN...Loser
Sep 2, 2017 12:16:50 #
(Main)
Jakebrake wrote:
Well there lil feller/gal, I found this on the Clinton Criminal Cabal through a little research. I suggest you do your own, (if you are capable) because I'm not about to do it for you! And if you do rise up to the challenge please use only true, reputable sources, and not your typical left wingnut f**e news s**t sites.
Tell me why would I bother, you've just have shown me I have no reason to speak to any one with the likes of you.
Sep 2, 2017 12:15:08 #
(Main)
Bevos wrote:
You ALREADY do ENOUGH of that on NOTHING!!! And THAT IS, with NOTHING to back up your WHINING!!!
I'm not the one whining here you i***t, you guys are on the Clintons again, and again, and again, completely obsessed and over focussed on stuff that doesn't matter anymore, you guys are the whiners for sure and if not whining having a temper tantrum. Look at you and how you write, you're pathetic.