Posts for: Singularity
Sep 15, 2021 17:02:00 #
(Main)
quote=Singularity= quote=Singularity to Bladerunner's earlier post:
Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.
34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.
My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the v****g implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any spouse who has a fertile spouse (lesbian marriages have two!) that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. Even if that number is 1, it matters to that one v**er, and maybe the spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....
I am sure v**ers will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "a******n bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations.
Sorry for the interruption, again...
Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.
34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.
My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the v****g implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any spouse who has a fertile spouse (lesbian marriages have two!) that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. Even if that number is 1, it matters to that one v**er, and maybe the spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....
I am sure v**ers will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "a******n bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations.
Sorry for the interruption, again...
Sep 15, 2021 16:48:18 #
(Main)
TexaCan wrote:
Thank you, Thank you very much…….for making my point! 😇
No, my point is it's not pornographic nor does it insult anyone.
It does contain a commonly used vulgar word used in public discourse among friends, strangers, even children. So, it is within this Forums published guidelines.
We've all BEEN through this before, of course.
In the following research study, some posts were removed, some not. Many removed were still represented in quote reply from others. Make any sense?
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/tpr?p=2592629&t=142556
QUOTING EXAMPLES!
Sep 15, 2021 16:38:29 #
(Main)
quote=Singularity to Bladerunner's earlier post:
Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.
34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.
My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the v****g implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any spouse who has a fertile spouse (lesbian marriages have two!) that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. Even if that number is 1, it matters to that one v**er, and maybe the spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....
I am sure v**ers will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "a******n bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations./quote
Sorry for the interruption.
Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.
34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.
My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the v****g implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any spouse who has a fertile spouse (lesbian marriages have two!) that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. Even if that number is 1, it matters to that one v**er, and maybe the spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....
I am sure v**ers will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "a******n bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations.
/quoteSorry for the interruption.
Sep 15, 2021 16:28:30 #
(Main)
Singularity wrote:
Oh my fucking GOD!!!
If this post is removed, we know ADMIN still has at least autonomic reflexes...
They never listen in when you're just talking to yourself.
Sep 15, 2021 16:19:09 #
(Main)
TexaCan wrote:
This is reposted from the other now famous thread!... (show quote)
Note to self; Off-putting topic. Shoes cleaned, moving on....
Sep 15, 2021 14:22:57 #
(Main)
Blade_Runner wrote:
In other words, you threw some hypothetical chum i... (show quote)
Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.
34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.
My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the v****g implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any husband who has a fertile spouse that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. If that number is 1, it matters to one v**er, and maybe their spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....
I am sure v**ers will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "a******n bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations.
Sep 15, 2021 13:58:31 #
(Main)
Sep 15, 2021 13:40:36 #
(Main)
lindajoy wrote:
Kittys repeated insults, vulgar insults at that ar... (show quote)
I have become content with the notion that having exhausted any and all avenues for reporting miscreants, and trusting the process, and the fact that my innocence of wrongdoing protects me from repercussions and possible prosecution, I STILL don't have to read any of someone like albertk's posts anymore, for instance. I can just reply with the link to his d********g story with a trigger warning.
If enough people don't like that, perhaps the poster will be constrained. Or perhaps the inappropriate stories will be stopped. I don't care which, frankly.
Even if a particular poster, albertk for instance, or the kitty you refer to, is somehow "innocent" it is still possible they could always resurrect themselves under a new avatar protected by a different vpn, hopefully more appropriately but at least more discreetly.
Sep 15, 2021 12:52:23 #
(Main)
BigMike wrote:
I might k**l the bass-turd with my bare hands but my wife would have kept the baby and so would I. This I can attest to.
And you answered it well with scripture. Sin (missing the mark) begins in the heart and God sees the heart.
And you answered it well with scripture. Sin (missing the mark) begins in the heart and God sees the heart.
"Vengeance is MINE," sayeth THE LORD.
SO, theoretically extending your(s) and others less recent but still in distant memory from earlier in this thread's argumentation, ... if you can k**l the rapist that threatens your wife with an unwanted progeny, why not k**l the "heartless baby" that threatens havoc, legally and emotionally, to your family?
Sep 15, 2021 12:25:54 #
(Main)
EmilyD wrote:
Survival of the fittest? You are taking this WAY too seriously, ma'am.
I hope you find some form of peace and calm in your day. (you seem to be needing that these days.)
Good luck.
I hope you find some form of peace and calm in your day. (you seem to be needing that these days.)
Good luck.
?
It is you who keeps insisting on continuing to beat this poor, tired old horse of a topic.
I really don't care, anymore.
Why do you?
Still trynta "cock block" (a soft test for proof of life re ADMIN) the conversation over son of witless's time knife argument? Should I assume that's what you are so gravely concerned about?
Okay, sure.
Sorry, witless.
Em may not want us to have that conversation....
Sep 15, 2021 12:17:05 #
(Main)
EmilyD wrote:
Master inquisitor and judge! On a forum?!! br br... (show quote)
And I, equally, choose how I respond. It's the way conversation works.
If my persona, confidence and rhetorical competence convey mutual respect and authority that induces others to admire and conform to my WISHES AS POSTED, when I ask assertively, even without authority, and it improves my enjoyment AND effective use of the forum, without breaking any rules?
Survival of the fittest, baby!
We each individually, must choose how to RESPOND when we step in something and get it on our shoe.
Sep 15, 2021 12:04:16 #
(Main)
son of witless wrote:
Are you referring to a different topic than this one ? I just searched through this whole thread to try to figure out what you are talking about. If you are talking about another topic, I have not had time of late to go through every subject that I am involved in. I'm sorry, I've been a victim of forced extra time at work and I am way behind in catching up with OPP.
If you wish me to comment on a specific post that you have left, please paste in the link ?
If you wish me to comment on a specific post that you have left, please paste in the link ?
"Maybe you missed my two or three pointed invitations on the [color=embarassed]spouse rape complications thread..."[/color.]
Things do move on. And things get crowded out by emotional displays, for sure. Im pretty sure the argument and my rebuttal will come up again at a pertinent and perhaps more opportune time, when the readers are not so distracted and paranoid and able to rationally attend to the argument instead of a scatological gish gallup composed of alternate personalities
and their disorders.
To the future, and BEYOND!
Sep 15, 2021 11:38:32 #
(Main)
(Copy/pasted from my reply on the "What if your wife...." thread.)
Reiterating and tying topics together....
I talked to THE FBI TIP LINE for civilian reporting.
The FBI tip reporting personel do not provide feedback or progress reports about ongoing investigations. It generally takes around a year for federal investigations to conclude, before anyone "shows up" to investigate, then they proceed by interviewing OTHERS, confidentially. If one were to be a main target, they'd be the last person they would want to warn!
Rewards for helping apprehend miscreants only apply at conviction of said miscreants for the full crime, not a pled down sentence.
Allowing for a couple years or so delay, the time off work to deal with officials, paying for an attorney and court costs ahead of time when one might be reimbursed and compensated years later, only IF the case gets a full conviction.
If you truly have nothing to hide, my (dear(s)s), I'm sure you'll be fine!
Or, otherwise, still FINE!
Effed up,
Insecure,
Neurotic, and
Emotional.
But that is for you to deal with in the privacy of your own hearts. I don't need to hear about it anymore, having reported it to the higher powers that be...
Higher Powers, ...
Turned over.
I get the appeal!
But after experiencing such, ah, inefficiency and lack of definitive action, on the part of THAT citizen reporting process and subsequent expectations....
I now feel much better knowing the barely pregnant women of Texas can sleep a little easier about the "Vagina Vigillantes!"
Reiterating and tying topics together....
I talked to THE FBI TIP LINE for civilian reporting.
The FBI tip reporting personel do not provide feedback or progress reports about ongoing investigations. It generally takes around a year for federal investigations to conclude, before anyone "shows up" to investigate, then they proceed by interviewing OTHERS, confidentially. If one were to be a main target, they'd be the last person they would want to warn!
Rewards for helping apprehend miscreants only apply at conviction of said miscreants for the full crime, not a pled down sentence.
Allowing for a couple years or so delay, the time off work to deal with officials, paying for an attorney and court costs ahead of time when one might be reimbursed and compensated years later, only IF the case gets a full conviction.
If you truly have nothing to hide, my (dear(s)s), I'm sure you'll be fine!
Or, otherwise, still FINE!
Effed up,
Insecure,
Neurotic, and
Emotional.
But that is for you to deal with in the privacy of your own hearts. I don't need to hear about it anymore, having reported it to the higher powers that be...
Higher Powers, ...
Turned over.
I get the appeal!
But after experiencing such, ah, inefficiency and lack of definitive action, on the part of THAT citizen reporting process and subsequent expectations....
I now feel much better knowing the barely pregnant women of Texas can sleep a little easier about the "Vagina Vigillantes!"
Sep 15, 2021 11:02:55 #
(Main)
BigMike wrote:
No.
A shout out to son of witless's argument,
When does a RAPE BABY begin to exist?
the Bible wrote:
Matthew 5:28, NIV: "But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart."
When a RAPIST first has guilty ruminations, or after implantation?
Recall that medically/technically, a woman or fertile child is "pregnant" at the beginning of the menstrual cycle which ultimately results in implantation of a conceptus that might not have implanted until two to three weeks into the process!
Sep 15, 2021 10:49:33 #
(Main)
EmilyD wrote:
A thread you are hosting....😂🤣😅😄❕❕❕❕❕
Where's that FBI? 😳😳😳
Where's that FBI? 😳😳😳
It was I who asked the question in the title and published it in a thread under my avatar. And in a Socratic manner, I developed the topic! So having begun the inquisition, I am the master inquisitor on this thread as well as the judge of what I FIND topical and interesting. I may not control or limit the subjects, Subjects or their productions. I may only choose how and when to respond. Or not.
See? I had already posted that info and you had read past it and are still off topic and reading comprehension impaired.
And peculiarly needy in regards to details of the reporting for a problem from which you have been cleared of any wrongdoing!?
~
THE FULLY DEVELOPED TOPIC FOR READING AND COMPREHENSION IMPAIRED PERSONS.
