One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: MarvinSussman
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 369 next>>
Jan 30, 2019 15:53:00   #
HonorNCourage57 wrote:
The Democrats' Radicalism Problem
David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images
By Ben Shapiro
@benshapiro
January 30, 2019

President Trump is deeply unpopular. According to RealClearPolitics, his favorability ratings now stand at just 41 percent — near-historic lows. This means that Democrats have the upper hand heading into 2020. All they have to do is not be radically insane.

And they just can't do it.

Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., the media darling of the moment, stated on a CNN town hall this week that she wants to fully abolish private health insurance, ban all semi-automatic weapons and rid the American economy of carbon emissions within a decade.

None of these positions are popular. Americans are interested in the idea of Medicare-for-All so long as there are no costs. The minute they're told that there may be delays in receiving care, as there are in nearly all countries with socialized medicine, support plummets to just 26 percent, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll. Only 37 percent support Medicare-for-All if it means merely raising taxes. How about banning all semi-automatic weapons? As of October, 57 percent of Americans opposed banning semi-automatics. And when it comes to abolishing private cars — which would essentially be necessary to achieve the goals of the so-called Green New Deal — that proposal wouldn't even chart.

Yet the Democratic primaries will require nearly every Democrat to embrace each of these positions. That's probably why Democrats are quaking in their boots at the possibility of a third-party run by former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz. Schultz has declared nationalized health care an impossibility; he has talked about the dangers of our massive national debt; he has opposed a 70 percent income tax rate. "I respect the Democratic Party," Schultz told CNBC this week. "I no longer feel affiliated because I don't know their views represent the majority of Americans."
Top articles
1*6
READ MORE
University Bans Christian Group For Refusing Leadership To
Gay Student. Case Hits Federal Court Tomorrow.

Now, Schultz may be a boring billionaire, but at least he isn't pushing proposals so loony they alienate vast swaths of the American public. Democrats want to have it both ways: They want to push radical l*****t policy, but they don't want the blowback such policies entail. They want to pretend that radical leftism is popular even as they implicitly acknowledge the fact that it's not all that popular.

Hence New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg's fulminating over Schultz's candidacy. She writes, "this frustrated executive's politics aren't widely shared by people who haven't been to Davos." Trump's riding in the low 40s. Democrats shouldn't have to sweat out fringe candidacies. Yet that's what they're doing, because they know they've pushed too far to the left.

There's an easy answer to the Schultz conundrum for Democrats: Stop embracing the radical id of your own base. But that would involve recognizing that Trump's unpopularity isn't equivalent to support for radicalism. And Democrats will never acknowledge it — not as long as the hope remains that Trump's unpopularity will t***slate into extreme l*****t policy, the likes of which the republic has rarely seen.

http://www.dailywire.com


The radical Democrats are creating a lot of problems for those who v**ed in their favor, but as i see it, these V**ers will soon see the t***h and the Liberal L*****t, will have to change their ways. Do it or Die!!!!!!.Now what's all Y'all's Opinion on this Issue?
The Democrats' Radicalism Problem br David Paul Mo... (show quote)


LET’S PREPARE OUR DEFENSE WITH A MAXIMUM EFFORT !!

A nation can be in only one of three possible states of affairs.

First, a nation can be at war, in an existential struggle, depending upon its defense.

To survive such an embattled state of affairs, a nation must continually prepare its defense.

Next, a nation can prepare defense with a maximum effort by using all of its idle resources to increase and to improve its infrastructure and its most important resource, its people, whose health and education are essential and can be improved most surely by providing free healthcare for all and free, expense-paid education for all. Such pr********n of defense needs maximum Congressional spending, which needs a maximum effort to prevent inflation, which needs adequate taxation of disposable income and no taxation of non-disposable income, which needs adequate and steeply progressive federal income and estate tax rates.

Such a provident nation would be well-prepared to survive an embattled state of affairs.

Finally, a nation can prepare its defense but WITHOUT a maximum effort to increase and improve its infrastructure, NOT providing free health care for all and free, expense-paid education for all, being more concerned with budget deficits and tax relief for the rich and their heirs while mired in idleness, poverty, trafficking, addiction, crime, and mass incarceration.

Such an improvident nation (ours!) is now ill-prepared to survive an embattled state of affairs.
Citizens opposed to free healthcare and expense-paid education for all, including free trade schools, will v**e for inflation due to sk**led labor shortages, for military recruiting shortages due to poor health and education, and for medical cost bankruptcies. V**es against maximum Congressional spending will guarantee destructive poverty, decaying infrastructure, and a sub-optimal defense that threatens our survival in an embattled state of affairs.

A provident nation will be not only the most prepared nation but also the most prosperous nation because that nation’s spending would generate the largest annual federal budget deficit, which is exactly equal to the sum of its annual trade deficit plus its annual domestic net private savings. That sum represents the nation’s consumption of foreign goods plus its private after-tax earnings, a necessary source of investment for growth. Therefore, that sum is directly proportional to the nation’s prosperity, that which trumps all taxes, sustains its social health, and encourages its youth, perhaps the most important element of its defense.

So, preparing our defense with maximum effort is also our best economic policy, as proven by the decades of post-war prosperity created by our huge World War II deficit spending on salaries that were saved as “War Bonds”, eventually cashed in for homes, cars, and kids, creating the prosperous suburbs that since exist all over America. Ask Granny for details!

Citizens intelligent enough to understand the above will v**e for the provident nation!

© 2018 Marvin Sussman. All rights reserved. Search YouTube.com for Marvin Sussman!
Go to
Jan 29, 2019 09:11:25   #
lindajoy wrote:
[/b]

Perhaps in the early stage that was true, now however the movement is significantly more than just policy~~ what other socialist policy would you suggest ??
Medicare for all?? No option for independant private choice??Free college?? Paid for by governmen?? How?? More taxation??

The bottom line: The Democratic socialist movement is growing at every level of government.
Plenty more to read..., <snip>

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) has grown from 7,000 members to 50,000 since President Trump was elected.

At least 46 Democratic socialist candidates and two DSA-backed b****t measures have won their primaries in 2018, according to a list compiled by the DSA.

Of those, 14 were endorsed by the national DSA chapter (but the other were endorsed by their local chapter.)
Four of their candidates are running for U.S. House; the rest are running for state-level office, like state House, state Senate, and city council.
Some DSA victories this cycle include:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Julia Salazar in New York

James Thompson in Kansas
Rashida Tlaib in Michigan
Sarah Smith in Washington
Four women in Pennsylvania, all backed by the Philly chapter of DSA, won their primaries for state House: Summer Lee and Sara Innamorato both unseated longtime Democratic incumbents, and Elizabeth Fiedler and Kristin Seale won their races.
Ocasio-Cortez, the Democratic socialist darling of 2018, has endorsed at least five candidates outside of DSA who have won their primaries, including Ayanna Pressley in Massachusetts, Ben Jealous in Maryland, Stacey Abrams in Georgia, Andrew Gillum in Florida and Ilhan Omar in Minnesota.

The bottom line: The Democratic socialist movement is growing at every level of government.

Go deeper: The Democratic socialist movement comes to Michigan

"Medicare for All" is a winner in Democratic primaries

Progressives to Democrats: Ignore Trump v**ers, focus on minorities

Correction: This post has been updated to reflect that DSA's 48 victories included two b****t measures, and that their membership is 50,000, not 37,000.

https://www.axios.com/democratic-socialist-candidates-who-have-won-in-2018-midterms-6bf604a3-ee98-4ab3-9e63-349aec324c43.html
/b br br Perhaps in the early stage that was tr... (show quote)


How do we pay for free education and free medical care? The same way we pay for a dozen aircraft carriers and all the airplanes on board and the pilots and the crews and the port facilities and fifty years of operating expenses. Tell me how we pay for all that and I will tell you how to pay for anything!
Go to
Jan 29, 2019 09:02:06   #
crazylibertarian wrote:
I must admit, I have all to do, to not descend into hatred of people like Andrew Cuomo for his signing this Reproductive Rights Bill into law, and those supposedly Catholic politicians, who support barbarities like a******n. As a practicing (I admit I’ve never gotten it right, like all, I continue to be a sinner) Catholic, I believe that these people should be excommunicated. I am ashamed to have to admit that this has happened in the city and state of my birth, New York.

I understand that there is a movement among lay Catholics to have him & his ilk excommunicated. Does anyone know whom I can contact to join in this effort?
I must admit, I have all to do, to not descend int... (show quote)


Use your brains. Try to imagine a woman in her sixth month of pregnancy who finds, after an examination, that the fetus is not viable. She can either terminate the pregnancy or wait for the birth. There are risks either way.

The question you should answer is not what she should do. You are not competent to answer, even if you are an obstetrician.

You should tell us exactly who should make that decision: the woman and her doctor?
Or a fat, bald politician? Your answer, please!
Go to
Jan 28, 2019 05:43:06   #
no propaganda please wrote:
Congress, Legal Scoops, Politics, Trump Administration
Democrats Says Brett Kavanaugh’s “Impeachment” is On the Table

by Andrew


For the last two years, Democrats have bemoaned our hotly-divided nation, but now that they have a little bit of power in Congress, they are going to blast those divisions wide open. Few events in recent memory have so sharply pitted Americans against each other like the shameful confirmation hearings of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Thankfully, he got through to the court despite one of the most bitter, reckless, fact-free smear jobs we’ve ever seen in Washington. The wise thing, right now, would be to put that d********g episode as far in the rearview mirror as we possibly can. You may love Kavanaugh or you may h**e him, but the fact remains that he’s on the court. It’s done. Live with it.

But Democrats aren’t willing to do that. No, they’re talking about impeaching him.

“Joe Neguse, a Colorado Democrat elected in 2018 to serve the state’s second congressional district, told supporters on Friday the committee could move to impeach the newly-appointed justice if their findings prove he knowingly lied to lawmakers during his confirmation process,” reports The Independent. “Donald Trump’s second pick to serve a lifelong appointment on the Supreme Court was alleged to have provided misleading statements surrounding sexual assault accusations leveled against him by Deborah Ramirez, a former Yale classmate.”

In an interview, Neguse said: “There’s no question he committed perjury during the confirmation hearings and so forth. I think the Judiciary Committee is likely to take that up.”

That would be a horrendous mistake. Neguse is referring to the fact that Kavanaugh, at one point in the hearings, claimed to learn of Ramirez’s accusation against him for the first time in the New Yorker article.

But that is of course impossible (and ludicrous to claim) since Kavanaugh is quoted IN THE ARTICLE as denying the incident ever took place. So it is beyond obvious that he was telling the Judiciary Committee that he learned about the incident through the reporters, not through the publication of the story. And this is such a silly, insignificant detail that it would be ridiculous to actually pursue an investigation.

The Democrats don’t care about any of that, of course. They are looking to prove to their base that they’re doing everything possible to “avenge” Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Doing everything they can to prevent the “tragedy” that would be the reversal of Roe v. Wade. And doing everything they can to #Resist Trump and his nominees. It makes for terrible governance and a more bitterly divided nation.

If there is a silver lining, it’s that v**ers may become quite disgusted with the Democrats for pursuing this phony case. And maybe that will lead to them making a better decision with their v**e in 2020.
Congress, Legal Scoops, Politics, Trump Administra... (show quote)


Under oath, he claimed that he never "blacked out". There will be the testimony of classmates who picked him up out of his vomit.

He is finished! Lock him up!
Go to
Jan 27, 2019 06:31:26   #
sisboombaa wrote:
After several years of reading the posts on OPP I have yet to notice anyone change their opinion on a major issue. Does anyone think maybe we are wasting our time and energy participating in these discussions, arguments, opinion sharing, name calling, etc. One thing I have noticed is the high number of participants that are closed minded in an insulting way driven by anger. Hopefully, most of you realize anger is one of several possible responses to fear. With out fear there can be no anger. To operate under the control of anger is not the most intelligent way to solve problems.

Repeating my question; are we wasting our time?
After several years of reading the posts on OPP I ... (show quote)


There are two problems to be overcome. 1. People have to learn how to reason with statements that are obviously true and that use deductive logic. 2. People have to learn how to recognize and accept such statements.

For example, we sometimes discuss Congressional spending and taxing without changing opinions. Let's try overcoming those two problems by the following attempt at reason and see how many minds are changed:

1. The primary goal of a rational economy is to produce maximum infrastructure and prosperity.
2. Maximum Congressional spending yields maximum infrastructure and maximum after-tax savings (deficit spending).
3. Maximum progressive taxation yields minimum inflation.
4. Maximum Congressional spending plus maximum progressive taxation yields maximum infrastructure plus minimum inflation plus maximum after-tax savings (prosperity).

Will any conservative argue with that reasoning? No!
Will every conservative accept that reasoning? NO!

That's the problem!
Go to
Jan 26, 2019 12:26:14   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
New Poll: Over 68% of Arkansas residents support a Convention of States!

Recent polling conducted by The Trafalgar Group reveal that more than two-thirds (68.2%) of likely Arkansas v**ers support the Convention of States resolution pending in the Arkansas legislature this session, calling for a state-led Article V convention to propose amendments that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its power and jurisdiction, and set term limits for federal officials.

Arkansas Senator Gary Stubblefield (R-6) is sponsoring the resolution, SJR 3, in the Senate. Support for the measure crosses party lines, as the poll indicates that more than 80% of Republicans, over half of Democrats, and more than 64% of “other” v**ers favor this approach.

Click here to read more.
https://conventionofstates.us8.list-manage.com/track/click?u=3a21cd3d06284c105dbd92fee&id=4333ed97c9&e=f6a2935952
New Poll: Over 68% of Arkansas residents support a... (show quote)


THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO PROSPERITY!!

Like the proof of a geometry theorem, the following statements contain only facts and logical conclusions.

You can follow this proof even if you flunked out of geometry!

1. Our Constitution empowers Congress to “…coin Money…” without limit so its spending can exhaust not dollars but only physical resources: fuel, sk**led labor, etc.

2. All payments to the federal government for taxes, bonds, tariffs, etc., are effectively destroyed1 before crediting any account. So, federal income taxes and Treasury bonds cannot fund Congressional spending. To spend, Congress “coins” money!

3. If the IRS does not collect all of Congress’ annual spending, the Treasury borrows the value of the remainder, our Annual Federal Deficit (AFD), adding to federal debt.. The deficit is a necessary addition to the money supply, which grows with the economy.

4. If our annual imports exceed our annual exports, the excess, our Annual Trade Deficit (ATD), a portion of the AFD, exits circulation into foreign bank accounts. Any remaining portion of the AFD is our Annual Domestic Surplus (ADS), which exits circulation into domestic bank accounts. So, AFD = ADS + ATD and ADS = AFD - ATD. To avoid a negative ADS (depleting our savings to buy foreign goods), our annual federal deficit (AFD) must exceed our annual trade deficit (ATD).

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

A Constitutional amendment requiring a near-zero average AFD planned over any period would drain our savings into foreign banks, causing inevitable recessions/depressions!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

5. Federal deficit dollars (AFD) exit circulation either to buy foreign goods (ATD) or to be saved for investment (ADS), t***sactions with volume proportional to our prosperity. The more Congress spends, the larger the tax revenue, the deficit, the buying, the saving, and, thus, the prosperity that trumps the larger tax payments! So, Congress should spend until the onset of rising inflation due ONLY to exhaustion of physical resources (fuel, sk**led labor, etc.) which Congress must provide for defense.

6. To avoid rising inflation caused by a shortage of strategic goods (oil, etc.), rationing and price controls may be necessary, as during World War II. The Fed can limit rising inflation caused by excessive bank credit by raising the federal funds interest rate. Maximum building of infrastructure needs maximum Congressional spending, which needs maximum prevention of inflation, which needs maximum taxation of disposable income (but minimum taxation of non-disposable income!), which needs adequate, steeply progressive federal income and estate tax rates.

7. To control our federal debt, the Fed can buy unlimited amounts from the public (or from the Treasury, as proposed by former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke2,) returning 94% of its profit to the Treasury as required by current law. Also, maximum infrastructure spending will keep our economy competitive with other nations and our GDP growing faster than our federal debt3

8. If a corporate dividend were a deductible expense like interest cost, undistributed earnings and dividends could be taxed (once!) like wages. And corporate projects could be financed with equity just as well as with debt, yielding a much stronger economy.

9. Unemployment and extreme poverty can be entirely eliminated by a federal “Job Guarantee” by which Congress would stop current unemployment benefits and, at a minimum wage, hire the jobless, possibly disabled, to assist any government or qualified NPO in jobs they are capable of performing after being trained. The more Congress spends, the more prosperity for us, as explained in paragraph 5 above.

10. Municipal bond funding threatens to bankrupt communities and cripple states that now are forced to rent infrastructure, taxing their residents over twice the cost of construction! But, since a simple pothole can delay a vital shipment, infrastructure is a crucial part of our defense. Uniquely responsible for defense, Congress should pay for all US infrastructure - including potholes! - and eliminate all municipal bond payments. The more Congress spends, the more prosperity for us, etc.

11. Given that (1) our defense industry needs healthy, well-educated workers; (2) all US male citizens and immigrants must register at age 18 for military service; (3) over 75% of applications for military service are now rejected for deficiencies in education and/or health; and (4) all children deserve an equal opportunity to serve in the military; therefore, Congress should provide totally free healthcare and expense-paid education for all, including nurseries, childcare, trade schools, community colleges, and universities at all levels of instruction! The more Congress spends, the more prosperity for us, as explained in paragraph 5 above.

12. As proven by the 25 years of prosperity that followed four huge World War II annual federal deficits resulting in a wartime debt/GDP ratio exceeding 120%, poverty exists mainly because an austere Congress deprives us of needed infrastructure and the prosperity that spending would bring. Rational v**ers will v**e only for candidates who will maximize infrastructure spending. May there be enough rational v**ers!

1http://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/can-taxes-and-bonds-finance-government-spending
2https://www.brookings.edu/blog/ben-bernanke/2016/04/11/what-tools-does-the-fed-have-left-part-3-helicopter- money/
3http://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/?docid=1379

© 2018 Marvin Sussman All rights reserved. Search YouTube.com for Marvin Sussman !
Go to
Jan 26, 2019 12:05:52   #
crazylibertarian wrote:
OMG, The Poor Child Has Ring Worm! We Must Have Socialized Medicine!


OMG, the poor child has ring worm. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez agonized over poor children in Alabama suffering from ring worm. Thus, we must have Medicare for all.

Those poor, poor children are suffering from...from... from... worms? And going untreated? Horrors!!!!!!!!!!!!

Worms? In this day & age? Is ringworm anything like pin worms? Hook worms? Or any of those other worms that infest many tropical people, some of which can actually go to the brain and be fatal? Dear God, we must do something about this.

No. Ring worm isn’t even a worm at all. It’s a skin fungus that starts as a small point and grows larger, into a circle. Its edges are raised & often red, distinguishing it from the skin in the center which looks like normal skin. It's shaped like a ring, hence its name.

If it grows on the feet, it’s called athlete’s foot. It will often grow in the folds near the groin where it’s called jock itch. The technical terms are tinea pedis and tinea crurum, respectively, As tinea crurum, it also often grows under pendulous breasts.

The treatment consists in spraying the lesions with any of the dozens or lotions, ointments, creams and powders that you can find in any pharmacy’s aisles. You apply it till it’s gone for at least two weeks. Tinactin powder costs all of nine dollars for a full treatment.

The toughest to treat is tinea unguium when it involves the toenails but it can involve finger nails. Toe treatment can take four to six months because a full healthy nail must grow out and toenails grow very slowly.

AOC regards this as justifying a socialized medical system.



OMG, The Poor Child Has Ring Worm! We Must Have S... (show quote)


LET’S PREPARE OUR DEFENSE WITH A MAXIMUM EFFORT !!

A nation can be in only one of three possible states of affairs.

First, a nation can be at war, in an existential struggle, depending upon its infrastructure.

To survive such an embattled state of affairs, a nation must continually prepare its defense.

Next, a nation can prepare defense with a maximum effort by using all of its idle resources to increase and to improve its infrastructure and its most important resource, its people, whose health and education are essential and can be improved most surely by providing free healthcare for all and free, expense-paid education for all. Such pr********n of defense needs maximum Congressional spending, which needs a maximum effort to prevent inflation, which needs adequate taxation of disposable income and no taxation of non-disposable income, which needs adequate and steeply progressive federal income and estate tax rates.

Such a provident nation would be well-prepared to survive an embattled state of affairs.

Finally, a nation can prepare its defense but WITHOUT a maximum effort to increase and improve its infrastructure, NOT providing free health care for all and free, expense-paid education for all, being more concerned with budget deficits and tax relief for the rich and their heirs while mired in idleness, poverty, trafficking, addiction, crime, and mass incarceration.

Such an improvident nation (ours!) is now ill-prepared to survive an embattled state of affairs.

Citizens opposed to free healthcare and expense-paid education for all, including free trade schools, will v**e for inflation due to sk**led labor shortages, for military recruiting shortages due to poor health and education, and for medical cost bankruptcies. V**es against maximum Congressional spending will guarantee destructive poverty, decaying infrastructure, and a sub-optimal defense that threatens our survival in an embattled state of affairs.

A provident nation will be not only the most prepared nation but also the most prosperous nation because that nation’s Congressional spending would generate the largest annual federal budget deficit, which is exactly equal to the sum of its annual trade deficit plus its annual domestic net private savings. That sum represents the nation’s consumption of foreign goods plus its private after-tax earnings, a necessary source of investment for growth. Therefore, that sum is directly proportional to the nation’s prosperity, that which trumps all taxes, sustains its social health, and encourages its youth, perhaps the most important element of its defense.

So, preparing our defense with maximum effort is also our best economic policy, as proven by the decades of post-war prosperity created by our huge World War II deficit spending on salaries that were saved as “War Bonds”, eventually cashed in for homes, cars, and kids, creating the prosperous suburbs that since exist all over America. Ask Granny for details!

Citizens intelligent enough to understand the above will v**e for the provident nation! © 2018 Marvin Sussman. All rights reserved. Search YouTube.com for Marvin Sussman!
Go to
Jan 23, 2019 06:30:55   #
rumitoid wrote:
Further video coverage shows a more complicated picture. I was way out of line in so staunchly, stubbornly and unreasonably, backing the initial limited view of the situation. Yes, the MAGA hats definitely produced the ire of my posts. I truly h**e that ugly and r****t e******n motto with all its damning implications against our values, ideals, principles, and laws. Truly sickening. It is a slur against this great country. The fact so-called patriots cannot see that, baffles and pisses me off. However, no excuse. There was more to the story that I refused to see. My bad. Yet it is not like subsequent videos show Covington to be scot-free (or is it "Scott free" as spelling laureate Trump would say?) of bad behavior. But the situation with all its variables and conflicting interests, the tension at the time, make it far less h**eful and damning than I made it out to be. My extreme bad. One of those things when people are in a unique and possibly dangerous situation: who really knows how to act?
Further video coverage shows a more complicated pi... (show quote)


I have seen that smirk before, on the white faces of "Christian" boys threatening a Jewish kid - me! I would know that smirk anywhere, the smirk of privilege, the smirk of disdain for the "other".

You can fool yourself but you can't fool me.
Go to
Jan 22, 2019 14:10:08   #
eagleye13 wrote:
8 Recent Reasons The “Manufactured” Border Crisis ISN’T Manufactured
http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/8-recent-reasons-the-manufactured-border-crisis-isnt-manufactured/

Pelosi and Company were getting ready leave Dodge for a week in the middle of the Shutdown. Because she’s not interested in any solution that involves closing the border.

Together with other Democrats and the Media(D), she claims the crisis is somehow ‘manufactured’. She could NOT be more wrong. Here are some recent stories that prove just HOW wrong she is.

The Caravans Keep Coming

A new ‘Caravan’ just punched through the Mexican Border, en route to USA what the numbers will swell to by the time they arrive on the border is anybody’s guess.

Trending: Hey NeverTrumpkins: Did You Hear What DJT Has Promised To Veto?

Hundreds of mostly Honduran migrants entered southern Mexico on Friday, joining around 1,000 other people from Central America who crossed a day earlier and putting to the test Mexico’s vows to guarantee the safe and orderly flow of people.

…A migration official at the entry point, who asked not to be named because she was not authorized to speak to media, said that at least 1,000 people crossed from Guatemala into Mexico before dawn, without putting on wrist bands.

Asked why migrants did not receive wrist bands, David Leon, the director of civil protection, said authorities faced a caravan of hundreds of people early in the morning and let them pass rather than risk a confrontation.
Source: Reuters

As you read further, you will see this isn’t the only one.

Rapists in the Crowd

Time reported that a nine-year-old girl in the group had already been raped and required medical attention. This aligns with the dangers we already know that attend to journeys like this one. When the President’s Oval Office address was ‘fact checked’ for raising the human rights concern that one-in-three women and girls are sexually abused during their attempts to illegally cross the border, it was because the President’s numbers were WAY Too low...
8 Recent Reasons The “Manufactured” Border Crisis ... (show quote)


People will come to ask for asylum whether there is a wall or not. They are not shooting their way in or sneaking in. They are asking to come in. A wall will not stop them from asking - by the hundreds or by the thousands. Your wall will not stop caravans.
Go to
Jan 21, 2019 05:32:24   #
2bltap wrote:
I posted this video quite awhile ago when Obama was in office and quite frankly didn't get much response from it then, which is perfectly ok. However, after the last two years, the Democrats and a number of RINOS in our government have in my opinion forfeited there rights as elected officials and have become nothing more than our supposed masters, who believe it is their collective right to tell us all how to think. Just look at the all of anti American BS that has been pushed through our education system, the toxic masculinity crap trying to soften our men. HMMMM I wonder what or men at IWO JIMA would think of our SOCIALIST/C*******T INDOCTRINATION OF OUR STUDENTS, who have been taught/confused as to which s**tter to use or having our athletes being g****r neutral having men competing against women and so on and so forth? The progressive left have damn near destroyed this country and President Trump is just about all by himself trying to turn this wayward ship around. Please watch this video and tell me where I'm wrong.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/0MkQXQLPcQQ
I posted this video quite awhile ago when Obama wa... (show quote)


You should attempt to sit down and write declarative sentences containing only verifiable facts that explain exactly what you are complaining about. All I heard was incoherent words. Sorry for your loss of time.
Go to
Jan 19, 2019 05:43:59   #
Pennylynn wrote:
House Democrats Add $1 Billion in Border-Related Spending to Measures to Reopen Government..... It seems than putting the skids on Polosi's boondoggle may have jarred the Democrats into working for the people instead of their own agendas. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/us/politics/pelosi-donald-trump-cancel-travel.html

Do not celebrate yet.... this is only a small crack and I do not think our President will accept this spending measure. First, it is not a budget and will only send people back to work for a few months and then the fight would start all over again. But, we will see.... as for me, I see this as a break among Democrats while the true Republicans are standing behind our President.
House Democrats Add $1 Billion in Border-Related S... (show quote)


There is no money added until the senate agrees and the President signs. It's only a gesture.
Go to
Jan 18, 2019 05:13:39   #
2bltap wrote:
This my fellow patriots is what PROGRESSIVISM has brought to our Once great nation. I say once great nation, because this has been allowed by the Hope and Change couple that occupied THE PEOPLES HOUSE FOR 8 YEARS. Oh and just a reminder, when he was leaving Our House he was caught on tape actually saying "I CAN'T BELIEVE WE GOT AWAY WITH IT"!!!!!! For here on OPP that say where is your proof that he said it, do your own research using anything other than CNN Nad the rest of the MSM. If you really want the t***h to what I'm saying you will find it just like I did when it first came out. Are there anyone here on OPP that is either happy or proud of this?
Semper FI
Mike

https://youtu.be/JFhMZm5reE8

This my fellow patriots is what PROGRESSIVISM has ... (show quote)


You lie! If you did the research, you would have the link. Makin' stuff up! Liar!
Go to
Jan 8, 2019 10:41:04   #
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Several points, the first being about no terrorists. I beg to differ.
https://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2016/apr/04/ron-desantis/terrorists-groups-besides-isis-crossing-us-mexico-/
*****
The second one about counties along the border being safer. Maybe in Texas. Not in general.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2014/08/doj-report-nearly-half-fed-crimes-near-mexican-border/

https://www.dailywire.com/news/10155/9-things-you-need-know-about-illegal-immigration-aaron-bandler
********

While illegal entries appear to be down, drug shipments are up.

https://www.libertyheadlines.com/illegal-border-crossings-illegal-drug-crossings-trump/

*********

Lastly, most Americans want border security. A wall is an integral part of this in some places, in other places it is a joke. Much of the existing "wall" is nothing. A child could get over it in a few seconds.
Border security involves walls where necessary, surveillance and rapid response capability for incursions, it also involves mandatory E Verify with stiff fines and jail time for employers who knowingly hire i******s.
It also involves ending the unconstitutional practice of granting birth citizenship to the children of i******s.
It involves vigorous prosecution of the estimated 1.3 million wetbacks in this country who have obtained jobs and benefits with ID stolen from US citizens.

More than anything else, it requires an e*****rate of informed and non-apathetic citizens who will no longer listen to or give credence to the whining, bulls**t excuses proffered by professional politicians about how it's all someone else's fault.
Several points, the first being about no terrorist... (show quote)


I check out one of your links and found this:

There have been several reported incidents along the U.S.-Mexico border of several agencies encountering a number of people from countries associated with terror groups stopped by authorities, although that’s not an indication they’re terrorist infiltrators. Experts noted that while border security is always a concern, this issue is far from a pressing crisis.

Much ado about nothing!
Go to
Jan 6, 2019 11:49:42   #
Pennylynn wrote:
Yea... I will watch her simply because she has the intelligence of a dead cat. The woman will flip/flop... change with the wind. I am not saying she is brainless, after all she breathes on her own... but I see nothing redeeming in her publicized comments.

The same goes for the muslim that democrats v**ed in.... shameless, but with a plan.
Watch her too.

BTW, we have jobs for legal immigrants, not for trespassers.


LET’S PREPARE OUR DEFENSE WITH A MAXIMUM EFFORT !!

A nation can be in only one of three possible states of affairs.

First, a nation can be at war, in an existential struggle, depending upon its infrastructure.

To survive such an embattled state of affairs, a nation must continually prepare its defense.

Next, a nation can be preparing its defense with a maximum effort by using all of its idle resources to increase and to improve its infrastructure and its most important resource, its people, whose health and education are essential and can be improved most surely by providing free healthcare for all and free, expense-paid education for all. Such pr********n of defense needs maximum Congressional spending, which needs a maximum effort to prevent inflation, which needs adequate taxation of disposable income but without taxation of non-disposable income, which needs adequate and steeply progressive federal income tax rates.

Such a provident nation would be well-prepared to survive an embattled state of affairs.
Finally, a nation can be preparing its defense but WITHOUT a maximum effort to increase and improve its infrastructure, NOT providing free health care for all and free, expense-paid education for all, being more concerned with budget deficits and tax relief for the rich and their heirs while mired in idleness, poverty, trafficking, addiction, crime, and mass incarceration.

Such an improvident nation (ours!) is ill-prepared to survive an embattled state of affairs.

Citizens who oppose free healthcare and expense-paid education for all, including free trade schools, will v**e for inflation due to sk**led labor shortages, for medical bill bankruptcies, and for military recruiting shortages due to poor health and education. V**es against maximum Congressional spending will spawn deficient infrastructure and destructive poverty, yielding a sub-optimal defense that risks our failure to survive an embattled state of affairs.

V**ers who gain a provident nation will have not only the most prepared nation but also the most prosperous because that nation’s Congressional spending would generate the largest annual federal budget deficits, which is exactly equal to the sum of its annual trade deficit plus its annual private net savings.

That sum represents the nation’s consumption of foreign goods plus its private after-tax earnings, a necessary source of investment for growth. Therefore, that sum is directly proportional to the nation’s prosperity, that which trumps all taxes, sustains its social health, and encourages its youth, perhaps the most important element of its defense.

So, preparing our defense with maximum effort is also our best economic policy, as proven by the decades of post-war prosperity created by our huge World War II deficit spending on salaries that were saved as “War Bonds” that were eventually cashed in for homes, cars, and kids, creating the prosperous suburbs that since exist all over America. Ask Granny for details!

Citizens intelligent enough to understand the above will v**e for the provident nation!
©2018 Marvin Sussman. All rights reserved. Search YouTube.com for Marvin Sussman!
Go to
Jan 6, 2019 11:42:56   #
JFlorio wrote:
Like you know anything about border security. Walls work. Exactly why you don’t want it.


More than half of all i*****l i*******ts overstay their visa after flying over the border. A perfect wall would just increase air traffic.

Only morons want the wall!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 369 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.