One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Inyourface
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 51 next>>
Jul 6, 2014 12:30:54   #
Old_Gringo wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I am as much a r****t as a sidewalk.

You certainly aren't averse to showing your r****m are you?


Ignorant,r****t,white people are so weird . They spew their malignant ,r****t take on all issues, but are too cowardly to own up to how they really feel.
Go to
Jul 6, 2014 12:26:06   #
Patty wrote:
John Whitehead, Rutherford Institute
238 Years Later, Would Americans Still Choose Freedom Over S***ery?

“Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and s***ery? I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”—Patrick Henry

Imagine living in a country where armed soldiers crash through doors to arrest and imprison citizens merely for criticizing government officials. Imagine that in this very same country, you’re watched all the time, and if you look even a little bit suspicious, the police stop and frisk you or pull you over to search you on the off chance you’re doing something illegal. Keep in mind that if you have a firearm of any kind while in this country, it may get you arrested and, in some circumstances, shot by police.
If you’re thinking this sounds like America today, you wouldn’t be far wrong. However, the scenario described above took place more than 200 years ago, when American colonists suffered under Great Britain’s version of an early police state. It was only when the colonists finally got fed up with being silenced, censored, searched, frisked, threatened, and arrested that they finally revolted against the tyrant’s fetters.

No document better states their grievances than the Declaration of Independence. A document seething with outrage over a government which had betrayed its citizens, the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776, by 56 men who laid everything on the line, pledged it all—“our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor”—because they believed in a radical idea: that all people are created to be free.

Labeled t*****rs, these men were charged with treason, a crime punishable by death. For some, their acts of r*******n would cost them their homes and their fortunes. For others, it would be the ultimate price—their lives. Yet even knowing the heavy price they might have to pay, these men dared to speak up when silence could not be tolerated. Even after they had won their independence from Great Britain, these new Americans worked to ensure that the rights they had risked their lives to secure would remain secure for future generations. The result: our Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution.

Imagine the shock and outrage these 56 men would feel were they to discover that 238 years later, the government they had risked their lives to create has been t***sformed into a militaristic police state in which exercising one’s freedoms is often viewed as a f**grant act of defiance. Indeed, had the Declaration of Independence been written today, it would have rendered its signers terrorists, resulting in them being placed on a government watch list, targeted for surveillance of their activities and correspondence, and potentially arrested, held indefinitely, stripped of their rights and labeled enemy combatants.

Indeed, as I document in my book, A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, a cursory review of the true state of our freedoms as outlined in the Bill of Rights shows exactly how dismal things have become:

The First Amendment is supposed to protect the freedom to speak your mind and protest in peace without being bridled by the government. It also protects the freedom of the media, as well as the right to worship and pray without interference. In other words, Americans cannot be silenced by the government. Yet despite the clear protections found in the First Amendment, the freedoms described therein are under constant assault. Whether it’s a Marine detained for criticizing the government on Facebook, a reporter persecuted for refusing to reveal his sources, or a protester arrested for standing silently in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, these are dangerous times for those who choose to exercise their rights.

The Second Amendment was intended to guarantee “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” Yet while gun ownership has been recognized as an individual citizen right, Americans continue to face an uphill battle in the courts when it comes to defending themselves against militarized, weaponized government agents armed to the hilt. In fact, court rulings in recent years have affirmed that citizens don’t have the right to resist police officers who enter their homes illegally, mistakenly or otherwise.

The Third Amendment reinforces the principle that civilian-elected officials are superior to the military by prohibiting the military from entering any citizen’s home without “the consent of the owner.” Unfortunately, the wall of separation between civilian and military policing has been torn down in recent years, as militarized SWAT teams are now allowed to burst into homes unannounced in order to investigate minor crimes such as marijuana possession and credit card fraud. With domestic police increasingly posing as military forces—complete with weapons, uniforms, assault vehicles, etc.—a good case could be made for the fact that SWAT team raids constitute the forced quartering of soldiers within the private home, which the Third Amendment was written to prevent.

The Fourth Amendment prohibits government agents from touching you or placing you under surveillance or entering your property without probable cause and even then, only with a court-sanctioned warrant. Unfortunately, the Fourth Amendment has been all but eviscerated in recent years by court rulings and government programs that sanction all manner of intrusions, including giving police carte blanche authority to break into homes or apartments without a warrant, conduct roadside strip searches, and generally manhandle any person in manner they see fit. Moreover, in the so-called name of national security, intelligence agencies like the National Security Agency now have the ability to conduct mass unwarranted electronic intrusions into the personal and private t***sactions of all Americans, including phone, mail, computer and medical records. All of this data is available to other government agencies, including local police.

The Fifth Amendment is supposed to ensure that you are innocent until proven guilty, and government authorities cannot deprive you of your life, your liberty or your property without following strict legal guidelines. Unfortunately, those protections have been largely extinguished in recent years, especially in the wake of Congress’ passage of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which allows the president and the military to arrest and detain Americans indefinitely without due process.

The Sixth Amendment was intended to not only ensure a “speedy and public trial,” but it was supposed to prevent the government from keeping someone in jail for unspecified offenses. That too has been a casualty of the so-called war on terror. Between the NDAA’s indefinite detention clause and the Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) legislation, which has been used as justification for using drones to k**l American citizens in the absence of a court trial, the Sixth Amendment’s guarantees become meaningless.

The Seventh Amendment guarantees citizens the right to a jury trial. However, when the populace has no idea of what’s in the Constitution—civic education has virtually disappeared from most school curriculums—that inevitably t***slates to an ignorant jury incapable of distinguishing justice and the law from their own preconceived notions and fears.

The Eighth Amendment is similar to the Sixth in that it is supposed to protect the rights of the accused and forbid the use of cruel and unusual punishment. However, the Supreme Court’s determination that what constitutes “cruel and unusual” should be dependent on the “evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society” leaves us with little protection in the face of a society lacking in morals altogether. America’s continued reliance on the death penalty, which has been shown to be flawed in its application and execution, is a perfect example of this.

The Ninth Amendment provides that other rights not enumerated in the Constitution are nonetheless retained by the people. Popular sovereignty—the belief that the power to govern flows upward from the people rather than downward from the rulers—is clearly evident in this amendment. However, it has since been turned on its head by a centralized federal government that sees itself as supreme and which continues to pass more and more laws that restrict our freedoms under the pretext that it has an “important government interest” in doing so. Thus, once the government began violating the non-enumerated rights granted in the Ninth Amendment, it was only a matter of time before it began to trample the enumerated rights of the people, as explicitly spelled out in the rest of the Bill of Rights.

As for the Tenth Amendment’s reminder that the people and the states retain every authority that is not otherwise mentioned in the Constitution, that assurance of a system of government in which power is divided among local, state and national entities has long since been rendered moot by the centralized Washington, DC power elite—the president, Congress and the courts. Indeed, the federal governmental bureaucracy has grown so large that it has made local and state legislatures relatively irrelevant. Through its many agencies, the federal government has stripped states of the right to regulate countless issues that were originally governed at the local level.

Thus, even on those rare occasions when the courts provide us with a slight glimmer of hope that all may not be lost, those brief reprieves of judicial sensibility are quickly overwhelmed by a bureaucratic machine that continues to march relentlessly in lockstep with the police state.

This brings me back to those 56 men who risked everything—their fortunes and their lives—to speak t***h to power in that sweltering Philadelphia heat 238 summers ago. Of those 56 signers, 9 died during the Revolution, 5 were captured by British soldiers, 18 had their homes l**ted and burned by the Red Coats, 2 were wounded in battle and 2 lost their sons during the war. Remarkably, these men—who were community leaders, business owners, judges, lawyers and inventors—sacrificed their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor so that you and I could live freely in a nation where we have the right to stand up and speak out against tyrannical government. In the face of torture and even death, they did not waver.

The choice before us is clear. In the words of Patrick Henry, will we choose freedom or s***ery?
John Whitehead, Rutherford Institute br 238 Years... (show quote)


Try suicide you moron.
Go to
Jul 6, 2014 09:32:37   #
karpenter wrote:
I Want Him To Stay. Like Most Of is Ilk, It's So Easy To Make A Fool Of Him.
He's Right, R****ts Are Stupid. Every Fiber Of His Being Is Indoctrinated.
He Screeches 'Toms' 'Lawn Jockies' Without Defining Their Policies That Make Them Race Traders.
Won't Define His Own Policies Either. Never Do.
Just Name Calling And H**e.


They are carrying water for the same greedy rich assholes you are. Their excuse is they have decide to sellout. Yours is stupidity and venal r****m.
Go to
Jul 6, 2014 09:29:57   #
Old_Gringo wrote:
Nope, he is being opposed because of both his actions and his in-actions. Both are equally odious because of their illegality.


Still too much of a punk ass to admit you are a virulent r****t? Admit it you'll feel better .you aren't fooling anyone, anyway.
Go to
Jul 6, 2014 09:26:56   #
Steve700 wrote:
Obama reveal exactly whose side he is on. The moment Bergdahls Taliban looking father began to praise Allah for his son's release saying in Arabic "In the name of Allah the most gracious and the most merciful...." That very instant Obama's face instantly and spontaneously broke out into a great big smirky looking smile. 6 soldiers were k**led trying to find Bergdahl will after he deserted to find that Taliban. And did you know that these were the absolute worst 5 savagely brutal terrorists at Gitmo and they all were top echelon commanders. One of them had personally k**led over 2000 people and another we have photographs of holding a bloody knife in his hand with 5 cut off human heads in front of him. Obama did this secretly instead of gaining the permission of Congress which he is supposed to get in order to do such a thing. He says he did it due to our "leave no soldier behind" policy. I guess that's why he says nothing, does nothing to get that Marine out of that Mexican jail because of an innocent mistake he made. (I know it was an innocent mistake because I had once made the same mistake, on that same road, at the Tijuana border myself. Once you go too far there is no turning around and you suddenly find yourself in Mexico. How do you liberals feel about this exchange DO YOU APPROVE ??????? If you do, I would have to say you're a t*****r and so is Obama !!!!!!!!
It should be obvious that no other president would have been such a thing. If you think there is no problem with him being a Muslim you must understand that a Muslim's loyalty is for allah alone & there is no division between religion and politics in Islamic theology.
Obama reveal exactly whose side he is on. The mome... (show quote)


Do you stay up all night slithering around rightwing, sewers dredging up this s**t? That Black man in the White House has really pushed your dumb ass over the edge. Well here is some more bad news for you . The future belongs to people of color the demographic, numbers don't lie. Live long and live miserable .
Go to
Jul 6, 2014 09:20:45   #
It does seem like Deja Vu all over again. Crazed ,snarling ,angry, W****s screaming, and hurling racial epitaphs at bus loads of children of color. Six decades ago it was Alabama,Missisippi,and later Boston. All trying to stop children from having a better future.

This time it is kids from south and Central America, these white people are subjecting to their fear and hatred of folks of color.

It proves yet again that r****m in America is like a poison that is soaked into the ground and the more things change the more things stay the same..
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 18:26:19   #
Steve700 wrote:
Don't call me a r****t, you lowlife piece of s**t. If I'm a r****t tell me why I would be perfectly happy with Alan Keyes, Larry Elder, Thomas Sowell or Herman Cain as my president. And all 4 of them are much blacker than Obama. There is only 2 races -the decent and the indecent and you're on the wrong side, you immoral piece of garbage. You're on the wrong side. All you got to defend your position is to call somebody a r****t you ass hole. The crazy thing is, you think this all means nothing. Well, you just wait and see where this goes. The sad thing is you will be happy when we have an economic collapse and Obama becomes a dictator with his martial law & executive orders. You think that's fanatical paranoia but you only think that because you're an i***t & can't see the writing on the wall. And what is the purpose of a civilian security force and who else had that ????????? Hitler and the C*******ts when they had their revolution. But you'll like it (for a while) is because you'll be on the side of the intolerant hating totalitarian bastards with the angry envious loser mentality out to destroy the best country that's ever existed on the face of this earth. You are ignorant garbage !!!!!
Don't call me a r****t, you lowlife piece of s**t.... (show quote)


First you dork,there are two types of Black folk who carry water for the r****t,GOP/Teaparty. They are fools or scoundrels. All those lawn jockeys you named fall into one or both categories. Second your are a r****t piece of vermin.
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 18:21:59   #
Wolf counselor wrote:
Well spookie, yer' nappy headed Obammy is a dope smoking, sodomite f*ggot and a race pimpin' Anti American, Islamo buttox kissing, wimp married to a masculine lookin', water buffalo Aunt Jemima.

He has stupefied the lot of you biscuit lipped, chittlin' swillin', coonjuice anthropoids to the point in which your frontal, occipital, parietal and temporal lobes have now been pickled into a state of permanent atrophy; resulting in the perpetual droning and cackling emanating from your profane facial apertures.
Well spookie, yer' nappy headed Obammy is a dope s... (show quote)


I love it. Stick a needle in your bloated ,white carcass and all your r****m spills out. Still claiming to oppose Obama on principle?
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 14:41:26   #
karpenter wrote:
The Rank And File L*****t
http://thebsreport.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/sgt.jpg?w=500 Parrots To This One http://blurbrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/sgt-wasserman-schultz-wazi1.jpg


You mutts do know that the N**is were all white people?Plus they were very r****t ,kind of like some of you guys.
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 14:38:38   #
JFlorio wrote:
That damn r****t Alan Keyes.


Are you at all familiar with the erstwhile,,GOP,P**********l Candidate Alan keyes? This Lawn Jockey is a laughing stock in the Black Community.

Quoting this Uncle Tom is hilarious. Who's next Uncle Remus?
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 14:33:21   #
Patty wrote:
Yes Mr Whitehead is such a non intellectual. How dare he concern himself with humanitarian issues, womans rights and write all those best sellers.


"John W. Whitehead is an attorney and author who has written, debated and practiced widely in the area of constitutional law and human rights. Whitehead's concern for the persecuted and oppressed led him, in 1982, to establish The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties and human rights organization whose international headquarters are located in Charlottesville, Virginia. Whitehead serves as the Institute’s president and spokesperson, in addition to writing a weekly commentary that is posted on The Rutherford Institute’s website (www.rutherford.org), as well being distributed to several hundred newspapers, and hosting a national public service radio campaign. Whitehead's aggressive, pioneering approach to civil liberties issues has earned him numerous accolades, including the Hungarian Medal of Freedom.

Whitehead has been the subject of numerous newspaper, magazine and television profiles, ranging from Gentleman's Quarterly to CBS' 60 Minutes. Articles by Whitehead have been printed in the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post and USA Today, among others.

Whitehead gained international renown as a result of his role as co-counsel in Paula Jones' sexual harassment lawsuit against President Clinton. Whitehead continues to speak out in defense of a woman's right to be free from sexual harassment and frequently comments on a variety of legal issues in the national media. He has been interviewed by the following national and international media (partial list): Crossfire, O’Reilly Factor, CNN Headline News, Larry King Live, Nightline, Dateline, The Today Show, Good Morning America, CBS Evening News, CBS This Morning, This Week with Sam and Cokie, Rivera Live, Burden of Proof, Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, FOX News Sunday, Hardball, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, National Public Radio, BBC Newsnight, BBC Radio, British Sky "Tonight" and "Sunday," TF1 (French TV) and Greek national television.

The author of numerous books on a variety of legal and social issues, as well as pamphlets and brochures providing legal information to the general public, Whitehead has also written numerous magazine and journal articles. In addition, he wrote and directed the documentary video series Grasping for the Wind, as well as its companion book, which focus on key cultural events of the 20th Century. The series received two Silver World Medals at the New York Film and Video Festival and is now available on DVD.

Whitehead has filed numerous amicus briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court. He has also been co-counsel in several landmark Supreme Court cases as well. His law reviews have been published in Emory Law Journal, Pepperdine Law Review, Harvard Journal on Legislation, Washington and Lee Law Review, Cumberland Law Review, Tulsa Law Journal and the Temple University Civil Rights Law Review."



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Yes Mr Whitehead is such a non intellectual. How d... (show quote)


GW Bush wrote a book once.
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 14:31:30   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
I love a lot of Rush talks about, but I think he's bought into the current 2 party system way too much and needs a reality check of who really is behind all the masquerading of deceptions !
He doesn't believe in Conspiracies no matter how much HARD DATA you put in front of him... so he is more part of the problem than part of the SOLUTION!
He does not use his influence properly at this stage of the game and he should be SLAMMING and Demanding more legal action against the perpetrators!
But he doesn't, so ask yourselves why?
I love a lot of Rush talks about, but I think he's... (show quote)


A drug abusing,r****t pig who has gotten rich telling low IQ morons that they are victims is a hero to the dwindling, white majority .
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 14:27:12   #
StillRational wrote:
Actually no. You are wrong on all counts. It is being revealed now that the 1% is mostly left/far left & every law that is passed restricts our freedom & benefits them, not us. The TEA Party stands for freedom. Freedom from ridiculous EPA restrictions, excessive taxes which are taken from those who earn it to give (redistribute) to those who don't & telling us how to behave & believe, regardless of common sense & practicality. (Do you really think that a rat or minnow should have more rights than a human? Ridiculous!)
Actually no. You are wrong on all counts. It is ... (show quote)


Up is down, off is on, left is right and day is night. That what you just did. You are either dumb as a box of rocks or a pathological, liar.
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 10:40:12   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
Well, that's probably not really the case... as most here are supporters of the TEA Party... in one form or another although they may not agree with everything. BECAUSE at lease the TP is making more progress than any other group out there in defending the CONSTITUTION !
What have you signed onto lately to reverse actions taken by your CLOWNREPS that are ANTI Constitutional ?
Stop b***hing about who is here and contribute to the cause...
DO SOMETHING every single day you wake up...
Call, write, email, drive down to, walk to, bike to your Clown Representatives and leaders and demand they honor the Constitution or resign!
PERIOD, Game over, thats what this is really all about and that CLOWN in the WHITE HOUSE causing border problems!
Well, that's probably not really the case... as mo... (show quote)


Low IQ ,i***ts who are at war with themselves over the role of the Government is what the Teaparty is made up of. There are just enough educated, slime balls among them fanning their r****m and their ignorance so they don't figure out how they are getting played by the greedy, rich.
Go to
Jul 5, 2014 10:33:46   #
kmikale wrote:
I've never met a TPW, have or are you one? You're not a RMer (retrobate minder) or, are you? Who's that low-life thug of which you wrote?

Here's the problem IYF, when you don't use the "quote reply", nobody can tell what you're ranting about. You may have a good point, but who could tell, you could be referring to Abe Lincoln or Barry Serento.

I see a street walker and a reference to pimps, but don't see your point. Oh, hang on, Bill and Hillary Clinton. That was clever and, I agree...

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
I've never met a TPW, have or are you one? You're ... (show quote)


You say you have never met a Teaparty, wingnut? Are there no mirrors in you trailer?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 51 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.